LaxPower Back-Up Stick

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:06 pm

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:03 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:41 pm

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:08 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:55 am

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:32 am

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 8:40 am Such a great article. Worth reading if you care about justice.

A fair trial might have come to the same conclusion. But we'll never know, and never be able to trust this outcome, because America's left purposefully made a fair trial impossible.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/21/th ... n-verdict/

“....You can’t tell me all of this didn’t affect jurors’ psyche and ultimate decision. They would be superhuman or inhuman if it didn’t. Yet those endorsing mob culture and vigilante “justice” for political ends are working hard to make it impossible to express such reasonable doubts, whether in a column or as a member of a murder jury.

Jurors are always human. There is always room for miscalculation, fear, and error. In this case, however, it is extremely clear that these human weaknesses were deliberately amplified to catastrophic proportions, all because of politics.

A fair trial might indeed have come to the same conclusion for Chauvin. But we’ll never know, and never be able to trust this outcome, because America’s left purposefully made a fair trial impossible, all for political power.

They deliberately perverted justice in favor of violent mob rule to strengthen their political hand. They have done evil and called it justice. They have sown the wind, and the resulting whirlwind has still not fully hit our nation yet. But it will.”

Come on Pete. The damn paramedics showed up and told Chauvin the man had no pulse and to get off of him. Chauvin kept his knee on the neck of an unresponsive dead man for like 3 more minutes. If the dumb cluck had got off of his neck when the paramedics advised him to he might have had a chance of being aquitted.

You’re gonna miss the authors point, too?!?

The point is not that he’s guilty, the point is the left has bastardized the justice system to the level where he couldn’t get a fair trial no matter what. You don’t think the jury felt pressure? Not sequestered. Seeing an armed fortress every day.

C’mon.

You think the American “justice” system is “just” and “impartial”? That it ever was?

Naive much or simple-minded?

I’d venture a guess that every poster here was “born on third”. Some of us realize our good fortune, others think
they “hit a triple”.

Which one are you?

Let me answer the only legitimate question your febrile mind spit up. Is the American justice system just and impartial?

To some extent, yes. To some extent, no. But to all extents, not what you’re thinking.

There is a small dirt poor village in southwest Florida called Everglades city. It used to be a purely fishing village. The feds unilaterally took away the fisherman’s rights to fish the waters they used to fish in. No compensation, just the threat of prison if they went out and fished again.

So the residents took to the only manner of making money that was offered. They took marijuana from offshore boats and brought it ashore. The feds investigated this town for years, then one day, they shut off access to and from on the only road to Everglades City. They proceeded to arrest half the town. If you wouldn’t rat on your brother, they threw the book at you. 40 year sentences.

The feds ruined whole families. Now, Democrats love to talk about making marijuana legal and certainly unpunishable.

Where is your sympathy for these poor families whose lives were ruined by your adored federal government? All you complain about is black this and black that, when want it actually is is government abuse. You bozos love racial discord so much, you don’t even know what the real problem is.

Thanks for recognizing the legitimacy of my point, of gracious savant.

Another argument by anecdote — neither strong nor persuasive.

Agreeing with my point about the inequity of the justice system followed by a plaintive bleat about someone done wrong makes you sound like a country and western lyricist.

So we agree that human artifices like government are flawed. Where we differ is in a prescription for corrective action. You appear to believe that human nature unfettered by communal restraints of the the commonweal will be more advantageous. I disagree, vociferously.

That’s because you fundamentally don’t trust other people. Which makes me question why you object to most voting identification laws.

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:13 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:06 pm

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:03 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:41 pm

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:08 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:55 am

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:32 am

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 8:40 am Such a great article. Worth reading if you care about justice.

A fair trial might have come to the same conclusion. But we'll never know, and never be able to trust this outcome, because America's left purposefully made a fair trial impossible.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/21/th ... n-verdict/

“....You can’t tell me all of this didn’t affect jurors’ psyche and ultimate decision. They would be superhuman or inhuman if it didn’t. Yet those endorsing mob culture and vigilante “justice” for political ends are working hard to make it impossible to express such reasonable doubts, whether in a column or as a member of a murder jury.

Jurors are always human. There is always room for miscalculation, fear, and error. In this case, however, it is extremely clear that these human weaknesses were deliberately amplified to catastrophic proportions, all because of politics.

