Page 534 of 848

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:40 am
by Peter Brown
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:37 am
Brooklyn wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:06 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:46 am
Brooklyn,

psssst ... even your pals at Fo卐 know it's true:


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... fghanistan

President Trump’s campaign has firmly rejected the Taliban’s endorsement for his 2020 reelection after members of the terrorist group voiced support for Trump amid negotiations on withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Dump gets endorsed by Fox, Taliban, and Petey. Wow - that's some company he keeps. :lol:
When will the Khmer Rouge announce?


My one regret is the stupid get to populate.

https://themedialine.org/top-stories/ta ... rse-trump/

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:58 am
by Typical Lax Dad
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:40 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:37 am
Brooklyn wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:06 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:46 am
Brooklyn,

psssst ... even your pals at Fo卐 know it's true:


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... fghanistan

President Trump’s campaign has firmly rejected the Taliban’s endorsement for his 2020 reelection after members of the terrorist group voiced support for Trump amid negotiations on withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Dump gets endorsed by Fox, Taliban, and Petey. Wow - that's some company he keeps. :lol:
When will the Khmer Rouge announce?


My one regret is the stupid get to populate.

https://themedialine.org/top-stories/ta ... rse-trump/
Nice to see you put your faith in the Taliban.
👍

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:08 am
by Peter Brown
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:58 am
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:40 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:37 am
Brooklyn wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:06 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:46 am
Brooklyn,

psssst ... even your pals at Fo卐 know it's true:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... fghanistan
President Trump’s campaign has firmly rejected the Taliban’s endorsement for his 2020 reelection after members of the terrorist group voiced support for Trump amid negotiations on withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Dump gets endorsed by Fox, Taliban, and Petey. Wow - that's some company he keeps. :lol:
When will the Khmer Rouge announce?
My one regret is the stupid get to populate.

https://themedialine.org/top-stories/ta ... rse-trump/
Nice to see you put your faith in the Taliban.
👍



Aren't you the guys leaning on a Taliban 'statement' (since disproven, but whatevs)?

Why do Democrats hate America?

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:20 am
by ggait
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/am ... ew-dolloff

Petey -- let's try a few facts on the Denver Saturday shooting. At this point, I don't think anyone out here really knows what exactly was happening. But some things we do know:

1. Victim was wearing a t-shirt that read: BLM -- your forking right biker's lives matter.
2. Victim (along with five other right wing patriot guys) was engaged in a heated argument with a solo kid wearing a t-shirt that said Black Guns Matter.
3. Victim has mace can out. Solo kid is unarmed. Looks like several of the patriot dudes are armed with knives, clubs, maybe other stuff.
4. Victim brandishes mace can at kid. Victim moves on/away from solo kid. Can't tell why.
5. Pictures show victim punching the shooter in the face. So the victim is now engaged in an altercation with a second person.
6. Victim has mace can out and in hand as he punches the shooter.
7. At this point, shooter's hands are empty -- no gun visible or drawn.
8. Next pictures show victim spraying mace at shooter and shooter had gun drawn.
9. No pictures or video of what happens next. You just hear the shot.

Who knows who started what or who was aggressing and who was defending. But it seems clear that the patriot/victim was pretty active in creating and escalating the situation. Including punching the shooter in the face before any weapon was drawn. Possible that the shooter was trying to break up the victim/kid altercation.

Carry on troll.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:22 am
by Brooklyn
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:37 am

When will the Khmer Rouge announce?

... and the Pathet Lao, too! :lol:

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:29 am
by Peter Brown
ggait wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:20 am https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/am ... ew-dolloff

Petey -- let's try a few facts on the Denver Saturday shooting. At this point, I don't think anyone out here really knows what exactly was happening. But some things we do know:

1. Victim was wearing a t-shirt that read: BLM -- your forking right biker's lives matter.
2. Victim was engaged in a heated argument with a kid wearing a t-shirt that said Black Guns Matter.
3. Victim threatened to mace said kid. Kid moves on/away.
4. Pictures show victim punching the shooter in the face. So the victim is now engaged in an altercation with a second person.
5. Victim has mace can out and in hand as he punches the shooter.
6. At this point, shooter's hands are empty -- no gun visible or drawn.
7. Next pictures show victim spraying mace at shooter and shooter had gun drawn.
8. No pictures or video of what happens next. You just hear the shot.

