Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

D1 Mens Lacrosse
wgdsr
Posts: 9878
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:00 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by wgdsr »

DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:42 pm
TAV wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 5:44 pm I also enjoyed that they won most FO’s and still lost!
Duke went 6-25 on face offs.
only thing that kept denver in the game.
wgdsr
Posts: 9878
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:00 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by wgdsr »

Laxxal22 wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:04 pm
pcowlax wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 5:00 pm Duke interestingly, and unlike most teams, has players birthdays listed in most bios. Man, these are some, uhm, seasoned guys.
Sean Lowrie was Independent School League player of the year... in 2015. Took a redshirt year due to injury in 2016 and was already in a Duke grad program in 2020 (so why not keep playing if enrolled and still have eligibility), but he'll turn 25 this summer. That's a lifetime older than a 18-19 college frosh.
definitely why not when you have 15 teammates in your classes and in the grad apts.
wgdsr
Posts: 9878
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:00 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by wgdsr »

questions no one wants to ask:
does duke have too many one and done frosh?

can they backfill with a new group next year?

what would coach k say?
pcowlax
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 9:16 am

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by pcowlax »

As bad as 6/25 is, it was something like 14/15 at one point. Ginder just holding his own in the second half did play a role in comeback. Not many Duke fans on here but if their are any what are you thoughts on goalie? Adler transferred in with lots of hype from a bad program were he never played in any high pressure/high stakes games (of course every game you play in you put pressure on yourself to play well for your teammates). Uppgren has not always been consistent but has been started for about 2.5yrs at Duke, played in many big time games facing best shooters in the nation. I think it is a tough sell in the locker room not to start him next game and make it his spot to lose. Not totally fair to Adler to lose job over 1/2 of a game but he had poached it by transferring in in the first place. Will be interesting to see if that becomes a distraction.
DMac
Posts: 9063
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by DMac »

wgdsr wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:45 pm
DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:42 pm
TAV wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 5:44 pm I also enjoyed that they won most FO’s and still lost!
Duke went 6-25 on face offs.
only thing that kept denver in the game.
Nope, Denver had 14 more GBs than Duke too.
GK play is huge in this one, Duke had 7 more saves than Denver.
wgdsr
Posts: 9878
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:00 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by wgdsr »

DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:59 pm
wgdsr wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:45 pm
DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:42 pm
TAV wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 5:44 pm I also enjoyed that they won most FO’s and still lost!
Duke went 6-25 on face offs.
only thing that kept denver in the game.
Nope, Denver had 14 more GBs than Duke too.
GK play is huge in this one, Duke had 7 more saves than Denver.
gb's are included in fo stats. so that's why they had more.
duke had more saves because denver had 19 more possessions from faceoffs.

duke's tough in so many phases of the game! go 'cuse! when do they open up? they only strapped it on this week?
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 32890
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

pcowlax wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:52 pm As bad as 6/25 is, it was something like 14/15 at one point. Ginder just holding his own in the second half did play a role in comeback. Not many Duke fans on here but if their are any what are you thoughts on goalie? Adler transferred in with lots of hype from a bad program were he never played in any high pressure/high stakes games (of course every game you play in you put pressure on yourself to play well for your teammates). Uppgren has not always been consistent but has been started for about 2.5yrs at Duke, played in many big time games facing best shooters in the nation. I think it is a tough sell in the locker room not to start him next game and make it his spot to lose. Not totally fair to Adler to lose job over 1/2 of a game but he had poached it by transferring in in the first place. Will be interesting to see if that becomes a distraction.
My guess is the goalie will be given a little more rope. First game. Practice counts. Lets see how he does next time out.
“You lucky I ain’t read wretched yet!”
10stone5
Posts: 7626
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:29 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by 10stone5 »

pcowlax wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:52 pm Adler transferred in with lots of hype from a bad program were he never played in any high pressure/high stakes games (of course every game you play in you put pressure on yourself to play well for your teammates
You’re being awfully hard on the Hawks.
With Adler in goal, the Hawks could afford to concentrate
on defense, and not worry nearly as much on offense.

