LaxPower Back-Up Stick

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:28 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 6:28 pm More musings from The President of The United States of America before he gets tucked in for night night:

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/sta ... 86592?s=21

You know what is funny, I would not even know about this, had you not posted his jerk. Why are you supporting Trump and his message

thought you only used twitter to check Ohio hoops stuff

I looked at his Twitter for the first time about 2 weeks ago. I was shocked....it is so bad I decided to post it so people that defend him, like you, can see how ridiculous he is. I find it hilarious. That’s your guy....but he is rich and knows how to have a good time! Why would you not want to be like him or at least be invited to the parties.... you hip old critter you!

Trump 2024 MAGAA

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:21 am

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:28 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 6:28 pm More musings from The President of The United States of America before he gets tucked in for night night:

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/sta ... 86592?s=21

You know what is funny, I would not even know about this, had you not posted his jerk. Why are you supporting Trump and his message

thought you only used twitter to check Ohio hoops stuff

I looked at his Twitter for the first time about 2 weeks ago. I was shocked....it is so bad I decided to post it so people that defend him, like you, can see how ridiculous he is. I find it hilarious. That’s your guy....but he is rich and knows how to have a good time! Why would you not want to be like him or at least be invited to the parties.... you hip old critter you!

Trump 2024 MAGAA

Another Goebbells comment. Spew the lie enough, you believe it.

Sick of the constant abuse and lies that I support trump. why this place sucks.......

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:21 am

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:04 am

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:30 am

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 1:43 pm

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 11:52 am And yet...you're so busy supporting Trump...

Your just jealous because Shirley Chisolm never ate at your house.

because I say so, he is. a bigot. He has NO idea who Shirley is, or was. mdlax was too busy shilling for Agnew in 1972

yup, another way out of bounds post.

as are your childish, constant rants , like TLD, that I support Trump. Just because you say so. (hence the toungue N cheek "bigot" comment )

Sorry you are lacking depth or critical thinking skills, if you conclude that I support Don J. Trump.

Have you played golf, outdoors, recently? In Florida?

I have certainly not ranted about your support, you are far from alone on here in making statements defending Trump or supporting his views about conspiracies.

"bigot" is tongue in cheek??

Why do you ask if I've played golf outdoors? (certainly haven't indoors ). I've said I have (poorly, I prefer balls that are moving...that little ball sitting still is quite frustrating to me!).

Do you imagine that I have an issue with going outdoors and getting some exercise (I do a lot of bike riding too, tennis yesterday as well) and other ways to get some enjoyment and fresh air?...yes, physically distanced.

So, why ask?

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:28 am

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:21 am

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:04 am

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:30 am

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 1:43 pm

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 11:52 am And yet...you're so busy supporting Trump...

Your just jealous because Shirley Chisolm never ate at your house.

because I say so, he is. a bigot. He has NO idea who Shirley is, or was. mdlax was too busy shilling for Agnew in 1972

yup, another way out of bounds post.

as are your childish, constant rants , like TLD, that I support Trump. Just because you say so. (hence the toungue N cheek "bigot" comment )

Sorry you are lacking depth or critical thinking skills, if you conclude that I support Don J. Trump.

Have you played golf, outdoors, recently? In Florida?

I have certainly not ranted about your support, you are far from alone on here in making statements defending Trump or supporting his views about conspiracies.

"bigot" is tongue in cheek??

Why do you ask if I've played golf outdoors? (certainly haven't indoors ). I've said I have (poorly, I prefer balls that are moving...that little ball sitting still is quite frustrating to me!).

Do you imagine that I have an issue with going outdoors and getting some exercise (I do a lot of bike riding too, tennis yesterday as well) and other ways to get some enjoyment and fresh air?...yes, physically distanced.

So, why ask?

Aren't you the guy who states, with glee in fact, that you put me on "ignore" ?

speaks volumes as to who you are.

