Page 149 of 338

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:20 pm
by WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus
Hoponboard wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:11 pm “The university will announce a plan for the spring semester by Thanksgiving, with the understanding that those plans will be re-evaluated closer to the start of the semester and may require a course change if coronavirus cases surge locally or nationally. Interim planning decisions will be announced at least every other week.”

“While spring plans are in development, the leaders also announced that the university's Intersession Program, which offers academic and enrichment courses to undergraduate students during the break between the fall and spring semesters, will take place entirely online Jan. 4–22.”

https://hub.jhu.edu/2020/10/01/universi ... sSO1jfrpg8

If there is a season in 2021, it sounds like it would be delayed at least a month.
So... March!!! How novel! It takes an effing pandemic to get the season schedule back to where it should be!


Maybe I’m being a bit sarcastic.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:23 pm
by Hoponboard
You are just expressing the sentiments of most sane fans.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 11:06 pm
by HopFan16
Hoponboard wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:11 pm “The university will announce a plan for the spring semester by Thanksgiving, with the understanding that those plans will be re-evaluated closer to the start of the semester and may require a course change if coronavirus cases surge locally or nationally. Interim planning decisions will be announced at least every other week.”

“While spring plans are in development, the leaders also announced that the university's Intersession Program, which offers academic and enrichment courses to undergraduate students during the break between the fall and spring semesters, will take place entirely online Jan. 4–22.”

https://hub.jhu.edu/2020/10/01/universi ... sSO1jfrpg8

If there is a season in 2021, it sounds like it would be delayed at least a month.
Not doubting that any potential season could get pushed back, but where are you getting that from this announcement? Jan 4-22 is a normal intersession schedule. Don't necessarily think that intersession being online will preclude teams from returning to campus for practice in January.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 11:56 pm
by Hoponboard
I’m assuming it means they won’t open the campus facilities in January.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 10:55 am
by flalax22
HopFan16 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 11:06 pm
Hoponboard wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:11 pm “The university will announce a plan for the spring semester by Thanksgiving, with the understanding that those plans will be re-evaluated closer to the start of the semester and may require a course change if coronavirus cases surge locally or nationally. Interim planning decisions will be announced at least every other week.”

“While spring plans are in development, the leaders also announced that the university's Intersession Program, which offers academic and enrichment courses to undergraduate students during the break between the fall and spring semesters, will take place entirely online Jan. 4–22.”

https://hub.jhu.edu/2020/10/01/universi ... sSO1jfrpg8

If there is a season in 2021, it sounds like it would be delayed at least a month.
Not doubting that any potential season could get pushed back, but where are you getting that from this announcement? Jan 4-22 is a normal intersession schedule. Don't necessarily think that intersession being online will preclude teams from returning to campus for practice in January.
Can’t think they are keeping the campus closed until Jan 22 but are going to let the lacrosse team practice. In fact I’d say no chance.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 10:59 am
by HopFan16
flalax22 wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 10:55 am
HopFan16 wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 11:06 pm
Hoponboard wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 9:11 pm “The university will announce a plan for the spring semester by Thanksgiving, with the understanding that those plans will be re-evaluated closer to the start of the semester and may require a course change if coronavirus cases surge locally or nationally. Interim planning decisions will be announced at least every other week.”

“While spring plans are in development, the leaders also announced that the university's Intersession Program, which offers academic and enrichment courses to undergraduate students during the break between the fall and spring semesters, will take place entirely online Jan. 4–22.”

