njbill wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:15 pm
Oh don’t get me wrong. I’m clear eyed enough to know this doesn’t help. The question is whether it hurts. Seems from the most recent polls that it may not have.
The story just got rolling in msm press today. Independent journos had it Monday.
I’m not sure ‘polls’ could reflect a story which is just today rolling out. Every newspaper in the state posted his texts above the fold, today.
njbill wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:15 pm
Oh don’t get me wrong. I’m clear eyed enough to know this doesn’t help. The question is whether it hurts. Seems from the most recent polls that it may not have.
The story just got rolling in msm press today. Independent journos had it Monday.
I’m not sure ‘polls’ could reflect a story which is just today rolling out. Every newspaper in the state posted his texts above the fold, today.
As I said, good luck!
The story came out in a big North Carolina newspaper five days ago.
The recent polls were conducted after the story broke.
So you are telling me Republican voters in North Carolina don’t care about Trump’s many sexual assaults and will still vote for him while Democratic voters in the state will be so turned off by this evidently consensual affair that they won’t vote for Cunningham? Quite a needle you are threading there, Pete. Doesn’t say much for your view of your fellow Republicans.
njbill wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:15 pm
Oh don’t get me wrong. I’m clear eyed enough to know this doesn’t help. The question is whether it hurts. Seems from the most recent polls that it may not have.
The story just got rolling in msm press today. Independent journos had it Monday.
I’m not sure ‘polls’ could reflect a story which is just today rolling out. Every newspaper in the state posted his texts above the fold, today.
As I said, good luck!
Meh
Is Trump running for Senate from North Carolina? If so, that is BIG!
njbill wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:15 pm
Oh don’t get me wrong. I’m clear eyed enough to know this doesn’t help. The question is whether it hurts. Seems from the most recent polls that it may not have.
The story just got rolling in msm press today. Independent journos had it Monday.
I’m not sure ‘polls’ could reflect a story which is just today rolling out. Every newspaper in the state posted his texts above the fold, today.
As I said, good luck!
Meh
Is Trump running for Senate from North Carolina? If so, that is BIG!
njbill wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:15 pm
Oh don’t get me wrong. I’m clear eyed enough to know this doesn’t help. The question is whether it hurts. Seems from the most recent polls that it may not have.
The story just got rolling in msm press today. Independent journos had it Monday.
I’m not sure ‘polls’ could reflect a story which is just today rolling out. Every newspaper in the state posted his texts above the fold, today.
As I said, good luck!
The story came out in a big North Carolina newspaper five days ago.
The recent polls were conducted after the story broke.
So you are telling me Republican voters in North Carolina don’t care about Trump’s many sexual assaults and will still vote for him while Democratic voters in the state will be so turned off by this evidently consensual affair that they won’t vote for Cunningham? Quite a needle you are threading there, Pete. Doesn’t say much for your view of your fellow Republicans.
Is Trump running for Senator from North Carolina?
Also, just to be sure, the Army Reserve opened an investigation of him, TODAY. There's a little law against what he did, a clear violation of rules concerning adultery under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
AL 24% (-1)
SC 24%
MT 34%
IA 51% (+1)
ME 62% (+1)
NC 65% (+1)
CO 75% (+1)
AZ 79% (+1)
Dems need +3 to get to 50 and obtain control if Joe wins. 68% chance of that today.
With CO and AZ looking solid, Dems just need to win one of the other three where currently ahead.
New England Journal of Medicine Demands Trump’s Ouster
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 6:09 pm
by DocBarrister
This has never happened before. The entire editorial board of the New England Journal of Medicine signed an editorial condemning the Trump administration’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic and is urging the ouster of the leadership.
(CNN)In an unprecedented move, the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday published an editorial written by its editors condemning the Trump administration for its response to the Covid-19 pandemic -- and calling for the current leadership in the United States to be voted out of office.
... "Anyone else who recklessly squandered lives and money in this way would be suffering legal consequences. Our leaders have largely claimed immunity for their actions. But this election gives us the power to render judgment," the editorial says. "When it comes to the response to the largest public health crisis of our time, our current political leaders have demonstrated that they are dangerously incompetent. We should not abet them and enable the deaths of thousands more Americans by allowing them to keep their jobs."
The most prestigious medical journal in the entire world just called for the ouster of Donald Trump.
DocBarrister
Re: New England Journal of Medicine Demands Trump’s Ouster
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 6:22 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
DocBarrister wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 6:09 pm
This has never happened before. The entire editorial board of the New England Journal of Medicine signed an editorial condemning the Trump administration’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic and is urging the ouster of the leadership.
(CNN)In an unprecedented move, the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday published an editorial written by its editors condemning the Trump administration for its response to the Covid-19 pandemic -- and calling for the current leadership in the United States to be voted out of office.
... "Anyone else who recklessly squandered lives and money in this way would be suffering legal consequences. Our leaders have largely claimed immunity for their actions. But this election gives us the power to render judgment," the editorial says. "When it comes to the response to the largest public health crisis of our time, our current political leaders have demonstrated that they are dangerously incompetent. We should not abet them and enable the deaths of thousands more Americans by allowing them to keep their jobs."
njbill wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:15 pm
Oh don’t get me wrong. I’m clear eyed enough to know this doesn’t help. The question is whether it hurts. Seems from the most recent polls that it may not have.
The story just got rolling in msm press today. Independent journos had it Monday.