Who knows who started what or who was aggressing and who was defending. But it seems clear that the patriot/victim was pretty active in creating and escalating the situation. Including punching the shooter in the face before any weapon was drawn.


You conveniently leave out a ton, not the least of which is the video where the BLM guy is screaming a few things. Let me help:

“Mace me, mother-effer!!’ (said multiple times)

“Don’t touch me again old man or I’ll eff you up!!” (again said multiple times to a third party, not the victim - the takeaway is the BLM guy is the only one ratcheting up the heat).

The victim walks away from this BLM confrontation only to be confronted by the Antifa shooter.

The pictures do not show the victim hitting the shooter. They show the victim blocking the hands of the shooter as the shooter attempts to hit him.

Finally, if you’d like to review the shooters social media posts, it’s quite clear he’s yet another deranged TDS/Antifa/BLM white boy in search of purpose in life.

We’ve also skipped past the part where the shooter isn’t even licensed to do what he purportedly is doing: security.

Now, having said all that and in spite of the facts which suggest the shooter is guilty of 1st degree murder of a totally decent husband and grandfather who simply chose to attend a ‘supportl the police’ rally (glad to know Dems object to this :roll: ), I’ll wait for the trial.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:40 am
by CU88
Taliban for trump.jpg
Taliban for trump.jpg (45.42 KiB) Viewed 697 times

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:45 am
by ggait
The pictures do not show the victim hitting the shooter.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/11/photos-ca ... -protests/

Wrong. See picture #2.

Actually looks like the macer/victim was aggressing towards the 9News press producer.

Shooter (no gun drawn yet) tries to intercept. Photo #1. Makes sense since he was supposed to be a security guard.

Then macer/victim raises his left hand to the shooter's face. Photo #2. Still no gun.

Macer/victim sprays his mace. Shooter has gun out. Photo #3.

Basically, it is REALLY REALLY stupid to bring weapons into a volatile situation and then get into multiple altercations with other people. Since those other people may have weapons too. If you go looking for a fight, you may just find one.

TBD what the criminal justice sorting out will show.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:54 am
by Typical Lax Dad
CU88 wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:40 am Taliban for trump.jpg


F.O.T

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:55 am
by Peter Brown
ggait wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:45 am The pictures do not show the victim hitting the shooter.

https://nypost.com/2020/10/11/photos-ca ... -protests/

Wrong. See picture #2.

Actually looks like the macer/victim was aggressing towards the 9News press producer.

Shooter (no gun drawn yet) tries to intercept. Photo #1. Makes sense since he was supposed to be a security guard.

Then macer/victim raises his left hand to the shooter's face. Photo #2. Still no gun.

Macer/victim sprays his mace. Shooter has gun out. Photo #3.

Basically, it is REALLY REALLY stupid to bring weapons into a volatile situation and then get into multiple altercations with other people. Who may also have weapons.

TBD what the criminal justice sorting out will show.


I think I'd point out how insane you sound, but my guess it is useless.

I will reserve the right however to wait for a trial for all of the facts to be known. Regardless of any of the facts you seem to want to find in favor of the Antifa guy, Antifa guy is going to be found guilty of first degree murder. Mace is not a weapon that can be met with deadly force unless it is being used in association with some other deadly weapon (like having a gun with the mace).

Antifa guy's best hope is for a pardon from the Colorado Democratic governor who no doubt sympathizes with the killer and not the elderly victim.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 12:25 pm
by ggait
Who knows what will happen at trial.

The security guard guy shot at an aggressive guy shooting mace and smacking him. Stupid Kyle shot one guy armed with a plastic bag and another with a skate board.

Both probably will get convicted of something.

And the folks on the receiving ends of those shots (skateboard guy, plastic bag guy, biker mace guy) were all incredibly stupid for provoking and escalating the situations in which they got shot. None of them get shot if they don't act like morons.

But lucky for you, being a complete moron usually isn't criminal. But it can be dangerous.

Cheers troll.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 12:28 pm
by a fan
seacoaster wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 8:06 am Anyone following this story?

https://twitter.com/DavidOAtkins/status ... 7900568577
:lol: (drumroll) Told ya so. Trump and the idiots at FoxNation think it's smart to play with fire, thinking their lies will only result in one thing.