Here is the opening to the State of Georgia's brief, in response to Syd Kraken'up:

"Plaintiffs, a group of disappointed Republican presidential electors, filed a Complaint alleging widespread fraud in the November general election in Georgia, weaving an unsupported tale of “ballot stuffing,” the switching of votes by an “algorithm” uploaded to the state’s electronic voting equipment that switched votes from President Trump to Joe Biden, hacking by foreign actors from Iran and China, and other nefarious acts by unnamed actors. Plaintiffs did not bring this election challenge in state court as provided by Georgia’s Election Code. Instead, they ask this Court to change the election outcome by judicial fiat and order the Governor, the Secretary, and the State Election Board to “de-certify” the results of the election and replace the presidential electors for Joe Biden (who were selected by a majority of Georgia voters by popular vote as provided by state law) with presidential electors for President Trump. Their claims would be extraordinary if true, but they are not. Much like the mythological “kraken” monster1 after which Plaintiffs have named this lawsuit, their claims of election fraud and malfeasance belong more to the kraken’s realm of mythos than they do to reality."

Here's a link to the brief; pages 4 through 9 detail the security of, and safeguards within, the Georgia voting system:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov ... 61.0_1.pdf

For whatever it's worth, the person who filed this brief, Georgia Attorney General Christopher Carr, is a Republican, was once the GOP Senator Johnny Isakson's Chief of Staff, and is a member of the Federalist Society. Part of the Deep State.

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:49 am

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:28 am

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:21 am

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:04 am

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:30 am

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 1:43 pm

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 11:52 am And yet...you're so busy supporting Trump...

Your just jealous because Shirley Chisolm never ate at your house.

because I say so, he is. a bigot. He has NO idea who Shirley is, or was. mdlax was too busy shilling for Agnew in 1972

yup, another way out of bounds post.

as are your childish, constant rants , like TLD, that I support Trump. Just because you say so. (hence the toungue N cheek "bigot" comment )

Sorry you are lacking depth or critical thinking skills, if you conclude that I support Don J. Trump.

Have you played golf, outdoors, recently? In Florida?

I have certainly not ranted about your support, you are far from alone on here in making statements defending Trump or supporting his views about conspiracies.

"bigot" is tongue in cheek??

Why do you ask if I've played golf outdoors? (certainly haven't indoors ). I've said I have (poorly, I prefer balls that are moving...that little ball sitting still is quite frustrating to me!).

Do you imagine that I have an issue with going outdoors and getting some exercise (I do a lot of bike riding too, tennis yesterday as well) and other ways to get some enjoyment and fresh air?...yes, physically distanced.

So, why ask?

Aren't you the guy who states, with glee in fact, that you put me on "ignore" ?

speaks volumes as to who you are.

uh huh
Yes, I have to open up your ramblings and personal attacks to see them, regardless of what alias you are posting on in a given day...I found it particularly amusing when you had one alias respond to the other!

What was the golf question about?

pretty sure it was about hypocrisy. lotta that going around for all of us. maybe our biggest obstacle. or probably.

for now, we need the vax!

What do the legal types think about this. Seems like Alito wants briefs by the 8th and not 9th?

https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/a ... -election/

This seems very odd to me. If, in fact, Alito’s initial order set a deadline of December 9 at 4 PM for the respondent’s brief, I don’t understand why he would yesterday or today move that deadline up.

If I were writing the brief, I would be really pissed off. Extremely unfair to first tell the lawyer he has until Wednesday at 4 PM, and then move the deadline up a day and a half around two days before the new due date for the brief.

Maybe the earlier reporting of the December 9 deadline was wrong, although that doesn’t seem to be the case.

So what to make of this? It still seems extremely unlikely to me that the court is going to step in and interfere with Pennsylvania’s decision to certify the results.

To hold the Pennsylvania mail in statute unconstitutional would be wrong for at least two reasons. First, the Pennsylvania legislature certainly has the constitutional authority to pass a statute permitting mail in voting. Second, if Pennsylvania’s law is unconstitutional, then does that make every other mail in law in the country unconstitutional? Obviously, that can’t be the case.

