Page 12 of 33
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2023 2:27 pm
by PulpExposure
1766 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:49 pm
His post was tempered.
Rutgers triggers Lorin to no end.
The Big 10 in general, but Rutgers for some godforsaken reason really does. It's bizarre. Keep tilting at those windmills, lorin.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2023 3:54 pm
by wgdsr
PulpExposure wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 2:27 pm
1766 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:49 pm
His post was tempered.
Rutgers triggers Lorin to no end.
The Big 10 in general, but Rutgers for some godforsaken reason really does. It's bizarre. Keep tilting at those windmills, lorin.
not really bizarre, and it's rutgers' fans, not rutgers... imo. still, a slog for him that he's willing to take lead sled dog on.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2023 5:20 pm
by lorin
wgdsr wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 1:15 pm
enjoy the updates. we're starved for it, think we've had enough conjecture on off-season musings.
and we all know we're just getting started on this thread! iorin, you're gonna be in for a long year vs rutty fans if you're into it already.
All in fun my friends.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2023 6:00 pm
by Laxfan#1969
Every post that talked about the scrimmage in this thread stated “we all know it’s a scrimmage so you can’t get too wrapped up in the weeds” ….just like every other team thread that’s had a scrimmage…
People are excited for nuggets…that’s all
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:33 pm
by 1766
wgdsr wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 3:54 pm
PulpExposure wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 2:27 pm
1766 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:49 pm
His post was tempered.
Rutgers triggers Lorin to no end.
The Big 10 in general, but Rutgers for some godforsaken reason really does. It's bizarre. Keep tilting at those windmills, lorin.
not really bizarre, and it's rutgers' fans, not rutgers... imo. still, a slog for him that he's willing to take lead sled dog on.
No, it's Rutgers. It's Brecht taking transfers and Rutgers winning.
Dollars donuts his kid didn't get recruited by the school so he's got an axe to grind. The more the program wins the more upset he gets. It's pretty funny.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2023 12:27 pm
by Njlaxx11
RU hosting NJIT today - anyone going?
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 12:52 pm
by 1766
Njlaxx11 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 24, 2023 12:27 pm
RU hosting NJIT today - anyone going?
Rutgers didn't play starters or too many upperclassmen.
Even so, it went as expected. The young guys blew them out by 14 goals or so.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 1:50 pm
by lorin
1766 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:33 pm
wgdsr wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 3:54 pm
PulpExposure wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 2:27 pm
1766 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:49 pm
His post was tempered.
Rutgers triggers Lorin to no end.
The Big 10 in general, but Rutgers for some godforsaken reason really does. It's bizarre. Keep tilting at those windmills, lorin.
not really bizarre, and it's rutgers' fans, not rutgers... imo. still, a slog for him that he's willing to take lead sled dog on.
No, it's Rutgers. It's Brecht taking transfers and Rutgers winning.
Dollars donuts his kid didn't get recruited by the school so he's got an axe to grind. The more the program wins the more upset he gets. It's pretty funny.
I wish my kid was good enough to transfer to Rutgers.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:23 pm
by Njlaxx11
lorin wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 1:50 pm
1766 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:33 pm
wgdsr wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 3:54 pm
PulpExposure wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 2:27 pm
1766 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:49 pm
His post was tempered.
Rutgers triggers Lorin to no end.
The Big 10 in general, but Rutgers for some godforsaken reason really does. It's bizarre. Keep tilting at those windmills, lorin.
not really bizarre, and it's rutgers' fans, not rutgers... imo. still, a slog for him that he's willing to take lead sled dog on.
No, it's Rutgers. It's Brecht taking transfers and Rutgers winning.
Dollars donuts his kid didn't get recruited by the school so he's got an axe to grind. The more the program wins the more upset he gets. It's pretty funny.
I wish my kid was good enough to transfer to Rutgers.
Maybe njit
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:40 pm
by lorin
Njlaxx11 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:23 pm
lorin wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 1:50 pm
1766 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:33 pm
wgdsr wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 3:54 pm
PulpExposure wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 2:27 pm
1766 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:49 pm
His post was tempered.
Rutgers triggers Lorin to no end.
The Big 10 in general, but Rutgers for some godforsaken reason really does. It's bizarre. Keep tilting at those windmills, lorin.
not really bizarre, and it's rutgers' fans, not rutgers... imo. still, a slog for him that he's willing to take lead sled dog on.
No, it's Rutgers. It's Brecht taking transfers and Rutgers winning.
Dollars donuts his kid didn't get recruited by the school so he's got an axe to grind. The more the program wins the more upset he gets. It's pretty funny.
I wish my kid was good enough to transfer to Rutgers.
Maybe njit
Perfect D1
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 5:34 pm
by 1766
Njlaxx11 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:23 pm
lorin wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 1:50 pm
1766 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:33 pm
wgdsr wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 3:54 pm
PulpExposure wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 2:27 pm
1766 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:49 pm
His post was tempered.
Rutgers triggers Lorin to no end.
The Big 10 in general, but Rutgers for some godforsaken reason really does. It's bizarre. Keep tilting at those windmills, lorin.
not really bizarre, and it's rutgers' fans, not rutgers... imo. still, a slog for him that he's willing to take lead sled dog on.
