Some pretty darn serious side effects!Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:45 pm https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
Death...
But hey, the troll gave it a +1 so....
Some pretty darn serious side effects!Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:45 pm https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
Uh, FDA seems to have “looked at” Ivermectin re COVID….tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:18 pmOhhhh I see, HCQ = Trump. Good god, you are incredibly shallow at timesMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:04 pmExactly what was said about HCQ.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:48 pm"Uh"... despite your anecdote, if you took the time to pay attention, no one is saying a drug should be a vaccine substitute (especially if the vaccine is shown to be safe... but the jury is still out on the Covid vaccines and will be for quite some time). What's needed is a therapeutic bridge for those vaccinated or not who come down with Covid and are not "sick enough" to be hospitalized. Otherwise, your doctor sends you home until you either recover or then dubiously qualify for hospital/Remdesevir/ICU/intubation. That's just super...Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:19 pmUh a vaccine does work like a drug. I had to explain this to my 17 year old nephew who was afraid of being vaccinated. My brother called and asked that I speak to him. My nephew called afterwards ans thanked me for explaining it to him…..like most people, he was thinking of it like a drug….you know the drugs you see advertised with all the “side effects”.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:33 pmEvery drug has side-effects. Some more than others, and from what I've read/heard,"I" when properly administered, has few to any based on decades of usage.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:13 pmI understand your view and argument, just was responding to why it was in violation.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:06 pmA drug FDA approved long ago, now found to have anti-viral capabilities when properly administered against Covid-19 but suppressed by the medical establishment institutions pushing Remdesevir. Something a Covid-suffering person doesn't have access to until they're practically dead.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:57 pmSince when? Simple search found Weinstein and Dark Horse podcast just fine.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:52 pmThere it is... Weinstein canceled/censored (or whatever term you prefer) by Youtube platform for "violating community guidelines" whatever THAT means. Just what is there to fear from people searching for truth/reality, and trying to help? Luckily, another less politically corrupted platform has picked up where Youtube left off...tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 13, 2021 8:38 am Important podcast (sans politics) from Bret Weinstein, which includes the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology.
Many of you here won't like what you hear, unfortunately. IMO, it's "truth and reality" re the current state of Covid-19.
Hopefully the podcast is not removed from the youtube platform...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY
Latest tweets by Dr. Robert Malone (Youtube typo incorrectly spelled his name as "Moore") inventor of mRNA technology:
https://twitter.com/rwmalonemd?lang=en
Ahhh, that specific video was taken down...perhaps because it was promoting a drug to be taken for usage that's not approved by the FDA? That's indeed against the site rules.
On the merits, the drug has side effects, has not actually been adequately tested for administration for Covid, and, thus, at best one could say more testing is warranted. Yet that podcast asserted something much different, and unproven, just as your post above does.
Prove it isn't snake oil first. Get it FDA approved before touting. Pretty simple rule.
Stop with the "snake oil" schtick... you look silly doing that.
Catch 22. Unless the medical establishment allows, FDA approval for Covid won't see light of day. The powers that be want drugs that are profitable... "I" costs nothing in comparison to say, Remdesevir, and now Fauci's new plan for therapeutic tablets which will undoubtedly be costly/profitable for Big Pharma and their investors.
https://isoponline.org/wp-content/uploa ... ccines.pdf
Some very smart and courageous people believe that drug-bridge already exists and have been using it off-label to great success.
Seriously, if ivermectin actually works and is safe, wonderful.
But testing first before touting as a miracle drug.
Fine, continue with your politicization of what should not be a political issue.
"Seriously, if ivermectin actually works and is safe, wonderful." That's a lie on your part based on everything else you've posted.
The FDA won't look at Ivermectin re Covid. Do you not understand this? There's the rub...Sheesh!
Drinking bleach or a disinfectant may kill you too!MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:57 pmSome pretty darn serious side effects!Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:45 pm https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
Death...
But hey, the troll gave it a +1 so....
