Page 8 of 76

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 5:25 pm
by wgdsr
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Jun 24, 2019 5:07 pm By the way, sorry to beat a dead season, horse, and topic, but if you took away one game, Towson's Woodall against Bailey, where Woodall seemingly won every FO like 20-4 or something like that, Bailey's #'s would be significantly better. He even beat the Holy Cross FOGO.
and if you took away 3 games, army and lafayette --- who were cosmically bad at faceoffs hovering around 30% --- his numbers were probably consistent for the season. those 3 games happened to be at the end of the year.
the lehigh game is the one that stands out positively --- he took it to a very good player.
after that, the results are about what you'd expect.
georgetown as a team was below 50%, savio won just over 54%.
bu was just over 50% and savio got it handed to him.
syracuse was in the upper 50s, pretty good... and savio got the better of that matchup.
penn state --- he finished against arceri almost exactly as arceri finished against all other opponents.

in those 5 games, he was almost 50%. pretty good considering the rest of the competition. but about what you'd expect going in. having some help might be as good a reason as any to hope for better results. they will often see good faceoff crews. wearing down over a season or a career tends to be the trend for some guys. injuries, etc.
but now you're back to unknowns. the greyhounds often figure it out.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 5:57 pm
by stupefied
To this observer, Scanlan was an accurate and efficient mid with over 70% on cage and 36% conversion. One is correct saying he benefitted from Spencer but so did all other Hounds including Lindley and Olmstead . Former improved his foot speed and latter is well rounded but PS enhanced their games. L PB is obviously a big Hounds fan but think he may be underestimating losses of three leads. You simply cant replace a dominating Tewarrton winner, a talented young mid who converts or a goalie like Stover who stopped alot of shots that many good goaltenders allow. CD was young and may have the potential to be good but defensive midfield was porous in the games I saw and not sure where the jump in improvement comes from. Savio is a good fogo and Pacheo arrives to assist but there are very few that dominate games. Loyola likely wins the PL again given retracement by others but hard to see Hounds being as strong as last year given losses.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 7:24 pm
by Peter Brown
we shall see! I feel good about this squad. If I’m correct, I’ll look like lacrosse’s Nostradamus. If I’m wrong, I’m just another schlub in the stands!

Watch for Lindley. I think he’ll surprise you folks.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:18 pm
by TheBigIguana
My feeling is next season figures to be a bit of a transition year where Loyola still competes at the top of the Patriot but doesn't win as many against the Duke/UVA/Hopkins part of the schedule. But 2021 figures to be a year where they don't lose a whole lot, only Swindell and possibly Railey depending on his redshirt situation figure to be starters who graduate, and could be a season where the Hounds start the year ranked low in the top 20 and suddenly are right in the hunt for an NCAA home game. I hope I'm wrong and they don't miss a beat in 2020 but losing the best player in lacrosse, a top 3 goalie and a top 5 freshman who was also a top 10 midfielder overall is so much that it is hard to not have an adjustment period.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:31 pm
by Olddog
Any thoughts on Matt Hughes and Ross Pridemore. They both sat out this past year. Hughs is a super-talented and causes lots of turnovers. Assuming he is back, he will likely start on D and can provide some help to Cam Wyers and the defense. Ross Pridemore is a total question mark, but could be the spark for this team that nobody is talking about.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 1:40 am
by TheBigIguana
Olddog wrote: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:31 pm Any thoughts on Matt Hughes and Ross Pridemore. They both sat out this past year. Hughs is a super-talented and causes lots of turnovers. Assuming he is back, he will likely start on D and can provide some help to Cam Wyers and the defense. Ross Pridemore is a total question mark, but could be the spark for this team that nobody is talking about.
Hughes was injured in the fall I believe unless I'm thinking of someone else. He should be in contention to play and presumably redshirted last year. Pridemore didn't suit up until the Syracuse game so I don't know if he was injured or ineligible. The Cuse game was the day after the semester ended so maybe he got his grades up or maybe he just go healthy. Either way he could have redshirted as well and has a chance to play next year.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:03 am
by Peter Brown
Olddog wrote: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:31 pm Any thoughts on Matt Hughes and Ross Pridemore. They both sat out this past year. Hughs is a super-talented and causes lots of turnovers. Assuming he is back, he will likely start on D and can provide some help to Cam Wyers and the defense. Ross Pridemore is a total question mark, but could be the spark for this team that nobody is talking about.

