Same Party, Different House
https://fanlax.com/forum/
AreaLax wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2024 10:50 am National Letter of Intent To be eliminated.
https://www.on3.com/news/ncaa-announces ... ntent-nli/
We might have Ben Reeves had it been a decade ago. Hobart operates like this already.oldbartman wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2024 1:49 pmAreaLax wrote: ↑Wed Oct 09, 2024 10:50 am National Letter of Intent To be eliminated.
https://www.on3.com/news/ncaa-announces ... ntent-nli/
Basically a recruit making a "commitment" is BS until they set foot on campus? Andy Shay and a few others must be thrilled with this..
As opposed to what?College sports leaders have said the new and largely unregulated opportunities could leave athletes vulnerable to exploitation.
Guys like this..44WeWantMore wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 2:43 pmAs opposed to what?College sports leaders have said the new and largely unregulated opportunities could leave athletes vulnerable to exploitation.
This44WeWantMore wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 2:43 pmAs opposed to what?College sports leaders have said the new and largely unregulated opportunities could leave athletes vulnerable to exploitation.
44WeWantMore wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 2:43 pmAs opposed to what?College sports leaders have said the new and largely unregulated opportunities could leave athletes vulnerable to exploitation.
Watch out for cartman tooTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:31 pm44WeWantMore wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 2:43 pmAs opposed to what?College sports leaders have said the new and largely unregulated opportunities could leave athletes vulnerable to exploitation.
Yep. The current system isn’t sustainable.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:02 pmWatch out for cartman tooTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:31 pm44WeWantMore wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 2:43 pmAs opposed to what?College sports leaders have said the new and largely unregulated opportunities could leave athletes vulnerable to exploitation.
https://youtu.be/EKJ0I7wg6uk?si=MDrpsRo2HhgKlWzJ
What the hell happened??!!wgdsr wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2024 11:58 amit is about both past and future. we're all calling it the house settlement, but it's actually 3 different lawsuits that they're intending to settle. name given for brevity or our lack of attention span.a fan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:44 pmJudge Claudia Wilken just gave an initial sign off on a deal....that doesn't include representatives of, oh, I don't know......the players that this deal will directly effect? Wait....what?wgdsr wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 7:29 pmwell, off we go:Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:54 pmYep…. I see Terrell Pryor is suing for back pay as well as a few others, most notably Reggie Bush…. I am waiting on Jimmy King and Cory Alexander to ask for back pay! Did Jeff Lamp get paid?wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:43 pmgene smith laid it all out around the time of his retirement:Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 8:38 pm https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/o ... s-say/amp/
And this is at The Ohio State University
Also see the “The” in the school name. It’s the name of the school….not football players being cute.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... ettlement/
already in the plan. and yes, that is 1st or 2nd in the country in revenue the ohio state university. with an extra $30 million coming in this year withoit lifting a finger. crazy times.
https://www.espn.com/college-sports/sto ... y-approval
baker says the nc$$ still has to hit up congress to get the requisite antitrust protections so their self-constructed deal can dismiss these pesky lawsuits. need title ix signoffs also.
lamp is still being marketed around town, if he's not getting a shred of licensing money, he should be. ralph should be raking.
American law is just.....weird. Or is the idea that this settlement is about the past, and has nothing to do with the future? Because it sure sounds like it's pertaining to the future.....
house - nil dating to 2016 (for statute of limitations). it's the big bag in the $2.8 billion number thrown around, and will be set as money's def coming (over 10 years). also going fwd as nil is now allowed, setting what the nc$$ wants to put as regulations on it.
hubbard - past education related expenses, which scotus didn't rule on in alston, they ruled on going forward rules. so creating a new class of plaintiffs.
carter - challenging revenue sharing rules, or pay for play directly from the institutions.
in all of these, if you could be considered part of a class of plaintiffs, you can opt in or not. if you don't, you retain the right to sue or be part of a class of future suits. if you do, you're signing away rights outside of what gets settled.
in parallel, as i've relayed the nc$$ is now going to be arm twisting congress to try to get antitrust protections from multiple fronts. including from challenges re: athletes being employees. i'm no labor attorney, but my understanding that qualification might be necessary for athletes to engage in collective bargaining. at least efficiently.
will there be lawsuits beyond that from athletes that don't like the revenue sharing number, or nil restrictions? probably. will there be lawsuits from non-p5 conferences that aren't cool with paying the lion's share of legacy p5 athletes? definitely. will there be title ix lawsuits from people that want to test the ambiguous rules around that and men getting 90% of the money? of course. and will there continue to be lawsuits that challenge the statute of limitations dating only to 2016? yes.
think that's a lot of it.