You sound "stupid."Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:42 pmLike wearing a mask.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:18 pmOhhhh I see, HCQ = Trump. Good god, you are incredibly shallow at timesMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:04 pmExactly what was said about HCQ.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:48 pm"Uh"... despite your anecdote, if you took the time to pay attention, no one is saying a drug should be a vaccine substitute (especially if the vaccine is shown to be safe... but the jury is still out on the Covid vaccines and will be for quite some time). What's needed is a therapeutic bridge for those vaccinated or not who come down with Covid and are not "sick enough" to be hospitalized. Otherwise, your doctor sends you home until you either recover or then dubiously qualify for hospital/Remdesevir/ICU/intubation. That's just super...Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:19 pmUh a vaccine does work like a drug. I had to explain this to my 17 year old nephew who was afraid of being vaccinated. My brother called and asked that I speak to him. My nephew called afterwards ans thanked me for explaining it to him…..like most people, he was thinking of it like a drug….you know the drugs you see advertised with all the “side effects”.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:33 pmEvery drug has side-effects. Some more than others, and from what I've read/heard,"I" when properly administered, has few to any based on decades of usage.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:13 pmI understand your view and argument, just was responding to why it was in violation.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:06 pmA drug FDA approved long ago, now found to have anti-viral capabilities when properly administered against Covid-19 but suppressed by the medical establishment institutions pushing Remdesevir. Something a Covid-suffering person doesn't have access to until they're practically dead.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:57 pmSince when? Simple search found Weinstein and Dark Horse podcast just fine.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:52 pmThere it is... Weinstein canceled/censored (or whatever term you prefer) by Youtube platform for "violating community guidelines" whatever THAT means. Just what is there to fear from people searching for truth/reality, and trying to help? Luckily, another less politically corrupted platform has picked up where Youtube left off...tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 13, 2021 8:38 am Important podcast (sans politics) from Bret Weinstein, which includes the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology.
Many of you here won't like what you hear, unfortunately. IMO, it's "truth and reality" re the current state of Covid-19.
Hopefully the podcast is not removed from the youtube platform...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY
Latest tweets by Dr. Robert Malone (Youtube typo incorrectly spelled his name as "Moore") inventor of mRNA technology:
https://twitter.com/rwmalonemd?lang=en
Ahhh, that specific video was taken down...perhaps because it was promoting a drug to be taken for usage that's not approved by the FDA? That's indeed against the site rules.
On the merits, the drug has side effects, has not actually been adequately tested for administration for Covid, and, thus, at best one could say more testing is warranted. Yet that podcast asserted something much different, and unproven, just as your post above does.
Prove it isn't snake oil first. Get it FDA approved before touting. Pretty simple rule.
Stop with the "snake oil" schtick... you look silly doing that.
Catch 22. Unless the medical establishment allows, FDA approval for Covid won't see light of day. The powers that be want drugs that are profitable... "I" costs nothing in comparison to say, Remdesevir, and now Fauci's new plan for therapeutic tablets which will undoubtedly be costly/profitable for Big Pharma and their investors.
https://isoponline.org/wp-content/uploa ... ccines.pdf
Some very smart and courageous people believe that drug-bridge already exists and have been using it off-label to great success.
Seriously, if ivermectin actually works and is safe, wonderful.
But testing first before touting as a miracle drug.
Fine, continue with your politicization of what should not be a political issue.
"Seriously, if ivermectin actually works and is safe, wonderful." That's a lie on your part based on everything else you've posted.
The FDA won't look at Ivermectin re Covid. Do you not understand this? There's the rub...Sheesh!
Hyperbole. Of course there are always people who self-medicate and use drugs irresponsibly... all the more reason the medical establishment and FDA should give a drug that's already approved and proven safe for years for other diseases a hard look re Covid, especially when evidence of efficacy exists. Why won't they?...Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:45 pm https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
You sound “stupid”.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 6:42 pmHyperbole. Of course there are always people who self-medicate and use drugs irresponsibly... all the more reason the medical establishment and FDA should give a drug that's already approved and proven safe for years for other diseases a hard look re Covid, especially when evidence of efficacy exists. Why won't they?...Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:45 pm https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer- ... t-covid-19
https://c19ivermectin.com/
They would rather develop new drugs, costly to general public and profitable for Big Pharma and investors. Just my opinion of course.
... it is unlawful to recommend using a drug for off label usage in a TV commercial - which is what the Weinstein video does. YouTube is correct in pulling it. Would bet YouTube got a letter from the FDA.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:11 pmAs of the canceling of the Malone/Kirsch podcast, going forward starting with yesterday's podcast #84, you will no longer see Darkhorse on Youtube. How's that?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:01 pmDark Horse is on youtube...that specific video is down.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:59 pmNot on Youtube, dude.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:57 pmSince when? Simple search found Weinstein and Dark Horse podcast just fine.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:52 pmThere it is... Weinstein canceled/censored (or whatever term you prefer) by Youtube platform for "violating community guidelines" whatever THAT means. Just what is there to fear from people searching for truth/reality, and trying to help? Luckily, another less politically corrupted platform has picked up where Youtube left off...tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 13, 2021 8:38 am Important podcast (sans politics) from Bret Weinstein, which includes the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology.