Hughes will contend for a starting role. In his first year at Mercer, he was #6 in CT's in all of D1. And he didn't play last year! He is simply superb at defense. I keep saying, like a broken record, our defense will be top-3 in the country. Mark my word.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:43 am
by BigTom4
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:03 am I keep saying, like a broken record, our defense will be top-3 in the country. Mark my word.
Yeah I don't see it. Team was 29th in defensive efficiency last year with a unit who regularly relied on their excellent goaltender to make a high number of saves to get the ball back to the offense. Now that goalie (and his NCAA leading 15 saves a game) graduates and you are telling me they are going to be a top 3 unit? I don't care if everyone is back, those guys who are coming back gave up 15 to HC, 18 to BU, and as many goals as PSU wanted to score last year with the best goalie in the country in net. :?:

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 10:32 am
by Peter Brown
BigTom4 wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:43 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:03 am I keep saying, like a broken record, our defense will be top-3 in the country. Mark my word.
Yeah I don't see it. Team was 29th in defensive efficiency last year with a unit who regularly relied on their excellent goaltender to make a high number of saves to get the ball back to the offense. Now that goalie (and his NCAA leading 15 saves a game) graduates and you are telling me they are going to be a top 3 unit? I don't care if everyone is back, those guys who are coming back gave up 15 to HC, 18 to BU, and as many goals as PSU wanted to score last year with the best goalie in the country in net. :?:

Hughes did not play; he was #6 in CT's as a freshman at another college. Likely to start.

Wyers was a freshman; 2nd on team in CT's with 17.

Higgins, Railey back as seniors...each has gotten progressively better every year on the field.

McNulty back as senior leader with 25 CT's as LSM...

Volante might be back, let's see.

Calder Vandenheuvel (incoming freshman) is a McNulty doppelganger...watch for his name a lot.

This defense, any coach imo in D1 would switch out what they have for what we have. Great athletes getting better. The biggest problem last year was communication on slides. That will get better with one more season of the whole defense back.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:40 am
by BigTom4
Doubtful. Much better chance you see the Hounds defense go through a season similar to Brown after Jack Kelly graduated. They returned all their poles (several AAs, great athletes), most of their d mids, but losing Kelly exposed a group who was overly reliant on him bailing them out time and again. We shall see.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:42 am
by wgdsr
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 10:32 am
BigTom4 wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:43 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:03 am I keep saying, like a broken record, our defense will be top-3 in the country. Mark my word.
Yeah I don't see it. Team was 29th in defensive efficiency last year with a unit who regularly relied on their excellent goaltender to make a high number of saves to get the ball back to the offense. Now that goalie (and his NCAA leading 15 saves a game) graduates and you are telling me they are going to be a top 3 unit? I don't care if everyone is back, those guys who are coming back gave up 15 to HC, 18 to BU, and as many goals as PSU wanted to score last year with the best goalie in the country in net. :?:
Hughes did not play; he was #6 in CT's as a freshman at another college. Likely to start.

Wyers was a freshman; 2nd on team in CT's with 17.

Higgins, Railey back as seniors...each has gotten progressively better every year on the field.

McNulty back as senior leader with 25 CT's as LSM...

Volante might be back, let's see.

Calder Vandenheuvel (incoming freshman) is a McNulty doppelganger...watch for his name a lot.

