LaxPower Back-Up Stick

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

CU77 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:36 pm

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... is/608026/

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:41 pm

CU77 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:36 pm

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... is/608026/

The sycophants will come to the administrations defense.

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:47 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:41 pm

CU77 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:36 pm

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... is/608026/

The sycophants will come to the administrations defense.

Are they WHO approved test kits ? (failure rate ?)

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:47 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:41 pm

CU77 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:36 pm

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... is/608026/

The sycophants will come to the administrations defense.

Are they WHO approved test kits ? (failure rate ?)

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:53 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:47 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:41 pm

CU77 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:36 pm

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... is/608026/

The sycophants will come to the administrations defense.

Are they WHO approved test kits ? (failure rate ?)

Serious question/request: could you provide a link that compares the failure rate of the WHO kits versus either those the CDC eventually produced or the ones currently being constructed here in the US.

I can't find so far with google anything that suggests a high failure rate of WHO kits.

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:53 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:47 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:41 pm

CU77 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:36 pm

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... is/608026/

The sycophants will come to the administrations defense.

Are they WHO approved test kits ? (failure rate ?)

Serious question/request: could you provide a link that compares the failure rate of the WHO kits versus either those the CDC eventually produced or the ones currently being constructed here in the US.

I can't find so far with google anything that suggests a high failure rate of WHO kits.

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:09 pm

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:53 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:47 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:41 pm

CU77 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:36 pm

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... is/608026/

The sycophants will come to the administrations defense.

Are they WHO approved test kits ? (failure rate ?)

Serious question/request: could you provide a link that compares the failure rate of the WHO kits versus either those the CDC eventually produced or the ones currently being constructed here in the US.

I can't find so far with google anything that suggests a high failure rate of WHO kits.

I didn't say WHO kits had a high failure rate. I linked a report that early Chinese test kits had a 30-50 % failure rate.
Bits & pieces I've found (Bloomberg & abc) -- different reports describing the unreliability of initial Chinese & Japanese test kits, in addition to the thoroughly reported CDC "techinica glitch " & FDA bureaucratic wrangling which delayed US testing startup.

Ask TLD about the WHO kits. He keeps karping about Trump turning down test kits offered by WHO. with no specifics to back up the accusation.

ardilla secreta wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:08 pm PLCB the North Korea like wine and spirits sales monopoly in Pennsylvania just announced that they will be closing all the stores in suburban Philadelphia. If you have a car, you can drive to NJ or Delaware, but this is the whistle that insanity must begin. Citizens now know the hoarding for liquor begins NOW!

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:41 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:09 pm

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:53 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:47 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:41 pm

CU77 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:36 pm

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... is/608026/

The sycophants will come to the administrations defense.

Are they WHO approved test kits ? (failure rate ?)

Serious question/request: could you provide a link that compares the failure rate of the WHO kits versus either those the CDC eventually produced or the ones currently being constructed here in the US.

I can't find so far with google anything that suggests a high failure rate of WHO kits.

I didn't say WHO kits had a high failure rate. I linked a report that early Chinese test kits had a 30-50 % failure rate.
Bits & pieces I've found (Bloomberg & abc) -- different reports describing the unreliability of initial Chinese & Japanese test kits, in addition to the thoroughly reported CDC "techinica glitch " & FDA bureaucratic wrangling which delayed US testing startup.

Ask TLD about the WHO kits. He keeps karping about Trump turning down test kits offered by WHO. with no specifics to back up the accusation.

I don't know the failure rate of the WHO units. Nobody seemed to complain about them and it wasn't covered anywhere....you know who had a bad failure rate? The USA....so going a few weeks with 0 kits and 0 failures is better than testing 200,000 with maybe a 50% failure rate. That's logic for the best and the brightest? Read the articles. Those orientals did a bang up job.

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 10:02 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:41 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:09 pm

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:53 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:47 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:41 pm

CU77 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:36 pm

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... is/608026/

The sycophants will come to the administrations defense.

Are they WHO approved test kits ? (failure rate ?)

Serious question/request: could you provide a link that compares the failure rate of the WHO kits versus either those the CDC eventually produced or the ones currently being constructed here in the US.

I can't find so far with google anything that suggests a high failure rate of WHO kits.

I didn't say WHO kits had a high failure rate. I linked a report that early Chinese test kits had a 30-50 % failure rate.
Bits & pieces I've found (Bloomberg & abc) -- different reports describing the unreliability of initial Chinese & Japanese test kits, in addition to the thoroughly reported CDC "techinica glitch " & FDA bureaucratic wrangling which delayed US testing startup.

Ask TLD about the WHO kits. He keeps karping about Trump turning down test kits offered by WHO. with no specifics to back up the accusation.

I don't know the failure rate of the WHO units. Nobody seemed to complain about them and it wasn't covered anywhere....you know who had a bad failure rate? The USA....so going a few weeks with 0 kits and 0 failures is better than testing 200,000 with maybe a 50% failure rate. That's logic for the best and the brightest? Read the articles. Those orientals did a bang up job.

