SCOTUS

The odds are excellent that you will leave this forum hating someone.
kramerica.inc
Posts: 6255
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by kramerica.inc »

jhu72 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2020 8:49 pm about 15.7% of pregnancies end in abortion in the US.
about 14.2% of pregnancies end in a child in poverty in the US.

So basically the pro-lifers what to double the number of children in poverty, because they lose all interest in the child after they are born. "Its the parent's responsibility, if they can't afford them, they should not have had them", is their claim. It's all about responsibility. It's always the same. They entire movement is filled with hypocrites.

They have no answers. Just push the problems around and blame someone else.
"We want to save kids from poverty, by not letting them live at all."

What were you saying about odd hypocricy?
ggait
Posts: 4165
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:23 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by ggait »

Judge Park doesn't see a little difference between church services and visiting the liquor store for a fifth of amber fluid?
Churches (like bars, restaurants and gyms) do have particular characteristics that make them a lot more hazardous than other public indoor spaces. But Cuomo did get carried away on this one.

Ten people in a cathedral? Pretty ridiculous when dealing with constitutionally protected behavior. Although in 2020, many (religious or not) would be correct in feeling that the ability to buy booze is a pretty fundamental right as well.

Having said that, I think Alito's whiny speech was embarassing. Sounds like he'd be better suited as a Fox News grievance ranter than as a federal judge. Get off my damn lawn!!

Alito is a great example of why SCOTUS justices need to be term limited.
Boycott stupid. If you ignore the gator troll, eventually he'll just go back under his bridge.
jhu72
Posts: 14128
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by jhu72 »

kramerica.inc wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:50 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2020 8:49 pm about 15.7% of pregnancies end in abortion in the US.
about 14.2% of pregnancies end in a child in poverty in the US.

So basically the pro-lifers what to double the number of children in poverty, because they lose all interest in the child after they are born. "Its the parent's responsibility, if they can't afford them, they should not have had them", is their claim. It's all about responsibility. It's always the same. They entire movement is filled with hypocrites.

They have no answers. Just push the problems around and blame someone else.
"We want to save kids from poverty, by not letting them live at all."

What were you saying about odd hypocricy?
I support live kids having a reasonable quality of life. Don't believe in putting them in cages. Don't believe in putting them in situations where they have hopeless lives. Until you are willing to address the quality of life issue, your moral position is bankrupt!
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
kramerica.inc
Posts: 6255
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by kramerica.inc »

No. My moral position is not bankrupt. I believe in letting kids live, them having a quality life, AND spending to ensure those things happen. So again, tell me why not letting those kids live is a better “choice?”
seacoaster
Posts: 8866
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 4:36 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by seacoaster »

More resistance to covid measures at the Court:

https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/11/new- ... ce-limits/
kramerica.inc
Posts: 6255
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by kramerica.inc »

Catholic Church wants a crack at it too:
https://nypost.com/2020/11/17/bet-scotu ... -services/
kramerica.inc
Posts: 6255
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by kramerica.inc »

Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
seacoaster
Posts: 8866
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 4:36 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by seacoaster »

kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15182
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by youthathletics »

seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:11 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
So was Trump....look what that got us.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
User avatar
RedFromMI
Posts: 5035
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 7:42 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by RedFromMI »

youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:20 pm
seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:11 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
So was Trump....look what that got us.
Dersh’s article requires enough EC votes to disappear from the win column for Joe to drop him below 270. Ain’t happening...

I suspect it (the article) is just to keep his reputation up with the crazies.
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15182
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by youthathletics »

RedFromMI wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:20 pm
seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:11 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
So was Trump....look what that got us.
Dersh’s article requires enough EC votes to disappear from the win column for Joe to drop him below 270. Ain’t happening...

I suspect it (the article) is just to keep his reputation up with the crazies.
It'd be nice if this all somehow gets us closer to a 'universal' voting policy, so we can avoid this roadside ditch we are stuck sloshing in each election.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 32844
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:38 pm
RedFromMI wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:20 pm
seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:11 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
So was Trump....look what that got us.
Dersh’s article requires enough EC votes to disappear from the win column for Joe to drop him below 270. Ain’t happening...