This defense, any coach imo in D1 would switch out what they have for what we have. Great athletes getting better. The biggest problem last year was communication on slides. That will get better with one more season of the whole defense back.
i subscribe to the notion that communication on slides is priority #1 on defense, that's just me. sometimes it never gets fixed.
i smell a wager. top 3/5 etc. is very difficult to do, let alone predict. but you seem pretty convinced.
i'll give you top 5. either category, goals against per game or defensive efficiency.
stakes?

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 12:26 pm
by houndace1
To me, transition from Loyola 2019 to 2020 could really be similar to Brown 2016 to '17... or even albany 2018 to 2019. Lose their top playmakers, goalies, Albany lost TD... and they bring back defenders and some middies, but they didn't have much success.

Honestly could happen with Loyola for 2020

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 12:38 pm
by Peter Brown
wgdsr wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:42 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 10:32 am
BigTom4 wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:43 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:03 am I keep saying, like a broken record, our defense will be top-3 in the country. Mark my word.
Yeah I don't see it. Team was 29th in defensive efficiency last year with a unit who regularly relied on their excellent goaltender to make a high number of saves to get the ball back to the offense. Now that goalie (and his NCAA leading 15 saves a game) graduates and you are telling me they are going to be a top 3 unit? I don't care if everyone is back, those guys who are coming back gave up 15 to HC, 18 to BU, and as many goals as PSU wanted to score last year with the best goalie in the country in net. :?:
Hughes did not play; he was #6 in CT's as a freshman at another college. Likely to start.

Wyers was a freshman; 2nd on team in CT's with 17.

Higgins, Railey back as seniors...each has gotten progressively better every year on the field.

McNulty back as senior leader with 25 CT's as LSM...

Volante might be back, let's see.

Calder Vandenheuvel (incoming freshman) is a McNulty doppelganger...watch for his name a lot.

This defense, any coach imo in D1 would switch out what they have for what we have. Great athletes getting better. The biggest problem last year was communication on slides. That will get better with one more season of the whole defense back.
i subscribe to the notion that communication on slides is priority #1 on defense, that's just me. sometimes it never gets fixed.
i smell a wager. top 3/5 etc. is very difficult to do, let alone predict. but you seem pretty convinced.
i'll give you top 5. either category, goals against per game or defensive efficiency.
stakes?


You are on. I am trying to find an online reference table for 'defensive efficiency' and can't; where is one? All I can find is 'goals scored against', which I'd prefer to not use but will if we can't find a mutually agreeable site for 'defensive efficiency' (preferable).

Goals scored against: https://www.ncaa.com/stats/lacrosse-men ... t/team/229

(and don't get too cocky too soon in the season, as our #'s will significantly improve as we get into the meat of the PL schedule)

Also, I'd like to wager a dozen jumbo crabs from Ocean Pride in Baltimore County, the only place I know for crabs, me and two friends (we will eat 4 a piece). I believe that the height of crab season is right around Memorial Day, so they will be very tasty! Also, "all I ask is three beers a piece for each of my co-feasters...I think a man workin' outdoors feels more like a man if he can have a bottle of suds. That's only my opinion."

