Page 98 of 110

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2022 7:07 pm
by old salt
I recall a SIQ chit.

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2022 7:07 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
Dip&Dunk wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 6:59 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 5:08 pm
youthathletics wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:08 pm BTW I wonder how many are SIQ today. ;) :lol:
When did you pick up that nomenclature?
Army I assume. It’s SIR at Annapolis.
It's cute.

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2022 7:16 pm
by youthathletics

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2022 9:09 pm
by old salt
FMUBart wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 12:54 pmP.S. 9 goals is pathetic..
It was enough to beat Hobart in the '04 PL champ game. :mrgreen:

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 7:43 am
by Farfromgeneva
old salt wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 9:09 pm
FMUBart wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 12:54 pmP.S. 9 goals is pathetic..
It was enough to beat Hobart in the '04 PL champ game. :mrgreen:
He wants Matt Kerwick to be hired if it can’t be Ricky. If not that Scott Urick!

And we lost by 4-5 in an early reg season game to Navy but that was a good season. Hobart ripped off a bunch of wins after a flat start including a opener loss to a game and think most of the season ranked Butler. Only loss until at PL Final and Cornell in Rd 1 (Navy beat Cornell in quarters in a super boring game that was like 5-3) was to OSU in their best year historically until they got into the ECAC in its final days and that was us giving up a 9 goal Q3 lead to lose in OT but a string wins that included Bucknell 2x, Army, Cornell & PSU. Probably the most competitive PL year until Loyola came and also had Boston U plus more competitive Gate/Lehigh who were functional then but not what Nagle and Cassesse made them ultimately.

But all that said, its early but the UVA scrimmage followed up with that sets the bar low for the rest of the year so we will all see how it shakes out. Would like to see a more competitive Navy like they were in the decade of the 2000s personally.

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 11:23 am
by Dip&Dunk
youthathletics wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 7:16 pm It’s still SIQ: https://www.usna-azpc.com/page-1859957
COMDTMIDINST 5400.6V Midshipmen Regulations Manual 1.3.2 Sick In Room (SIR)

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 11:35 am
by FMUBart
old salt wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 9:09 pm
FMUBart wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 12:54 pmP.S. 9 goals is pathetic..
It was enough to beat Hobart in the '04 PL champ game. :mrgreen:
Hobart ain't MSM...

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 12:58 pm
by youthathletics
Dip&Dunk wrote: Tue Feb 08, 2022 11:23 am
youthathletics wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 7:16 pm It’s still SIQ: https://www.usna-azpc.com/page-1859957
COMDTMIDINST 5400.6V Midshipmen Regulations Manual 1.3.2 Sick In Room (SIR)
Exactly, now read the entire sentence for the class. :lol: They both can be right.

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 1:09 pm
by Dip&Dunk
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 08, 2022 12:58 pm
Dip&Dunk wrote: Tue Feb 08, 2022 11:23 am
youthathletics wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 7:16 pm It’s still SIQ: https://www.usna-azpc.com/page-1859957
COMDTMIDINST 5400.6V Midshipmen Regulations Manual 1.3.2 Sick In Room (SIR)
Exactly, now read the entire sentence for the class. :lol: They both can be right.
I was just happy I found the reference. Certainly never read it when I was there.

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 8:26 pm
by FMUBart
Farfromgeneva wrote: Tue Feb 08, 2022 7:43 am
old salt wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 9:09 pm
FMUBart wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 12:54 pmP.S. 9 goals is pathetic..
It was enough to beat Hobart in the '04 PL champ game. :mrgreen:
He wants Matt Kerwick to be hired if it can’t be Ricky. If not that Scott Urick!
No, what I want is to not see you post on every forum on Fanlax!

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2022 10:24 pm
by The Orfling
youthathletics wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 9:24 am After letting it marinate a bit....

1st Quarter:
~ Nice to see Goers still snagging #10's first goal game ball
~ Tough GB loss when #64 thought shot clock was over but was reset, advantage MSM
~ Subsequent ride was poo
~ 10:31 MSM 1st goal was like a middle school offense, our D fell for it being sucked upfield entirely too high
~ 9:32 F/O just laying stick out after winning in...you must always assume you have a trailer, always.
~ 7:34 #10 stuck ball watching, leaving MSM 32 wide open in middle of field, MSM 32 then gets an assist on their clear.
~ 5:28 MSM, same play as their 1st goal from 10:31 just from the otherside
~ 1:10 #6 Navy missed a beautiful throwback opportunity to #64 when he drew a double, then #12 also missed #64 sitting wide open at 5&5

2nd Quarter
~ 13:59 MSM was having a tough time on our picks. #28 shoots a bomb
~ 13:01 MSM again screws up assignments on pick, #28 missed throw back
~ 11:10 Skip passes will go :)
~ 9:34 #29 double teamed a ton, then just chucks in to the crease (just trying to do too much, understandably)
~ 8:13 #29 with the great feed inside to #10 turned in to a GLF. (#10 will figure it out as the game slows down for him)
~ 3:54 Navy EMO 6 vs 4 was just poo that time

