it's not that simple. according to the university, they knew about it well in advance at some point, and according to them, so did the nc$$. and again according to them, the nc$$ signed off on it, preventing wiseman from going elsewhere with the "change of ruling". if that's what happened:Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:36 pmPenny Hardaway should have known better. He should have went to the AD and the NCAA when he was vying for the job and then recruiting the player. IMHO, Penny put the kid in a tough spot. How he though this was not an extra benefit is beyond me. Hopefully Wiseman gets to come back but Hardaway should have known better. Ego. Guy gave $1MM to the school and provided extra benefits to what became a recruit. Penny should have cleared it or sent the kid on to UK.wgdsr wrote: ↑Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:20 pm just in the past week, we have:
chase young, maybe the most marketable (for the nc$$, anyway) football player going and a possible #1 overall pick -- ruled ineligible temporarily for taking a small loan from a family friend (don't know the whole association) so his family could go out to a bowl game. and it was paid back.
jahvon quinerly -- ruled he has to sit a year on new hardship transfer rules, no waiver granted as he had to deal with a cloud of suspicion the entirety of his freshman year re: basketball fbi fishnet, only to eventually have none of his involvement amount to any charge and be walked back by the coach in question ---transfers to alabama for fresh start, villanova is cool with it --- but nc$$ says no go, sit a year.
memphis star freshman james wiseman ruled ineligible (also, maybe the best freshman in the country) because his then high school/club coach penny hardaway gave him moving expenses, over 2 years ago. all fine. but penny is now the memphis coach (and was considered a booster from a donation 10+ years ago), and after a hard fought recruiting win vs kentucky for his services, wiseman gets to be ruled ineligible. lmao. you couldn't make this up. hardaway is taking a stand against the wounded nc$$ and playing him anyway, looking for a ruling outside the nc$$.
one week. 3 instances of the nc$$ holding fast to b.s. minutiae and their iron, illogical grip. ironically, that hubris will ultimately be their ruling power's downfall.
https://www.sportingnews.com/us/ncaa-ba ... dcbr6c2365
also in there, again according to the university, supposedly wiseman never knew about it. remembering cases (cam newton?), i think that matters.
for some reason, i don't think penny is gonna be the guy to dot all your i's and cross your t's:
https://www.commercialappeal.com/story/ ... 2535152001
anyway -- memphis signed off on penny playing him anyway, and fighting the battle in court. so they seem fine with it. on a number of fronts, i think they may have the leg up.
this may be end up being the most formidable challenge to the nc$$ eligibility rulings, maybe ever. i don't remember a school saying i don't care what your ruling on ineligibility is, we're playing him anyway.
worst case scenario for the player -- he doesn't get to keep playing for memphis. assesses options for the winter. gets an agent, works out or plays somewhere, and is top 4 instead of top 1. loses a bit on development also, but a trade on getting access to $$ earlier probably. good chance he was always going to be one and done, unless he had a rough year, in which case this might help him in some ways. i don't like writing any of that.