Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
This whole reply lacks any substance. I can read just fine, right through the nonsense some people choose to post in fact.
You said here’s a piece from the Washington Plat as if you imply it had the backing of the institution. And a media critic carries weight with you while you question all a sorts of media? Why would I care about a media critics opinion? They get paid to be critical, hence the title. Get it?
“She doesn’t care who she harms...” - do you know her? I know the answer is no so you’re just speculating and I’m mean and vindictive way towards someone who isn’t helping your cause and nothing more with that dumb comment. Her peers are saying bad things but what about the editor of Politico from the first op ed piece you posted? Did you forget, not read that? Or ignoring it in a Dishonest attempt to make your case with the media critics op ed piece (again not news)?
Then you post, naturally, a page six piece about who’s dating who and suggesting that anyone who dates a colleague is morally or professionally problematic. That’s very 21st century of you philosophically...
Using some idiotic alliteration passes as humor for you? Dope.
No crush on Bertrand, there’s way hotter political journalists. I just find your bashing anyone who puts out anything critical of the soon to be prior administration, particularly how quick you’ve done it with numerous women to be just pathetic.
We all get it, you’re going to do every gymnastic and make every hypocritical statement to try to defend your positions. Trash and attack everyone and everything that sheds any negative light on your side sparing no one and let gross stuff slide from folks on your side. I admire the consistency of living with the lie and burning everyone down in order to preserve it in your mind. But that doesn’t mean other educated people aren’t going to see through it and call it out.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
This whole reply lacks any substance. I can read just fine, right through the nonsense some people choose to post in fact.
You said here’s a piece from the Washington Plat as if you imply it had the backing of the institution. And a media critic carries weight with you while you question all a sorts of media? Why would I care about a media critics opinion? They get paid to be critical, hence the title. Get it?
“She doesn’t care who she harms...” - do you know her? I know the answer is no so you’re just speculating and I’m mean and vindictive way towards someone who isn’t helping your cause and nothing more with that dumb comment. Her peers are saying bad things but what about the editor of Politico from the first op ed piece you posted? Did you forget, not read that? Or ignoring it in a Dishonest attempt to make your case with the media critics op ed piece (again not news)?
Then you post, naturally, a page six piece about who’s dating who and suggesting that anyone who dates a colleague is morally or professionally problematic. That’s very 21st century of you philosophically...
Using some idiotic alliteration passes as humor for you? Dope.
No crush on Bertrand, there’s way hotter political journalists. I just find your bashing anyone who puts out anything critical of the soon to be prior administration, particularly how quick you’ve done it with numerous women to be just pathetic.
We all get it, you’re going to do every gymnastic and make every hypocritical statement to try to defend your positions. Trash and attack everyone and everything that sheds any negative light on your side sparing no one and let gross stuff slide from folks on your side. I admire the consistency of living with the lie and burning everyone down in order to preserve it in your mind. But that doesn’t mean other educated people aren’t going to see through it and call it out.
The Wash Post piece is one of a 12 part series of articles they published, by their resident media critic, on how the media used the Steele dossier. That is a significant critique of their own profession.
Of course the Politico editor defends her. Who do you think hired her, then edits & publishes her reports ?
If you find Politico more credible than the Wash Post & National Review, so be it.
Re Wallace -- I suspect you know organizations or businesses which discourage workplace fraternization or even prohibit it.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
This whole reply lacks any substance. I can read just fine, right through the nonsense some people choose to post in fact.
You said here’s a piece from the Washington Plat as if you imply it had the backing of the institution. And a media critic carries weight with you while you question all a sorts of media? Why would I care about a media critics opinion? They get paid to be critical, hence the title. Get it?
“She doesn’t care who she harms...” - do you know her? I know the answer is no so you’re just speculating and I’m mean and vindictive way towards someone who isn’t helping your cause and nothing more with that dumb comment. Her peers are saying bad things but what about the editor of Politico from the first op ed piece you posted? Did you forget, not read that? Or ignoring it in a Dishonest attempt to make your case with the media critics op ed piece (again not news)?
Then you post, naturally, a page six piece about who’s dating who and suggesting that anyone who dates a colleague is morally or professionally problematic. That’s very 21st century of you philosophically...
Using some idiotic alliteration passes as humor for you? Dope.
No crush on Bertrand, there’s way hotter political journalists. I just find your bashing anyone who puts out anything critical of the soon to be prior administration, particularly how quick you’ve done it with numerous women to be just pathetic.