A fair trial might indeed have come to the same conclusion for Chauvin. But we’ll never know, and never be able to trust this outcome, because America’s left purposefully made a fair trial impossible, all for political power.

They deliberately perverted justice in favor of violent mob rule to strengthen their political hand. They have done evil and called it justice. They have sown the wind, and the resulting whirlwind has still not fully hit our nation yet. But it will.”

Come on Pete. The damn paramedics showed up and told Chauvin the man had no pulse and to get off of him. Chauvin kept his knee on the neck of an unresponsive dead man for like 3 more minutes. If the dumb cluck had got off of his neck when the paramedics advised him to he might have had a chance of being aquitted.

You’re gonna miss the authors point, too?!?

The point is not that he’s guilty, the point is the left has bastardized the justice system to the level where he couldn’t get a fair trial no matter what. You don’t think the jury felt pressure? Not sequestered. Seeing an armed fortress every day.

C’mon.

You think the American “justice” system is “just” and “impartial”? That it ever was?

Naive much or simple-minded?

I’d venture a guess that every poster here was “born on third”. Some of us realize our good fortune, others think
they “hit a triple”.

Which one are you?

Let me answer the only legitimate question your febrile mind spit up. Is the American justice system just and impartial?

To some extent, yes. To some extent, no. But to all extents, not what you’re thinking.

There is a small dirt poor village in southwest Florida called Everglades city. It used to be a purely fishing village. The feds unilaterally took away the fisherman’s rights to fish the waters they used to fish in. No compensation, just the threat of prison if they went out and fished again.

So the residents took to the only manner of making money that was offered. They took marijuana from offshore boats and brought it ashore. The feds investigated this town for years, then one day, they shut off access to and from on the only road to Everglades City. They proceeded to arrest half the town. If you wouldn’t rat on your brother, they threw the book at you. 40 year sentences.

The feds ruined whole families. Now, Democrats love to talk about making marijuana legal and certainly unpunishable.

Where is your sympathy for these poor families whose lives were ruined by your adored federal government? All you complain about is black this and black that, when want it actually is is government abuse. You bozos love racial discord so much, you don’t even know what the real problem is.

Thanks for recognizing the legitimacy of my point, of gracious savant.

Another argument by anecdote — neither strong nor persuasive.

Agreeing with my point about the inequity of the justice system followed by a plaintive bleat about someone done wrong makes you sound like a country and western lyricist.

So we agree that human artifices like government are flawed. Where we differ is in a prescription for corrective action. You appear to believe that human nature unfettered by communal restraints of the the commonweal will be more advantageous. I disagree, vociferously.

That’s because you fundamentally don’t trust other people. Which makes me question why you object to most voting identification laws.

Trust implies uncertainty. I know humans s?ck.

Who said I oppose any voter identification mechanisms? I oppose thinly-veiled disenfranchisement as a remedy for an magnary problem.

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:35 pm

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:13 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:06 pm

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:03 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:41 pm

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:08 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:55 am

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:32 am

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 8:40 am Such a great article. Worth reading if you care about justice.

A fair trial might have come to the same conclusion. But we'll never know, and never be able to trust this outcome, because America's left purposefully made a fair trial impossible.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/21/th ... n-verdict/

“....You can’t tell me all of this didn’t affect jurors’ psyche and ultimate decision. They would be superhuman or inhuman if it didn’t. Yet those endorsing mob culture and vigilante “justice” for political ends are working hard to make it impossible to express such reasonable doubts, whether in a column or as a member of a murder jury.

Jurors are always human. There is always room for miscalculation, fear, and error. In this case, however, it is extremely clear that these human weaknesses were deliberately amplified to catastrophic proportions, all because of politics.

A fair trial might indeed have come to the same conclusion for Chauvin. But we’ll never know, and never be able to trust this outcome, because America’s left purposefully made a fair trial impossible, all for political power.

They deliberately perverted justice in favor of violent mob rule to strengthen their political hand. They have done evil and called it justice. They have sown the wind, and the resulting whirlwind has still not fully hit our nation yet. But it will.”

Come on Pete. The damn paramedics showed up and told Chauvin the man had no pulse and to get off of him. Chauvin kept his knee on the neck of an unresponsive dead man for like 3 more minutes. If the dumb cluck had got off of his neck when the paramedics advised him to he might have had a chance of being aquitted.

You’re gonna miss the authors point, too?!?

