There was a time when you had something or some perspective to contribute. Now, you are just reduced to this content free yammering, which is just kind of sad. The vulgarity makes you sound like a middle schooler, not a veteran and grandfather. And your interest in naked pictures of Trump is troubling around the dinner hour.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 5:07 pmAll you had to do was pay attention to the look on the foreheads face when the Congresswoman called him out. She made a complete jackass out of him using his own words. The fact that the usual suspects here are vigorously trying to put their spin on it says as much as the blank look on the foreheads face. The Congresswoman caught the forehead with his pants down and his dingus in his hand. The nervous and jerky look on the foreheads face said everything that needed to be said. Spin away boys... spin away. The only thing you can do is look as pathetic as the forehead. i can't believe that if you all folks were hoping to impeach Trump that yall handed over the reins of the wagon to a nincompoop like the forehead. Secretly I bet you were all hoping to get a glance of the pictures of the naked Trump.seacoaster wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 7:32 amOnly if you're not paying attention.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 7:25 amSorry but he ticked away his credibility when he feverishly tried to find those pictures of the naked Trump. The forehead will never be mistaken for Sam Ervin. He is methodically making a fool of himself.seacoaster wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:13 pmSo you really have nothing to say or add but the same, silly, inaccurate palaver that you always provide. You never converse; you blather. Read again Garden Boy. I can criticize Schiff; he's hardly perfect. But he isn't "pissing his pants" looking for anything. He's pretty methodically tracking down facts, if Americans have the brains and comprehension to read and assimilate them.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:46 pmWas that the 5 term Congressman and former federal prosecutor, Stanford, Harvard Law that was pissing his pants while trying to find those pictures of the naked Trump? Your mistake was placing the forehead on a pedestal and bowing down before him as your salvation to impeach the naked Trump. Welcome to Realville Schiff is a member of the same group of dirtbags you detest so much. Would you like to see those pictures of the naked Trump? I love having the conversation. None of these players are above being criticized. Schiff included.seacoaster wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 2:30 pmSorry, I answered assuming you had a real question, not your usual pretend "pox on both houses, while propping up the Right" silliness. My mistake, thinking we were having a real discussion.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 1:41 pmDoes the forehead have any pictures of the naked Trump?seacoaster wrote: ↑Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:45 pm Assuming your question is serious: I think Schiff has been a little heavy-handed at times (from the times I've seen), but I think it is from an effort to not allow the thing to become a conspiracy-theory circus. But it is a far cry from stonewalling in a general sense (the GOP has its own counsel to prepare an examination and inquire with each of the witnesses, and then time for the members of Congress) and, specifically, compared to the manner in which the WH has asserted a blanket absolute immunity to the inquiry's document and witness production requests/demands. Schiff's management of the process really cannot compare to the blanket refusal of the WH, not even close.
The forehead? A five term Congressman and former federal prosecutor, Stanford, Harvard Law School. I'll bet he'd be really upset knowing the Grumpy Gardener has a nickname for him.
Read a little more, and more widely. The Nunes-Stefanik thing was a stunt, which it appears you fell for in a big way. She was out of order, and Schiff just managed the situation. This is what the Republicans do: stunts and media tricks because the President they are defending abused the powers of his office. They rely on folks like you -- who feel diminished by circumstances and complain that "nobody cares about me" -- to carry that faux narrative and content free message forward. You're a willing actor in their drama of lies. Nice work. Read the rules of the Committees, and try to inform yourself beyond the narrow, tiny world you are in.