Same Party, Different House
https://fanlax.com/forum/
I realize this is a total troll on your part because of your hatred for Maryland wlax, but why don't you post your comment directly on the insta page for maryland's wlax, so the student athletes, coaches, fans, parents, and admin can respond directly to your comment.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 12:50 pm This may be the most uninspired (and realized) photo shoot idea I’ve ever seen. Look at the expressions
https://www.instagram.com/p/CZzim-_FeoH ... =copy_link
I believe they all quit around the same time which makes it interesting so close to the start of the season. Another poster commented on how light the UVA bench was in their scrimmage with Stony Brook.Justalaxdad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 12:43 pmNice!!! Somebody actually did the easy thing and compared rosters. It’s entertaining to sit and watch the “developing stories” and “something up in Hooville” when all that was needed was an easy comparison of rosters. After the comparing the rosters, the logic was easy to follow - as runrusselrun proved.LaxThoughts wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:25 amA quick comparison of last year's and this year's rosters shows the absence of the following from this year's roster (other than those who were seniors last year), with games played in 2021 in parentheses: Riley Hoag (8), Ella Vaughan (1), Jordan Vaught (1). Aislinn McCarthy (8), and Madisen Patrick (1). The key players are still there, so I would not ring any alarm bells, although a roster of 29 is definitely light by ACC standards.seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:12 amYep, looks like something's up in Hooville.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:09 amSo we’ve got a developing story here...seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:02 amYou're right: 29. And three of them are goalies. So 26 field players on the roster, eight of whom are freshmen. Huh.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:58 amI counted 29. And a quick random survey showed other teams carrying significantly more players:seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:27 amWebsite show thirty kids:OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:15 amThat would be a blockbuster story, especially on the eve of the new season.
https://virginiasports.com/sports/wlax/roster/
Don't know this team well enough to see if anyone is missing.
JHU 41
Carolina 41
Florida 42
I’m sure they would agree with me, the players that is. I seriously doubt they would look at those photos and choose them out of the whole photo shoot. They look tired and uninspired.8meterPA wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 1:40 pmI realize this is a total troll on your part because of your hatred for Maryland wlax, but why don't you post your comment directly on the insta page for maryland's wlax, so the student athletes, coaches, fans, parents, and admin can respond directly to your comment.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 12:50 pm This may be the most uninspired (and realized) photo shoot idea I’ve ever seen. Look at the expressions
https://www.instagram.com/p/CZzim-_FeoH ... =copy_link
I know that the players full time class load, 20 hours a week of allowed practice time and countless hours of voluntary extra practice pales in comparison to the time that you spend posting on this site, but maybe they are pretty proud of these pics and their team.
Please do do that and then let us know how that goes.
Brownlax wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 1:49 pmJustalaxdad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 12:43 pmI believe they all quit around the same time which makes it interesting so close to the start of the season. Another poster commented on how light the UVA bench was in their scrimmage with Stony Brook.LaxThoughts wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:25 amA quick comparison of last year's and this year's rosters shows the absence of the following from this year's roster (other than those who were seniors last year), with games played in 2021 in parentheses: Riley Hoag (8), Ella Vaughan (1), Jordan Vaught (1). Aislinn McCarthy (8), and Madisen Patrick (1). The key players are still there, so I would not ring any alarm bells, although a roster of 29 is definitely light by ACC standards.seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:12 amYep, looks like something's up in Hooville.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:09 amSo we’ve got a developing story here...seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:02 amYou're right: 29. And three of them are goalies. So 26 field players on the roster, eight of whom are freshmen. Huh.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:58 amI counted 29. And a quick random survey showed other teams carrying significantly more players:seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:27 amWebsite show thirty kids:OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:15 amThat would be a blockbuster story, especially on the eve of the new season.
https://virginiasports.com/sports/wlax/roster/
Don't know this team well enough to see if anyone is missing.
JHU 41
Carolina 41
Florida 42
Ok then, so according to you they would agree with your assessment, I'll check their instagram page to look for your posting and will be very interested in the players responses.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 2:01 pmI’m sure they would agree with me, the players that is. I seriously doubt they would look at those photos and choose them out of the whole photo shoot. They look tired and uninspired.8meterPA wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 1:40 pmI realize this is a total troll on your part because of your hatred for Maryland wlax, but why don't you post your comment directly on the insta page for maryland's wlax, so the student athletes, coaches, fans, parents, and admin can respond directly to your comment.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 12:50 pm This may be the most uninspired (and realized) photo shoot idea I’ve ever seen. Look at the expressions
https://www.instagram.com/p/CZzim-_FeoH ... =copy_link
I know that the players full time class load, 20 hours a week of allowed practice time and countless hours of voluntary extra practice pales in comparison to the time that you spend posting on this site, but maybe they are pretty proud of these pics and their team.
Please do do that and then let us know how that goes.
As for my supposed hatred of Maryland, what are all these then?
viewtopic.php?p=324520#p324520
viewtopic.php?p=311745#p311745
viewtopic.php?p=295610#p295610
viewtopic.php?p=300278#p300278
viewtopic.php?p=303001#p303001
One thing I do realize is you’ve got a nasty axe to grind with me, and you get that grinding wheel a-crankin’ at the slightest hiccup of presumption.