The point is not that he’s guilty, the point is the left has bastardized the justice system to the level where he couldn’t get a fair trial no matter what. You don’t think the jury felt pressure? Not sequestered. Seeing an armed fortress every day.

C’mon.

You think the American “justice” system is “just” and “impartial”? That it ever was?

Naive much or simple-minded?

I’d venture a guess that every poster here was “born on third”. Some of us realize our good fortune, others think
they “hit a triple”.

Which one are you?

Let me answer the only legitimate question your febrile mind spit up. Is the American justice system just and impartial?

To some extent, yes. To some extent, no. But to all extents, not what you’re thinking.

There is a small dirt poor village in southwest Florida called Everglades city. It used to be a purely fishing village. The feds unilaterally took away the fisherman’s rights to fish the waters they used to fish in. No compensation, just the threat of prison if they went out and fished again.

So the residents took to the only manner of making money that was offered. They took marijuana from offshore boats and brought it ashore. The feds investigated this town for years, then one day, they shut off access to and from on the only road to Everglades City. They proceeded to arrest half the town. If you wouldn’t rat on your brother, they threw the book at you. 40 year sentences.

The feds ruined whole families. Now, Democrats love to talk about making marijuana legal and certainly unpunishable.

Where is your sympathy for these poor families whose lives were ruined by your adored federal government? All you complain about is black this and black that, when want it actually is is government abuse. You bozos love racial discord so much, you don’t even know what the real problem is.

Thanks for recognizing the legitimacy of my point, of gracious savant.

Another argument by anecdote — neither strong nor persuasive.

Agreeing with my point about the inequity of the justice system followed by a plaintive bleat about someone done wrong makes you sound like a country and western lyricist.

So we agree that human artifices like government are flawed. Where we differ is in a prescription for corrective action. You appear to believe that human nature unfettered by communal restraints of the the commonweal will be more advantageous. I disagree, vociferously.

That’s because you fundamentally don’t trust other people. Which makes me question why you object to most voting identification laws.

Trust implies uncertainty. I know humans s?ck.

Who said I oppose any voter identification mechanisms? I oppose thinly-veiled disenfranchisement as a remedy for an magnary problem.

That’s a sad commentary, but also why you are a Democrat. I trust every neighbor of mine. I generally trust every American. Most people are good. Very few are racist. Very few are sexist. Most people, when you get them one on one, are fundamentally good human beings who want the best for their families.

Who I don’t trust too much are Democrats in positions of power, because their philosophy is so fundamentally opposite American excellence. I can think of a few good Democratic politicians, but it is a very small percentage.

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 7:41 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 6:35 pm

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:13 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:06 pm

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 5:03 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:41 pm

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 3:08 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:55 am

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:32 am

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 8:40 am Such a great article. Worth reading if you care about justice.

A fair trial might have come to the same conclusion. But we'll never know, and never be able to trust this outcome, because America's left purposefully made a fair trial impossible.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/04/21/th ... n-verdict/

“....You can’t tell me all of this didn’t affect jurors’ psyche and ultimate decision. They would be superhuman or inhuman if it didn’t. Yet those endorsing mob culture and vigilante “justice” for political ends are working hard to make it impossible to express such reasonable doubts, whether in a column or as a member of a murder jury.

Jurors are always human. There is always room for miscalculation, fear, and error. In this case, however, it is extremely clear that these human weaknesses were deliberately amplified to catastrophic proportions, all because of politics.

A fair trial might indeed have come to the same conclusion for Chauvin. But we’ll never know, and never be able to trust this outcome, because America’s left purposefully made a fair trial impossible, all for political power.

They deliberately perverted justice in favor of violent mob rule to strengthen their political hand. They have done evil and called it justice. They have sown the wind, and the resulting whirlwind has still not fully hit our nation yet. But it will.”

Come on Pete. The damn paramedics showed up and told Chauvin the man had no pulse and to get off of him. Chauvin kept his knee on the neck of an unresponsive dead man for like 3 more minutes. If the dumb cluck had got off of his neck when the paramedics advised him to he might have had a chance of being aquitted.

You’re gonna miss the authors point, too?!?

The point is not that he’s guilty, the point is the left has bastardized the justice system to the level where he couldn’t get a fair trial no matter what. You don’t think the jury felt pressure? Not sequestered. Seeing an armed fortress every day.

C’mon.

You think the American “justice” system is “just” and “impartial”? That it ever was?

