LaxPower Back-Up Stick

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 10:19 am

runrussellrun wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 9:56 am Has Barr been held in contempt yet? Or was the bar set low when the only AG evah to be held in contempt was Obama's Holder

https://www.politico.com/story/2012/06/ ... ess-077988

Holder? Holder?

Didn't he proudly proclaim he was the Presidents wing man?

6ftstick wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 10:32 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 10:19 am

runrussellrun wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 9:56 am Has Barr been held in contempt yet? Or was the bar set low when the only AG evah to be held in contempt was Obama's Holder

https://www.politico.com/story/2012/06/ ... ess-077988

Holder? Holder?

Didn't he proudly proclaim he was the Presidents wing man?

also joked

That Tom Joyner radio show is something else! The infatuation is hilarious

Barr =

Remember when Christine Blasey Ford refused to testify if she would be questioned by lawyers?

Oh wait. No. That was AG William Barr who showed that level of cowardice.

"What a piece of .... (th)is man, how .... in reason, how infinite in.... ,In form and moving how .... and .... ,In action how like an ...., In apprehension how like a....,the ....of the world, the.... of animals".

Hamlet via Willy Shakes,had his own thoughts on MAN .I have my own on BARR.

Feel free to insert whichever nouns,gerunds,verbs,adjectives you wish.But not here.The brain police and 72 inch may object.I suggest cut and paste.

https://www.newsday.com/opinion/comment ... oon-Update

6ftstick wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 10:32 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 10:19 am

runrussellrun wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 9:56 am Has Barr been held in contempt yet? Or was the bar set low when the only AG evah to be held in contempt was Obama's Holder

https://www.politico.com/story/2012/06/ ... ess-077988

Holder? Holder?

Didn't he proudly proclaim he was the Presidents wing man?

Holder and the former POTUS were BLACK AFRICAN AMERICANS.So it's not surprising the would both enjoy chicken wings.Trump claims he is a "thigh man" (albeit proximal).Perhaps Barr was formerly a breast or leg man who thought it best to "try a thigh" to better align with the COOO.

TASTY!

Brooklyn wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2019 9:11 am

Funny you'd use SCIENCE FICTION in your Collusion Delusion!

I'd call it jealously....they are getting beat at their own game.

6ftstick wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2019 8:04 am

Funny you'd use SCIENCE FICTION in your Collusion Delusion!

It's a good bet you wouldn't be calling it a "Collusion Delusion" if those redactions were eliminated.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... ainst-con/ Thank you Eric Holder. It was inevitable your own treachery would come back to bite the Democrats square in the ass...

On the one hand, that's some fantastic karma.

On the other, not real happy about Holder lowering the bar in the first place.


Pun intended.

Bill Barr’s Actions on the Mueller Report: A Response to Jack Goldsmith

"Jack Goldsmith’s defense of Attorney General Barr’s handling of the Mueller report is typically thoughtful but ultimately unpersuasive. While certain aspects of Barr’s behavior could be defensible if they stood alone, taken as a whole his course of conduct—what he said, how he said it and what he didn’t say—shows that Barr is not merely “defen[ding] the presidency” institutionally, as Goldsmith argues, but defending this particular president politically. I want to highlight a few points that undercut the argument that Barr has been acting in good faith."

Interesting LawFare analysis...

..

Rubio nails it!

https://twitter.com/BillKristol/status/ ... 8448165888

CU88 wrote: ↑Wed May 08, 2019 3:53 pm Rubio nails it!

https://twitter.com/BillKristol/status/ ... 8448165888

Bill Kristol is one of the rare stand-up guys.
Of course, he's not running for office in these Trumpist days.

CU88 wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 12:48 pm Remember when Christine Blasey Ford refused to testify if she would be questioned by lawyers?

Oh wait. No. That was AG William Barr who showed that level of cowardice.

wait, was that a congressional over site hearing? No

Members of that committee have oversite, not their staff lawyers. Now the lawyers can write their question but they have to ask them. But they would look foolish when Barr hit them with an answer they didn't understand. Like something ti do with the constitution or a law the voted on years ago about not releasing certain info in special council reports.

6ftstick wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2019 8:04 am

Brooklyn wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2019 9:11 am

Funny you'd use SCIENCE FICTION in your Collusion Delusion!

Isn't there an 98% unredacted report sitting in a secure room at Congress that any member can read?

I believe I heard Graham and McConnell are the only two that looked at it

HOORAY!
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/05 ... -privilege

Some things just don't change. Except the way that the media decides to cover it. No mention of a "constitutional crisis" in this story.

For the rest of the country, the impact is likely negligible. While the debate over — and the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches — is an important one, it is also decidedly complex, meaning that most undecided voters simply won’t engage on it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... cdf2e44005

frmanfan wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 8:07 am Some things just don't change. Except the way that the media decides to cover it. No mention of a "constitutional crisis" in this story.

For the rest of the country, the impact is likely negligible. While the debate over — and the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches — is an important one, it is also decidedly complex, meaning that most undecided voters simply won’t engage on it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... cdf2e44005

That's what politicians want....an ignorant voting public ... slippery slope here.