Adler looked star struck, lacking in confidence, too nervous, not aggressive at all which is his game,
they’ll need him in conference play, so hopefully he
gets his confidence back.
DMac
Posts: 9063
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by DMac »

wgdsr wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:09 pm
DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:59 pm
wgdsr wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:45 pm
DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:42 pm
TAV wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 5:44 pm I also enjoyed that they won most FO’s and still lost!
Duke went 6-25 on face offs.
only thing that kept denver in the game.
Nope, Denver had 14 more GBs than Duke too.
GK play is huge in this one, Duke had 7 more saves than Denver.
gb's are included in fo stats. so that's why they had more.
duke had more saves because denver had 19 more possessions from faceoffs.

duke's tough in so many phases of the game! go 'cuse! when do they open up? they only strapped it on this week?
:lol: :lol:
How many shots did they put on cage from the possessions of those 19 more face off wins?

Cuse opens up v Army on the 21st.
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 32890
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

10stone5 wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:16 pm
pcowlax wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:52 pm Adler transferred in with lots of hype from a bad program were he never played in any high pressure/high stakes games (of course every game you play in you put pressure on yourself to play well for your teammates
You’re being awfully hard on the Hawks.
With Adler in goal, the Hawks could afford to concentrate
on defense, and not worry nearly as much on offense.

Adler looked star struck, lacking in confidence, too nervous, not aggressive at all which is his game,
they’ll need him in conference play, so hopefully he
gets his confidence back.
He just needs to make a couple of saves and then relax. Its like a shooter that just needs to see the ball go in a few times in order to settle down.
“You lucky I ain’t read wretched yet!”
wgdsr
Posts: 9878
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:00 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by wgdsr »

DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:19 pm
wgdsr wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:09 pm
DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:59 pm
wgdsr wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:45 pm
DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:42 pm
TAV wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 5:44 pm I also enjoyed that they won most FO’s and still lost!
Duke went 6-25 on face offs.
only thing that kept denver in the game.
Nope, Denver had 14 more GBs than Duke too.
GK play is huge in this one, Duke had 7 more saves than Denver.
gb's are included in fo stats. so that's why they had more.
duke had more saves because denver had 19 more possessions from faceoffs.

duke's tough in so many phases of the game! go 'cuse! when do they open up? they only strapped it on this week?
:lol: :lol:
How many shots did they put on cage from the possessions of those 19 more face off wins?

Cuse opens up v Army on the 21st.
not enough!!! 7 it looks like?
my point and always has been.... if you lose faceoffs (big), you have to be that much better than your opponent net net in all other phases combined. that is an absolute fact and indisputable. you cannot play equal in those phases, or you will lose. another fact.

if you win faceoffs, you have a buffer. don't lose the buffer by being outplayed too badly.
JoeMauer89
Posts: 2005
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:39 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by JoeMauer89 »

Laxxal22 wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:04 pm
pcowlax wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 5:00 pm Duke interestingly, and unlike most teams, has players birthdays listed in most bios. Man, these are some, uhm, seasoned guys.
Sean Lowrie was Independent School League player of the year... in 2015. Took a redshirt year due to injury in 2016 and was already in a Duke grad program in 2020 (so why not keep playing if enrolled and still have eligibility), but he'll turn 25 this summer. That's a lifetime older than a 18-19 college frosh.

Turner Uppgren TURNED 25 in December!! Crazy..But going to become more common for a few years at least!

