LaxPower Back-Up Stick

MDlaxfan76 wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:Why won't I understand? Because I am too stupid? To racists? WHy? 90% of the district is white, so they should have put images of "otherisms" in the ad?

And, please respond to his lyrics and content. But you won't, and mostly can't, because they are scrubbed. Sorry, but Delgado made it about race when he chose to make the Painful CD. But, what is REALLY important is Delgado's corporate lawfirm, Akin Gump, and who it represents. He's sad that GE is gone? And yet has worked at a law firm that has helped, and continues to, ship US jobs to slaves overseas. Oh, and defended Paul Manfort

I have no idea whether you are "too stupid" nor "To racists?"...I assume you meant "too racist?".

What your posts seem to suggest is that you have an angry perspective about a black man, in his youth, expressing challenges to racial bigotry and other social issues in the medium of rap, or otherwise.

If you'd like to point me to other posts where you've demonstrated a more subtle comprehension about such perspectives and their expression, I'd be happy to change my opinion of the likelihood that I could explain the rationale of those particular lyrics. That said, I'm not a fan of that medium per se, so wouldn't be the best interpreter in any case. But some of the expressions about bigotry and social justice, sure, I can go there.

You say that Delgado made it about race because he expressed anger about the legacy of white supremacy a decade ago? Really? He made it about race?

In the posts above, you evidently don't see the signals about race that the ad expressed. Is that sheer ignorance or is it willful disregard? Or is it actually looking for an excuse to be angry? I dunno.

I don't have any particular stake in the specific candidates in that particular election and haven't examined the candidates' backgrounds in any depth, other than as follow-up to this controversy.

Maybe there is something to criticized, legitimately, about this candidate and his views. But I'd like to understand what he really believes as a more mature man today than how he expressed himself as an young 'artist' a decade ago. Wow, you made you the "pass" lady? Suddenly being a 31 year old Harvard Law school grad is "young"? HUH

On the Akin Gump stuff, perhaps there's something legitimate to question there as well. If so, I'd like to know what the candidate's views actually are.

As a lifelong Republican, I'm disturbed by the tack the GOP has taken to more and more overtly tailoring messaging to appeal to scared and angry white voters. It has a long history, but it seems to me that it has grown increasingly frequent and overt.

Typical Lax Dad wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:All of them. Trump is a racist because of his associations, Obama is not. Eric Holder, the only AG in the history of the US to be......gee, forgot what Congress did to him....said some pretty racist stuff too. ASSociations are in the eye of the beholder stuff.

Trumps staff sure seems good enough to listen too when they are speaking as "unnamed" sources though.

Again, the hate is marrow deep. We get it. But, that same hate (disapproval rating) is fostered upon members of Congress. You get what you deserve. Didn't Obama say it best, Trump is the symptom, not the cause. Think about how true that is. He finally gets it. Too bad he didn't when he was in office.

Yep too bad.

Typical Lax Dad wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:All of them. Trump is a racist because of his associations, Obama is not. Eric Holder, the only AG in the history of the US to be......gee, forgot what Congress did to him....said some pretty racist stuff too. ASSociations are in the eye of the beholder stuff.

Trumps staff sure seems good enough to listen too when they are speaking as "unnamed" sources though.

Again, the hate is marrow deep. We get it. But, that same hate (disapproval rating) is fostered upon members of Congress. You get what you deserve. Didn't Obama say it best, Trump is the symptom, not the cause. Think about how true that is. He finally gets it. Too bad he didn't when he was in office.

Yep too bad.

runrussellrun wrote:

Typical Lax Dad wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:All of them. Trump is a racist because of his associations, Obama is not. Eric Holder, the only AG in the history of the US to be......gee, forgot what Congress did to him....said some pretty racist stuff too. ASSociations are in the eye of the beholder stuff.

Trumps staff sure seems good enough to listen too when they are speaking as "unnamed" sources though.

Again, the hate is marrow deep. We get it. But, that same hate (disapproval rating) is fostered upon members of Congress. You get what you deserve. Didn't Obama say it best, Trump is the symptom, not the cause. Think about how true that is. He finally gets it. Too bad he didn't when he was in office.

Yep too bad.