Naive much or simple-minded?

I’d venture a guess that every poster here was “born on third”. Some of us realize our good fortune, others think
they “hit a triple”.

Which one are you?

Let me answer the only legitimate question your febrile mind spit up. Is the American justice system just and impartial?

To some extent, yes. To some extent, no. But to all extents, not what you’re thinking.

There is a small dirt poor village in southwest Florida called Everglades city. It used to be a purely fishing village. The feds unilaterally took away the fisherman’s rights to fish the waters they used to fish in. No compensation, just the threat of prison if they went out and fished again.

So the residents took to the only manner of making money that was offered. They took marijuana from offshore boats and brought it ashore. The feds investigated this town for years, then one day, they shut off access to and from on the only road to Everglades City. They proceeded to arrest half the town. If you wouldn’t rat on your brother, they threw the book at you. 40 year sentences.

The feds ruined whole families. Now, Democrats love to talk about making marijuana legal and certainly unpunishable.

Where is your sympathy for these poor families whose lives were ruined by your adored federal government? All you complain about is black this and black that, when want it actually is is government abuse. You bozos love racial discord so much, you don’t even know what the real problem is.

Thanks for recognizing the legitimacy of my point, of gracious savant.

Another argument by anecdote — neither strong nor persuasive.

Agreeing with my point about the inequity of the justice system followed by a plaintive bleat about someone done wrong makes you sound like a country and western lyricist.

So we agree that human artifices like government are flawed. Where we differ is in a prescription for corrective action. You appear to believe that human nature unfettered by communal restraints of the the commonweal will be more advantageous. I disagree, vociferously.

That’s because you fundamentally don’t trust other people. Which makes me question why you object to most voting identification laws.

Trust implies uncertainty. I know humans s?ck.

Who said I oppose any voter identification mechanisms? I oppose thinly-veiled disenfranchisement as a remedy for an magnary problem.

That’s a sad commentary, but also why you are a Democrat. I trust every neighbor of mine. I generally trust every American. Most people are good. Very few are racist. Very few are sexist. Most people, when you get them one on one, are fundamentally good human beings who want the best for their families.

Who I don’t trust too much are Democrats in positions of power, because their philosophy is so fundamentally opposite American excellence. I can think of a few good Democratic politicians, but it is a very small percentage.

“Most people, when you get them one on one, are fundamentally good human beings who want the best for their families. ”

Don’t see it. Guess we’ll have to agree to disagree.

P.S. You think corporations are “are fundamentally good human beings who want the best for their families”?

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:47 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 1:25 pm Will any libs address the black on Asian crime sweeping America right now?

Meggsy, do you have any friends besides Rosie and her five friends?

admin wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 8:06 am

PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:47 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 1:25 pm Will any libs address the black on Asian crime sweeping America right now?

Meggsy, do you have any friends besides Rosie and her five friends?

Pizza, dial it back. This is a public forum.

Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:21 am.

admin wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:55 am

Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:21 am.

The issue with Pizza's quote is that he's alluding to masturbation. It's unnecessary.

In terms of post-ers attacking post-ers, there most certainly is a spectrum. In theory, "Are you serious?!" is an attack. But, for obvious reasons, we don't throw a flag at that. Further along the spectrum, there's “why is it that people who grew up with a silver spoon who’s dad donated to Loyola and live in FL are completed dbags and not worth their existence”. That kind of post is much more of a problem. And we penalize it.

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 1:14 pm

admin wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:55 am

Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:21 am.

The issue with Pizza's quote is that he's alluding to masturbation. It's unnecessary.

In terms of post-ers attacking post-ers, there most certainly is a spectrum. In theory, "Are you serious?!" is an attack. But, for obvious reasons, we don't throw a flag at that. Further along the spectrum, there's “why is it that people who grew up with a silver spoon who’s dad donated to Loyola and live in FL are completed dbags and not worth their existence”. That kind of post is much more of a problem. And we penalize it.

For what it’s worth Mr Admin, I don’t personally take offense to any posters words, so I’m not asking for anything.

I will filet ‘Democrats writ large’, but hopefully veer away from any personal slight.

Anyway, let’s get back to the action and discuss race and why Democrats use fake racial division to harm America/raise money.

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 8:23 am The Democrats plan to turn the USA into Venezuela is succeeding.

