Page 670 of 1038

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:13 am
by RedFromMI
seacoaster wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:09 am Request for a stay in the Trump v. Vance matter is denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_2cp3.pdf

So what does this mean?
Vance gets the copies of Trump's personal financial records from lenders and accountants, and the tax returns as well (lower court decision rules here).

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:28 am
by Brooklyn
tRUMP ~ the face and the Pride of the republican party:


Image





ℕ𝕆ℕ𝔼 𝔻𝔸ℝ𝔼 ℂ𝔸𝕃𝕃 𝕀𝕋 π•‹β„π”Όπ”Έπ•Šπ•†β„•

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:31 am
by MDlaxfan76
RedFromMI wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:13 am
seacoaster wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:09 am Request for a stay in the Trump v. Vance matter is denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_2cp3.pdf

So what does this mean?
Vance gets the copies of Trump's personal financial records from lenders and accountants, and the tax returns as well (lower court decision rules here).
Any best guesses as to the timing of when we'll see actions taken in court enabled by access to these returns?

Later this spring? Next summer? fall? a year?

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:48 am
by Kismet
Rick Reilly
@ReillyRick
5m

Q: Name 3 sides that never win.
A: The Washington Generals, Germany and Trump lawyers.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:08 pm
by njbill
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:31 am
RedFromMI wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:13 am
seacoaster wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:09 am Request for a stay in the Trump v. Vance matter is denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_2cp3.pdf

So what does this mean?
Vance gets the copies of Trump's personal financial records from lenders and accountants, and the tax returns as well (lower court decision rules here).
Any best guesses as to the timing of when we'll see actions taken in court enabled by access to these returns?

Later this spring? Next summer? fall? a year?
Good question.

There has been a lot of discussion and argument from the New York prosecutors that statute of limitations concerns make it important to them that they get these materials ASAP. They have been making those arguments for some time.

I don’t know the details of those SOL arguments.

If there truly are statute issues, one would expect very quick action by the prosecutors.

I’m not sure if there will be any additional proceedings in court. I suspect the next step, if it is going to happen, will be that indictments are issued.

Hard to predict how quickly things will move, but my guess would be months, not weeks, not years, unless there are rapidly approaching upcoming SOL deadlines. Just a guess.

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:10 pm
by njbill
seacoaster wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:09 am Request for a stay in the Trump v. Vance matter is denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_2cp3.pdf

So what does this mean?

And... Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch would hear the Pennsylvania election cases, stepping the federal courts into the state conduct of the elections and potentially countermanding the PA Supreme Court on an issue of PA state law?
sc, I don’t see anything in the Pennsylvania case saying that Barrett did not participate. Did you?

That Thomas opinion is really beyond the pale. Talk about conservative judicial activism.

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:26 pm
by seacoaster
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:10 pm
seacoaster wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:09 am Request for a stay in the Trump v. Vance matter is denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_2cp3.pdf

So what does this mean?

And... Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch would hear the Pennsylvania election cases, stepping the federal courts into the state conduct of the elections and potentially countermanding the PA Supreme Court on an issue of PA state law?
sc, I don’t see anything in the Pennsylvania case saying that Barrett did not participate. Did you?

That Thomas opinion is really beyond the pale. Talk about conservative judicial activism.
Right; I assumed she voted against the grant of certiorari.

Yes, the Thomas opinion just puts the lie to the notion of "conservative judicial restraint." He and Alito are essentially culture warring politicians now. Remarkable.

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:52 pm
by jhu72
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:08 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:31 am
RedFromMI wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:13 am
seacoaster wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:09 am Request for a stay in the Trump v. Vance matter is denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_2cp3.pdf

So what does this mean?
Vance gets the copies of Trump's personal financial records from lenders and accountants, and the tax returns as well (lower court decision rules here).
Any best guesses as to the timing of when we'll see actions taken in court enabled by access to these returns?

Later this spring? Next summer? fall? a year?
Good question.

There has been a lot of discussion and argument from the New York prosecutors that statute of limitations concerns make it important to them that they get these materials ASAP. They have been making those arguments for some time.