We all get it, you’re going to do every gymnastic and make every hypocritical statement to try to defend your positions. Trash and attack everyone and everything that sheds any negative light on your side sparing no one and let gross stuff slide from folks on your side. I admire the consistency of living with the lie and burning everyone down in order to preserve it in your mind. But that doesn’t mean other educated people aren’t going to see through it and call it out.
The Wash Post piece is one of a 12 part series of articles they published, by their resident media critic, on how the media used the Steele dossier. That is a significant critique of their own profession.
Of course the Politico editor defends her. Who do you think hired her, then edits & publishes her reports ?
If you find Politico more credible than the Wash Post & National Review, so be it.
Re Wallace -- I suspect you know organizations or businesses which discourage workplace fraternization or even prohibit it.
No problem at all at Proctor and Gamble. Many married couples at that company.....
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
This whole reply lacks any substance. I can read just fine, right through the nonsense some people choose to post in fact.
You said here’s a piece from the Washington Plat as if you imply it had the backing of the institution. And a media critic carries weight with you while you question all a sorts of media? Why would I care about a media critics opinion? They get paid to be critical, hence the title. Get it?
“She doesn’t care who she harms...” - do you know her? I know the answer is no so you’re just speculating and I’m mean and vindictive way towards someone who isn’t helping your cause and nothing more with that dumb comment. Her peers are saying bad things but what about the editor of Politico from the first op ed piece you posted? Did you forget, not read that? Or ignoring it in a Dishonest attempt to make your case with the media critics op ed piece (again not news)?
Then you post, naturally, a page six piece about who’s dating who and suggesting that anyone who dates a colleague is morally or professionally problematic. That’s very 21st century of you philosophically...
Using some idiotic alliteration passes as humor for you? Dope.
No crush on Bertrand, there’s way hotter political journalists. I just find your bashing anyone who puts out anything critical of the soon to be prior administration, particularly how quick you’ve done it with numerous women to be just pathetic.
We all get it, you’re going to do every gymnastic and make every hypocritical statement to try to defend your positions. Trash and attack everyone and everything that sheds any negative light on your side sparing no one and let gross stuff slide from folks on your side. I admire the consistency of living with the lie and burning everyone down in order to preserve it in your mind. But that doesn’t mean other educated people aren’t going to see through it and call it out.
The Wash Post piece is one of a 12 part series of articles they published, by their resident media critic, on how the media used the Steele dossier. That is a significant critique of their own profession.
Of course the Politico editor defends her. Who do you think hired her, then edits & publishes her reports ?
If you find Politico more credible than the Wash Post & National Review, so be it.
Re Wallace -- I suspect you know organizations or businesses which discourage workplace fraternization or even prohibit it.
A. It clearly states it’s an “Opinion” in the opinion section. You drop that like a mic drop and case closed because an open series ran about one specific topic of work from a body of work and (albeit short) career. I didn’t say Politico is better, stop putting words in my mouth waaah! But...one is from her boss or former boss who is the head of a news organization that is credible and employed her and the other is an opinion piece focused on one subject.
And that’s enough for you to believe you can justify besmirching her character and tossing crappy names attached to her? You’re proving my point for me,that’s great!
On Wallace, most companies don’t allow or endorse coworkers hooking up and yet it happens all the time. I used to love the Commerzbank christmas parties because as you should know European grad schools do two year work internships (more like true apprenticeships) which provides a nice stockpile of 24-27yr old German women for use red blooded Americans to congregate with over many cocktails. I would never start calling them names publicly. Know people who’ve had long marriages who met working together. I guess those women are all nasty too.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
This whole reply lacks any substance. I can read just fine, right through the nonsense some people choose to post in fact.
You said here’s a piece from the Washington Plat as if you imply it had the backing of the institution. And a media critic carries weight with you while you question all a sorts of media? Why would I care about a media critics opinion? They get paid to be critical, hence the title. Get it?
“She doesn’t care who she harms...” - do you know her? I know the answer is no so you’re just speculating and I’m mean and vindictive way towards someone who isn’t helping your cause and nothing more with that dumb comment. Her peers are saying bad things but what about the editor of Politico from the first op ed piece you posted? Did you forget, not read that? Or ignoring it in a Dishonest attempt to make your case with the media critics op ed piece (again not news)?
Then you post, naturally, a page six piece about who’s dating who and suggesting that anyone who dates a colleague is morally or professionally problematic. That’s very 21st century of you philosophically...
Using some idiotic alliteration passes as humor for you? Dope.
No crush on Bertrand, there’s way hotter political journalists. I just find your bashing anyone who puts out anything critical of the soon to be prior administration, particularly how quick you’ve done it with numerous women to be just pathetic.