No, it's Rutgers. It's Brecht taking transfers and Rutgers winning.
Dollars donuts his kid didn't get recruited by the school so he's got an axe to grind. The more the program wins the more upset he gets. It's pretty funny.
I wish my kid was good enough to transfer to Rutgers.
Maybe njit
Genetics are a real thing
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 4:27 pm
by 10stone5
From Rutgers message board,
Caliknight
Caliknight
Legend Gold Member
Today at 3:24 PM
#1
We won 14-11. Was a close game throughout. I don’t know anything about Villanova but they have a preseason first team AA at midfield.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:51 pm
by 1766
10stone5 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 4:27 pm
From Rutgers message board,
Caliknight
Caliknight
Legend Gold Member
Today at 3:24 PM
#1
We won 14-11. Was a close game throughout. I don’t know anything about Villanova but they have a preseason first team AA at midfield.
I couldn't make this one but I also heard this was the score. Most if not all of the RU starters sat, not unsurprisingly. I was told Villanova played their starters through the 3rd quarter. This is a good sign if our underclassman and back ups compete at this level.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 1:02 pm
by Njlaxx11
1766 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:51 pm
10stone5 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 4:27 pm
From Rutgers message board,
Caliknight
Caliknight
Legend Gold Member
Today at 3:24 PM
#1
We won 14-11. Was a close game throughout. I don’t know anything about Villanova but they have a preseason first team AA at midfield.
I couldn't make this one but I also heard this was the score. Most if not all of the RU starters sat, not unsurprisingly. I was told Villanova played their starters through the 3rd quarter. This is a good sign if our underclassman and back ups compete at this level.
if the starters sat this is an extremely impressive outing. nova is a solid team.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 1:17 pm
by 1766
Njlaxx11 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 1:02 pm
1766 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:51 pm
10stone5 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 4:27 pm
From Rutgers message board,
Caliknight
Caliknight
Legend Gold Member
Today at 3:24 PM
#1
We won 14-11. Was a close game throughout. I don’t know anything about Villanova but they have a preseason first team AA at midfield.
I couldn't make this one but I also heard this was the score. Most if not all of the RU starters sat, not unsurprisingly. I was told Villanova played their starters through the 3rd quarter. This is a good sign if our underclassman and back ups compete at this level.
if the starters sat this is an extremely impressive outing. nova is a solid team.
Not sure on the defensive end but the only starter on the offensive end that played was Cameron.
I think we are going to see some first years make an impact. Kurdyla and Shane Murphy on O and Dollive at SSDM. Especially Murphy. He's putting himself in a position where you simply have to play him.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 1:33 pm
by Asgot
1766 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 1:17 pm
Njlaxx11 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 1:02 pm
1766 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:51 pm
10stone5 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 28, 2023 4:27 pm
From Rutgers message board,
Caliknight
Caliknight
Legend Gold Member
Today at 3:24 PM
#1
We won 14-11. Was a close game throughout. I don’t know anything about Villanova but they have a preseason first team AA at midfield.
I couldn't make this one but I also heard this was the score. Most if not all of the RU starters sat, not unsurprisingly. I was told Villanova played their starters through the 3rd quarter. This is a good sign if our underclassman and back ups compete at this level.
if the starters sat this is an extremely impressive outing. nova is a solid team.
Not sure on the defensive end but the only starter on the offensive end that played was Cameron.
I was told that the entire starting defense played on Saturday
I think we are going to see some first years make an impact. Kurdyla and Shane Murphy on O and Dollive at SSDM. Especially Murphy. He's putting himself in a position where you simply have to play him.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:37 pm
by livelovelax
All of the Rutgers starters played. The only starter that did not play was Ross Scott for something that was outside of lacrosse. Villanova played well and Rutgers was not at their best. The goalies were solid on both sides. The second half was mostly second lines and youngsters for Rutgers. Rutgers has some young talent coming up from their recruiting and the transfers look very good and are a cultural fit on and off the field. Freshmen Murphy looks solid as does Macheca. Decker, Miller and Daniels look good at SSDM. Cameron has looked better than last year on attack. Mullin looks good in goal but Rutgers Depalma and Stoller are very good too. The Knights have a lot of pieces. Should be a fun season if they stay locked in and can get their fare share of possessions.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2023 3:09 pm
by 1766
Solid day for the Knights. Dante Kulas' shooting percentage must be off the charts for his career. Small sample size but he finds the back of the net when he shoots.
What you want at the start of the season. Almost the entire roster entered the game with the starters getting rested early with no injuries. Marist was a team Rutgers struggled with last year and they return a lot.
Good win to start the season.
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2023 2:20 pm
by 1766
Big Ten releases all of the nationally televised B1G games.
https://bigten.org/news/2023/2/6/genera ... unced.aspx
Re: Rutgers 2023
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2023 3:40 pm
by 1766
Workman like win for the squad today. Missing Ethan Rall and Jon Dugenio notwithstanding. Yale transfer Neumann did an excellent job at the x. If he can get going with Dugenio, that's going to bode well for B1G play.
Hats off to SB's goalie. He stood on his head today. Had to have had north of 20 saves.