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 12:39 pm
by HopFan16
To say nothing of losing Stover and now Scanlan, I would expect there to be major growing pains on offense without Pat Spencer. He had a hand in literally half of your goals in 2019. (Okay, it's 47%, but close enough.) 114 points. Yes, some of that production will be filled organically as other players step up and Olmstead and whomever else takes on bigger roles. But you don't just remove a player like Spencer from an offense and expect things to continue as they did. And his impact on the game went far beyond those 114 points. It was immeasurable. It does remind me a bit of Brown, and quite frankly it reminds me somewhat of Hopkins this year—losing Stanwick, Tinney, and Turnbaugh all at once, all key players at their positions as Spencer, Scanlan, and Stover were. Yes, we've got some nice young talent to replace them including an attackman who looks like a future Tewaaraton candidate, but he alone was not enough to prevent a mediocre season and a significant drop-off from the prior year. Loyola will be fine in the long run, but expecting there to be no step back whatsoever after losing such a transformational player (as well as other key pieces) strikes me as borderline delusional—something I'm pretty familiar with from the Hopkins thread.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 12:50 pm
by wgdsr
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 12:38 pm
wgdsr wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:42 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 10:32 am
BigTom4 wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:43 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:03 am I keep saying, like a broken record, our defense will be top-3 in the country. Mark my word.
Yeah I don't see it. Team was 29th in defensive efficiency last year with a unit who regularly relied on their excellent goaltender to make a high number of saves to get the ball back to the offense. Now that goalie (and his NCAA leading 15 saves a game) graduates and you are telling me they are going to be a top 3 unit? I don't care if everyone is back, those guys who are coming back gave up 15 to HC, 18 to BU, and as many goals as PSU wanted to score last year with the best goalie in the country in net. :?:
Hughes did not play; he was #6 in CT's as a freshman at another college. Likely to start.

Wyers was a freshman; 2nd on team in CT's with 17.

Higgins, Railey back as seniors...each has gotten progressively better every year on the field.

McNulty back as senior leader with 25 CT's as LSM...

Volante might be back, let's see.

Calder Vandenheuvel (incoming freshman) is a McNulty doppelganger...watch for his name a lot.

This defense, any coach imo in D1 would switch out what they have for what we have. Great athletes getting better. The biggest problem last year was communication on slides. That will get better with one more season of the whole defense back.
i subscribe to the notion that communication on slides is priority #1 on defense, that's just me. sometimes it never gets fixed.
i smell a wager. top 3/5 etc. is very difficult to do, let alone predict. but you seem pretty convinced.
i'll give you top 5. either category, goals against per game or defensive efficiency.
stakes?
You are on. I am trying to find an online reference table for 'defensive efficiency' and can't; where is one? All I can find is 'goals scored against', which I'd prefer to not use but will if we can't find a mutually agreeable site for 'defensive efficiency' (preferable).

Goals scored against: https://www.ncaa.com/stats/lacrosse-men ... t/team/229

(and don't get too cocky too soon in the season, as our #'s will significantly improve as we get into the meat of the PL schedule)

Also, I'd like to wager a dozen jumbo crabs from Ocean Pride in Baltimore County, the only place I know for crabs, me and two friends (we will eat 4 a piece). I believe that the height of crab season is right around Memorial Day, so they will be very tasty! Also, "all I ask is three beers a piece for each of my co-feasters...I think a man workin' outdoors feels more like a man if he can have a bottle of suds. That's only my opinion."
deal.
here is a working site page for 2019:
https://lacrossereference.com/stats/adj ... fficiency/
main site:
https://lacrossereference.com/
this site is still up, but no new data for 2019. past years show loyola at 6, 9, 12...
http://analyticslacrosse.com/about

so defensive efficiency, top 5, a bunch of patsies in the PL next year, OP.
done.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 8:29 pm
by BigTom4
Hold up, I started this debate. I want in on the free crabs too. PB you down to host back to back weekends?

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 8:44 pm
by NovaHound
This is FUN!!! I do like all of the conjecture, assumptions, foretelling, forecasting, predictive analysis, wishful thinking, hopefulness, etc.... Makes an otherwise boring Summer tolerable, although the Chase Scanlan sweepstakes are certainly entertaining.

I just think you have to pay heed to what Peter brown is saying about the defense and here's why. The SSDMs are a year (and will be) better, more experienced and bigger - Benus, Swindell, Higgins, Rezanka... I probably missed someone else here. I also think Milhouse shifts more to offense but all of his time spent on Defense only increases his upside in the transition game.

