Re: The Hate Directed at the LGBTQ+
Posted: Sun May 28, 2023 5:12 pm
It’s absolutely genetic. What kind of person would subject themselves to the derision and prejudice the LGBTQ+ have to deal with every day if their sexuality or presentation were choices?old salt wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 4:31 pmAgain -- my snowflaker denial was in reference to the recent discussion on this topic.a fan wrote: ↑Sun May 28, 2023 11:15 amStill lying. Both for the snowflake, and for you "I only engage" claim.
I sent you the Pm telling you I'd leave you alone. You kept engaging me, even though I didn't quote you or name you. You did it a few times before I finally said to myself "message received, he wants me to keep posting with me", like any rational person would.
This is the center of you and your personality, and explains everything. You don't want to be held responsible for any of your past posts. You want to wallow in your hypocrisy, and not get called out for the fact that your values and moral shift and move according to which party we are discussing.
You're upset that I have noticed you do this. Other posters like TLD and MDLax know you do this, too.
But at the same time you do this? You tell us you want an honest conversation....which is a lie.
What you want to do is sling mud at Dems, while protecting your precious Republican Party. So you do things like yell at your fellow posters for daring to call out Trump's corruption in Scotland, while at the same time, you call Hunter's briefcase "evidence", and get mad if anyone dares get in the way of that laptop. It's insane.
Sorry man, you're on a forum. and you're gonna get called out for intellectual dishonesty.
The part that doesn't occur to you? You can stop being hypocritical with political parties. YOU can control that. Stop doing it, and I'll stop calling you out for it. Your posts don't exist in a vacuum, sorry.
I'm not going to let you be hypocritical, sorry, no.
But after I wrote that? I sent you the PM. You refused that offer, too. So here we are.
Yeah. Ya did.....you asked me for proof of my claim. Here ya go....
Thank you for proving my point. We go around and around because you ALWAYS have some dumb excuse for being wrong.old salt wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 6:31 pm I did not call you out. I simply asked for examples. I could not recall seeing any such commercials. Now that you've provided examples, I still don't recall having seen them. Based on the article you linked, they were not widely viewed or aired. They were narrowly targeted.
You can't say "they were narrowly targeted". The social influencer? Wasn't on TV at all. By definition, it's more "narrowly targeted".
How did you hear about it, OS? Did you, unprompted, go to her YouTube channel? F no.
You heard about it from RIGHTWINGNUTJOBLAND in your RightWIngMediaFeed. You made it go viral.
Now your team is complaining that it went viral after taking it viral.
If you had left it alone, as you did with the 2014 piece, and not taken it viral? It would be the EXACT same thing as the 2014 commercial...you would have never seen or heard about it. Which is, for the 10th time, the ENTIRE point to this thread.
And you're pretending you're too stupid to understand this.
Right. So concede the point, and move on. You're unable to do this. YOU are the problem, not me.
Again, you can't answer the question: when was the last time you conceded a point I made, and just shut the F up? No equivocations. No bullsh(t. Just concede the point, and move on.
But sure, it's MY fault, and you have NOTHING to do with going round and round and round.
What are you, five years old? This is the most boomer comment you've ever made. "I didn't see the ads, therefore it wasn't shown".
Are your viewing habits the same as a 21-35 year old male? Gosh, i hope not. Protip: I didn't see it, either. I don't watch enough TV to notice ads. I can't remember the last time I saw the Superbowl live. We're not the target audience, OS. Shouldn't be that hard to figure out.
That's right. Why?
Becuase of my point: you and your team didn't take it viral. Which, for the 100th time, is the entire point to this thread.
Take a knee, move on.
F no. THIS is why we go round and round. Next time? All you have to write is "huh, I didn't see those 2014 ads, you're right". And then guess what? The freaking conversation is over. We move on. And chalk it up to a Xmas miracle that you were able to admit you learned something, or that you were (gasp) wrong.
That's the point given to you by TeamRightWingNutJob.
That's like saying the point Kim Kardashian is making is that she's openly straight, and celebrating it. You don't notice Kardashian's sexual preferences because you support it. The problem isn't Dylan. The problem is you and your fellow Americans who take even a millisecond worrying about who someone they never met sleeps with. For all you know, Dylan could like to sleep with women. Why would a man your age....or any age...care? Do you need more hobbies?
Your wife sleeps with men. Should I ostracize her because I think it's weird to sleep with men?
You're giving me a homophobic interpretation of what the Ad (it's not an Ad, but whatever) is about. The Ad is actually about Budweiser. Or do you think that Anheuser Busch paid a few million dollars with the intent of selling Clydesdale horses on those 9/11 ads?
Doing your word search, you'll find I used "snowflake" (in my words), once, > 2 years ago, as an adjective, on an entirely different topic.
The rest of the search hits were for others using it in quote chains. Nice try.
I re-engaged with you in a non-confrontational manner, sticking to just the subject matter.
It was not long before you dragged us down another rabbit hole, personalizing it & making it a (R) vs (D) thing.
I get few PM's. I don't delete them. I find no PM's from you in my inbox dating back to '2018.
I'm homophobic because I'm not sexually attracted to men, but if I was, it would be genetic. Okie dokie.
If I'm trapped in the out of touch boomer fringe, why are A-B's sales tanking ?
You don't hire a social media influencer unless you want your message to go viral.
Don't blame this on "my team". A-B got the attention they paid for.
On the A-B / Dylan issue. I reopened discussion just to update the impact it's having on A-B sales & what they're trying to do.
You immediately began deflecting & diverting, trying to tell us that this is business as usual, blaming it on "my team" & ignoring the impact on sales.
Who's gaslighting on this issue ?