JUST the Stolen Documents/Mar-A-Lago/"Judge" Cannon Trial

The odds are excellent that you will leave this forum hating someone.
tech37
Posts: 4367
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:02 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by tech37 »

CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:13 am
tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 8:29 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 7:51 am We all know that the r's never read the Mueller Report, so I doubt they will read these reports, but here they are:

"The slim, 85-page report reads like a Russian spy novel crossed with a sequel to Orwell’s most dystopian version of the future — right down to an interview with a paid Russian troll who said his experience in 2016, pitting American voters against each other with social media platforms of their own making, was like being “a character in the book ‘1984’ by George Orwell — a place where you have to write that white is black and black is white.”

http://www.rollcall.com/news/opinion/th ... -ever-read

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sit ... olume2.pdf
Why didn't Obama do something about it?...he knew. Perhaps instead, he and his IC saw an opportunity to exploit their carelessness?

Calling IG Horowitz and FP Durham...
Get Over It. ;)

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/21/58761404 ... ce-in-2016
"So why didn't Obama's administration do more?
That isn't clear."
:roll:
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27057
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

tech37 wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:05 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2019 5:35 pm
tech37 wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2019 4:42 pm
holmes435 wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2019 3:44 pmWhat you can't fathom is the fact that Clinton won the popular vote and more people wanted her in office than Trump. The election wasn't a rejection of Clinton and Obama policies - the voters did actually want them.
Nah, lesser of two evils holmes. Some voters thought Clinton was lesser of two evils and other voters Trump the lesser of two evils. Bottom line, two awful choices ;)
I sure thought it was two awful choices.
But you do keep skirting the fundamental point that more voters chose Clinton than Trump. Thank god for the Electoral College ;)

Unless you buy Trump's BS that that those millions more voters weren't actually Americans...
Yup, that's how it's set up.
The minority of voters can win over the preference of the majority of voters.
Didn't use to happen, but it did this past go round.

I don't think that's sustainable over the long haul.
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27057
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:19 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:13 am
tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 8:29 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 7:51 am We all know that the r's never read the Mueller Report, so I doubt they will read these reports, but here they are:

"The slim, 85-page report reads like a Russian spy novel crossed with a sequel to Orwell’s most dystopian version of the future — right down to an interview with a paid Russian troll who said his experience in 2016, pitting American voters against each other with social media platforms of their own making, was like being “a character in the book ‘1984’ by George Orwell — a place where you have to write that white is black and black is white.”

http://www.rollcall.com/news/opinion/th ... -ever-read

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sit ... olume2.pdf
Why didn't Obama do something about it?...he knew. Perhaps instead, he and his IC saw an opportunity to exploit their carelessness?

Calling IG Horowitz and FP Durham...
Get Over It. ;)

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/21/58761404 ... ce-in-2016
"So why didn't Obama's administration do more?
That isn't clear."
:roll:
I dunno why the right wing remains so dense on this.
Obama miscalculated and/or didn't know how extensive the effort was in reality. He saw the issue, but not the magnitude, and discounted the impact.

And he thought that making a stink would have been seen as baldly partisan and that such would be worse, both in the election and as a precedent for an outgoing Administration.

He assumed HRC would win and the issue could be addressed post election without the partisanship.
jhu72
Posts: 14448
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by jhu72 »

If Trump wins in 2020, it will happen again. No reason to believe he will receive more votes in 2020 than the democrat.
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27057
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

a fan wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:55 pm Ever the optimist, old salt.

And I appreciate that.
:lol:
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27057
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

jhu72 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:45 am If Trump wins in 2020, it will happen again. No reason to believe he will receive more votes in 2020 than the democrat.
Yup, and that's not going to be sustainable...unless it leads to full blown authoritarian rule.
Which is what concerns me most.
jhu72
Posts: 14448
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by jhu72 »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:46 am
jhu72 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:45 am If Trump wins in 2020, it will happen again. No reason to believe he will receive more votes in 2020 than the democrat.
Yup, and that's not going to be sustainable...unless it leads to full blown authoritarian rule.
Which is what concerns me most.
If it does happen in 2020, I expect a much bigger backlash than in years past.
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
tech37
Posts: 4367
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:02 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by tech37 »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:43 am
tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:19 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:13 am
tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 8:29 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 7:51 am We all know that the r's never read the Mueller Report, so I doubt they will read these reports, but here they are:

"The slim, 85-page report reads like a Russian spy novel crossed with a sequel to Orwell’s most dystopian version of the future — right down to an interview with a paid Russian troll who said his experience in 2016, pitting American voters against each other with social media platforms of their own making, was like being “a character in the book ‘1984’ by George Orwell — a place where you have to write that white is black and black is white.”

http://www.rollcall.com/news/opinion/th ... -ever-read

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sit ... olume2.pdf
Why didn't Obama do something about it?...he knew. Perhaps instead, he and his IC saw an opportunity to exploit their carelessness?