Or maybe he's being a politician. His actions as President (making the 1% richer/powerful) speak to that fact that he aint' no liberal.
Something about Trump and nafta? or was it natifa? Anything positive there there?

runrussellrun wrote:

MDlaxfan76 wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:Why won't I understand? Because I am too stupid? To racists? WHy? 90% of the district is white, so they should have put images of "otherisms" in the ad?

And, please respond to his lyrics and content. But you won't, and mostly can't, because they are scrubbed. Sorry, but Delgado made it about race when he chose to make the Painful CD. But, what is REALLY important is Delgado's corporate lawfirm, Akin Gump, and who it represents. He's sad that GE is gone? And yet has worked at a law firm that has helped, and continues to, ship US jobs to slaves overseas. Oh, and defended Paul Manfort

I have no idea whether you are "too stupid" nor "To racists?"...I assume you meant "too racist?".

What your posts seem to suggest is that you have an angry perspective about a black man, in his youth, expressing challenges to racial bigotry and other social issues in the medium of rap, or otherwise.

If you'd like to point me to other posts where you've demonstrated a more subtle comprehension about such perspectives and their expression, I'd be happy to change my opinion of the likelihood that I could explain the rationale of those particular lyrics. That said, I'm not a fan of that medium per se, so wouldn't be the best interpreter in any case. But some of the expressions about bigotry and social justice, sure, I can go there.

You say that Delgado made it about race because he expressed anger about the legacy of white supremacy a decade ago? Really? He made it about race?

In the posts above, you evidently don't see the signals about race that the ad expressed. Is that sheer ignorance or is it willful disregard? Or is it actually looking for an excuse to be angry? I dunno.

I don't have any particular stake in the specific candidates in that particular election and haven't examined the candidates' backgrounds in any depth, other than as follow-up to this controversy.

Maybe there is something to criticized, legitimately, about this candidate and his views. But I'd like to understand what he really believes as a more mature man today than how he expressed himself as an young 'artist' a decade ago. Wow, you made you the "pass" lady? Suddenly being a 31 year old Harvard Law school grad is "young"? HUH

On the Akin Gump stuff, perhaps there's something legitimate to question there as well. If so, I'd like to know what the candidate's views actually are.

As a lifelong Republican, I'm disturbed by the tack the GOP has taken to more and more overtly tailoring messaging to appeal to scared and angry white voters. It has a long history, but it seems to me that it has grown increasingly frequent and overt.

Typical Lax Dad wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:

Typical Lax Dad wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:All of them. Trump is a racist because of his associations, Obama is not. Eric Holder, the only AG in the history of the US to be......gee, forgot what Congress did to him....said some pretty racist stuff too. ASSociations are in the eye of the beholder stuff.

Trumps staff sure seems good enough to listen too when they are speaking as "unnamed" sources though.

Again, the hate is marrow deep. We get it. But, that same hate (disapproval rating) is fostered upon members of Congress. You get what you deserve. Didn't Obama say it best, Trump is the symptom, not the cause. Think about how true that is. He finally gets it. Too bad he didn't when he was in office.

Yep too bad.

Or maybe he's being a politician. His actions as President (making the 1% richer/powerful) speak to that fact that he aint' no liberal.
Something about Trump and nafta? or was it natifa? Anything positive there there?

Black folks can’t be wealthy?

runrussellrun wrote:You keep calling me angry....why?

But, the real question is: why aren't you?

runrussellrun wrote:

Typical Lax Dad wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:

Typical Lax Dad wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:All of them. Trump is a racist because of his associations, Obama is not. Eric Holder, the only AG in the history of the US to be......gee, forgot what Congress did to him....said some pretty racist stuff too. ASSociations are in the eye of the beholder stuff.

Trumps staff sure seems good enough to listen too when they are speaking as "unnamed" sources though.

Again, the hate is marrow deep. We get it. But, that same hate (disapproval rating) is fostered upon members of Congress. You get what you deserve. Didn't Obama say it best, Trump is the symptom, not the cause. Think about how true that is. He finally gets it. Too bad he didn't when he was in office.

Yep too bad.

Or maybe he's being a politician. His actions as President (making the 1% richer/powerful) speak to that fact that he aint' no liberal.
Something about Trump and nafta? or was it natifa? Anything positive there there?

