tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:18 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:04 pm
tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:48 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:19 pm
tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:33 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:13 pm
tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 3:06 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:57 pm
tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 2:52 pm
tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 13, 2021 8:38 am
Important podcast (sans politics) from Bret Weinstein, which includes the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology.
Many of you here won't like what you hear, unfortunately. IMO, it's "truth and reality" re the current state of Covid-19.
Hopefully the podcast is not removed from the youtube platform...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY
There it is... Weinstein canceled/censored (or whatever term you prefer) by Youtube platform for "violating community guidelines"
whatever THAT means. Just what is there to fear from people searching for truth/reality, and trying to help? Luckily, another less politically corrupted platform has picked up where Youtube left off...
Latest tweets by Dr. Robert Malone (Youtube typo incorrectly spelled his name as "Moore") inventor of mRNA technology:
https://twitter.com/rwmalonemd?lang=en
Since when? Simple search found Weinstein and Dark Horse podcast just fine.
Ahhh, that specific video was taken down...perhaps because it was promoting a drug to be taken for usage that's not approved by the FDA? That's indeed against the site rules.
A drug FDA approved long ago, now found to have anti-viral capabilities when properly administered against Covid-19 but suppressed by the medical establishment institutions pushing Remdesevir. Something a Covid-suffering person doesn't have access to until they're practically dead.
I understand your view and argument, just was responding to why it was in violation.
On the merits, the drug has side effects, has not actually been adequately tested for administration for Covid, and, thus, at best one could say more testing is warranted. Yet that podcast asserted something much different, and unproven, just as your post above does.
Prove it isn't snake oil first. Get it FDA approved before touting. Pretty simple rule.
Every drug has side-effects. Some more than others, and from what I've read/heard,"I" when properly administered, has few to any based on decades of usage.
Stop with the "snake oil" schtick... you look silly doing that.
Catch 22. Unless the medical establishment allows, FDA approval for Covid won't see light of day. The powers that be want drugs that are profitable... "I" costs nothing in comparison to say, Remdesevir, and now Fauci's new plan for therapeutic tablets which will undoubtedly be costly/profitable for Big Pharma and their investors.
Uh a vaccine does work like a drug. I had to explain this to my 17 year old nephew who was afraid of being vaccinated. My brother called and asked that I speak to him. My nephew called afterwards ans thanked me for explaining it to him…..like most people, he was thinking of it like a drug….you know the drugs you see advertised with all the “side effects”.
https://isoponline.org/wp-content/uploa ... ccines.pdf
"Uh"... despite your anecdote, if you took the time to pay attention, no one is saying a drug should be a vaccine substitute (especially if the vaccine is shown to be safe... but the jury is still out on the Covid vaccines and will be for quite some time). What's needed is a therapeutic bridge for those vaccinated or not who come down with Covid and are not "sick enough" to be hospitalized. Otherwise, your doctor sends you home until you either recover or then dubiously qualify for hospital/Remdesevir/ICU/intubation. That's just super...
Some very smart and courageous people believe that drug-bridge already exists and have been using it off-label to great success.
Exactly what was said about HCQ.
Seriously, if ivermectin actually works and is safe, wonderful.
But testing first before touting as a miracle drug.
Ohhhh I see, HCQ = Trump. Good god, you are incredibly shallow at times
Fine, continue with your politicization of what should not be a political issue.
"Seriously, if ivermectin actually works and is safe, wonderful." That's a lie on your part based on everything else you've posted.
The FDA won't look at Ivermectin re Covid. Do you not understand this? There's the rub...Sheesh!
Why would
you bring up Trump?
HCQ was touted a year ago as the miracle drug and I said the same thing when that was the case.
Do the testing...then tout, not the other way around.
Yeah, Trump inserted politics into that, but that wasn't the issue.
But yeah, he did make it worse, given that as POTUS, people actually believed his BS.
I'm simply consistent.
And yeah, I don't buy for a second that the FDA wouldn't review an actual controlled study of ivermectin and approve usage if it was found to be effective and safe.
It's incredible to even imagine that they wouldn't...why do you believe such nonsense?
Merck would make a huge bundle if it worked...and they say there's no basis for thinking it would.
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statem ... -pandemic/
https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.c ... political/
