a fan wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:29 pm
ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:22 pm
Do you have a link of this bashing? Agree, couldn't find a more respectable witness. However, medals and career aside.....all that matters is he didn't really sell us on this Ukrainian thing being "impeachable".
That's not his job. His job was to tell you what happened. He did that.
So how many posters here are now signing up for this behavior.
To be clear, you are now saying it's ok for a President to use his office to investigate his political rivals. He used our State Dept., as well as the AG to try and do this.
So now the next President can do this. Do I have this right?
Recall, this is part of the reason Nixon was removed.
ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 12:22 pm
And, will ask again. Why can the President withhold already allocated and approved funds ? Does this apply to domestic aid? Is Trump withholding funds domesticaly?
Who can challenge him? The DoJ, who works for the President?
Everyone here is laboring under the laughable and, frankly, idiotic idea that Trump is the last ***hole we're going to have as President.
The list of the things TrumpEnablers have said "oh yeah, the President can do that" grows by the day. And I'm counting the days before a left wing zealot gets into office, and starts to undo allllll the things right wing America takes for granted.
as jusual AFAN.......you miss.
I do NOT think any of what trump did was cool. What's even uncooler is that you just throw your hands up and act as if Congress is powerless. Also, you never (
) answered the direct question.
Does ANY POTSUSA have the authority to withhold appropriated, allocated funds? (does this mean that trump can withhold funds from US districts, unless a "favor is granted"
But, you're right. It's NOT a problem that we need to fix.