Joe
Gorilla Fan
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:26 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by Gorilla Fan »

10stone5 wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:02 pm Help me,
Anish right away with the complete garbage,
volume to mute !
GET OFF MY LAWN!
DMac
Posts: 9063
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by DMac »

wgdsr wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:29 pm
DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:19 pm
wgdsr wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:09 pm
DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:59 pm
wgdsr wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:45 pm
DMac wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:42 pm
TAV wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 5:44 pm I also enjoyed that they won most FO’s and still lost!
Duke went 6-25 on face offs.
only thing that kept denver in the game.
Nope, Denver had 14 more GBs than Duke too.
GK play is huge in this one, Duke had 7 more saves than Denver.
gb's are included in fo stats. so that's why they had more.
duke had more saves because denver had 19 more possessions from faceoffs.

duke's tough in so many phases of the game! go 'cuse! when do they open up? they only strapped it on this week?
:lol: :lol:
How many shots did they put on cage from the possessions of those 19 more face off wins?

Cuse opens up v Army on the 21st.
not enough!!! 7 it looks like?
my point and always has been.... if you lose faceoffs (big), you have to be that much better than your opponent net net in all other phases combined. that is an absolute fact and indisputable. you cannot play equal in those phases, or you will lose. another fact.

if you win faceoffs, you have a buffer. don't lose the buffer by being outplayed too badly.
Uh oh, I think we might be in agreement here. I've always said that complete teams win games not just FOGOs. What you do with that possession is what matters. Did you score on the possession that FOGO got you? If not, that face off win doesn't really mean a whole lot beyond the stat sheet. Lots of evidence of that early on in this season. The most important stat is goals....how efficient are you at putting the ball in the cage when you have possession. 1-7 on EMO...I'd worry about that more than face offs.
pcowlax
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 9:16 am

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by pcowlax »

10stone5 wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:16 pm
pcowlax wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:52 pm Adler transferred in with lots of hype from a bad program were he never played in any high pressure/high stakes games (of course every game you play in you put pressure on yourself to play well for your teammates
You’re being awfully hard on the Hawks.
With Adler in goal, the Hawks could afford to concentrate
on defense, and not worry nearly as much on offense.

Adler looked star struck, lacking in confidence, too nervous, not aggressive at all which is his game,
they’ll need him in conference play, so hopefully he
gets his confidence back.
That’s kind of my point but you are right, bad is harsh, let’s say low profile. He was star struck and nervous because of how much of a bigger stage this was, I doubt he would have looked like that in his first game is he had transferred to Drexel. Of course he can bounce back but it’s an interesting dynamic now. Uppgren has been teammates with many of these guys 3 and 4 years and he pretty much saved the day today. Want to keep an eye on the locker room if Adler struggles next game as well.
molo
Posts: 2043
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 2:14 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by molo »

What happened to Sillstrop. He started and was playing well. I noted that I didn’t realize that De ver stated two lefty attackmen and then he was gone.
Badlands
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:08 am

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by Badlands »

Duke's D really took over in the second half. They just kept stopping DU when the Pios needed goals. JT knocked down a few passes that turned into critical stops. And DU's EMO was atrocious. Sounds like they've only scored two EMO goals this season. Duke's man down D was part of the story too.

I see Duke starting Uppgren on Sunday. Don't see how you can keep him on the bench after that performance. If the game against Robert Morris is under control after 3Q, I'd take TU out and let Adler play the 4th.

Sowers sent a strong message that if they let him play from X, plenty of guys are gonna get really good looks. He showed signs of Jordan Wolf running around with the ball in the last minute killing the clock just toying with the guys assigned to keep up with him. Might see that a lot this year.
10stone5
Posts: 7626
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:29 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by 10stone5 »

What does Duke do when Robertson comes back ?
Does Williams move to mid ?

Oh, to have such problems.
molo
Posts: 2043
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 2:14 pm

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by molo »

My guess would be that Upgren starts Sunday and that Robertson will provide depth when returns.
Badlands
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:08 am

Re: Denver@Duke 2/5@1500 hrs.

Post by Badlands »

Robertson wasn't dominant enough in recent years to displace Williams.
Post Reply

Return to “D1 MENS LACROSSE”