Many of you here won't like what you hear, unfortunately. IMO, it's "truth and reality" re the current state of Covid-19.
Hopefully the podcast is not removed from the youtube platform...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY
Latest tweets by Dr. Robert Malone (Youtube typo incorrectly spelled his name as "Moore") inventor of mRNA technology:
https://twitter.com/rwmalonemd?lang=en
Ahhh, that specific video was taken down...perhaps because it was promoting a drug to be taken for usage that's not approved by the FDA? That's indeed against the site rules.
Or do I misunderstand your meaning?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi5N_u ... lg32QzkPlg
wrong... from first level Google search:jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:08 am... it is unlawful to recommend using a drug for off label usage in a TV commercial - which is what the Weinstein video does. YouTube is correct in pulling it. Would bet YouTube got a letter from the FDA.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:11 pmAs of the canceling of the Malone/Kirsch podcast, going forward starting with yesterday's podcast #84, you will no longer see Darkhorse on Youtube. How's that?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:01 pmDark Horse is on youtube...that specific video is down.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:59 pmNot on Youtube, dude.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:57 pmSince when? Simple search found Weinstein and Dark Horse podcast just fine.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:52 pmThere it is... Weinstein canceled/censored (or whatever term you prefer) by Youtube platform for "violating community guidelines" whatever THAT means. Just what is there to fear from people searching for truth/reality, and trying to help? Luckily, another less politically corrupted platform has picked up where Youtube left off...tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 13, 2021 8:38 am Important podcast (sans politics) from Bret Weinstein, which includes the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology.
Many of you here won't like what you hear, unfortunately. IMO, it's "truth and reality" re the current state of Covid-19.
Hopefully the podcast is not removed from the youtube platform...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY
Latest tweets by Dr. Robert Malone (Youtube typo incorrectly spelled his name as "Moore") inventor of mRNA technology:
https://twitter.com/rwmalonemd?lang=en
Ahhh, that specific video was taken down...perhaps because it was promoting a drug to be taken for usage that's not approved by the FDA? That's indeed against the site rules.
Or do I misunderstand your meaning?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi5N_u ... lg32QzkPlg
... a physician can prescribe it to a patient he has examined and is familiar with. HE CANNOT ADVERTISE IT FOR OFF LABEL USE IN A PUBLIC FORUM. That is a crime. These are two different situations!! The only thing a drug can be advertised to do is those things included on the label!tech37 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:17 amwrong... from first level Google search:jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:08 am... it is unlawful to recommend using a drug for off label usage in a TV commercial - which is what the Weinstein video does. YouTube is correct in pulling it. Would bet YouTube got a letter from the FDA.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:11 pmAs of the canceling of the Malone/Kirsch podcast, going forward starting with yesterday's podcast #84, you will no longer see Darkhorse on Youtube. How's that?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:01 pmDark Horse is on youtube...that specific video is down.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:59 pmNot on Youtube, dude.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:57 pmSince when? Simple search found Weinstein and Dark Horse podcast just fine.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:52 pmThere it is... Weinstein canceled/censored (or whatever term you prefer) by Youtube platform for "violating community guidelines" whatever THAT means. Just what is there to fear from people searching for truth/reality, and trying to help? Luckily, another less politically corrupted platform has picked up where Youtube left off...tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 13, 2021 8:38 am Important podcast (sans politics) from Bret Weinstein, which includes the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology.
Many of you here won't like what you hear, unfortunately. IMO, it's "truth and reality" re the current state of Covid-19.
Hopefully the podcast is not removed from the youtube platform...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY
Latest tweets by Dr. Robert Malone (Youtube typo incorrectly spelled his name as "Moore") inventor of mRNA technology:
https://twitter.com/rwmalonemd?lang=en
Ahhh, that specific video was taken down...perhaps because it was promoting a drug to be taken for usage that's not approved by the FDA? That's indeed against the site rules.
Or do I misunderstand your meaning?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi5N_u ... lg32QzkPlg
"Off-label prescribing is when a physician gives you a drug that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved to treat a condition different than your condition. This practice is legal and common. In fact, one in five prescriptions written today are for off-label use."