I don’t know the details of those SOL arguments.

If there truly are statute issues, one would expect very quick action by the prosecutors.

I’m not sure if there will be any additional proceedings in court. I suspect the next step, if it is going to happen, will be that indictments are issued.

Hard to predict how quickly things will move, but my guess would be months, not weeks, not years, unless there are rapidly approaching upcoming SOL deadlines. Just a guess.
... agreed. Queue up the indictments. My suspicion is they already know a lot about his financials, without having "received" them.

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2021 6:38 am
by cradleandshoot
jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:52 pm
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:08 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:31 am
RedFromMI wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:13 am
seacoaster wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:09 am Request for a stay in the Trump v. Vance matter is denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_2cp3.pdf

So what does this mean?
Vance gets the copies of Trump's personal financial records from lenders and accountants, and the tax returns as well (lower court decision rules here).
Any best guesses as to the timing of when we'll see actions taken in court enabled by access to these returns?

Later this spring? Next summer? fall? a year?
Good question.

There has been a lot of discussion and argument from the New York prosecutors that statute of limitations concerns make it important to them that they get these materials ASAP. They have been making those arguments for some time.

I don’t know the details of those SOL arguments.

If there truly are statute issues, one would expect very quick action by the prosecutors.

I’m not sure if there will be any additional proceedings in court. I suspect the next step, if it is going to happen, will be that indictments are issued.

Hard to predict how quickly things will move, but my guess would be months, not weeks, not years, unless there are rapidly approaching upcoming SOL deadlines. Just a guess.
... agreed. Queue up the indictments. My suspicion is they already know a lot about his financials, without having "received" them.
At the end of this 3 ring circus the end game will be very clear. The AG in NYS will have to convince 12 jurors that Dump is guilty. They have to explain all of Dumps taxes and financial games in a manner that 12 people can understand it and agree on a conviction. Why do I think that Dump will be rotting in the ground long before that happens? This case has to be a lawyers dream... sooooo much money to be made via billable hours. :D

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2021 6:56 am
by Kismet
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 24, 2021 6:38 am
jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:52 pm
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:08 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:31 am
RedFromMI wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:13 am
seacoaster wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:09 am Request for a stay in the Trump v. Vance matter is denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_2cp3.pdf

So what does this mean?
Vance gets the copies of Trump's personal financial records from lenders and accountants, and the tax returns as well (lower court decision rules here).
Any best guesses as to the timing of when we'll see actions taken in court enabled by access to these returns?

Later this spring? Next summer? fall? a year?
Good question.

There has been a lot of discussion and argument from the New York prosecutors that statute of limitations concerns make it important to them that they get these materials ASAP. They have been making those arguments for some time.

I don’t know the details of those SOL arguments.

If there truly are statute issues, one would expect very quick action by the prosecutors.

I’m not sure if there will be any additional proceedings in court. I suspect the next step, if it is going to happen, will be that indictments are issued.

Hard to predict how quickly things will move, but my guess would be months, not weeks, not years, unless there are rapidly approaching upcoming SOL deadlines. Just a guess.
... agreed. Queue up the indictments. My suspicion is they already know a lot about his financials, without having "received" them.
At the end of this 3 ring circus the end game will be very clear. The AG in NYS will have to convince 12 jurors that Dump is guilty. They have to explain all of Dumps taxes and financial games in a manner that 12 people can understand it and agree on a conviction. Why do I think that Dump will be rotting in the ground long before that happens? This case has to be a lawyers dream... sooooo much money to be made via billable hours. :D
Of course, with Dump the lawyers will need to see the cash which often is not the case. It will be interesting to see how good a lawyer he can get to take his case with his history of stiffing banks, lawyers, vendors and creditors. The Feds in VA managed to convict Paul Manafort on multiple counts of complex financial fraud without much difficulty so expect that the Manhattan DA is equally competent.

