Page 73 of 201

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 4:31 pm
by jhu06
51percentcorn wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 1:56 pm Nice post 06 - 2 very valid points relative to the upcoming season

Angelus' importance and contributions to last year's season almost cannot be overstated. When he played well and contributed points Hopkins won - when he did not play (Loyola) or was held under control - Hopkins lost. In the 5 losses that he played in - he scored 1 goal and passed out 6 assists. That is 6% of his goals and 14% of his assists (While 5 games of the 17 he played in represents pretty much 30%). In certainly 3 of the most important games of the season (Penn State, BIG semi against Maryland and Notre Dame) he accounted for 3 assists total. SO that tells me that to help towards an even more successful season Hopkins must figure out 2 things - how to get him untracked when he is playing better opponents and defensemen and the converse - more effective alternatives if a Posey or Ajax or one of the UVA condors is giving Angelus problems.

The Denver face-off man is certainly a concern and an important factor in the season opener. You never know about match-ups until they happen and certainly its better to start with the ball more than 50% of the time than not. You certainly wouldn't call Denver a high scoring team from last year - 11.5 goals per game - so the face-off man could allow the PIoneers to get in a rhythm with the Matt Brown offense or become very important for possessions in a low scoring game. February 3rd is anybody's guess for weather.

Denver is a noon game which will feel like 10 am to their players. Then there's the elevation-they're going from and yes I looked this up 5000+ feet above sea level to 300 feet above sea level.

https://en-gb.topographic-map.com/map-9 ... 18&zoom=14

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2024 8:51 am
by 51percentcorn
And we were doing better.

Given these are 19-23 year old atheltes training at a high level - the time change effect will likely be minimal if not non-existent - compensated by the fact there will be alot of adrenaline for the first game of the year and I am sure Brown and his staff will be on it.
The altitude change? First - you're surprised the "Mile High" city is approx. 5,000 ft above sea level? Second, while everybody is different - the reason athletes train at altitude or simulate it with oxgen equipmnent is to build up red blood cells on the theory that it will provide a boost at sea level so in theory this helps Denver. Maybe that's what you meant but again very likely nothing to see here.

What there is to see is how much these two teams are mirror images of each other. Denver returns every single player that was listed as a starter in the Big East Final against Georgetown and their roster has 18 seniors and grad students. Their MO is not to be run and gun but rather to execute more 6v6 as evidenced by 35 shots per game - fairly high turnover rate and they don't take alot of penalties. Goalie percentage was under 50. Given the first game of the year - possibility of pretty cold and even poor weather - and the two teams willingness to hold the ball - scoring could be low - which is always concerning when you might be at a face-off disadvantage. A second half 2 or 3 goal lead could look like the Rockies to climb for either team.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 6:25 pm
by jhu06
51percentcorn wrote: Mon Jan 15, 2024 8:51 am And we were doing better.

Given these are 19-23 year old atheltes training at a high level - the time change effect will likely be minimal if not non-existent - compensated by the fact there will be alot of adrenaline for the first game of the year and I am sure Brown and his staff will be on it.
The altitude change? First - you're surprised the "Mile High" city is approx. 5,000 ft above sea level? Second, while everybody is different - the reason athletes train at altitude or simulate it with oxgen equipmnent is to build up red blood cells on the theory that it will provide a boost at sea level so in theory this helps Denver. Maybe that's what you meant but again very likely nothing to see here.

What there is to see is how much these two teams are mirror images of each other. Denver returns every single player that was listed as a starter in the Big East Final against Georgetown and their roster has 18 seniors and grad students. Their MO is not to be run and gun but rather to execute more 6v6 as evidenced by 35 shots per game - fairly high turnover rate and they don't take alot of penalties. Goalie percentage was under 50. Given the first game of the year - possibility of pretty cold and even poor weather - and the two teams willingness to hold the ball - scoring could be low - which is always concerning when you might be at a face-off disadvantage. A second half 2 or 3 goal lead could look like the Rockies to climb for either team.
Very smart. Dunn and Callahan need to have big years. I don't know anything about Lane or the freshman faceoff guy that's listed. They have an absurd number of ssdms listed on the roster it seems awful lot of bodies there.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 6:46 pm
by HopFan16
Looks like Todaro is making the switch to SSDM. He got some run there in the fall, so not a huge surprise, especially with D/LSM already looking pretty deep.

11 bodies at the position does seem like a lot, till you look a little closer.

6 of them are likely gone after this year. Another one has been hurt and has barely practiced since he stepped foot on campus. And I bet if other teams properly labeled their shorties on the roster (instead of lumping them in with offensive middies), 11 wouldn't seem so crazy. It's one position you'd much rather have too many of, than not enough. Given Raposo's injury scare in the fall (he's already back at practice and will be fine, btw), it's better to be safe than sorry. A lot of teams have been killed by poor SSDM depth.