3rd Quarter
~ 15:00 This is just something that erks the hell out me. The way we line up our wings just seems insane. We play the odds of the ball coming our way rather than making every F/O a 3v3 man to man battle. Just strange for college level game.
~ 14:26 MSM goal right down the middle. Could just be luck, but wondering if we are being coached to go put pressure at all costs, and not after settled? Something to keep an eye on.
~ 13:35 missing a goal opportunity on doorstep again. Lets hope no more of those.
~ 13:11 got beat, badly, on the sub game at midline
~ 12:24 Buy our goalie a steak dinner. Our MDD was stretched out too far, leaving middle wide open for a clean shot.
~ 12:06 #10 snags a bigtime GB at midline, gets mugged by to 2-3 MSM players. But for some reason tries to swim out with one hand. Get low, hands on plastic and stick butt, hell put it on your chest of thumb to get the hell outta there.
~ 6:12 another GLF on the doorstep
~ 6:08 #6 needs to add another shot in his arsenal
~ 4:13 MDD still too stretched out towards top and sides of the box for my liking. This leaves skip lanes open and when the backside does not pinch in/support the middle while ball is opposite, it exposes far too much turf for their O to work. Not to mention, we seemed to just slowly move in and out as we were onball/offball. IMO, we should really be moving fast in/out, especially as far out as we were.

Not going to re-watch the 4th.

This was certainly a team loss, we had plenty of opportunities to score goals directly in front of the cage. and gave MSM two. The pulse while at the game, just seemed like "someone else will get us the win" and then that pressure gets even worse as the clock ticks away and you play even tighter. MSM pulse was chill, and frankly it was a win-win matchup, and a trap game for Navy.

For those blaming coaching, certainly...and they'll accept that, it is part of the job description. However, IMO that is just like blaming the refs for a loss, when the players also know they too underperformed. Coaches do not teach missing shots wide open on the crease, they do not teach swim moves to escape a triple team GB possession, ball watching, scoring on oneself, throwing ill-advised passes, laying out the stick.

This is a pivotal moment, for a game that really had zero meaning chasing the PL AQ. Will it hurt RPI to back in with an at-large...sure, but the odds are extremely unlikely anyway. What matters 'most' is league play. I trust the staff will present the outcome in a meaningful way, and I hope they too can be vulnerable in this process.

Mercer ain't no joke, strap up.
@youthathletics, this is a really accurate "tick-tock" (as journalists say) account of the game.

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:15 am
by Farfromgeneva
FMUBart wrote: Tue Feb 08, 2022 8:26 pm
Farfromgeneva wrote: Tue Feb 08, 2022 7:43 am
old salt wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 9:09 pm
FMUBart wrote: Mon Feb 07, 2022 12:54 pmP.S. 9 goals is pathetic..
It was enough to beat Hobart in the '04 PL champ game. :mrgreen:
He wants Matt Kerwick to be hired if it can’t be Ricky. If not that Scott Urick!
No, what I want is to not see you post on every forum on Fanlax!
Stop sweating my nuts then son!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ef9QnZVpVd8

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:15 am
by FMUBart
More thoughts from the jock-sniffer...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LJgX5n4fFc

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:19 am
by Farfromgeneva
Pretty funny but let’s just get you focused on us whipping Canisius then taking down Lehigh and Cornell on our thread rather than worrying about Uricks old assistants.

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:30 am
by FMUBart
You brought it up..not sure why you feel compelled to wade into every conversation--especially one that dates back several years? In any event, if we're worried about Canisius, gonna be a looong season ;)

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:49 am
by stupefied
The loss to MSM was very surprising.

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2022 11:08 am
by Farfromgeneva
FMUBart wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:30 am You brought it up..not sure why you feel compelled to wade into every conversation--especially one that dates back several years? In any event, if we're worried about Canisius, gonna be a looong season ;)
The story on Raymond that was posted still bothers me...my problem I suppose. Wade into every conversation is not factual by any means - completely specious. But MSM is a conference opponent so this matters to any NEC fan or hobart fan (not to mention the Gravante connection as well as any other connectins I might have that you don't have any clue about).

Not worried more how do we come out of the gate with a harder OOC than we've had in 5-6yrs. Lehigh/Cornell this month BTB on the road after Canisius. Faceoffs and midfield depth with so many Fr and Sophs still making up for a lost season and a half in HS.

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2022 11:25 am
by FMUBart
Farfromgeneva wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 11:08 am
FMUBart wrote: Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:30 am You brought it up..not sure why you feel compelled to wade into every conversation--especially one that dates back several years? In any event, if we're worried about Canisius, gonna be a looong season ;)
The story on Raymond that was posted still bothers me...my problem I suppose. Wade into every conversation is not factual by any means - completely specious. But MSM is a conference opponent so this matters to any NEC fan or hobart fan (not to mention the Gravante connection as well as any other connectins I might have that you don't have any clue about).

Not worried more how do we come out of the gate with a harder OOC than we've had in 5-6yrs. Lehigh/Cornell this month BTB on the road after Canisius. Faceoffs and midfield depth with so many Fr and Sophs still making up for a lost season and a half in HS.
Over 11,000 post hardly specious...moved on.

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2022 1:05 pm
by Farfromgeneva
I guess sometimes one has to let a b**ch be a b**ch.

Re: Navy 2022

Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2022 6:09 pm
by FMUBart
I knew your wife digging me had me living rent free in your gourd..it was a long time ago, move on sniffer..

PS Gravante & I were teammates…you weren’t around.