don't know. supposedly not health related. most speculating it's the era of nil and the portal. presser at 11 am. sad 24 hours in the wgdsr household.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:19 pmWhat the hell happened??!!wgdsr wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2024 11:58 amit is about both past and future. we're all calling it the house settlement, but it's actually 3 different lawsuits that they're intending to settle. name given for brevity or our lack of attention span.a fan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:44 pmJudge Claudia Wilken just gave an initial sign off on a deal....that doesn't include representatives of, oh, I don't know......the players that this deal will directly effect? Wait....what?wgdsr wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 7:29 pmwell, off we go:Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:54 pmYep…. I see Terrell Pryor is suing for back pay as well as a few others, most notably Reggie Bush…. I am waiting on Jimmy King and Cory Alexander to ask for back pay! Did Jeff Lamp get paid?wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:43 pmgene smith laid it all out around the time of his retirement:Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 8:38 pm https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/o ... s-say/amp/
And this is at The Ohio State University
Also see the “The” in the school name. It’s the name of the school….not football players being cute.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... ettlement/
already in the plan. and yes, that is 1st or 2nd in the country in revenue the ohio state university. with an extra $30 million coming in this year withoit lifting a finger. crazy times.
https://www.espn.com/college-sports/sto ... y-approval
baker says the nc$$ still has to hit up congress to get the requisite antitrust protections so their self-constructed deal can dismiss these pesky lawsuits. need title ix signoffs also.
lamp is still being marketed around town, if he's not getting a shred of licensing money, he should be. ralph should be raking.
American law is just.....weird. Or is the idea that this settlement is about the past, and has nothing to do with the future? Because it sure sounds like it's pertaining to the future.....
house - nil dating to 2016 (for statute of limitations). it's the big bag in the $2.8 billion number thrown around, and will be set as money's def coming (over 10 years). also going fwd as nil is now allowed, setting what the nc$$ wants to put as regulations on it.
hubbard - past education related expenses, which scotus didn't rule on in alston, they ruled on going forward rules. so creating a new class of plaintiffs.
carter - challenging revenue sharing rules, or pay for play directly from the institutions.
in all of these, if you could be considered part of a class of plaintiffs, you can opt in or not. if you don't, you retain the right to sue or be part of a class of future suits. if you do, you're signing away rights outside of what gets settled.
in parallel, as i've relayed the nc$$ is now going to be arm twisting congress to try to get antitrust protections from multiple fronts. including from challenges re: athletes being employees. i'm no labor attorney, but my understanding that qualification might be necessary for athletes to engage in collective bargaining. at least efficiently.
will there be lawsuits beyond that from athletes that don't like the revenue sharing number, or nil restrictions? probably. will there be lawsuits from non-p5 conferences that aren't cool with paying the lion's share of legacy p5 athletes? definitely. will there be title ix lawsuits from people that want to test the ambiguous rules around that and men getting 90% of the money? of course. and will there continue to be lawsuits that challenge the statute of limitations dating only to 2016? yes.
think that's a lot of it.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/17/sport/vi ... index.html
It ran Jay Wright out of Villanova. Bennett may be taking that Seattle Supersonics job when they land.wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 9:18 amdon't know. supposedly not health related. most speculating it's the era of nil and the portal. presser at 11 am. sad 24 hours in the wgdsr household.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:19 pmWhat the hell happened??!!wgdsr wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2024 11:58 amit is about both past and future. we're all calling it the house settlement, but it's actually 3 different lawsuits that they're intending to settle. name given for brevity or our lack of attention span.a fan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:44 pmJudge Claudia Wilken just gave an initial sign off on a deal....that doesn't include representatives of, oh, I don't know......the players that this deal will directly effect? Wait....what?wgdsr wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 7:29 pmwell, off we go:Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:54 pmYep…. I see Terrell Pryor is suing for back pay as well as a few others, most notably Reggie Bush…. I am waiting on Jimmy King and Cory Alexander to ask for back pay! Did Jeff Lamp get paid?wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:43 pmgene smith laid it all out around the time of his retirement:Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 8:38 pm https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/o ... s-say/amp/
And this is at The Ohio State University
Also see the “The” in the school name. It’s the name of the school….not football players being cute.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... ettlement/
already in the plan. and yes, that is 1st or 2nd in the country in revenue the ohio state university. with an extra $30 million coming in this year withoit lifting a finger. crazy times.
https://www.espn.com/college-sports/sto ... y-approval
baker says the nc$$ still has to hit up congress to get the requisite antitrust protections so their self-constructed deal can dismiss these pesky lawsuits. need title ix signoffs also.
lamp is still being marketed around town, if he's not getting a shred of licensing money, he should be. ralph should be raking.