It's a veteran and experienced group, and they don't need any contributions from younger guys (barring injury), but I wonder if they try to get someone like Colhoun or Claiborne some minutes. Otherwise you run the risk of graduating Martin, Jaronski, Aviles, etc. and then next year you're left with a bunch of guys who have never played before.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 8:04 pm
by 51percentcorn
Well - I am all for playing Billings/Claiborne/Colhoun etc. but just like across the field - probably not going to happen very much. Look at last year - aside from Ohio State and Bryant - the highest total number of players in a game was 27 against Michigan - and Hop switched goalies at half time and used 3 face-off men so traditionally it could have been 25 - right there at my magic number of 23/24. So this schedule likely does not afford the luxury of sending out inexperience when you are in a tight game and you have 2 grad students and 2 seniors at your disposal. Maybe if you time it right and can send them out against a team's second mid-field you can sneak in some runs but it all depends on the status of the game.

Collison and the emergence of English give you some valued offensive experience returning in '25 and Melndez has another year of eligibility but this is the cloud in the silver lining of a deep experienced team. If Smith wants/gets his medical redshirt the close D will only lose Szuluk which will help.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 8:19 pm
by HopFan16
51percentcorn wrote: Tue Jan 16, 2024 8:04 pm Well - I am all for playing Billings/Claiborne/Colhoun etc. but just like across the field - probably not going to happen very much. Look at last year - aside from Ohio State and Bryant - the highest total number of players in a game was 27 against Michigan - and Hop switched goalies at half time and used 3 face-off men so traditionally it could have been 25 - right there at my magic number of 23/24. So this schedule likely does not afford the luxury of sending out inexperience when you are in a tight game and you have 2 grad students and 2 seniors at your disposal. Maybe if you time it right and can send them out against a team's second mid-field you can sneak in some runs but it all depends on the status of the game.

Collison and the emergence of English give you some valued offensive experience returning in '25 and Melndez has another year of eligibility but this is the cloud in the silver lining of a deep experienced team. If Smith wants/gets his medical redshirt the close D will only lose Szuluk which will help.
Billings has dealt with seemingly never-ending lower body injuries. The upside is tantalizing, but I don't think he's close to seeing the field right now. Hopefully next year.

In the fall, Claiborne and Colhoun both looked like future contributors at the position. Like you said, though, it would probably require an injury ahead of them to get more than a cameo appearance or two this season. And then you have to ask yourself if a couple trivial runs is worth burning the year of eligibility.

Curious to see how the d-mid groupings shake out. A pairing of Raposo and Aviles, alongside Deans at pole, would be absolutely *lethal* in transition. The Martin/Jaronski pair probably won't run quite as much but those three are gonna be flying up the field.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2024 8:15 am
by 51percentcorn
Yes the future of the SSDM position will be interesting
11 names - 3 absolutely have to go after this year - Martin/Jaronski Aviles
2 have another year of eligibility - Ince and Arteaga - unfortunately Marcelo has played in 1 game over 3 years - one of those unsung players that toils through all the work but doesn't make the field - Ince will be mildly interesting - undersized but experienced
Raposo - appeared in 4 games in 2021 - the last being the 2nd Michigan game which was the 7th of the 13 games that year - was he hurt? Can a medical eligibility year be applied even if they wanted one? Doesn't sound like it but who knows
Todaro and Billings - oft injured
McDonald - did not play last year and 5'9" 175 is not ideal
Colhoun and Claiborne - Freshmen

2 more signed for the '25 season - Ace and Pace

So if 6 leave you could still have at least 7 but maybe close to zero experience - future is now

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2024 9:45 am
by HopFan16
I think Ince is done after this season. Already has a nice job lined up after graduation.

Raposo — would love to have him back but yeah, another year might be stretch. Though we did say the same about Degnon. And it seems like the NCAA is giving them out like candy these days. So who knows.

Kilrain now has the "D/LSM" tag that Brown and Kaufman have. Very interested to see how much time he gets and where. Looked the part in the fall, but, again, not many available slots this year unless someone gets hurt.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2024 12:37 pm
by nyjay
Speaking of SSDM, US Lacrosse magazine has Martin as 2nd team preseason AA. Collison and Smith as 3rd team, and Melendez and Irelan and HMs.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2024 6:34 pm
by 51percentcorn
I would say US Lax Magazine just gave some unintentional bulletin board material to the Jays with their preview of Georgetown:

"Specifically, between February 17 and March 5, Georgetown’s resilience will be put to the test with a grueling lineup of games against Brown, High Point, Penn and Notre Dame. This intense period will significantly shape their RPI and Strength-of-Record. And given the importance of cross-conference games in the RPI math, how they fare could have some real knock-on effects."

Excuse me - who do they play on Feb 10?

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:24 am
by 51percentcorn
https://www.usalaxmagazine.com/college/ ... denver-men

US LAx MAG preview of Denver - sounds like they have a new piece in this red-shirt freshman attackman - Malawsky. If he starts and/or when he plays - will Smith take him? The preview says he's their guy at X.