They forget that the nation is increasingly filled with tinfoil hats.....and they might wind up losing thousands and thousands of votes because they've been telling everyone voting by mail doesn't work.

And many of these folks, many elderly, won't vote at all...thinking that someone will take their ballot and mark it up "wrong".

Whoops. You can only explain these things so many times.....

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 2:07 pm
by Peter Brown
ggait wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 12:25 pm Who knows what will happen at trial.

The security guard guy shot at an aggressive guy shooting mace and smacking him. Stupid Kyle shot one guy armed with a plastic bag and another with a skate board.

Both probably will get convicted of something.

And the folks on the receiving ends of those shots (skateboard guy, plastic bag guy, biker mace guy) were all incredibly stupid for provoking and escalating the situations in which they got shot. None of them get shot if they don't act like morons.

But lucky for you, being a complete moron usually isn't criminal. But it can be dangerous.

Cheers troll.



Even the NYT broke down the Rittenhouse shootings saying he was totally justified. Self defense all the way through.

Mace is not considered a weapon and does not justify lethal force whatsoever. Matthew Dolloff in no universe can be considered anything other than a straight up murderer.

I love how you guys try to conflate two wildly different scenarios.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 2:42 pm
by ggait
Rittenhouse has been charged with murder.

TBD what Dolloff gets charged with.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 3:22 pm
by Peter Brown
ggait wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 2:42 pm Rittenhouse has been charged with murder.

TBD what Dolloff gets charged with.


Well I think most Americans can see what happened in both cases and know the score. It boggles the mind that anyone would be against a rally in support of police or America (in other words, there should have been no counter protest leading up to the murder), but such is today's Left.

But, I make no bets on local DA's and what they decide, and like I said, I'm not above retracting my beliefs if information comes out in an investigation which shows something the video doesn't, so I will wait for the charges and trial.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 4:03 pm
by holmes435

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 4:16 pm
by Kismet
holmes435 wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 4:03 pm In the "you can't make this stuff up" category: Nurse who spoke at Republican National Convention arrested for shooting woman in the stomach
Only the best people........... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

sign in Iowa near the site of DOPUS rally this week

Image

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 4:32 pm
by youthathletics
Kismet wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 4:16 pm
holmes435 wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 4:03 pm In the "you can't make this stuff up" category: Nurse who spoke at Republican National Convention arrested for shooting woman in the stomach
Only the best people........... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
How'd you find it what happened already, before the press even knows?

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 4:33 pm
by youthathletics
Vote for Joe....for Senate. :oops:


Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 4:57 pm
by ABV 8.3%
6ftstick wrote: Sun Oct 11, 2020 4:58 pm
a fan wrote: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:29 pm
6ftstick wrote: Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:08 am Their team wants

Abortion up to and including delivery
Paid for by federal funds

the elimination of the electoral college

End of the filibuster

free healthcare AND open borders

Defunding the police

The green new deal

Socialism

Elimination of the first second fourth and fifth amendments

And we've lost our way?
Yes. What are you offering, 6ft? That's how this country works. If your team has better answers to our health, infrastructure, education and other domestic problems.....you'll win in the war of ideas, and you'll get the votes and stay in power.

What's your counter to the above proposals? By every metric-----education, access to health care, infrastructure, police killings, energy usage, etc.....we're falling behind other 1st world nations.

So what do you have, besides "the Dems are bad"??

I can rattle off dozens of ideas given out by Nixon and other Republicans in the 60's and 70's that addressed these issues, 6ft. Where are the big ideas from your party?

You should be able to list them off the top of your head.
We're offering the country as founded.
Slaves, no white non property owners or woman voting.

Three separate branches of government

and yet you never say a word about having the same members of the House (435) as we did 100 years ago.

Legislation that begins in the house

Distinct enforced borders.


First amendment protection

Second amendment protection.

Fourth Amendment protection.

Innocence until proven guilty

A raging economy based on inexpensive readily available fossil fuels

Less regulation

Energy independence.

C A P I T A L I S M

So, you want to BAN it when companies, that make most, if not all, of it's revenue from tax dollars, to NOT be allowed to trade /gamble on the markets?

Law and Order.
Where do you live? Will you complain if I raise pigs, and use the pig feces in a biodigester, to heat my house. Or, would that need to be
"regulated"