https://hub.jhu.edu/2020/10/01/universi ... sSO1jfrpg8

If there is a season in 2021, it sounds like it would be delayed at least a month.
Not doubting that any potential season could get pushed back, but where are you getting that from this announcement? Jan 4-22 is a normal intersession schedule. Don't necessarily think that intersession being online will preclude teams from returning to campus for practice in January.
Can’t think they are keeping the campus closed until Jan 22 but are going to let the lacrosse team practice. In fact I’d say no chance.
Fair enough—if the campus is closed closed during intersession then I doubt they'd make an exception for lacrosse. I just don't know if intersession being online necessarily means campus will also be fully closed during that time. They could slowly reopen campus in January and still do an online-only intersession. From what I've heard, the team is expecting to be back together officially in January, but that was a few weeks ago and obviously a lot can change.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 12:59 pm
by 10stone5
Chitown wrote: Tue Sep 29, 2020 1:02 pm
Sagittarius A* wrote: Tue Sep 29, 2020 11:44 am
Chitown wrote: Sun Sep 27, 2020 1:54 pm A change of topic in these desperate soul-sucking times :evil:

I found confirmation of my opinion that the best Lacrosse Team that I have ever seen or played against (bar done) was the 1965 Navy Team. My sophomore year we had only one loss and Navy beat us approx 14-5 and the game wasn't that close. They were terrific.

Read for yourselves: https:/www.capitalgazette.com/sports/navy/ac-c ... story.html

Plus there were less than 35 players on the Team. (relevant for the size of lacrosse rosters and Navy players just "loved" Coach Bilderbach.)
Do you think they could have beaten the 1979 Hopkins team, assuming the teams used similar stick technologies? Greenberg against Jimmy Lewis would have been an epic match-up. The 79 Hop defense was flat out scary and they also ran three elite midfields. Jeff Cook, Jimmie Zaffuto and Frank Cutrone at attack. Piggie in goal. Radebaugh at the face. They blew NC state off the field in the semifinals and NC State had Stan Cockerton and a record setting offense. Not sure anybody hangs with the 79 team in the playoffs, honestly. Greenberg was absolutely dominant that year. No comparison I can think of.
You know, the teams that Navy beat in 1965, and surrounding years, weren"t "half bad" and were not Swiss Cheese ; Navy in 1965 was in a different Universe. They didn't just beat teams, they destroyed teams.
I am always reluctant to compare teams from different Eras and using different technologies (sticks, sticks, sticks!).

In 1967. JHU's defense had a Goalie that was 2nd Team AA, Hank K that was the Schmeiser Award winner for 2 straight years (and 1st Team AA for those years), Mike Clark that would be the Schmeiser Award winner in the succeeding years, John Cardillo who was "only" 2nd team AA, on Attack:Joe Cowan (1st Team AA), Downie McCarty (1st Team AA) and Phil Kneip (2nd Team AA) and lots of good fast middies. And all with size. That is what it took to beat Navy in 1967, a team that didn't have Jimmy Lewis, Pat Donnelly, Lanier, Henderson, etc.

Navy in 1965 had all that talent, and with lots of depth. They just kept running the whole game. Who really knows how they would compare to a team in a different Era, BUT US Lacrosse picked 1965 Navy Team and explained its reasons :lol: I will go with its reasoning.
The 1st team to get this special citation from
US Lacrosse was the 1950 Johns Hopkins team.
The 1950 Blue Jays captured a fourth straight USILA national championship and are routinely mentioned as one of the most dominant collegiate teams from any era. The famed senior class never lost a game to a collegiate opponent during their career. Kelso Morrill, a member of the National Lacrosse Hall of Fame, served as coach for the 1950 team. Ten of the team’s 25 players earned All-America status that year, and many of them went on to very successful coaching careers, including a sophomore named Bob Scott who eventually became JHU’s all-time leader in coaching victories.

https://www.uslacrosse.org/blog/inaugur ... tion-award

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:26 pm
by flalax22
Koleton Marquis 22 - Attack/ Mid committed to Hop today. Nice pick up.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:36 pm
by mocking jay
Howdy Myers was Head Coach of the JHU team for the first three years. He also coached the FB team. Myers left and went to Hofstra in the same roles. He developed the zone defense. Among his players in the 1970s was Tom Calder a middie who scored 3 against Hopkins in a NCAA game.

Joe Cowan was drafted by the Colts as a kick returner and receiver. He was the last player cut on a position decision. He was almost surely the fastest attack man to play. He had NFL level speed. Mike Curtis who was an All Pro Middle Linebacker and two teammates went to see Cowan play FB. They came away believing he could play in the NFL but Curtis was awed by Willie Scroggs. He noted if Scroggs weighed 50 lbs more he could be an All Pro linebacker.