Then why haven't Dr. Kory and his associates been arrested?jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:23 am... a physician can prescribe it to a patient he has examined and is familiar with. HE CANNOT ADVERTISE IT FOR OFF LABEL USE IN A PUBLIC FORUM. That is a crime. These are two different situations!! The only thing a drug can be advertised to do is those things included on the label!tech37 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:17 amwrong... from first level Google search:jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:08 am... it is unlawful to recommend using a drug for off label usage in a TV commercial - which is what the Weinstein video does. YouTube is correct in pulling it. Would bet YouTube got a letter from the FDA.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:11 pmAs of the canceling of the Malone/Kirsch podcast, going forward starting with yesterday's podcast #84, you will no longer see Darkhorse on Youtube. How's that?MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:01 pmDark Horse is on youtube...that specific video is down.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:59 pmNot on Youtube, dude.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:57 pmSince when? Simple search found Weinstein and Dark Horse podcast just fine.tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:52 pmThere it is... Weinstein canceled/censored (or whatever term you prefer) by Youtube platform for "violating community guidelines" whatever THAT means. Just what is there to fear from people searching for truth/reality, and trying to help? Luckily, another less politically corrupted platform has picked up where Youtube left off...tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 13, 2021 8:38 am Important podcast (sans politics) from Bret Weinstein, which includes the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology.
Many of you here won't like what you hear, unfortunately. IMO, it's "truth and reality" re the current state of Covid-19.
Hopefully the podcast is not removed from the youtube platform...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY
Latest tweets by Dr. Robert Malone (Youtube typo incorrectly spelled his name as "Moore") inventor of mRNA technology:
https://twitter.com/rwmalonemd?lang=en
Ahhh, that specific video was taken down...perhaps because it was promoting a drug to be taken for usage that's not approved by the FDA? That's indeed against the site rules.
Or do I misunderstand your meaning?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCi5N_u ... lg32QzkPlg
"Off-label prescribing is when a physician gives you a drug that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved to treat a condition different than your condition. This practice is legal and common. In fact, one in five prescriptions written today are for off-label use."
Do you have evidence they have been issued a warning?... if not, just speculation on your part. Their website is a year old and some have testified in front of the US Senate over the past year. I'll believe they are breaking laws when they're shut down, fined, and/or arrested.jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:44 am Because the FDA has process and procedures. They initially send a warning letter to the organization and individuals involved. Generally people only get prosecuted if they do it repeatedly ignoring notifications from the FDA. It is known as an FDA Form 483. Each instance of it being "shown" to the public could illicit a warning letter and ultimately a fine or other action. YouTube has a greater liability than the individuals in this case.
tech, like this site, youtube has the right to permit or not permit what it wants, however those decisions do incur various costs, including regulatory risk as well as user response.tech37 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:08 amDo you have evidence they have been issued a warning?... if not, just speculation on your part. Their website is a year old and some have testified in front of the US Senate over the past year. I'll believe they are breaking laws when they're shut down, fined, and/or arrested.jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:44 am Because the FDA has process and procedures. They initially send a warning letter to the organization and individuals involved. Generally people only get prosecuted if they do it repeatedly ignoring notifications from the FDA. It is known as an FDA Form 483. Each instance of it being "shown" to the public could illicit a warning letter and ultimately a fine or other action. YouTube has a greater liability than the individuals in this case.
I have not checked FDA if they have issued warning. Not going to. You can get the information. It really does not matter. YouTube lawyers are aware of how the process works. Their lawyers will have advised them to take it down. Believe what you want, they have been taken down and for a perfectly legitimate reason. YouTube is placing themselves in jeopardy. The fact that the doctor has testified before the Senate means diddly.tech37 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:08 amDo you have evidence they have been issued a warning?... if not, just speculation on your part. Their website is a year old and some have testified in front of the US Senate over the past year. I'll believe they are breaking laws when they're shut down, fined, and/or arrested.jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:44 am Because the FDA has process and procedures. They initially send a warning letter to the organization and individuals involved. Generally people only get prosecuted if they do it repeatedly ignoring notifications from the FDA. It is known as an FDA Form 483. Each instance of it being "shown" to the public could illicit a warning letter and ultimately a fine or other action. YouTube has a greater liability than the individuals in this case.
... youtube isn't a newbie to how this works. They have content police and lawyers. Internally when they recognize what they have, they likely would pull it down on their own. Best way to stay on the right side of the FDA (any regulatory body), is to be proactive. They get folks selling snake oil all the time posting videos.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 10:38 amtech, like this site, youtube has the right to permit or not permit what it wants, however those decisions do incur various costs, including regulatory risk as well as user response.tech37 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:08 amDo you have evidence they have been issued a warning?... if not, just speculation on your part. Their website is a year old and some have testified in front of the US Senate over the past year. I'll believe they are breaking laws when they're shut down, fined, and/or arrested.jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:44 am Because the FDA has process and procedures. They initially send a warning letter to the organization and individuals involved. Generally people only get prosecuted if they do it repeatedly ignoring notifications from the FDA. It is known as an FDA Form 483. Each instance of it being "shown" to the public could illicit a warning letter and ultimately a fine or other action. YouTube has a greater liability than the individuals in this case.