American law is just.....weird. Or is the idea that this settlement is about the past, and has nothing to do with the future? Because it sure sounds like it's pertaining to the future.....
house - nil dating to 2016 (for statute of limitations). it's the big bag in the $2.8 billion number thrown around, and will be set as money's def coming (over 10 years). also going fwd as nil is now allowed, setting what the nc$$ wants to put as regulations on it.
hubbard - past education related expenses, which scotus didn't rule on in alston, they ruled on going forward rules. so creating a new class of plaintiffs.
carter - challenging revenue sharing rules, or pay for play directly from the institutions.
in all of these, if you could be considered part of a class of plaintiffs, you can opt in or not. if you don't, you retain the right to sue or be part of a class of future suits. if you do, you're signing away rights outside of what gets settled.
in parallel, as i've relayed the nc$$ is now going to be arm twisting congress to try to get antitrust protections from multiple fronts. including from challenges re: athletes being employees. i'm no labor attorney, but my understanding that qualification might be necessary for athletes to engage in collective bargaining. at least efficiently.
will there be lawsuits beyond that from athletes that don't like the revenue sharing number, or nil restrictions? probably. will there be lawsuits from non-p5 conferences that aren't cool with paying the lion's share of legacy p5 athletes? definitely. will there be title ix lawsuits from people that want to test the ambiguous rules around that and men getting 90% of the money? of course. and will there continue to be lawsuits that challenge the statute of limitations dating only to 2016? yes.
think that's a lot of it.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/17/sport/vi ... index.html
couldn't be all in in this environment, being honest with himself led him here. what i said above he mentioned in response for what next. most humble guy in the profession that i know. presser on accnx, via espn app.
You need to hire my home boy King!wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 12:05 pmcouldn't be all in in this environment, being honest with himself led him here. what i said above he mentioned in response for what next. most humble guy in the profession that i know. presser on accnx, via espn app.
ha, we came down once and i got to match up with him all game in h.s.. that was fun, lot of relatives, we kept it single digits. they had a v good squad and he earned "king" not just in hoops, but football. glad he's still doing work at monmouth.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 1:19 pmYou need to hire my home boy King!wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 12:05 pmcouldn't be all in in this environment, being honest with himself led him here. what i said above he mentioned in response for what next. most humble guy in the profession that i know. presser on accnx, via espn app.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Rice
Binghamton in the house home of Dave bliss and Jeff Van gundys career
Hes actually around ten years older than me but he'd come back often. Very nice guy.wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 1:38 pmha, we came down once and i got to match up with him all game in h.s.. that was fun, lot of relatives, we kept it single digits. they had a v good squad and he earned "king" not just in hoops, but football. glad he's still doing work at monmouth.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 1:19 pmYou need to hire my home boy King!wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 12:05 pmcouldn't be all in in this environment, being honest with himself led him here. what i said above he mentioned in response for what next. most humble guy in the profession that i know. presser on accnx, via espn app.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Rice
Binghamton in the house home of Dave bliss and Jeff Van gundys career
ron sanchez will be interim elevated. i'm resigned we won't find another bennett no matter what.
I heard that rumor as well, but never saw confirmation.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:02 amIt ran Jay Wright out of Villanova. Bennett may be taking that Seattle Supersonics job when they land.wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 9:18 amdon't know. supposedly not health related. most speculating it's the era of nil and the portal. presser at 11 am. sad 24 hours in the wgdsr household.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:19 pmWhat the hell happened??!!wgdsr wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2024 11:58 amit is about both past and future. we're all calling it the house settlement, but it's actually 3 different lawsuits that they're intending to settle. name given for brevity or our lack of attention span.a fan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:44 pmJudge Claudia Wilken just gave an initial sign off on a deal....that doesn't include representatives of, oh, I don't know......the players that this deal will directly effect? Wait....what?wgdsr wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 7:29 pmwell, off we go:Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:54 pmYep…. I see Terrell Pryor is suing for back pay as well as a few others, most notably Reggie Bush…. I am waiting on Jimmy King and Cory Alexander to ask for back pay! Did Jeff Lamp get paid?wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:43 pmgene smith laid it all out around the time of his retirement:Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 8:38 pm https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/o ... s-say/amp/
And this is at The Ohio State University
Also see the “The” in the school name. It’s the name of the school….not football players being cute.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... ettlement/
already in the plan. and yes, that is 1st or 2nd in the country in revenue the ohio state university. with an extra $30 million coming in this year withoit lifting a finger. crazy times.
https://www.espn.com/college-sports/sto ... y-approval
baker says the nc$$ still has to hit up congress to get the requisite antitrust protections so their self-constructed deal can dismiss these pesky lawsuits. need title ix signoffs also.
lamp is still being marketed around town, if he's not getting a shred of licensing money, he should be. ralph should be raking.