Black folks can’t be wealthy?

Why I am responding to this stupid question is beyond me.

No, folks that are different than different should not be allowed money. Like Larry Summers( Harvard/Sect of Treasury under Obama) said, woman are not smart enough to have careers in STEM. I mean, who doesn't agrees. Did I mention different? Happy gilmore never played swallow tail while attending Tailhook in Vegas. The Sect. of the Navy did though, getting a lapdance. Want more nonsense to your nonsense question? Not relevant to the rolling in the Reagan grave. Big to fail, big to jail.

In short, perhaps the most idiotic question asked that has zero relevance to anything I wrote. Let's be grownups here.

Febuary, 2009....Obama allows the TARP bonus cap of $500K (barely enough for that new Boston Whaler) to go away. And you know who this story continues and ends.

MDlaxfan76 wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:

MDlaxfan76 wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:Why won't I understand? Because I am too stupid? To racists? WHy? 90% of the district is white, so they should have put images of "otherisms" in the ad?

And, please respond to his lyrics and content. But you won't, and mostly can't, because they are scrubbed. Sorry, but Delgado made it about race when he chose to make the Painful CD. But, what is REALLY important is Delgado's corporate lawfirm, Akin Gump, and who it represents. He's sad that GE is gone? And yet has worked at a law firm that has helped, and continues to, ship US jobs to slaves overseas. Oh, and defended Paul Manfort

I have no idea whether you are "too stupid" nor "To racists?"...I assume you meant "too racist?".

What your posts seem to suggest is that you have an angry perspective about a black man, in his youth, expressing challenges to racial bigotry and other social issues in the medium of rap, or otherwise.

If you'd like to point me to other posts where you've demonstrated a more subtle comprehension about such perspectives and their expression, I'd be happy to change my opinion of the likelihood that I could explain the rationale of those particular lyrics. That said, I'm not a fan of that medium per se, so wouldn't be the best interpreter in any case. But some of the expressions about bigotry and social justice, sure, I can go there.

You say that Delgado made it about race because he expressed anger about the legacy of white supremacy a decade ago? Really? He made it about race?

In the posts above, you evidently don't see the signals about race that the ad expressed. Is that sheer ignorance or is it willful disregard? Or is it actually looking for an excuse to be angry? I dunno.

I don't have any particular stake in the specific candidates in that particular election and haven't examined the candidates' backgrounds in any depth, other than as follow-up to this controversy.

Maybe there is something to criticized, legitimately, about this candidate and his views. But I'd like to understand what he really believes as a more mature man today than how he expressed himself as an young 'artist' a decade ago. Wow, you made you the "pass" lady? Suddenly being a 31 year old Harvard Law school grad is "young"? HUH

On the Akin Gump stuff, perhaps there's something legitimate to question there as well. If so, I'd like to know what the candidate's views actually are.

As a lifelong Republican, I'm disturbed by the tack the GOP has taken to more and more overtly tailoring messaging to appeal to scared and angry white voters. It has a long history, but it seems to me that it has grown increasingly frequent and overt.

Actually, he was 29 in 2006 when he released that one rap album. Yeah, at my age I'd call that a "young man".
Graduated with honors from Colgate, Rhodes Scholar, Harvard Law in 2005.

I have no idea at all what this means: "Wow, you made you the "pass" lady?"
Huh?

MDlaxfan76 wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:You keep calling me angry....why?

But, the real question is: why aren't you?

Angry? Hate-filled? Nope.

Deeply disturbed and concerned, sure.

As to why I call you "angry", it's simply clear from all your seething vitriol, expressed solely at opponents of Trump, where you're coming from emotionally.

The vitriol is expressed with all sorts of exaggerations and caustic remarks, and the intentional misspelling of people's names.
Ugly stuff.

For instance, I've made pretty darn clear that I think Farrakhan made overtly racist comments about Jews, but "Farracon" is just a stupid way to make a point. So is "McLame".

It's been good to have Bandito expelled in my feed, you appear to be on that path as you post more and more uncivilly.

We can discuss issues without that stuff. How about let's try?

runrussellrun wrote:

MDlaxfan76 wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:

MDlaxfan76 wrote:

runrussellrun wrote:Why won't I understand? Because I am too stupid? To racists? WHy? 90% of the district is white, so they should have put images of "otherisms" in the ad?