Calling IG Horowitz and FP Durham...
Get Over It. ;)

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/21/58761404 ... ce-in-2016
"So why didn't Obama's administration do more?
That isn't clear."
:roll:
I dunno why the right wing remains so dense on this. Right wing :lol:
Obama miscalculated and/or didn't know how extensive the effort was in reality. He saw the issue, but not the magnitude, and discounted the impact. :lol: Translation...Obama f'd up

And he thought that making a stink would have been seen as baldly partisan and that such would be worse, both in the election and as a precedent for an outgoing Administration. Amazing rationalization :roll:
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 34046
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 10:20 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:43 am
tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:19 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:13 am
tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 8:29 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 7:51 am We all know that the r's never read the Mueller Report, so I doubt they will read these reports, but here they are:

"The slim, 85-page report reads like a Russian spy novel crossed with a sequel to Orwell’s most dystopian version of the future — right down to an interview with a paid Russian troll who said his experience in 2016, pitting American voters against each other with social media platforms of their own making, was like being “a character in the book ‘1984’ by George Orwell — a place where you have to write that white is black and black is white.”

http://www.rollcall.com/news/opinion/th ... -ever-read

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sit ... olume2.pdf
Why didn't Obama do something about it?...he knew. Perhaps instead, he and his IC saw an opportunity to exploit their carelessness?

Calling IG Horowitz and FP Durham...
Get Over It. ;)

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/21/58761404 ... ce-in-2016
"So why didn't Obama's administration do more?
That isn't clear."
:roll:
I dunno why the right wing remains so dense on this. Right wing :lol:
Obama miscalculated and/or didn't know how extensive the effort was in reality. He saw the issue, but not the magnitude, and discounted the impact. :lol: Translation...Obama f'd up

And he thought that making a stink would have been seen as baldly partisan and that such would be worse, both in the election and as a precedent for an outgoing Administration. Amazing rationalization :roll:
Why hasn't the Trump administration done more to defend against it? :D
“I wish you would!”
a fan
Posts: 19523
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:05 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by a fan »

tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:19 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:13 am
tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 8:29 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 7:51 am We all know that the r's never read the Mueller Report, so I doubt they will read these reports, but here they are:

"The slim, 85-page report reads like a Russian spy novel crossed with a sequel to Orwell’s most dystopian version of the future — right down to an interview with a paid Russian troll who said his experience in 2016, pitting American voters against each other with social media platforms of their own making, was like being “a character in the book ‘1984’ by George Orwell — a place where you have to write that white is black and black is white.”

http://www.rollcall.com/news/opinion/th ... -ever-read

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sit ... olume2.pdf
Why didn't Obama do something about it?...he knew. Perhaps instead, he and his IC saw an opportunity to exploit their carelessness?

Calling IG Horowitz and FP Durham...
Get Over It. ;)

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/21/58761404 ... ce-in-2016
"So why didn't Obama's administration do more?
That isn't clear."
:roll:
You know exactly why: because no matter what Obama did, it would have been construed by you and all the other Obama haters as wrong.

Give me your version of what you think it would have looked like if Obama had handled the Russia issue flawlessly, and I'll give you the FoxNation spin as to how it was "wrong".

Not trying to pick a fight. There was no "right" way to handle this, and if Trump had been any other President, he and his crew wouldn't have lied about Russian contacts every chance they got, and he sure as *hit wouldn't have fired Comey. Comey would have been allowed to finish his report, tell the AG he found no laws broken, and that would have been the end of it for all but the die hard tin foil hat wearers.
tech37
Posts: 4367
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:02 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by tech37 »

a fan wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 11:05 am
tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:19 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:13 am
tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 8:29 am
CU88 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 7:51 am We all know that the r's never read the Mueller Report, so I doubt they will read these reports, but here they are:

"The slim, 85-page report reads like a Russian spy novel crossed with a sequel to Orwell’s most dystopian version of the future — right down to an interview with a paid Russian troll who said his experience in 2016, pitting American voters against each other with social media platforms of their own making, was like being “a character in the book ‘1984’ by George Orwell — a place where you have to write that white is black and black is white.”

http://www.rollcall.com/news/opinion/th ... -ever-read

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sit ... olume2.pdf
Why didn't Obama do something about it?...he knew. Perhaps instead, he and his IC saw an opportunity to exploit their carelessness?