The Navy team of 1965 did not have the stick skills Hopkins players had. They had a huge size advantage. They were able to take advantage of the sports schedule then. The fall sports did not have spring activity. Jimmy Lewis was first team soccer his senior and Pat Donnelly a FB AA. Both Bilderbavk and Scott believed size was the biggest factor. Scott recruited for size after and in 1966 the Hopkins freshman team routinely man handled the varsity. Freshman couldn’t play varsity then. After the 1967 game Bilderback questioned whether the team would lose any games for the next three years. Jimmy Lewis would run circles to tire his man out. He had a non stop motor.

Opinion: JHU 1978-1980; Cuse 1988-1990, Cornell 1976-1978 and others were better than that team by their time. Size speed conditioning and skills were significantly better by then.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 6:57 pm
by Chitown
mocking jay wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:36 pm Howdy Myers was Head Coach of the JHU team for the first three years. He also coached the FB team. Myers left and went to Hofstra in the same roles. He developed the zone defense. Among his players in the 1970s was Tom Calder a middie who scored 3 against Hopkins in a NCAA game.

Joe Cowan was drafted by the Colts as a kick returner and receiver. He was the last player cut on a position decision. He was almost surely the fastest attack man to play. He had NFL level speed. Mike Curtis who was an All Pro Middle Linebacker and two teammates went to see Cowan play FB. They came away believing he could play in the NFL but Curtis was awed by Willie Scroggs. He noted if Scroggs weighed 50 lbs more he could be an All Pro linebacker.

The Navy team of 1965 did not have the stick skills Hopkins players had. They had a huge size advantage. They were able to take advantage of the sports schedule then. The fall sports did not have spring activity. Jimmy Lewis was first team soccer his senior and Pat Donnelly a FB AA. Both Bilderbavk and Scott believed size was the biggest factor. Scott recruited for size after and in 1966 the Hopkins freshman team routinely man handled the varsity. Freshman couldn’t play varsity then. After the 1967 game Bilderback questioned whether the team would lose any games for the next three years. Jimmy Lewis would run circles to tire his man out. He had a non stop motor.

Opinion: JHU 1978-1980; Cuse 1988-1990, Cornell 1976-1978 and others were better than that team by their time. Size speed conditioning and skills were significantly better by then.
I just have to "jump in" here because the stated facts are just wrong. In 1966, the Freshmen Team did not routinely man-handle the Varsity. That rumor supposedly arose in 1971, when the Varsity was thin (after 4 straight NC Teams) and Freshmen were then (that year) allowed to play Varsity. Navy, Army and the Ivies did not allow Freshmen to play Varsity in 1971, and Scotty decided it would be unfair if Hopkins permitted a group of outstanding Freshmen to play Varsity (even though a number of Varsity players asked Scotty to let them play). That was a difficult year (1971) for Hopkins, but a "game" group of players. :(

Navy football finished 2nd in the Nation to Texas in 1964 (I believe) when Roger Staubach was the QB and the Heisman Trophy winner. The Navy football players during that time were certainly not equivalent physically to Cornell, Syracuse & JHU lacrosse players. The equivalent would be current Alabama, Ohio State, etc football players. ;)

In 1965, McFadden, Lewis, Overton, Lantier, the Navy goalie, their midfielders, all had excellent stickwork (the wood stick era) and had played lacrosse in High School. Scattered among them were really good Div. 1 football players who Coach Bilderback, with his assistants, taught lacrosse fundamentals in the Winter and Spring in Navy's Field House.

I think many observers think that good stick skills alone make a "good lacrosse player". I don't think so. Lacrosse fundamentals, such as ground balls, good defensive skills, good defensive and offensive positioning, field judgment, speed, clearing and riding skills, simple passing and catching skills, etc and No Unforced Errors.

Some of your statements are straight from the 1967 Sports Illustrated article.