Maybe Justice Alito simply feels that the court needs to have time to act before the Safeharbor deadline passes. If the decision is going to be that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision is upheld, that would be fine. But if the court is going to try to muck up the process in some respect, that would be exceedingly unfair given the impending Safeharbor deadline. That deadline was critical to the court in Bush v. Gore. Why wouldn’t it still be critical?

njbill wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:09 pm This seems very odd to me. If, in fact, Alito’s initial order set a deadline of December 9 at 4 PM for the respondent’s brief, I don’t understand why he would yesterday or today move that deadline up.

If I were writing the brief, I would be really ticked off. Extremely unfair to first tell the lawyer he has until Wednesday at 4 PM, and then move the deadline up a day and a half around two days before the new due date for the brief.

Maybe the earlier reporting of the December 9 deadline was wrong, although that doesn’t seem to be the case.

So what to make of this? It still seems extremely unlikely to me that the court is going to step in and interfere with Pennsylvania’s decision to certify the results.

To hold the Pennsylvania mail in statute unconstitutional would be wrong for at least two reasons. First, the Pennsylvania legislature certainly has the constitutional authority to pass a statute permitting mail in voting. Second, if Pennsylvania’s law is unconstitutional, then does that make every other mail in law in the country unconstitutional? Obviously, that can’t be the case.

Maybe Justice Alito simply feels that the court needs to have time to act before the Safeharbor deadline passes. If the decision is going to be that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision is upheld, that would be fine. But if the court is going to try to muck up the process in some respect, that would be exceedingly unfair given the impending Safeharbor deadline. That deadline was critical to the court in Bush v. Gore. Why wouldn’t it still be critical?

Thanks for the response. It all seems rather jenky to me as a lay person.

I do not understand how you would run an election with a set of rules. The electorate participates with that set of rules. Now you’d say the rules are no good? People in good faith played by the rules they were given. Again seems rather jenky to me.

Plus weren’t these same rules used in the primary?

Yes.

In fact, the legislation was passed last year (2019). Kelly waited to challenge the mail in law until after T**** lost Pennsylvania, which is why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit on laches grounds. Kelly could have filed this lawsuit last year, or many many months ago.

His lawsuit only raises state law issues. The US Supreme Court has no business interfering with the ruling of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Pennsylvania state issues.

njbill wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:30 pm Yes.

In fact, the legislation was passed last year (2019). Kelly waited to challenge the mail in law until after T**** lost Pennsylvania, which is why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit on laches grounds. Kelly could have filed this lawsuit last year, or many many months ago.

His lawsuit only raises state law issues. The US Supreme Court has no business interfering with the ruling of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Pennsylvania state issues.

Thanks. Seems reasonable but What the heck do I know

Bart wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:42 pm

njbill wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:30 pm Yes.

In fact, the legislation was passed last year (2019). Kelly waited to challenge the mail in law until after T**** lost Pennsylvania, which is why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit on laches grounds. Kelly could have filed this lawsuit last year, or many many months ago.

His lawsuit only raises state law issues. The US Supreme Court has no business interfering with the ruling of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Pennsylvania state issues.

Thanks. Seems reasonable but What the heck do I know

Bart, pretty good thread here from a University of Texas law professor:

https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/statu ... 1951417345

Georgia election official Gabe Sterling on NBC: "The president's statements are false. They're disinformation. They are stoking anger and fear among his supporters. And hell, I voted for him."

seacoaster wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 3:56 pm

Bart wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:42 pm

njbill wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:30 pm Yes.

In fact, the legislation was passed last year (2019). Kelly waited to challenge the mail in law until after T**** lost Pennsylvania, which is why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit on laches grounds. Kelly could have filed this lawsuit last year, or many many months ago.

His lawsuit only raises state law issues. The US Supreme Court has no business interfering with the ruling of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Pennsylvania state issues.