As for the Long Poles:
Wyers is a lefty. Hughes, a projected starter until a January knee injury, is a rightie. That's one heck of a double from both sides if you ask me. They are both big and fast. Both are experienced. Railey and Johnson - both starters/experienced. I hear LeBlanc might be a factor in the rotation this year as well. Defense - you have starting experience, size, knowledge, etc... and I expect communication within the group to improve. Very little downside. They will miss the senior leadership provided by Volante and Stover but someone will step up IMO. Last year Stover bailed the defense out with his crazy saves, this defense bails out the goalie by forcing bad shots, creating turnovers, winning the GB game and creating the transition to quickly take advanatge of an unsettled and unprepared defense. It's a hopeful wish.

I forgot to mention McNulty?? 2 more years Baby!!! His confidence and ability is off the charts. And Middleton steps up his defense to go with his offensive mindset. Johnson also took some runs at LSM last year and may do the same this year. And I hear we have another good pole coming in from the Hill Academy...

It's going to be a good defense.

Offense - Lindley and Olmstead. Proven, dependable, willing to step up and lead the team. Both are tough as nails. I remember someone mentioning Ross Pridemore. Have heard nothing but good things about him. Has the size, speed and all around knack for feeding the ball to the open man. He injured his knee prior to arriving on campus and rehabbed it last Fall. He was finally cleared in late Spring and is why he suited up for the Playoffs.

Middies - sure the Scanlan loss hurts. But Hounds have Cox, Devoreaux, Wiggs, Milhouse, and some new faces coming in that are dependable and experienced.

The Freshman class from last year saw playing time and I'm not sure who will emerge and make an impact.

Goalie - Sam Shaffer (sp??) 2 years watching Stover and learning the game. Bigger. Good clearing.

I almost forgot to mention how the game tactics are executed - it begins at X with Bailey Savio. Loyola improved its face off percentage from .478 in 2018 to .522 in 2019. I expect this to improve and this will help wear down the opposing defense. Hounds will have more touches on the ball.

Prognosis - Pretty Good team with potential. Team starts slow (possible losses to UVA and JHU - I hate to say) and then begins to build its chemistry and gets on a roll during Patriot League. Win it. On to Playoffs. That's how I see it. But I also believe in one game at a time... Each game will be a stepping stone. It doesn't matter how you start - it's how you finish :D

Please chime in Peter Brown - what did I miss??

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 8:54 am
by Voyuer
Great analysis, great optimism, but it won't make a difference because the D will still be slightly better than average, and in case you forgot PAT SPENCER graduated. With Scanlan leaving and Pat gone the O will be down big. i will stick by saying a PL league championship would be a nice accomplishment next year, and the only chance the Hounds will have to make the NCAA tourney.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 9:20 am
by Peter Brown
NovaHound wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 8:44 pm This is FUN!!! I do like all of the conjecture, assumptions, foretelling, forecasting, predictive analysis, wishful thinking, hopefulness, etc.... Makes an otherwise boring Summer tolerable, although the Chase Scanlan sweepstakes are certainly entertaining.

I just think you have to pay heed to what Peter brown is saying about the defense and here's why. The SSDMs are a year (and will be) better, more experienced and bigger - Benus, Swindell, Higgins, Rezanka... I probably missed someone else here. I also think Milhouse shifts more to offense but all of his time spent on Defense only increases his upside in the transition game.

As for the Long Poles:
Wyers is a lefty. Hughes, a projected starter until a January knee injury, is a rightie. That's one heck of a double from both sides if you ask me. They are both big and fast. Both are experienced. Railey and Johnson - both starters/experienced. I hear LeBlanc might be a factor in the rotation this year as well. Defense - you have starting experience, size, knowledge, etc... and I expect communication within the group to improve. Very little downside. They will miss the senior leadership provided by Volante and Stover but someone will step up IMO. Last year Stover bailed the defense out with his crazy saves, this defense bails out the goalie by forcing bad shots, creating turnovers, winning the GB game and creating the transition to quickly take advanatge of an unsettled and unprepared defense. It's a hopeful wish.

