holmes435 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2019 9:10 pm
Peter Brown wrote: ↑Sun Nov 03, 2019 6:53 pmOne tell is when a rather homely woman comes to the surface on this issue, it’s fair to not believe her words. Trump has a look as we all know. And several of his accusers don’t exactly strike me as what Trump finds attractive. Sue me for being honest btw before you say ‘sexist’. You want honesty, I’m being honest. Anyone reading this knows exactly what I’m saying too.
You're probably not a sexist, and I'm sure you're being honest with what you believe. You just have no clue about what you're talking about regarding sexual assault or even just normal sexual relations.
Yes, I have 'no clue'. I need to tell our HR staff that they are failing me!
The liberals/left-leaning here have a decidedly difficult time when we're being very frank and honest about topics they previously considered
their own (as in,
'I refuse to consider alternative thoughts!').
If I point out that
ski season will occur every year without fail, or that the Russia thing seems far-fetched, or that Miami real estate is on fire, or that several of Trump's accusers don't exactly look the part (for him), the reactions are almost always
'you're so dumb you can't see the data' or 'you are a (fill in the blank)-ist!!!'.
I have zero doubt that the liberals/left-leaning folks here similarly fell for the Rolling Stone/UVA hoax and the Duke lacrosse hoax and so forth; absolutely not a doubt in my mind. Know why? Because you
want those stories to be true. Because you
need those stories to be true to justify so much of your world framework. And if a guy like me came along and said
slow your roll about UVA/Duke/etc, let's see about this story, it doesn't ring true to me, what would the post look like from them:
you are a rape apologist. Very very predictable.
But that's okay, it helps make the day move along.