Thanks. Seems reasonable but What the heck do I know

Bart, pretty good thread here from a University of Texas law professor:

https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/statu ... 1951417345

Hope this guy is right as to why Justice Alito changed the schedule. Still seems very weird to me.

njbill wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 4:44 pm

seacoaster wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 3:56 pm

Bart wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:42 pm

njbill wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:30 pm Yes.

In fact, the legislation was passed last year (2019). Kelly waited to challenge the mail in law until after T**** lost Pennsylvania, which is why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit on laches grounds. Kelly could have filed this lawsuit last year, or many many months ago.

His lawsuit only raises state law issues. The US Supreme Court has no business interfering with the ruling of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Pennsylvania state issues.

Thanks. Seems reasonable but What the heck do I know

Bart, pretty good thread here from a University of Texas law professor:

https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/statu ... 1951417345

Hope this guy is right as to why Justice Alito changed the schedule. Still seems very weird to me.

Yep, me too. He and Thomas are ardently and openly partisan.

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:30 am

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 1:43 pm

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 11:52 am And yet...you're so busy supporting Trump...

Your just jealous because Shirley Chisolm never ate at your house.

because I say so, he is. a bigot. He has NO idea who Shirley is, or was. mdlax was too busy shilling for Agnew in 1972

ABV, take it down a notch. Your anger-laden posts are numerous and aren't appreciated. Take it down a notch. And, I repeat, discuss topics, issues, etc., not fellow post-ers.

admin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 5:06 pm

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:30 am

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 1:43 pm

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 11:52 am And yet...you're so busy supporting Trump...

Your just jealous because Shirley Chisolm never ate at your house.

because I say so, he is. a bigot. He has NO idea who Shirley is, or was. mdlax was too busy shilling for Agnew in 1972

ABV, take it down a notch. Your anger-laden posts are numerous and aren't appreciated. Take it down a notch. And, I repeat, discuss topics, issues, etc., not fellow post-ers.

yeah.....let me post joy when others get covid....instead. or, call ME a drunk, or a crack head, or mentally ill.

such hypocrites.

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 5:13 pm

admin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 5:06 pm

ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:30 am

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 1:43 pm

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 11:52 am And yet...you're so busy supporting Trump...

Your just jealous because Shirley Chisolm never ate at your house.

because I say so, he is. a bigot. He has NO idea who Shirley is, or was. mdlax was too busy shilling for Agnew in 1972

ABV, take it down a notch. Your anger-laden posts are numerous and aren't appreciated. Take it down a notch. And, I repeat, discuss topics, issues, etc., not fellow post-ers.

yeah.....let me post joy when others get covid....instead. or, call ME a drunk, or a crack head, or mentally ill.

such hypocrites.

gotta agree with abv on this one. matnum (is admin here one and the same?) openly advocated for the death of our der leder. ok, not the same as vs other posters? seems weird, but let's go with it. our boy doc b maybe 80-90% of the time he pops on here throws out that x posters are racist heathens. to me, maybe the most objectionable accusation you can toss at anyone. does it regularly. watch, he's been real busy lately but it'll go down again within a week. exactly how many times has he been censured, suspended?

pick a direction, fanlax. you in for speech, or ish you like?

seacoaster wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 4:50 pm

njbill wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 4:44 pm

seacoaster wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 3:56 pm

Bart wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:42 pm

njbill wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:30 pm Yes.

In fact, the legislation was passed last year (2019). Kelly waited to challenge the mail in law until after T**** lost Pennsylvania, which is why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit on laches grounds. Kelly could have filed this lawsuit last year, or many many months ago.

His lawsuit only raises state law issues. The US Supreme Court has no business interfering with the ruling of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Pennsylvania state issues.

Thanks. Seems reasonable but What the heck do I know

Bart, pretty good thread here from a University of Texas law professor:

https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/statu ... 1951417345

Hope this guy is right as to why Justice Alito changed the schedule. Still seems very weird to me.

Yep, me too. He and Thomas are ardently and openly partisan.

Thank you for the thread. I do worry about what would happen to the country if this somehow worked. I think it would be pandemonium.