Here we go again with the Face Off

D1 Mens Lacrosse
spartanslynx
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:31 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by spartanslynx »

Still a lot of gray area in the new faceoff rules, Greg Gurenlian translates the rulebook.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iMXbKl ... gGurenlian
kramerica.inc
Posts: 6383
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by kramerica.inc »

Glad Greg has finally come around on his positivity toward the SNG.

As I said before, it will definitely make faceoffs more competitive- more 50/50 GBs, quicker out of scrums, and allow it to be a more competitive postition- not just for specialists. Some will be stubborn and try to bring over Moto techniques, but they wont see a ton of success. This is less about power and more about quickness. Really, what's old is new again. The ones that will be succeeding will be fully embracing the new stance and grip. And shhh....don't tell anyone, but you'll also be seeing lots of techniques from the 90s early 00s.
AreaLax
Posts: 2983
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:12 am

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by AreaLax »

According to Greg Gurenlian

Hearing that NCAA FO Covid protocol just for this spring. Ball down first. Players must stay 6 feet away from ball until told to go down. Officials from distance give cadence. If player takes too long to set up then possession will be awarded to other team.
Njlaxx11
Posts: 847
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:05 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by Njlaxx11 »

kramerica.inc wrote: Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:09 am Glad Greg has finally come around on his positivity toward the SNG.

As I said before, it will definitely make faceoffs more competitive- more 50/50 GBs, quicker out of scrums, and allow it to be a more competitive postition- not just for specialists. Some will be stubborn and try to bring over Moto techniques, but they wont see a ton of success. This is less about power and more about quickness. Really, what's old is new again. The ones that will be succeeding will be fully embracing the new stance and grip. And shhh....don't tell anyone, but you'll also be seeing lots of techniques from the 90s early 00s.
i don't think he's ever been against SNG, in fact watching him the past few years he seems to have used it a lot. I think him and the rest of the FOA are upset that there's constantly rule changes.
xxxxxxx
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 12:08 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by xxxxxxx »

I guess no one told Ashton Wood from Mercer that the new rules were supposed to make it harder to dominate and make it 50 / 50 balls. Kid just went 18 of 19.
spartanslynx
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:31 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by spartanslynx »

Day 1 face off thoughts from Gurenlian and Ragonese.

Ref are far too loose on the rules.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4lsNqv ... gGurenlian
wgdsr
Posts: 10005
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:00 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by wgdsr »

xxxxxxx wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 12:55 pm I guess no one told Ashton Wood from Mercer that the new rules were supposed to make it harder to dominate and make it 50 / 50 balls. Kid just went 18 of 19.
they need to change the rules.
User avatar
HopFan16
Posts: 6137
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:22 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by HopFan16 »

Denver and Utah faceoff guys were leaning halfway over the ball before the whistle. Not even feigning attempts to be perpendicular. Refs weren't interested in calling it. That's got to change quickly or it's gonna be a total mess.
DMac
Posts: 9374
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by DMac »

Face offs looked real clean to me, seems as if the new rules accomplished what they were intended to do.
spartanslynx
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:31 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by spartanslynx »

The ball often came out quickly but the leaning was terrible. The one step rule was never close to being called. Stathakis should have been called for withholding alot of times.
wgdsr
Posts: 10005
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:00 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by wgdsr »

HopFan16 wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:15 pm Denver and Utah faceoff guys were leaning halfway over the ball before the whistle. Not even feigning attempts to be perpendicular. Refs weren't interested in calling it. That's got to change quickly or it's gonna be a total mess.
what are the leaning rules?
User avatar
HopFan16
Posts: 6137
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:22 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by HopFan16 »

wgdsr wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:42 pm
HopFan16 wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:15 pm Denver and Utah faceoff guys were leaning halfway over the ball before the whistle. Not even feigning attempts to be perpendicular. Refs weren't interested in calling it. That's got to change quickly or it's gonna be a total mess.
what are the leaning rules?
From the '21-'22 rulebook:

Image

What's odd is leaning has always been illegal. Not a new rule. So maybe refs were thrown off by having to watch out for the new rules, and forgot about enforcing the existing ones.
wgdsr
Posts: 10005
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:00 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by wgdsr »

HopFan16 wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:55 pm
wgdsr wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:42 pm
HopFan16 wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:15 pm Denver and Utah faceoff guys were leaning halfway over the ball before the whistle. Not even feigning attempts to be perpendicular. Refs weren't interested in calling it. That's got to change quickly or it's gonna be a total mess.
what are the leaning rules?
From the '21-'22 rulebook:

Image

What's odd is leaning has always been illegal. Not a new rule. So maybe refs were thrown off by having to watch out for the new rules, and forgot about enforcing the existing ones.
are you talking about the head of the crosse leaning and not being perpendicular?

i'm confused and didn't see it. what was leaning?
User avatar
HopFan16
Posts: 6137
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:22 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by HopFan16 »

^Yes, the head of the crosse was leaning, which is illegal. Refs are supposed to step in and straighten them out. But they were letting it go.

https://twitter.com/GregBeast32/status/ ... 3059691520

Your body can lean over the center line, but the stick has to stay straight and can't lean over.
Cletus
Posts: 2333
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 2:15 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by Cletus »

WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 3:47 am Saves the refs from having to watch everything. Including grips, early start, etc. As long as you both are behind your lines and the ball is in place, be prepared for a whistle at any moment.

The key skill then becomes getting a ground ball.

Not all this specialized stick, clamping stuff.
Your idea makes good common sense, for all the reasons you mentioned. Put this man on the rules committee!
spartanslynx
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:31 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by spartanslynx »

Cletus wrote: Sat Jan 30, 2021 7:14 pm
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: Fri May 08, 2020 3:47 am Saves the refs from having to watch everything. Including grips, early start, etc. As long as you both are behind your lines and the ball is in place, be prepared for a whistle at any moment.

The key skill then becomes getting a ground ball.

Not all this specialized stick, clamping stuff.
Your idea makes good common sense, for all the reasons you mentioned. Put this man on the rules committee!
What? If you don't call those infraction you'll never get a ground ball. The best way to get alot of ground balls is to call the rules as written.
Cletus
Posts: 2333
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2020 2:15 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by Cletus »

DMac wrote: Thu May 07, 2020 10:31 pm Two guys clamping the ball down and circling in a wrestling match of sorts shouldn't happen on a lacrosse field. Clamp and scrape...it's about quickness, not who the better wrestler is. Doesn't surprise me that the rules committee is looking at the face off again, they sure as hell need to make a decision and stick with it though.
Well said too, DMac. More common sense. Especially the italicized section.
DMac
Posts: 9374
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by DMac »

...and that's what it amounted to today, ball came out and was in play pretty quickly. This is the main reason I wanted to see this game, to check the new face off rules out. Mission accomplished as far as I'm concerned.
spartanslynx
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 5:31 pm

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by spartanslynx »

SNG gives more loose balls but leaning and allowance to take more then one step after the clamp could put an end to loosies.
DMac
Posts: 9374
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Here we go again with the Face Off

Post by DMac »

Nothing more than the same ol' story....just enforce the rules and all's well.
Post Reply

Return to “D1 MENS LACROSSE”