And, please respond to his lyrics and content. But you won't, and mostly can't, because they are scrubbed. Sorry, but Delgado made it about race when he chose to make the Painful CD. But, what is REALLY important is Delgado's corporate lawfirm, Akin Gump, and who it represents. He's sad that GE is gone? And yet has worked at a law firm that has helped, and continues to, ship US jobs to slaves overseas. Oh, and defended Paul Manfort

I have no idea whether you are "too stupid" nor "To racists?"...I assume you meant "too racist?".

What your posts seem to suggest is that you have an angry perspective about a black man, in his youth, expressing challenges to racial bigotry and other social issues in the medium of rap, or otherwise.

If you'd like to point me to other posts where you've demonstrated a more subtle comprehension about such perspectives and their expression, I'd be happy to change my opinion of the likelihood that I could explain the rationale of those particular lyrics. That said, I'm not a fan of that medium per se, so wouldn't be the best interpreter in any case. But some of the expressions about bigotry and social justice, sure, I can go there.

You say that Delgado made it about race because he expressed anger about the legacy of white supremacy a decade ago? Really? He made it about race?

In the posts above, you evidently don't see the signals about race that the ad expressed. Is that sheer ignorance or is it willful disregard? Or is it actually looking for an excuse to be angry? I dunno.

I don't have any particular stake in the specific candidates in that particular election and haven't examined the candidates' backgrounds in any depth, other than as follow-up to this controversy.

Maybe there is something to criticized, legitimately, about this candidate and his views. But I'd like to understand what he really believes as a more mature man today than how he expressed himself as an young 'artist' a decade ago. Wow, you made you the "pass" lady? Suddenly being a 31 year old Harvard Law school grad is "young"? HUH

On the Akin Gump stuff, perhaps there's something legitimate to question there as well. If so, I'd like to know what the candidate's views actually are.

As a lifelong Republican, I'm disturbed by the tack the GOP has taken to more and more overtly tailoring messaging to appeal to scared and angry white voters. It has a long history, but it seems to me that it has grown increasingly frequent and overt.

Actually, he was 29 in 2006 when he released that one rap album. Yeah, at my age I'd call that a "young man".
Graduated with honors from Colgate, Rhodes Scholar, Harvard Law in 2005.

I have no idea at all what this means: "Wow, you made you the "pass" lady?"
Huh?

Have you read the guys boring same ole, same ole viewpoints on "issues" yet? Do you believe that the Iraq war was started for the oil execs like Antonio does? Draped flags "song" says so, never found those WMD's. Any pretends vote for that military action mdlaxfan?

MDlaxfan76 wrote: The vitriol is expressed with all sorts of exaggerations and caustic remarks, and the intentional misspelling of people's names.
Ugly stuff.

For instance, I've made pretty darn clear that I think Farrakhan made overtly racist comments about Jews, but "Farracon" is just a stupid way to make a point. So is "McLame".

It's been good to have Bandito expelled in my feed, you appear to be on that path as you post more and more uncivilly.

We can discuss issues without that stuff. How about let's try?

MDlaxfan76: been good to have Bandito expelled in my feed, you appear to be on that path as you post more and more uncivilly.

kramerica.inc wrote:

MDlaxfan76 wrote: The vitriol is expressed with all sorts of exaggerations and caustic remarks, and the intentional misspelling of people's names.
Ugly stuff.

For instance, I've made pretty darn clear that I think Farrakhan made overtly racist comments about Jews, but "Farracon" is just a stupid way to make a point. So is "McLame".

It's been good to have Bandito expelled in my feed, you appear to be on that path as you post more and more uncivilly.

We can discuss issues without that stuff. How about let's try?

That would be awesome. Is it possible?

Farracon and McLAme are about as funny, clever and poignant as DOPUS, Agent Orange etc.

wahoomurf wrote:

MDlaxfan76: been good to have Bandito expelled in my feed, you appear to be on that path as you post more and more uncivilly.

For some reason, I thought the friend/foe function wasn't available on this new blog. Thanks for the G-2, MDL. Happily anticipating adding and being added to many foe lists.

"Hallefrigginluiah".(VISUALIZE HANDS CLAPPING)