I forgot to mention McNulty?? 2 more years Baby!!! His confidence and ability is off the charts. And Middleton steps up his defense to go with his offensive mindset. Johnson also took some runs at LSM last year and may do the same this year. And I hear we have another good pole coming in from the Hill Academy...

It's going to be a good defense.

Offense - Lindley and Olmstead. Proven, dependable, willing to step up and lead the team. Both are tough as nails. I remember someone mentioning Ross Pridemore. Have heard nothing but good things about him. Has the size, speed and all around knack for feeding the ball to the open man. He injured his knee prior to arriving on campus and rehabbed it last Fall. He was finally cleared in late Spring and is why he suited up for the Playoffs.

Middies - sure the Scanlan loss hurts. But Hounds have Cox, Devoreaux, Wiggs, Milhouse, and some new faces coming in that are dependable and experienced.

The Freshman class from last year saw playing time and I'm not sure who will emerge and make an impact.

Goalie - Sam Shaffer (sp??) 2 years watching Stover and learning the game. Bigger. Good clearing.

I almost forgot to mention how the game tactics are executed - it begins at X with Bailey Savio. Loyola improved its face off percentage from .478 in 2018 to .522 in 2019. I expect this to improve and this will help wear down the opposing defense. Hounds will have more touches on the ball.

Prognosis - Pretty Good team with potential. Team starts slow (possible losses to UVA and JHU - I hate to say) and then begins to build its chemistry and gets on a roll during Patriot League. Win it. On to Playoffs. That's how I see it. But I also believe in one game at a time... Each game will be a stepping stone. It doesn't matter how you start - it's how you finish :D

Please chime in Peter Brown - what did I miss??

Great summary.

Only thing you overlooked were the incoming freshmen. I think Pacheco is the most underrated player in high school; how we got him I have no idea, other than the bigs keep overlooking non-hotbed areas of high school lacrosse. vandenHeuvel is just like McNulty, and I assume everyone knows how good Ryan is?

Where Voyeur and others can't see the forest (team performance) through the trees (Spencer!!!) is we are likely to be significantly better as a team in 2020 than we wee this year.

1. That starts with Bailey, Cottone, and Pacheco at FOGO. We will see the ball so much more in 2020 than we did in 2019.

2. Then go to our defense. No one here outside if you are a Mercer fan realizes just how good Hughes is. The kid is as good a defender as you will see in D1, as is Wyers. Our defense will be excellent, not simply better than average.

3. No one appreciates Lindley and Olmstead yet, except for Pat Spencer. When you take the reins off those two, as we saw in the BU and Gtown games, you will see two very elite players whose numbers will surprise many here.

Look, I love Pat as much as anyone, and no doubt there will be some adjusting period, but this team will be a very strong D1 squad next year. The upside and downside to having a great player is so many teammates start staring at the one guy to create everything, and then you become less of the sum of your parts. That will not be the case next year. Lindley is an elite player as is Olmstead.

My only worry has nothing to do with losing Spencer, Scanlan, or Duffy, our offense, midfield, LSM's, or defense...we willbe excellent at all three lines. My only worry for the 2020 Hounds is in goal. One of those two guys will need to be very good.

Re: Loyola University Lacrosse 2020

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 9:26 am
by TheBigIguana
Peter Brown wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2019 9:20 am
NovaHound wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2019 8:44 pm This is FUN!!! I do like all of the conjecture, assumptions, foretelling, forecasting, predictive analysis, wishful thinking, hopefulness, etc.... Makes an otherwise boring Summer tolerable, although the Chase Scanlan sweepstakes are certainly entertaining.

I just think you have to pay heed to what Peter brown is saying about the defense and here's why. The SSDMs are a year (and will be) better, more experienced and bigger - Benus, Swindell, Higgins, Rezanka... I probably missed someone else here. I also think Milhouse shifts more to offense but all of his time spent on Defense only increases his upside in the transition game.