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2021 7:40 am
by cradleandshoot
Kismet wrote: ↑Wed Feb 24, 2021 6:56 am
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 24, 2021 6:38 am
jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:52 pm
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:08 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:31 am
RedFromMI wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:13 am
seacoaster wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:09 am Request for a stay in the Trump v. Vance matter is denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_2cp3.pdf

So what does this mean?
Vance gets the copies of Trump's personal financial records from lenders and accountants, and the tax returns as well (lower court decision rules here).
Any best guesses as to the timing of when we'll see actions taken in court enabled by access to these returns?

Later this spring? Next summer? fall? a year?
Good question.

There has been a lot of discussion and argument from the New York prosecutors that statute of limitations concerns make it important to them that they get these materials ASAP. They have been making those arguments for some time.

I don’t know the details of those SOL arguments.

If there truly are statute issues, one would expect very quick action by the prosecutors.

I’m not sure if there will be any additional proceedings in court. I suspect the next step, if it is going to happen, will be that indictments are issued.

Hard to predict how quickly things will move, but my guess would be months, not weeks, not years, unless there are rapidly approaching upcoming SOL deadlines. Just a guess.
... agreed. Queue up the indictments. My suspicion is they already know a lot about his financials, without having "received" them.
At the end of this 3 ring circus the end game will be very clear. The AG in NYS will have to convince 12 jurors that Dump is guilty. They have to explain all of Dumps taxes and financial games in a manner that 12 people can understand it and agree on a conviction. Why do I think that Dump will be rotting in the ground long before that happens? This case has to be a lawyers dream... sooooo much money to be made via billable hours. :D
Of course, with Dump the lawyers will need to see the cash which often is not the case. It will be interesting to see how good a lawyer he can get to take his case with his history of stiffing banks, lawyers, vendors and creditors. The Feds in VA managed to convict Paul Manafort on multiple counts of complex financial fraud without much difficulty so expect that the Manhattan DA is equally competent.
I am certain that the Manhattan DA is very competent. I don't know if any of Manaforts illegal activities even remotely approach the Dump level. My guess is that any trial turns into a multi year fiasco with every possible sort of delay imaginable. That being said, I know the case will move forward. When all is said and done the prosecutors have to make the case understandable to 12 citizens. That will be a huge challenge.

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2021 8:59 am
by MDlaxfan76
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 24, 2021 7:40 am
Kismet wrote: ↑Wed Feb 24, 2021 6:56 am
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Wed Feb 24, 2021 6:38 am
jhu72 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:52 pm
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:08 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:31 am
RedFromMI wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:13 am
seacoaster wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:09 am Request for a stay in the Trump v. Vance matter is denied.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/cou ... r_2cp3.pdf

So what does this mean?
Vance gets the copies of Trump's personal financial records from lenders and accountants, and the tax returns as well (lower court decision rules here).
Any best guesses as to the timing of when we'll see actions taken in court enabled by access to these returns?

Later this spring? Next summer? fall? a year?
Good question.

There has been a lot of discussion and argument from the New York prosecutors that statute of limitations concerns make it important to them that they get these materials ASAP. They have been making those arguments for some time.

I don’t know the details of those SOL arguments.

If there truly are statute issues, one would expect very quick action by the prosecutors.

I’m not sure if there will be any additional proceedings in court. I suspect the next step, if it is going to happen, will be that indictments are issued.

