GREAT !!!!jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:16 amNothing could be farther from the truth. It is a highly (written) process driven discipline. Largely subject matter independent.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:06 amIt sounds like there is no "official" process to claim peer review than?jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 10:59 am
I have never sat on a peer-review (grant application) board with less than 20 reviewers (frequently more). This an interdisciplinary peer-review. I am sure climate review boards do work the same way. The applicate is given every advantage to make their case. If it is felt that one or two or three reviewers are unreasonably withholding their approval those reviewers are replaced by others in the community and the application is reconsidered by the new board. I have never heard of, or seen a peer review board made up of one reviewer.
Will wait for the link that describes the process.