American law is just.....weird. Or is the idea that this settlement is about the past, and has nothing to do with the future? Because it sure sounds like it's pertaining to the future.....
house - nil dating to 2016 (for statute of limitations). it's the big bag in the $2.8 billion number thrown around, and will be set as money's def coming (over 10 years). also going fwd as nil is now allowed, setting what the nc$$ wants to put as regulations on it.
hubbard - past education related expenses, which scotus didn't rule on in alston, they ruled on going forward rules. so creating a new class of plaintiffs.
carter - challenging revenue sharing rules, or pay for play directly from the institutions.
in all of these, if you could be considered part of a class of plaintiffs, you can opt in or not. if you don't, you retain the right to sue or be part of a class of future suits. if you do, you're signing away rights outside of what gets settled.
in parallel, as i've relayed the nc$$ is now going to be arm twisting congress to try to get antitrust protections from multiple fronts. including from challenges re: athletes being employees. i'm no labor attorney, but my understanding that qualification might be necessary for athletes to engage in collective bargaining. at least efficiently.
will there be lawsuits beyond that from athletes that don't like the revenue sharing number, or nil restrictions? probably. will there be lawsuits from non-p5 conferences that aren't cool with paying the lion's share of legacy p5 athletes? definitely. will there be title ix lawsuits from people that want to test the ambiguous rules around that and men getting 90% of the money? of course. and will there continue to be lawsuits that challenge the statute of limitations dating only to 2016? yes.
think that's a lot of it.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/17/sport/vi ... index.html
I heard it from an assistant coach at a D1 powerhouse. I introduced him at a celebrity breakfast that the organization I am involved with hosts every year. He wasn’t sure how his program was going to be impacted as they like to develop players like Jay does….so far it has worked out for them. Our Board chairman runs the NIL program for this basketball program…..and that’s how we got him.44WeWantMore wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 6:32 pmI heard that rumor as well, but never saw confirmation.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:02 amIt ran Jay Wright out of Villanova. Bennett may be taking that Seattle Supersonics job when they land.wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2024 9:18 amdon't know. supposedly not health related. most speculating it's the era of nil and the portal. presser at 11 am. sad 24 hours in the wgdsr household.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:19 pmWhat the hell happened??!!wgdsr wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2024 11:58 amit is about both past and future. we're all calling it the house settlement, but it's actually 3 different lawsuits that they're intending to settle. name given for brevity or our lack of attention span.a fan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:44 pmJudge Claudia Wilken just gave an initial sign off on a deal....that doesn't include representatives of, oh, I don't know......the players that this deal will directly effect? Wait....what?wgdsr wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 7:29 pmwell, off we go:Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:54 pmYep…. I see Terrell Pryor is suing for back pay as well as a few others, most notably Reggie Bush…. I am waiting on Jimmy King and Cory Alexander to ask for back pay! Did Jeff Lamp get paid?wgdsr wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:43 pmgene smith laid it all out around the time of his retirement:Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 04, 2024 8:38 pm https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/o ... s-say/amp/
And this is at The Ohio State University
Also see the “The” in the school name. It’s the name of the school….not football players being cute.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footb ... ettlement/
already in the plan. and yes, that is 1st or 2nd in the country in revenue the ohio state university. with an extra $30 million coming in this year withoit lifting a finger. crazy times.
https://www.espn.com/college-sports/sto ... y-approval
baker says the nc$$ still has to hit up congress to get the requisite antitrust protections so their self-constructed deal can dismiss these pesky lawsuits. need title ix signoffs also.
lamp is still being marketed around town, if he's not getting a shred of licensing money, he should be. ralph should be raking.
American law is just.....weird. Or is the idea that this settlement is about the past, and has nothing to do with the future? Because it sure sounds like it's pertaining to the future.....
house - nil dating to 2016 (for statute of limitations). it's the big bag in the $2.8 billion number thrown around, and will be set as money's def coming (over 10 years). also going fwd as nil is now allowed, setting what the nc$$ wants to put as regulations on it.
hubbard - past education related expenses, which scotus didn't rule on in alston, they ruled on going forward rules. so creating a new class of plaintiffs.
carter - challenging revenue sharing rules, or pay for play directly from the institutions.
in all of these, if you could be considered part of a class of plaintiffs, you can opt in or not. if you don't, you retain the right to sue or be part of a class of future suits. if you do, you're signing away rights outside of what gets settled.
in parallel, as i've relayed the nc$$ is now going to be arm twisting congress to try to get antitrust protections from multiple fronts. including from challenges re: athletes being employees. i'm no labor attorney, but my understanding that qualification might be necessary for athletes to engage in collective bargaining. at least efficiently.
will there be lawsuits beyond that from athletes that don't like the revenue sharing number, or nil restrictions? probably. will there be lawsuits from non-p5 conferences that aren't cool with paying the lion's share of legacy p5 athletes? definitely. will there be title ix lawsuits from people that want to test the ambiguous rules around that and men getting 90% of the money? of course. and will there continue to be lawsuits that challenge the statute of limitations dating only to 2016? yes.
think that's a lot of it.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/17/sport/vi ... index.html