I don't consider myself to be infallible but I played in every JHU game 1965-1967. My only insight is that 1965 Navy Team was very very special. :)

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 7:14 pm
by HopFan16
flalax22 wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:26 pm Koleton Marquis 22 - Attack/ Mid committed to Hop today. Nice pick up.
Really happy about this. Had a feeling throughout the process we’d land him but you never really know. Can’t really remember the last time we had a player with his finishing skill (potential skill I should say, as he’s still just a high school junior). Brandon Benn or Zach Palmer maybe but Marquis seems to have more dodging ability at this stage. The new staff’s first official class is coming together pretty well I’d say.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2020 7:29 pm
by houndace1
HopFan16 wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 7:14 pm
flalax22 wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:26 pm Koleton Marquis 22 - Attack/ Mid committed to Hop today. Nice pick up.
Really happy about this. Had a feeling throughout the process we’d land him but you never really know. Can’t really remember the last time we had a player with his finishing skill (potential skill I should say, as he’s still just a high school junior). Brandon Benn or Zach Palmer maybe but Marquis seems to have more dodging ability at this stage. The new staff’s first official class is coming together pretty well I’d say.
The second I heard this announcement, the first thought that came to my mind was how excited you would be 16.

I like the makeup as this class, and I’m sure the classes from them on will be good as well.

If there is a season in 2021, I’m dreading the game between loyola and hopkins. I think the new staff will effectively utilize the talent they have with the new style they plan to implement, and to be quite honest- will give opponents some headache

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 1:15 am
by WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus
I just saw a new butcherization of JHU’s name:

Johnson Hopkins University

At least they got the S right.

Thanks, Fox News. Not sure if you are calling us all dicks or what.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 2:29 am
by DocBarrister
Chitown wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 6:57 pm
mocking jay wrote: Fri Oct 02, 2020 4:36 pm Howdy Myers was Head Coach of the JHU team for the first three years. He also coached the FB team. Myers left and went to Hofstra in the same roles. He developed the zone defense. Among his players in the 1970s was Tom Calder a middie who scored 3 against Hopkins in a NCAA game.

Joe Cowan was drafted by the Colts as a kick returner and receiver. He was the last player cut on a position decision. He was almost surely the fastest attack man to play. He had NFL level speed. Mike Curtis who was an All Pro Middle Linebacker and two teammates went to see Cowan play FB. They came away believing he could play in the NFL but Curtis was awed by Willie Scroggs. He noted if Scroggs weighed 50 lbs more he could be an All Pro linebacker.

The Navy team of 1965 did not have the stick skills Hopkins players had. They had a huge size advantage. They were able to take advantage of the sports schedule then. The fall sports did not have spring activity. Jimmy Lewis was first team soccer his senior and Pat Donnelly a FB AA. Both Bilderbavk and Scott believed size was the biggest factor. Scott recruited for size after and in 1966 the Hopkins freshman team routinely man handled the varsity. Freshman couldn’t play varsity then. After the 1967 game Bilderback questioned whether the team would lose any games for the next three years. Jimmy Lewis would run circles to tire his man out. He had a non stop motor.

Opinion: JHU 1978-1980; Cuse 1988-1990, Cornell 1976-1978 and others were better than that team by their time. Size speed conditioning and skills were significantly better by then.
I just have to "jump in" here because the stated facts are just wrong. In 1966, the Freshmen Team did not routinely man-handle the Varsity. That rumor supposedly arose in 1971, when the Varsity was thin (after 4 straight NC Teams) and Freshmen were then (that year) allowed to play Varsity. Navy, Army and the Ivies did not allow Freshmen to play Varsity in 1971, and Scotty decided it would be unfair if Hopkins permitted a group of outstanding Freshmen to play Varsity (even though a number of Varsity players asked Scotty to let them play). That was a difficult year (1971) for Hopkins, but a "game" group of players. :(

Navy football finished 2nd in the Nation to Texas in 1964 (I believe) when Roger Staubach was the QB and the Heisman Trophy winner. The Navy football players during that time were certainly not equivalent physically to Cornell, Syracuse & JHU lacrosse players. The equivalent would be current Alabama, Ohio State, etc football players. ;)

In 1965, McFadden, Lewis, Overton, Lantier, the Navy goalie, their midfielders, all had excellent stickwork (the wood stick era) and had played lacrosse in High School. Scattered among them were really good Div. 1 football players who Coach Bilderback, with his assistants, taught lacrosse fundamentals in the Winter and Spring in Navy's Field House.