Calling IG Horowitz and FP Durham...
Get Over It. ;)

https://www.npr.org/2018/02/21/58761404 ... ce-in-2016
"So why didn't Obama's administration do more?
That isn't clear."
:roll:
Give me your version of what you think it would have looked like if Obama had handled the Russia issue flawlessly, and I'll give you the FoxNation spin as to how it was "wrong".
Oh I'll get right on that for you a fan...sure. Of course my version and FoxNews are one in the same so what's the point? :lol:

Nah, I'll just wait for the investigations to play out, then form my final opinion.
User avatar
dislaxxic
Posts: 4652
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 11:00 am
Location: Moving to Montana Soon...

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by dislaxxic »

I see the the daily rope-a-dope of our favorite forum "moderate" continues unabated. Nice work AF. He doesn't even realize he's out cold on his feet! :lol:

..
"The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog." - Calvin, to Hobbes
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 34046
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

dislaxxic wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 11:57 am I see the the daily rope-a-dope of our favorite forum "moderate" continues unabated. Nice work AF. He doesn't even realize he's out cold on his feet! :lol:

..
Yep!!!

“I wish you would!”
a fan
Posts: 19523
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:05 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by a fan »

tech37 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 11:35 am Oh I'll get right on that for you a fan...sure. Of course my version and FoxNews are one in the same so what's the point? :lol:
Wasn't asking you to do that. I was honestly not trying to pick a fight

Simply pointing out that there isn't a "correct" way to do what was asked of Obama. The problem isn't Obama. The problem is that our Federal government is not designed properly. There is no way to investigate the President for wrongdoing without conflicts of interest and/or heavy leaking to the media.

Same reason Mark Felt leaked to the WaPo. It was his only move.
jhu72
Posts: 14448
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by jhu72 »

So according to PBS, Syrian authorities are claiming up to 800 ISIS prisoners have now been released. Amb Jefferies claims only dozens. How he would know, no one seems to know.
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
User avatar
old salt
Posts: 18813
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 11:44 am

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by old salt »

jhu72 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:30 pm So according to PBS, Syrian authorities are claiming up to 800 ISIS prisoners have now been released. Amb Jefferies claims only dozens. How he would know, no one seems to know.
Probably by talking to his staff still embedded with the SDF in NE Syria.
How does PBS know ?

Remarkable performance by Sen Jim Jeffrey today before the Senate Foreign Relations Comm.
Lot's of good info. Best summaries at 2:14 & 2:22.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?465519-1/ ... withdrawal

I learned more from Jeffrey's testimony than everything I've found in the MSM since this thing started.
Any news outfit could distill it into a 10-15 min series of clips.
Our MSM is clueless. BBC, DW & Al Jazeera are days ahead.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/ ... 33484.html
jhu72
Posts: 14448
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by jhu72 »

old salt wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2019 1:28 am
jhu72 wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2019 9:30 pm So according to PBS, Syrian authorities are claiming up to 800 ISIS prisoners have now been released. Amb Jefferies claims only dozens. How he would know, no one seems to know.
Probably by talking to his staff still embedded with the SDF in NE Syria.
How does PBS know ? -- they are repeating statements made by the Syrians and the Amb -- you probably could have figured that out for yourself

Remarkable performance by Sen Jim Jeffrey today before the Senate Foreign Relations Comm.
Lot's of good info. Best summaries at 2:14 & 2:22.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?465519-1/ ... withdrawal

I learned more from Jeffrey's testimony than everything I've found in the MSM since this thing started.
Any news outfit could distill it into a 10-15 min series of clips.
Our MSM is clueless. BBC, DW & Al Jazeera are days ahead.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/ ... 33484.html
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
foreverlax
Posts: 3219
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:21 pm

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by foreverlax »

Donald J. Trump

Verified account

@realDonaldTrump
3h3 hours ago
More
Big success on the Turkey/Syria Border. Safe Zone created! Ceasefire has held and combat missions have ended. Kurds are safe and have worked very nicely with us. Captured ISIS prisoners secured. I will be making a statement at 11:00 A.M. from the White House. Thank you!
Thank you to Putin!!
Trinity
Posts: 3513
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 8:14 am

Re: The Politics of National Security

Post by Trinity »

"New York City Bar Calls for US AG William Barr's Recusal in Ukraine Matter. If Barr does not recuse himself, the bar association's statement said, 'he should resign or, failing that, be subject to sanctions, including possible removal, by Congress'."

law.com/newyorklawjour…
“I don’t take responsibility at all.” —Donald J Trump
Post Reply

Return to “POLITICS”