If Hopkins is ranked 6th or 7th I guess the JHU preview will be out Thursday or Friday.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2024 11:29 am
by HopFan16
51percentcorn wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:24 am https://www.usalaxmagazine.com/college/ ... denver-men

US LAx MAG preview of Denver - sounds like they have a new piece in this red-shirt freshman attackman - Malawsky. If he starts and/or when he plays - will Smith take him? The preview says he's their guy at X.

If Hopkins is ranked 6th or 7th I guess the JHU preview will be out Thursday or Friday.
Same Jr A team as Phillips and Charboneau, could help with the scouting report since there is no tape of this kid playing field lacrosse. He's not going to have a very fun debut if Smith is on him. Sillstrop is by far their most dynamic scorer, but he plays almost exclusively above the cage. Could see Smith sticking to him and Szuluk matching up with whoever's at X. They've done that before.

Think our D matches up well with their offense. Big question is gonna be faceoffs. Callahan surprisingly got the better of Stathakis in our scrimmage vs. Denver last year but I would not expect a repeat of that.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 11:28 am
by HopFan16
Ranked 5th in the IL media poll.

Scrimmage vs. UMBC is on Friday at 5pm at the indoor St. James Complex outside of DC. Open to the public, but tix cost $10: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/mens-ncaa- ... 9654002957

HOB is off on one of his exotic trips, so gonna need someone else to attend and report back.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:26 pm
by JaXKy0521S
I’ll be there and can post updates from the scrimmage.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:22 am
by Hack2022
Hopkins ranked 5th coming into the season. Let’s see if they can take it all the way this year.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:45 am
by LaxAllStars
https://laxallstars.com/the-second-wave/

Hopkins opens Feb 3 vs Denver noon

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 11:27 am
by HopFan16
JaXKy0521S wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:26 pm I’ll be there and can post updates from the scrimmage.
You're a legend.

Quint's assessment seems fair, only issue is the characterization that we were "not in the same galaxy" as ND last year. Don't get me wrong, the Irish were clearly a better team, but they were not astronomically better. That quarterfinal game was pretty competitive. He does say that he thinks the gap between the Jays and ND/UVA is closing.

Felt like there was a quiet dig at Petro in his Cuse writeup. Says their new DC Odierna will "simplify schemes," implying they were too complicated before.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2024 4:33 pm
by flalax22
Not that long ago I looked at the Jays schedule and wondered where the wins would come from. This year I have them favored in every match up save Virginia and Maryland. Maybe that’s way too optimistic but this team seems ready to handle their business.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2024 6:35 pm
by 51percentcorn
flalax22 wrote: Wed Jan 24, 2024 4:33 pm Not that long ago I looked at the Jays schedule and wondered where the wins would come from. This year I have them favored in every match up save Virginia and Maryland. Maybe that’s way too optimistic but this team seems ready to handle their business.
Just out of curiosity - not saying you are wrong either - but interested in your thoughts on why you would have Hopkins as an underdog to Maryland. Maryland lost more to eligibility - Makar/Gephardt/Lacey but gains Malever and McEneany back. Hopkins has hopefully improved its goaltending as that was a key stat in those two games last year - Hopkins goalie averaged 38% in those two games - admittedly the Maryland goalie did not fare well in the regular season contest but was above 50 in the BIG semi. In the 3rd and 4th quarters of those two games - so an entire 60 minutes of playing time - the Hopkins goalie made 5 saves and Maryland scored 14. Game is at Homewood - yes I know its been flipped somewhat in that any of Hopkins more recent victories seem to have come at College Park but I would think if Ierlan gives them anything it feels like a pick'em.

As I said before - the first part of the season - is so important before the 3 road/neutral ACC games.

Re: Johns Hopkins 2024

Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2024 7:45 am
by flalax22
51percentcorn wrote: Wed Jan 24, 2024 6:35 pm
flalax22 wrote: Wed Jan 24, 2024 4:33 pm Not that long ago I looked at the Jays schedule and wondered where the wins would come from. This year I have them favored in every match up save Virginia and Maryland. Maybe that’s way too optimistic but this team seems ready to handle their business.
Just out of curiosity - not saying you are wrong either - but interested in your thoughts on why you would have Hopkins as an underdog to Maryland. Maryland lost more to eligibility - Makar/Gephardt/Lacey but gains Malever and McEneany back. Hopkins has hopefully improved its goaltending as that was a key stat in those two games last year - Hopkins goalie averaged 38% in those two games - admittedly the Maryland goalie did not fare well in the regular season contest but was above 50 in the BIG semi. In the 3rd and 4th quarters of those two games - so an entire 60 minutes of playing time - the Hopkins goalie made 5 saves and Maryland scored 14. Game is at Homewood - yes I know its been flipped somewhat in that any of Hopkins more recent victories seem to have come at College Park but I would think if Ierlan gives them anything it feels like a pick'em.

As I said before - the first part of the season - is so important before the 3 road/neutral ACC games.
Honestly it was based on nothing more than history and probably me not willing to go there yet. I definitely agree with your point especially about goalie play