I think many observers think that good stick skills alone make a "good lacrosse player". I don't think so. Lacrosse fundamentals, such as ground balls, good defensive skills, good defensive and offensive positioning, field judgment, speed, clearing and riding skills, simple passing and catching skills, etc and No Unforced Errors.

Some of your statements are straight from the 1967 Sports Illustrated article.

I don't consider myself to be infallible but I played in every JHU game 1965-1967. My only insight is that 1965 Navy Team was very very special. :)
Thanks for the history lesson, Chitown!

DocBarrister :)

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 2:30 am
by DocBarrister
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 1:15 am I just saw a new butcherization of JHU’s name:

Johnson Hopkins University

At least they got the S right.

Thanks, Fox News. Not sure if you are calling us all dicks or what.
They don’t call it Faux News for nothin’.

DocBarrister :P

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:22 am
by mocking jay
Fact corrections

Both Bilderbavk snd Scott identified size as the most important factor. Years after Bilderback retired I used to sit in front of him at Navy games. This was one topic of conversation. Scott said the same thing to me a few years later. But rather than simply trade anecdotes Chitowniffers his opinion. After Hopkind beat Navy 9-6 in 1967 Sports Illustrated wrote an article on the game. You can find it online if anyone cares to do the work. Should put the question to rest I would think,

The Navy Hopkins game in 1967 was not as close as 9-6 woukd indicate. Hopkins was in control all the way. It would have been more lopsided had Cowan not been injured in the Syracuse game on a cheap shot and had to play on one leg with very limited mobility because the leg was totally wrapped.

Joe Cowan sat out his first year with a back injury... 1966z. The freshman class was loaded. And yes they did beat the varsity in scrimmages 2x according to a few people who played in or watched them. They were open to anyone who wanted to attend. A problem with the Hopkins thread is myth making and echo chamber. Perhaps because the core posters are so few in number and so lacking in knowledge with a few notable exceptions.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:49 am
by DMac
Both Bilderbavk snd Scott identified size as the most important factor.
I highly doubt this. While size can sometimes give one an advantage, it's far from the most important factor.
Lacrosse has long been known as a game where size really doesn't make a whole lot of difference.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 11:57 am
by MA Lax Fan
Size matters - it can be equally at devastating as speed / quickness and having a team that has multiple tools in the chest is always good.

I love seeing big attackmen make first contact with the defender and start pushing their D guy off balance instead of the other way around.

I’m sure there are plenty of current big guys out there to reference but Ian Dingman (Navy) jumps out as a good example. I think he was 6’5 and maybe 230. Not the fastest guy but used his size to devastating effectiveness at Attack.

Also, I think at D3 size is even more of a game changer. D3 is filled w/ little water bugs but significant size on offense....not so much.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 1:52 pm
by WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus
It’s not like one of these factors is considered in the total absence of all others either.

For example, in the comments on size, you’d think it was a given that the players in question had above average stick skills and perhaps some speed.

But what Bilderback and Scotty seemed to be saying, as I would interpret it, out of all those factors, size can be a huge advantage.

And you don’t have to have everyone on a team be speedy.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:39 pm
by DMac
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 1:52 pm It’s not like one of these factors is considered in the total absence of all others either.


But what Bilderback and Scotty seemed to be saying, as I would interpret it, out of all those factors, size can be a huge advantage.
Yes, and huge advantage isn't the same as most important. If size were the most important, Matt Lane would be lacrosse's all time leading scorer while Grant Ament would struggle to score.