As for the Long Poles:
Wyers is a lefty. Hughes, a projected starter until a January knee injury, is a rightie. That's one heck of a double from both sides if you ask me. They are both big and fast. Both are experienced. Railey and Johnson - both starters/experienced. I hear LeBlanc might be a factor in the rotation this year as well. Defense - you have starting experience, size, knowledge, etc... and I expect communication within the group to improve. Very little downside. They will miss the senior leadership provided by Volante and Stover but someone will step up IMO. Last year Stover bailed the defense out with his crazy saves, this defense bails out the goalie by forcing bad shots, creating turnovers, winning the GB game and creating the transition to quickly take advanatge of an unsettled and unprepared defense. It's a hopeful wish.

I forgot to mention McNulty?? 2 more years Baby!!! His confidence and ability is off the charts. And Middleton steps up his defense to go with his offensive mindset. Johnson also took some runs at LSM last year and may do the same this year. And I hear we have another good pole coming in from the Hill Academy...

It's going to be a good defense.

Offense - Lindley and Olmstead. Proven, dependable, willing to step up and lead the team. Both are tough as nails. I remember someone mentioning Ross Pridemore. Have heard nothing but good things about him. Has the size, speed and all around knack for feeding the ball to the open man. He injured his knee prior to arriving on campus and rehabbed it last Fall. He was finally cleared in late Spring and is why he suited up for the Playoffs.

Middies - sure the Scanlan loss hurts. But Hounds have Cox, Devoreaux, Wiggs, Milhouse, and some new faces coming in that are dependable and experienced.

The Freshman class from last year saw playing time and I'm not sure who will emerge and make an impact.

Goalie - Sam Shaffer (sp??) 2 years watching Stover and learning the game. Bigger. Good clearing.

I almost forgot to mention how the game tactics are executed - it begins at X with Bailey Savio. Loyola improved its face off percentage from .478 in 2018 to .522 in 2019. I expect this to improve and this will help wear down the opposing defense. Hounds will have more touches on the ball.

Prognosis - Pretty Good team with potential. Team starts slow (possible losses to UVA and JHU - I hate to say) and then begins to build its chemistry and gets on a roll during Patriot League. Win it. On to Playoffs. That's how I see it. But I also believe in one game at a time... Each game will be a stepping stone. It doesn't matter how you start - it's how you finish :D

Please chime in Peter Brown - what did I miss??

Great summary.

Only thing you overlooked were the incoming freshmen. I think Pacheco is the most underrated player in high school; how we got him I have no idea, other than the bigs keep overlooking non-hotbed areas of high school lacrosse. vandenHeuvel is just like McNulty, and I assume everyone knows how good Ryan is?

Where Voyeur and others can't see the forest (team performance) through the trees (Spencer!!!) is we are likely to be significantly better as a team in 2020 than we wee this year.

1. That starts with Bailey, Cottone, and Pacheco at FOGO. We will see the ball so much more in 2020 than we did in 2019.

2. Then go to our defense. No one here outside if you are a Mercer fan realizes just how good Hughes is. The kid is as good a defender as you will see in D1, as is Wyers. Our defense will be excellent, not simply better than average.

3. No one appreciates Lindley and Olmstead yet, except for Pat Spencer. When you take the reins off those two, as we saw in the BU and Gtown games, you will see two very elite players whose numbers will surprise many here.

Look, I love Pat as much as anyone, and no doubt there will be some adjusting period, but this team will be a very strong D1 squad next year. The upside and downside to having a great player is so many teammates start staring at the one guy to create everything, and then you become less of the sum of your parts. That will not be the case next year. Lindley is an elite player as is Olmstead.

My only worry has nothing to do with losing Spencer, Scanlan, or Duffy, our offense, midfield, LSM's, or defense...we willbe excellent at all three lines. My only worry for the 2020 Hounds is in goal. One of those two guys will need to be very good.
Hopefully Toomey is working on Brandau because that would solve that problem