Hard to predict how quickly things will move, but my guess would be months, not weeks, not years, unless there are rapidly approaching upcoming SOL deadlines. Just a guess.
... agreed. Queue up the indictments. My suspicion is they already know a lot about his financials, without having "received" them.
At the end of this 3 ring circus the end game will be very clear. The AG in NYS will have to convince 12 jurors that Dump is guilty. They have to explain all of Dumps taxes and financial games in a manner that 12 people can understand it and agree on a conviction. Why do I think that Dump will be rotting in the ground long before that happens? This case has to be a lawyers dream... sooooo much money to be made via billable hours. :D
Of course, with Dump the lawyers will need to see the cash which often is not the case. It will be interesting to see how good a lawyer he can get to take his case with his history of stiffing banks, lawyers, vendors and creditors. The Feds in VA managed to convict Paul Manafort on multiple counts of complex financial fraud without much difficulty so expect that the Manhattan DA is equally competent.
I am certain that the Manhattan DA is very competent. I don't know if any of Manaforts illegal activities even remotely approach the Dump level. My guess is that any trial turns into a multi year fiasco with every possible sort of delay imaginable. That being said, I know the case will move forward. When all is said and done the prosecutors have to make the case understandable to 12 citizens. That will be a huge challenge.
Indeed, they'll need to make it very 'simple', Trump has been living grossly high on the hog while lying to his bankers and insurers, and to the government...costing taxpayers like them and millions of others to pick up Trump's high living tab. Pretty simple when it all comes down to it.

The criminal cases will not be easy to delay, once the prosecutors push the 'go' button, the civil ones considerably easier.

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2021 9:38 am
by Brooklyn

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2021 4:53 pm
by njbill
Springsteen pled guilty to drinking in a closed park. Presumably the park is one of those that is closed after sunset. Also the no alcohol prohibition was only two years old in the park.

The prosecutor dropped the DUI charge because, he told the judge, they couldn’t prove the case due to the fact that Bruce only blew .02.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/24/entertai ... index.html

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2021 9:59 pm
by MDlaxfan76

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2021 7:10 am
by Brooklyn
Image

https://i.imgur.com/QzKjAbY.png


It's time for repukeblican incompetents in Congress to get with the program.

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2021 1:38 pm
by cradleandshoot
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/25/politics ... index.html

So how long does it take to sift through millions of pages? I'm guessing a couple of weeks. :roll: This chit circus should be a whole lot of fun to watch unfold. Of those millions of pages how many are relevant and how many are useless? There have to be some prosecutors out there that will spend their entire careers sifting through this garbage heap looking for the good stuff. If they didn't need reading glasses before they certainly will now. The ACA was a thousand pages and nobody could sit still long enough to read that bill.

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2021 7:29 pm
by seacoaster
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 1:38 pm https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/25/politics ... index.html

So how long does it take to sift through millions of pages? I'm guessing a couple of weeks. :roll: This chit circus should be a whole lot of fun to watch unfold. Of those millions of pages how many are relevant and how many are useless? There have to be some prosecutors out there that will spend their entire careers sifting through this garbage heap looking for the good stuff. If they didn't need reading glasses before they certainly will now. The ACA was a thousand pages and nobody could sit still long enough to read that bill.
Routine stuff in the edited of fraud and financial crimes cases.

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 4:57 am
by cradleandshoot
seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 7:29 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 1:38 pm https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/25/politics ... index.html

So how long does it take to sift through millions of pages? I'm guessing a couple of weeks. :roll: This chit circus should be a whole lot of fun to watch unfold. Of those millions of pages how many are relevant and how many are useless? There have to be some prosecutors out there that will spend their entire careers sifting through this garbage heap looking for the good stuff. If they didn't need reading glasses before they certainly will now. The ACA was a thousand pages and nobody could sit still long enough to read that bill.
Routine stuff in the edited of fraud and financial crimes cases.
Any idea how long you think that will take? Having to go through millions of pages sounds like a daunting challenge.

Re: Orange Duce

Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2021 6:17 am
by foreverlax
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 4:57 am
seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 7:29 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 1:38 pm https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/25/politics ... index.html

So how long does it take to sift through millions of pages? I'm guessing a couple of weeks. :roll: This chit circus should be a whole lot of fun to watch unfold. Of those millions of pages how many are relevant and how many are useless? There have to be some prosecutors out there that will spend their entire careers sifting through this garbage heap looking for the good stuff. If they didn't need reading glasses before they certainly will now. The ACA was a thousand pages and nobody could sit still long enough to read that bill.
Routine stuff in the edited of fraud and financial crimes cases.
Any idea how long you think that will take? Having to go through millions of pages sounds like a daunting challenge.
Same way you eat an elephant.... ;)