Louisville murders rise by 75 per cent and shootings rocket 84 per cent in past year, during a lockdown no less! Yay?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... slump.html

Going woke gets your family killed.

jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:51 am

Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:37 am

jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:52 am

runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:25 am

jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:18 am

runrussellrun wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:04 am

jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 15, 2021 9:42 am ... or it's just the news.

OK.....will give you that. YES, absolutely.

How many murders in Baltimore yesterday? --- I rely on you or Goebbels for local news

And, again, IS not it news? That Insider trading, IN YOUR FACE, insider trading.........just rolls on and on. Nancy P. buy some "Give it all away GATES" investments.

Did microsoft just get a big, big, big.. Yup, they sure did. Your reporting of financial news is top notch.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/31/microso ... -army.html

https://www.barrons.com/articles/nancy- ... 1618264201

But, instead...........national news IS.....a guy pushed a guy ? what a joke.

ONLY purpose to run this story is too divide....and we all know it. ... or to show what is going on in America

What part, of your neighbors, being killed, is funny?

Sorry for offending your tender sensibilities. It is just that you and Goebbels, neither of you being local to Baltimore sure seem to have an obsession with it. So I defer to your reporting, and that is funny. Do you guys spend as much time covering other top 10 murder cities?
- like
1) East St. Louis, IL;
2) Chester, PA;
3) Gary, IN;
4) St. Louis, MO;
6) Flint, MI;
7) Detroit, MI;
8) Salisbury, NC;
9) Danville, VA.

I would think Danville would be worthy of an full expose. I spent a good bit of time in the Danville area as a child, teenager, great rural town at that time, not so much now.


you people are disgusting.....

I know Danville, American National Bank is there. That area has declined with the decline in furniture manufacturing in the Triad area (Greensboro) have a friend and business client at a bank based in Martinsville, VA not far away and he hates it there having grown up in Chicago then living in NYC finally relocating from Hilton Head to Martinsville to take a gig at a bank HQd there. They are moving that bank eventually either Richmond or Greensboro because they see that Southern VA area can be beautiful but filled with meth-heads and opioid addicted folks.

Would note that Salisbury is effectively a suburb/exurb pf Charlotte (nice little downtown of maybe three blocks). Chester, PA is Philly area. This makes Danville a true outlier.

Yup. Danville is a true 21st century American town, succumbing to rural opioid addiction. All the surrounding counties are the same way. But it is basically the same cause as all the the bigger cities - too many criminalized drugs; not enough jobs; poorly educated; etc.

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 4:59 pm Have any Fanlax libs posted today about the black on black murders last night in America?

https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/op ... story.html

Or do they just wait for a white cop’s gun to go off to whine about whatever ism floats their lib boat? I definitely think their newest stance is 13 year old black girls should be allowed to stab to death without interference other 13 year old black girls.

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 5:24 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 4:59 pm Have any Fanlax libs posted today about the black on black murders last night in America?

https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/op ... story.html

Or do they just wait for a white cop’s gun to go off to whine about whatever ism floats their lib boat? I definitely think their newest stance is 13 year old black girls should be allowed to stab to death without interference other 13 year old black girls.

I believe we have a fellow poster on this forum here who has stated the case on black on black violence something like this.. once the problem with the cops shooting black folks is solved then the SBLM movement can move on to black on black murders. Until then, nothing will happen to change a damn thing in the killing fields of urban America. So long as no snitch is the rule of the day in urban America. You will watch your young black children being gunned down left and right and you won't say an effing thing to bring the suspects to justice. Too busy perhaps protesting the police to be troubled by a petty little issue such as that. SBLM... other black lives... not so much.

cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 5:24 pm

Peter Brown wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 4:59 pm Have any Fanlax libs posted today about the black on black murders last night in America?

https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/op ... story.html

Or do they just wait for a white cop’s gun to go off to whine about whatever ism floats their lib boat? I definitely think their newest stance is 13 year old black girls should be allowed to stab to death without interference other 13 year old black girls.

I believe we have a fellow poster on this forum here who has stated the case on black on black violence something like this.. once the problem with the cops shooting black folks is solved then the SBLM movement can move on to black on black murders. Until then, nothing will happen to change a damn thing in the killing fields of urban America. So long as no snitch is the rule of the day in urban America. You will watch your young black children being gunned down left and right and you won't say an effing thing to bring the suspects to justice. Too busy perhaps protesting the police to be troubled by a petty little issue such as that. SBLM... other black lives... not so much.