I suspect it (the article) is just to keep his reputation up with the crazies.
It'd be nice if this all somehow gets us closer to a 'universal' voting policy, so we can avoid this roadside ditch we are stuck sloshing in each election.
When did this “roadside ditch development”? Sounds pejorative....Record voter turnout. We should be asking for more.
“You lucky I ain’t read wretched yet!”
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 14539
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by cradleandshoot »

youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:38 pm
RedFromMI wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:20 pm
seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:11 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
So was Trump....look what that got us.
Dersh’s article requires enough EC votes to disappear from the win column for Joe to drop him below 270. Ain’t happening...

I suspect it (the article) is just to keep his reputation up with the crazies.
It'd be nice if this all somehow gets us closer to a 'universal' voting policy, so we can avoid this roadside ditch we are stuck sloshing in each election.
+1 It will never happen, but it should.
I use to be a people person until people ruined that for me.
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 32844
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

cradleandshoot wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:45 pm
youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:38 pm
RedFromMI wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:20 pm
seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:11 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
So was Trump....look what that got us.
Dersh’s article requires enough EC votes to disappear from the win column for Joe to drop him below 270. Ain’t happening...

I suspect it (the article) is just to keep his reputation up with the crazies.
It'd be nice if this all somehow gets us closer to a 'universal' voting policy, so we can avoid this roadside ditch we are stuck sloshing in each election.
+1 It will never happen, but it should.
What happened to “states rights”.....
“You lucky I ain’t read wretched yet!”
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15182
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by youthathletics »

Typical Lax Dad wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:43 pm
youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:38 pm
RedFromMI wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:20 pm
seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:11 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
So was Trump....look what that got us.
Dersh’s article requires enough EC votes to disappear from the win column for Joe to drop him below 270. Ain’t happening...

I suspect it (the article) is just to keep his reputation up with the crazies.
It'd be nice if this all somehow gets us closer to a 'universal' voting policy, so we can avoid this roadside ditch we are stuck sloshing in each election.
When did this “roadside ditch development”? Sounds pejorative....Record voter turnout. We should be asking for more.
There you go again, you need another hobby. I posted on it earlier, where you engaged and also threw in your typical 1-3 questions, followed by a smart ass condescending comment. #TrollCzar #TLDTrumpOfFanLax :lol: ;)
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 32844
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:51 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:43 pm
youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:38 pm
RedFromMI wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:20 pm
seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:11 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
So was Trump....look what that got us.
Dersh’s article requires enough EC votes to disappear from the win column for Joe to drop him below 270. Ain’t happening...

I suspect it (the article) is just to keep his reputation up with the crazies.
It'd be nice if this all somehow gets us closer to a 'universal' voting policy, so we can avoid this roadside ditch we are stuck sloshing in each election.
When did this “roadside ditch development”? Sounds pejorative....Record voter turnout. We should be asking for more.
There you go again, you need another hobby. I posted on it earlier, where you engaged and also threw in your typical 1-3 questions, followed by a smart ass condescending comment. #TrollCzar #TLDTrumpOfFanLax :lol: ;)
I missed it. You can answer my question now. I stepped up my troll game after you, actually... ;)
“You lucky I ain’t read wretched yet!”
seacoaster
Posts: 8866
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 4:36 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by seacoaster »

youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:20 pm
seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:11 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
So was Trump....look what that got us.
Well...that’s kind of on you.
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 32844
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 6:44 pm
youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:20 pm
seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:11 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
So was Trump....look what that got us.
Well...that’s kind of on you.
+1
“You lucky I ain’t read wretched yet!”
seacoaster
Posts: 8866
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 4:36 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by seacoaster »

Apparently Sid’s not part of the Elite Strike Team.
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15182
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: SCOTUS

Post by youthathletics »

seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 6:44 pm
youthathletics wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:20 pm
seacoaster wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:11 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:46 pm Dersh thinks SCOTUS could keep Biden out of the White House:

https://www.inquisitr.com/6391682/alan- ... -election/
I responded to this on the 2020 election thread. Dershowitz is really a sad haz-been.
So was Trump....look what that got us.
Well...that’s kind of on you.
Not living in MD, it’s not.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
Post Reply

Return to “POLITICS”