THE 2019 Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

D1 Mens Lacrosse
Laxjunkie
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:01 am

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by Laxjunkie »

20?
Penn state is great. But 20?
JHU looks dead. And not subbing anyone. PSU throwing everyone in.
User avatar
HopFan16
Posts: 6054
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:22 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by HopFan16 »

Imagine still supporting this staff. Couldn't be me
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:46 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus »

Weston Narewski won a faceoff. Good.

Game 12 talent development.
Wheels
Posts: 2078
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2019 11:40 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by Wheels »

Tambroni's done this all year, and it was silly to assume he'd take it easy on Petro because he likes Petro. Tambroni has no, um, *expletives* to give.

Also, part of PSU's identity is to beat teams before they take the field. Teams come into games so in awe of PSU's offense, that PSU's almost won the game before the first face off.

So dropping 20 on Hopkins is part of the plan.
DougELax
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 1:27 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by DougELax »

Petro post game press conference next week:

1) We understand this is not what is expected at Hopkins.

2) We will evaluate the entire program this summer.

3) Changes will be made to get Hopkins back where it belongs.

Next fall:

1) We have changed the pregame meal. Nothing else is wrong.
LRoggy
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:30 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by LRoggy »

WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2019 1:58 pm
LRoggy wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2019 1:54 pm Watching this game as someone who roots for neither team . . .

How is it possible a high end D1 program could have so little foot speed?

I don't care what Quint does in his Top 20 poll tomorrow but if JHU is anywhere near it . . . this is not a Top 20 team right now.

Is it time to question whether recruit rankings assume that if JHU is recruiting the kid they should be ranked, instead of whether their recruits get over-ranked? Are JHU commits not as good as they get ranked in general? Or is the player development seriously flawed?
To answer your four questions:

You can’t teach speed.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
But you can recruit it. I run FLN and remember how effective Lee Coppersmith was as a change of pace. Who plays that role today?

And, while watching this, has JHU won a single 50/50 ground ball?
Laxjunkie
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:01 am

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by Laxjunkie »

Last time JHU gave up 20: 1994

You can say it’s coaching.

Or you can say it’s players not meeting their potential. But who recruits those players??
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:46 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus »

Laxjunkie wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2019 2:08 pm Last time JHU gave up 20: 1994

You can say it’s coaching.

Or you can say it’s players not meeting their potential. But who recruits those players??
The parents recruit themselves, I mean their kids, at age 13.
DocBarrister
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:00 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by DocBarrister »

Why did Darby stay in the entire game?!?

DocBarrister :?:
@DocBarrister
User avatar
HopFan16
Posts: 6054
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:22 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by HopFan16 »

DocBarrister wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2019 2:13 pm Why did Darby stay in the entire game?!?

DocBarrister :?:
Game's not over yet, we still have a chance
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:46 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus »

DMac wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2019 2:03 pm They need to call a mercy rule in for this one, am feelin' sorry the Hop boys.
Besides, am sure Dwan's got a basket of Peeps he's waiting to dive into.
Image
Navy had a Peep-Art competition in Bancroft last week.

Here’s an interesting entry in line with your idea:

Image
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:46 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus »

Peeps are highly, highly flammable too.

Throw one into a campfire, and you’ll quickly find out.
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:46 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus »

a fan,

I see you are on here. I sent you a FB PM (to business acct) asking what kind of work socks you wear with your Carhartt’s.

Your staff might be thinking What the heck?

W
flalax22
Posts: 1248
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2018 2:38 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by flalax22 »

Dmac calling Dwan fat again. :roll:

So obvious in the last five minutes when the subs went in that this team lacks size and toughness when they play the munchkins. Play the bigger boys and have a fight with the Terps.

Anyone think Nads will change the drapes?
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:46 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus »

Hi Rasheed, I see you are here for some schadenfreude. Enjoy!
DocBarrister
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:00 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by DocBarrister »

LRoggy wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2019 2:07 pm
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2019 1:58 pm
LRoggy wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2019 1:54 pm Watching this game as someone who roots for neither team . . .

How is it possible a high end D1 program could have so little foot speed?

I don't care what Quint does in his Top 20 poll tomorrow but if JHU is anywhere near it . . . this is not a Top 20 team right now.

Is it time to question whether recruit rankings assume that if JHU is recruiting the kid they should be ranked, instead of whether their recruits get over-ranked? Are JHU commits not as good as they get ranked in general? Or is the player development seriously flawed?
To answer your four questions:

You can’t teach speed.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
But you can recruit it. I run FLN and remember how effective Lee Coppersmith was as a change of pace. Who plays that role today?

And, while watching this, has JHU won a single 50/50 ground ball?
Blue Jays have both speed and size, but they’re sitting on the bench.

Freshman midfielder Jake Lilly was a high school receiver in football (over 1000 career yards receiving with 15 touchdowns). He’s 6’4”.

Mabbett is 6’4” with decent speed. He’s strong, too, as we saw on his goal against Penn State.

“Shorty” Evan Zinn is 6’3” and has the best wheels on the team. Needless to mention a blaster for a shot.

Put those three together and you have one of the biggest, most athletic midfields Hopkins has seen in over a decade.

Ya tellin’ me that they can’t play because they might diminish a defense that just got hung for 20 goals by Penn State?!?

DocBarrister :roll:
@DocBarrister
User avatar
CU77
Posts: 3644
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 1:49 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by CU77 »

LRoggy wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2019 2:00 pmMaybe Tambroni experienced a shellacking against JHU in the past when he was on the other end of it somewhere?
I don't think that ever happened.

And in case anyone here doesn't know: Tambroni was Petro's assistant at Cornell, they worked very closely together, and when Petro left for JHU he strongly recommended that Tambroni take over.
DocBarrister
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:00 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by DocBarrister »

CU77 wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2019 2:36 pm
LRoggy wrote: Sun Apr 21, 2019 2:00 pmMaybe Tambroni experienced a shellacking against JHU in the past when he was on the other end of it somewhere?
I don't think that ever happened.

And in case anyone here doesn't know: Tambroni was Petro's assistant at Cornell, they worked very closely together, and when Petro left for JHU he strongly recommended that Tambroni take over.
Hopkins kept their starters in. Why shouldn’t Tambroni keep the pedal to the metal?

DocBarrister :roll:
@DocBarrister
User avatar
CU77
Posts: 3644
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 1:49 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by CU77 »

Usually it's the winning team that pulls its starters first …
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:46 pm

Re: THE Hopkins Lacrosse Fallout Shelter (44, we want more!)

Post by WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus »

I snapshotted laf’s TSI calculations this morning, including all of yesterday’s games but prior to Pickett’s Charge today.

Here’s where Hopkins stood:
LaxBytes TSI 21APR2019 AM
LaxBytes TSI 21APR2019 AM
7960CCB4-8DA7-46E2-A3BC-1CACC5FCB484.jpeg (202.97 KiB) Viewed 2930 times
That’s 20th overall, 21.8% chance of AQ which will drop like a brick, and 5.55% chance of an at large which might actually go up.

Will be interesting to see how these change based on today’s asswhipping.
Locked

Return to “D1 MENS LACROSSE”