It is highly likely that Youtube was warned by the FDA about its users promoting drugs on the platform for unauthorized usage. It's a significant issue. It is less likely, though not impossible, that Youtube was specifically warned by the FDA about this particular podcast video.
However, it is certainly possible that other users complained/notified Youtube that Weinstein had breached the standards of Youtube. Given what I've seen of other Dark Horse podcasts, I wouldn't be surprised that such objections may have been raised earlier and that Weinstein had heard from Youtube previously to be careful. This one stepped way over the line IMO...apparently Youtube thought so too. Again, simply speculation, but a series of prior communications, or Weinstein's response, would explain why Weinstein is off the platform altogether, not just that specific video.
You yourself in your very first post of the podcast predicted its removal from Youtube.
These platforms have been getting all sorts of regulatory oversight pressure regarding content that is potentially damaging to public health, with such speech not protected under the First Amendment, akin to the illegality of yelling fire in a crowded movie theater.
Whether it's 'speech' fomenting violence or 'speech' touting drugs for potentially dangerous, unauthorized, usage, this is not protected speech...and the platforms are very concerned about regulatory oversight.
That said, alternative platforms may be willing to take the risk of violations, so provide avenues to reach an audience for the violence and snake oil peddlers.
Let me say that I don't think you sound "stupid" with your claims of a conspiracy to not investigate ivermectin because of some sort of nefarious, profit-seeking cabal of FDA and pharma, business people and scientists in cahoots to prevent a miracle solution (made by Merck) from being adopted, but you do sound like you're deep down the rabbit hole...
Treasurer at a pharmaceutical client had an existing drug that was being considered for therapeutic purposes for COVID. The company was tasked with investigating it although they did not expect to make much money off of it…..must not be part of the cabal. Drug wouldn’t work off the shelf but the mechanism which contributed to its effectiveness was similar. Anyway, I was told fairly early that treatment and outcomes were improving as doctors gained more and more experience……but hey, you can get a script from your vet.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 10:38 amtech, like this site, youtube has the right to permit or not permit what it wants, however those decisions do incur various costs, including regulatory risk as well as user response.tech37 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:08 amDo you have evidence they have been issued a warning?... if not, just speculation on your part. Their website is a year old and some have testified in front of the US Senate over the past year. I'll believe they are breaking laws when they're shut down, fined, and/or arrested.jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:44 am Because the FDA has process and procedures. They initially send a warning letter to the organization and individuals involved. Generally people only get prosecuted if they do it repeatedly ignoring notifications from the FDA. It is known as an FDA Form 483. Each instance of it being "shown" to the public could illicit a warning letter and ultimately a fine or other action. YouTube has a greater liability than the individuals in this case.
It is highly likely that Youtube was warned by the FDA about its users promoting drugs on the platform for unauthorized usage. It's a significant issue. It is less likely, though not impossible, that Youtube was specifically warned by the FDA about this particular podcast video.
However, it is certainly possible that other users complained/notified Youtube that Weinstein had breached the standards of Youtube. Given what I've seen of other Dark Horse podcasts, I wouldn't be surprised that such objections may have been raised earlier and that Weinstein had heard from Youtube previously to be careful. This one stepped way over the line IMO...apparently Youtube thought so too. Again, simply speculation, but a series of prior communications, or Weinstein's response, would explain why Weinstein is off the platform altogether, not just that specific video.
You yourself in your very first post of the podcast predicted its removal from Youtube.
These platforms have been getting all sorts of regulatory oversight pressure regarding content that is potentially damaging to public health, with such speech not protected under the First Amendment, akin to the illegality of yelling fire in a crowded movie theater.
Whether it's 'speech' fomenting violence or 'speech' touting drugs for potentially dangerous, unauthorized, usage, this is not protected speech...and the platforms are very concerned about regulatory oversight.
That said, alternative platforms may be willing to take the risk of violations, so provide avenues to reach an audience for the violence and snake oil peddlers.
Let me say that I don't think you sound "stupid" with your claims of a conspiracy to not investigate ivermectin because of some sort of nefarious, profit-seeking cabal of FDA and pharma, business people and scientists in cahoots to prevent a miracle solution (made by Merck) from being adopted, but you do sound like you're deep down the rabbit hole...