Same Party, Different House
https://fanlax.com/forum/
Sure sounds like an obvious case of "whataboutism" to me...isn't that the term the hypocrats on here always use to discredit?Lax Fidelis wrote:Thanks to both seacoaster and dislaxxic for reminding everyone that Sen. Turkey Wattles turned the SCOTUS nomination process into a totally politically process which may never be restored to something even resembling what it used to be.
Nope, not so much. I am not sure if you dodge the point willfully, or just plain old miss it. Hoodat described the blood sport politics of this Supreme Court nomination process; we just pointed out that the politics here are little more than a continuation of the Garland business, which was a continuation of previous troubling tussles. But at least "hypocrats" shows your true color, which, for all of your purported "moderation," is Red.tech37 wrote:Sure sounds like an obvious case of "whataboutism" to me...isn't that the term the hypocrats on here always use to discredit?Lax Fidelis wrote:Thanks to both seacoaster and dislaxxic for reminding everyone that Sen. Turkey Wattles turned the SCOTUS nomination process into a totally politically process which may never be restored to something even resembling what it used to be.
seacoaster wrote:Nope, not so much. I am not sure if you dodge the point willfully, or just plain old miss it. Guess you missed my post days ago regarding, IMO, whether K should be confirmed or not. Hoodat described the blood sport politics of this Supreme Court nomination process; we just pointed out that the politics here are little more than a continuation of the Garland business, which was a continuation of previous troubling tussles. Lawyerspeak BS But at least "hypocrats" shows your true color, which, for all of your purported "moderation," is Red. No nuance here on your part counselor...you need not be "red" to be disgusted with the so-called "blue wave."tech37 wrote:Sure sounds like an obvious case of "whataboutism" to me...isn't that the term the hypocrats on here always use to discredit?Lax Fidelis wrote:Thanks to both seacoaster and dislaxxic for reminding everyone that Sen. Turkey Wattles turned the SCOTUS nomination process into a totally politically process which may never be restored to something even resembling what it used to be.
As to your earlier post...1000 Professors!...big surprise with the progressive culture on campus these days.
This article does a decent job at showing his body work on a multitude of topics and where he stands. Sure, we each can read into these with our own prejudice, but his body of work and legal aptitude are really not in question, other than he leans right.seacoaster wrote: Again, folks, I ask: if you favor Kavanaugh's nomination, can anyone say why? Is it just more "sticking it to the libs"? Or is there a result or two that you think he will secure, and if so what is it?
) is oozing out. Just take a look for yourself..https://video.foxnews.com/v/58440311670 ... show-clipsLies and Demeanor? What are you talking about? Ford and her lies and her "baby talk"? I know better than that. You saying uneducated white men and women are energized is such a bigoted statement from someone who acts holier than thou. I didn't know Dartmouth taught you so much hatred. Once again proving liberalism is a hate filled ideology. It is crap like this that got Trump elected in the first place. You called us 'deplorables' and we showed up and he won an electoral landslide. The Democrats are so dumb. Doubling down is the worst thing they could do. They are going to get pounded at the polls this fall.MDlaxfan76 wrote:Feels like this will go through, despite the known lies and demeanor.
"no corroboration" doesn't mean "refuted" but the way this has been defined is that multiple sexual assault allegations "not corroborated" are not enough to prevent R Senators from confirming.
Heck, 56% of R's polled say that even if it was proven that he assaulted Ford and Ramirez, Kav should be confirmed.
That's where we are.
What's even more appalling is that Trumpists cheer "Lock her up" when an admitted sexual assaulter POTUS mocks a woman who has made a credible claim of having been assaulted.
Looking at the polls this week, it looks like this issue has energized and inflamed R's, especially white men and non-college educated white women, such that the 'blue wave' may not happen at all.
Of course, a week is an eternity these days and there's a full month before voters go to the polls. So, stay tuned.
Ford lied plain and simple. Kav did not. If he did, the FBI would have found that out. Again, just because someone says something doesn't mean it is true. Man must suck to be on the losing end of everything!DMac wrote:An IMO might add a little credibility to your post(s), dito. Here are some facts, you weren't there, you don't know with certainty who is or isn't lying, but you believe Keg isn't.
Many of his colleagues who were there and witnessed his behavior say he did lie (not talking about the Ford claims here). I think it's been established that Keg has been less than forthcoming during this interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K52E_A1lHAQ
For the 7th time!!Trinity wrote:The FBI has reaffirmed Kavanaugh’s virginity.
You miss the point completely.Bandito wrote:Heck if drinking beer disqualifies you for a life in politics, guess who the most qualified is?
DONALD TRUMP. He does not consume alcohol.
No e in honky. C'mon now. You of all air-breathers should know better. Get it right1 bangBandito wrote:For the 7th time!!Trinity wrote:The FBI has reaffirmed Kavanaugh’s virginity.
Good morning honkey!
Uneducated white women is name calling and very bigoted. Go get mad at MDLax.DMac wrote:You miss the point completely.Bandito wrote:Heck if drinking beer disqualifies you for a life in politics, guess who the most qualified is?
DONALD TRUMP. He does not consume alcohol.
I'll wait until it's past your bedtime again to come back, the discussion was civil and reasonable while people expressed their opinions in your absence. You're the only one who gets off on the childish name calling and sophomoric behavior. The thread is yours, entertain yourself.
Bandito wrote:Ford lied plain and simple. Kav did not. If he did, the FBI would have found that out. Again, just because someone says something doesn't mean it is true. Man must suck to be on the losing end of everything!DMac wrote:An IMO might add a little credibility to your post(s), dito. Here are some facts, you weren't there, you don't know with certainty who is or isn't lying, but you believe Keg isn't.
Many of his colleagues who were there and witnessed his behavior say he did lie (not talking about the Ford claims here). I think it's been established that Keg has been less than forthcoming during this interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K52E_A1lHAQ
Kav will be the next SCOTUS Justice. Nothing you say or post matters. Sucks to suck loser.
A group representing 100,000 congregations and 45 million churchgoers across an array of Christian denominations in the U.S. has called for the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to be withdrawn.
Buenos dias, Manuel! You were right!Bandito wrote:For the 7th time!!Trinity wrote:The FBI has reaffirmed Kavanaugh’s virginity.
Good morning honkey!