Looking at the rosters would have only proved the point that 5 girls quit the team. The fact that they all quit at about the same time right as the season is starting is a story to me.Justalaxdad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 2:36 pmNo problem at all with your observation. The point of my comment was, instead of speculating, it would have been very easy to just look at the rosters and see what happened instead of trying to make a big story out of nothing.Brownlax wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 1:49 pmI believe they all quit around the same time which makes it interesting so close to the start of the season. Another poster commented on how light the UVA bench was in their scrimmage with Stony Brook.Justalaxdad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 12:43 pmNice!!! Somebody actually did the easy thing and compared rosters. It’s entertaining to sit and watch the “developing stories” and “something up in Hooville” when all that was needed was an easy comparison of rosters. After the comparing the rosters, the logic was easy to follow - as runrusselrun proved.LaxThoughts wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:25 amA quick comparison of last year's and this year's rosters shows the absence of the following from this year's roster (other than those who were seniors last year), with games played in 2021 in parentheses: Riley Hoag (8), Ella Vaughan (1), Jordan Vaught (1). Aislinn McCarthy (8), and Madisen Patrick (1). The key players are still there, so I would not ring any alarm bells, although a roster of 29 is definitely light by ACC standards.seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:12 amYep, looks like something's up in Hooville.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:09 amSo we’ve got a developing story here...seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:02 amYou're right: 29. And three of them are goalies. So 26 field players on the roster, eight of whom are freshmen. Huh.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:58 amI counted 29. And a quick random survey showed other teams carrying significantly more players:seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:27 amWebsite show thirty kids:OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:15 amThat would be a blockbuster story, especially on the eve of the new season.
https://virginiasports.com/sports/wlax/roster/
Don't know this team well enough to see if anyone is missing.
JHU 41
Carolina 41
Florida 42
I still think it's a relatively significant story in light of how the subject was brought up. The Hoos had 37 players on their roster last season; now down to 29 including 3 goalies and 8 frosh, as seacoaster noted. In the world of women's lacrosse, in proportion, I think it's a pretty decent sized story. We're just following a lead, having a little fun, passing the time.Justalaxdad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 2:36 pm No problem at all with your observation. The point of my comment was, instead of speculating, it would have been very easy to just look at the rosters and see what happened instead of trying to make a big story out of nothing.
I did a quick look at UVA's opponents for this year. The 16 teams they play against had an average of 36 players per team on their rosters. UVA has 29 including 3 goalies, 8 freshmen and 1 grad transfer. No other team had below 30 players.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 3:49 pmI still think it's a relatively significant story in light of how the subject was brought up. The Hoos had 37 players on their roster last season; now down to 29 including 3 goalies and 8 frosh, as seacoaster noted. In the world of women's lacrosse, in proportion, I think it's a pretty decent sized story. We're just following a lead, having a little fun, passing the time.Justalaxdad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 2:36 pm No problem at all with your observation. The point of my comment was, instead of speculating, it would have been very easy to just look at the rosters and see what happened instead of trying to make a big story out of nothing.
29 is a light roster, makes it really difficult to hold scrimmages which most teams do several times a week. As I mentioned a quick look at the roster seemed like 4 sophs and 1 junior left the team...whether or not they all left for the same reason at the same time is what is unknown.Brownlax wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 4:11 pmI did a quick look at UVA's opponents for this year. The 16 teams they play against had an average of 36 players per team on their rosters. UVA has 29 including 3 goalies, 8 freshmen and 1 grad transfer. No other team had below 30 players.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 3:49 pmI still think it's a relatively significant story in light of how the subject was brought up. The Hoos had 37 players on their roster last season; now down to 29 including 3 goalies and 8 frosh, as seacoaster noted. In the world of women's lacrosse, in proportion, I think it's a pretty decent sized story. We're just following a lead, having a little fun, passing the time.Justalaxdad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 2:36 pm No problem at all with your observation. The point of my comment was, instead of speculating, it would have been very easy to just look at the rosters and see what happened instead of trying to make a big story out of nothing.
Think you’ll check in on any of these, Matnum? If so—which?Matnum PI wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 1:16 pm What to watch this weekend from IL: https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ ... nday/58906
Yes, it’s premature to ask if we are in a two team race…but it does feel that way. And that makes sense. NU doesn’t “have everyone back,” and neither does Syracuse. BC has all its pieces, and enough to make up for the departure of Urbank. UNC has nearly everyone back, and has good players and transfers to step in for Hoeg, Wakefield and Woodruff, their biggest loses to graduation. So at this excessively early date, it looks like 1 and 2 and then everyone else steps behind. Loyola should be a Memorial Day weekend team.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 9:59 am Is it premature to ask--are there really only two top teams in BC and NC and then everyone else? Northwestern looked like anything but a #4 ranked team against BC, let alone a shoo-in for Memorial day. And even though #3 Syracuse had a fairly comfortable win, they obviously have some things to work on.
May be a good guess. She didn’t play Friday.
Not sure NU is a top 4 team without Scane, I would say closer to #10 than #4...her absence was very noticeable to say the least and no way Gilbert can pick up the slack, in fact I'm guessing she will see the bulk of defensive attention and will have trouble replicating her stats from last year.seacoaster wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 10:59 amYes, it’s premature to ask if we are in a two team race…but it does feel that way. And that makes sense. NU doesn’t “have everyone back,” and neither does Syracuse. BC has all its pieces, and enough to make up for the departure of Urbank. UNC has nearly everyone back, and has good players and transfers to step in for Hoeg, Wakefield and Woodruff, their biggest loses to graduation. So at this excessively early date, it looks like 1 and 2 and then everyone else steps behind. Loyola should be a Memorial Day weekend team.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 9:59 am Is it premature to ask--are there really only two top teams in BC and NC and then everyone else? Northwestern looked like anything but a #4 ranked team against BC, let alone a shoo-in for Memorial day. And even though #3 Syracuse had a fairly comfortable win, they obviously have some things to work on.
Got to say I was really impressed with BC yesterday. First game, good opponent and they just did everything well.