I’m not sure ‘polls’ could reflect a story which is just today rolling out. Every newspaper in the state posted his texts above the fold, today.
As I said, good luck!
The story came out in a big North Carolina newspaper five days ago.
The recent polls were conducted after the story broke.
So you are telling me Republican voters in North Carolina don’t care about Trump’s many sexual assaults and will still vote for him while Democratic voters in the state will be so turned off by this evidently consensual affair that they won’t vote for Cunningham? Quite a needle you are threading there, Pete. Doesn’t say much for your view of your fellow Republicans.
Is Trump running for Senator from North Carolina?
Also, just to be sure, the Army Reserve opened an investigation of him, TODAY. There's a little law against what he did, a clear violation of rules concerning adultery under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
DocBarrister wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 6:09 pm
This has never happened before. The entire editorial board of the New England Journal of Medicine signed an editorial condemning the Trump administration’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic and is urging the ouster of the leadership.
(CNN)In an unprecedented move, the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday published an editorial written by its editors condemning the Trump administration for its response to the Covid-19 pandemic -- and calling for the current leadership in the United States to be voted out of office.
... "Anyone else who recklessly squandered lives and money in this way would be suffering legal consequences. Our leaders have largely claimed immunity for their actions. But this election gives us the power to render judgment," the editorial says. "When it comes to the response to the largest public health crisis of our time, our current political leaders have demonstrated that they are dangerously incompetent. We should not abet them and enable the deaths of thousands more Americans by allowing them to keep their jobs."
DocBarrister wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 6:09 pm
This has never happened before. The entire editorial board of the New England Journal of Medicine signed an editorial condemning the Trump administration’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic and is urging the ouster of the leadership.
(CNN)In an unprecedented move, the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday published an editorial written by its editors condemning the Trump administration for its response to the Covid-19 pandemic -- and calling for the current leadership in the United States to be voted out of office.
... "Anyone else who recklessly squandered lives and money in this way would be suffering legal consequences. Our leaders have largely claimed immunity for their actions. But this election gives us the power to render judgment," the editorial says. "When it comes to the response to the largest public health crisis of our time, our current political leaders have demonstrated that they are dangerously incompetent. We should not abet them and enable the deaths of thousands more Americans by allowing them to keep their jobs."
The most prestigious medical journal in the entire world just called for the ouster of Donald Trump.
DocBarrister
Must be upset that Hillary lost.
Agreed; crazy TDS among these stupid physicians and immunologists and epidemiologists. Sore losers!!!!!!
Guaranteed not one of these drug-pushers is an American patriot. Wonder how much $$ they made selling OxyContin? Did they ever post an op-Ed ripping Purdue Pharma? Huh? No?
Gtfooh.
Re: New England Journal of Medicine Demands Trump’s Ouster
DocBarrister wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 6:09 pm
This has never happened before. The entire editorial board of the New England Journal of Medicine signed an editorial condemning the Trump administration’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic and is urging the ouster of the leadership.
(CNN)In an unprecedented move, the New England Journal of Medicine on Wednesday published an editorial written by its editors condemning the Trump administration for its response to the Covid-19 pandemic -- and calling for the current leadership in the United States to be voted out of office.
... "Anyone else who recklessly squandered lives and money in this way would be suffering legal consequences. Our leaders have largely claimed immunity for their actions. But this election gives us the power to render judgment," the editorial says. "When it comes to the response to the largest public health crisis of our time, our current political leaders have demonstrated that they are dangerously incompetent. We should not abet them and enable the deaths of thousands more Americans by allowing them to keep their jobs."
The most prestigious medical journal in the entire world just called for the ouster of Donald Trump.
DocBarrister
Must be upset that Hillary lost.
Agreed; crazy TDS among these stupid physicians and immunologists and epidemiologists. Sore losers!!!!!!
Guaranteed not one of these drug-pushers is an American patriot. Wonder how much $$ they made selling OxyContin? Did they ever post an op-Ed ripping Purdue Pharma? Huh? No?
Gtfooh.
The one I know is a Billionaire.
Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 8:07 pm
by wgdsr
i'm walking away disappointed tonight if i don't see a spike protein stuck on the plexiglass, unable to get over.
Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 8:12 pm
by Peter Brown
wgdsr wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 8:07 pm
i'm walking away disappointed tonight if i don't see a spike protein stuck on the plexiglass, unable to get over.
Kamala needs to defend Cal Cunningham by invoking the spirit of Willie Brown.
4018D096-F0FB-40BA-989E-0448A0E91FB6.jpeg (68.85 KiB) Viewed 1224 times
Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 8:18 pm
by njbill
Now that Trump has pulled all of his TV ads in the Midwest (out of money?), he is resigned to putting up bedsheets on barns in counties with five voters?
Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 9:02 pm
by njbill
Word is that what finally broke the log jam with Mike Pence about the plexiglass is that Mother told him that under no circumstances was he to be in the same room with a woman without two plexiglass dividers between them.
Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 9:06 pm
by youthathletics
njbill wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 9:02 pm
Word is that what finally broke the log jam with Mike Pence about the plexiglass is that Mother told him that under no circumstances was he to be in the same room with a woman without two plexiglass dividers between them.
Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 9:32 pm
by Catbird
Why are Pence's eyes so bloodshot red?
Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2020 9:38 pm
by wgdsr
Catbird wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 9:32 pm
Why are Pence's eyes so bloodshot red?