We all get it, you’re going to do every gymnastic and make every hypocritical statement to try to defend your positions. Trash and attack everyone and everything that sheds any negative light on your side sparing no one and let gross stuff slide from folks on your side. I admire the consistency of living with the lie and burning everyone down in order to preserve it in your mind. But that doesn’t mean other educated people aren’t going to see through it and call it out.
The Wash Post piece is one of a 12 part series of articles they published, by their resident media critic, on how the media used the Steele dossier. That is a significant critique of their own profession.
Of course the Politico editor defends her. Who do you think hired her, then edits & publishes her reports ?
If you find Politico more credible than the Wash Post & National Review, so be it.
Re Wallace -- I suspect you know organizations or businesses which discourage workplace fraternization or even prohibit it.
No problem at all at Proctor and Gamble. Many married couples at that company.....
Yo, I need to work at P&G with all those straight up naughty women there!
Re: The 2024 Election Cycle
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 12:41 pm
by old salt
Yesterday, on MSNBC, when introducing a past video clip of Trump, Wallace described Trump as " several pounds, & a few shades of hair color ago".
Imagine the outrage if anyone said that about her or any woman politician or reporter.
Regarding fraternization -- any time you see a military officer relieved of duty because of "loss of confidence". That's usually the cause.
Re: The 2024 Election Cycle
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 12:56 pm
by njbill
She was being kind by saying “several.”
Re: The 2024 Election Cycle
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 1:44 pm
by Farfromgeneva
And his hair was dogs**t 20yrs ago.
At a Credit Suisse summer retreat around 15yrs ago a friend who was an analyst had to do the roast. Analysts always had to do it and were expected to show some effort but if you cross lines you’d be in trouble. So Steve walks up double fisting vodka tonics and does his bit. One of the jokes was directed at the head of the group Steve Kantor (Real Estate Finance and Securitization, started his career out of Syracuse law at Drexel Burnham Lambert in the late 80s and was making around 15mm/yr). The joke goes:
Steve Kantor is a great head. Good guy, talented and he knows a lot of famous people. Friends everywhere. He’s friends with Donald Trump. They hang out once in a while. In fact it’s pretty hard to tell them apart sometimes except one has the worst hair in the world and the other Is Donald Trump...
(We all stood in silence until Kantor cracked a laugh, I was very worried my friend was going to be unemployed af TE r the weekend but it worked out swimmingly)
Re: The 2024 Election Cycle
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 7:33 pm
by old salt
njbill wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 12:56 pm
She was being kind by saying “several.”
Trump actually looked heavier in the clip she showed than he does now. ...or maybe his suits are a better cut now.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:38 pm
You gave me a opinion piece, not the Waco, rather an individual which does not reflect any judgement or values of the paper. Either you understand this and are being disingenuous or don’t which is a whole other problem.
I missed where she was commonly referred to as “nasty Natasha” in your opinion piece as well. Unless you show me otherwise I’m taking that as a moniker you have to a 26-27yr old chick. I did see where the editor of Politico had some praise for her work ethic and demonstrated knowledge of national security topics however. That girl is just plain nasty based on your “evidence” I guess...
How about some others you’ve given names and said literally mean things about like Nicole Wallace for example?
PoInt is you corn down here and cut down people you don’t know because they hurt the effort your trying to support which despite your protests otherwise is everything inherent in the Trump presidency. Service my, very young (and frankly, green, hard working, if not experienced) women. Experts in fields etc. it’s just to lay waste to anyone who hurts your cause and doesn’t even provide a legitimate counter argument. It’s rape victim shamin gm at its finest and it’s pathetic.
She's a public figure, professional journalist & aspiring media personality. I don't need to know her personally.
I included in the quote that it was an opinion piece, by the Washington Post media critic. Part of a 12 piece WP series.
He thoroughly documents his opinion, as does the National Review piece I linked.
You appear to have the reading comprehension problem.
Where's your alleged sense of humor ? "Nasty" is a play on her name & a critique of her reporting style. She projects a Little Bo Peep persona, while conveying social media chatter & her speculation as "news". She doesn't care who she harms with her inaccuracies. Her peers, in the WP & NR are calling her out & making fun of her.
Given your obsession with womens appearances, I can see why you might have a crush on her & feel the need to defend her honor.
She's still young & probably tight enough for you.
A helluva band. I liked Page talking about how he came up eith Kashmir. Interesting progressions. I don’t like skiing so I never bothered asking. I stayed at bottom of slopes to watch my kids come down. 2 or 3 “runs” for me was enough....get 2 or 3 in and then just watch my kids. My wife would do cross country.... just enough experience to be informed at the cocktail parties..... you are a back bowls and tree guy..... no hemet of course...