By locking down Wuhan province the way we are now locking down the USA, & more EU nations are following suit.

A 50% failure rate of 200,000 tests allows 100,000 potential carriers to share bat soup & cigarettes with granny & grandpa.

a fan wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:46 pm

ardilla secreta wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:08 pm PLCB the North Korea like wine and spirits sales monopoly in Pennsylvania just announced that they will be closing all the stores in suburban Philadelphia. If you have a car, you can drive to NJ or Delaware, but this is the whistle that insanity must begin. Citizens now know the hoarding for liquor begins NOW!

On a lighter note, this might bet the death of PA's monopoly. Especially if PA citizens are unhappy with how long they stayed closed.

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 10:06 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 10:02 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:41 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:09 pm

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:53 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:47 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:41 pm

CU77 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:36 pm

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... is/608026/

The sycophants will come to the administrations defense.

Are they WHO approved test kits ? (failure rate ?)

Serious question/request: could you provide a link that compares the failure rate of the WHO kits versus either those the CDC eventually produced or the ones currently being constructed here in the US.

I can't find so far with google anything that suggests a high failure rate of WHO kits.

I didn't say WHO kits had a high failure rate. I linked a report that early Chinese test kits had a 30-50 % failure rate.
Bits & pieces I've found (Bloomberg & abc) -- different reports describing the unreliability of initial Chinese & Japanese test kits, in addition to the thoroughly reported CDC "techinica glitch " & FDA bureaucratic wrangling which delayed US testing startup.

Ask TLD about the WHO kits. He keeps karping about Trump turning down test kits offered by WHO. with no specifics to back up the accusation.

I don't know the failure rate of the WHO units. Nobody seemed to complain about them and it wasn't covered anywhere....you know who had a bad failure rate? The USA....so going a few weeks with 0 kits and 0 failures is better than testing 200,000 with maybe a 50% failure rate. That's logic for the best and the brightest? Read the articles. Those orientals did a bang up job.

By locking down Wuhan province the way we are now locking down the USA, & more EU nations are following suit.

A 50% failure rate of 200,000 tests allows 100,000 potential carriers to share bat soup & cigarettes with granny & grandpa.

a stop gap while we developed our own.... don't let perfect be the enemy of good so it's better to let 200,000 carriers have soup while waiting for a test to be developed, which then had a worse failure rate.......

MAGA


Stop misleading people, you don’t know the failure rate of the WHO units.

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 10:28 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 10:06 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 10:02 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:41 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 9:09 pm

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:53 pm

old salt wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:47 pm

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:41 pm

CU77 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 8:36 pm

Yesterday, the Jack Ma Foundation, a charitable organization established by the founder of the Chinese retail company Alibaba, announced a donation of 500,000 testing kits to the United States.

Acute state failure has reduced the richest nation in world history to a charitable cause.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... is/608026/

The sycophants will come to the administrations defense.

Are they WHO approved test kits ? (failure rate ?)

Serious question/request: could you provide a link that compares the failure rate of the WHO kits versus either those the CDC eventually produced or the ones currently being constructed here in the US.

I can't find so far with google anything that suggests a high failure rate of WHO kits.

I didn't say WHO kits had a high failure rate. I linked a report that early Chinese test kits had a 30-50 % failure rate.
Bits & pieces I've found (Bloomberg & abc) -- different reports describing the unreliability of initial Chinese & Japanese test kits, in addition to the thoroughly reported CDC "techinica glitch " & FDA bureaucratic wrangling which delayed US testing startup.

Ask TLD about the WHO kits. He keeps karping about Trump turning down test kits offered by WHO. with no specifics to back up the accusation.

I don't know the failure rate of the WHO units. Nobody seemed to complain about them and it wasn't covered anywhere....you know who had a bad failure rate? The USA....so going a few weeks with 0 kits and 0 failures is better than testing 200,000 with maybe a 50% failure rate. That's logic for the best and the brightest? Read the articles. Those orientals did a bang up job.

By locking down Wuhan province the way we are now locking down the USA, & more EU nations are following suit.

A 50% failure rate of 200,000 tests allows 100,000 potential carriers to share bat soup & cigarettes with granny & grandpa.

a stop gap while we developed our own.... don't let perfect be the enemy of good so it's better to let 200,000 carriers have soup while waiting for a test to be developed, which then had a worse failure rate.......

MAGA


Stop misleading people, you don’t know the failure rate of the WHO units.

You're doing the misleading. I never cited or implied a failure rate for the WHO units.
The failure rates were in the knockoffs which China, Japan & the US produced & rushed into service.
Apparently S Korea got it right.

DocBarrister wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 10:34 pm United States has at least 2,796 confirmed coronavirus cases now.

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html

Will cross 3,000 by tomorrow. Have we even begun testing in earnest yet? No, we haven’t.

In truth, the “real” count may be ten or a hundred times as high or more.

The magnitude and horror of Trump’s failure has only begun to be revealed.

DocBarrister