kramerica.inc wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2019 12:58 pm JHU and others are twisting in the wind to defend Hill, like so many around here defend Trump
Let's talk facts.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... rn/601198/
By her own account, Hill engaged in a profound breach of responsibility by engaging in a sexual relationship with someone who was working for her—and by doing so while running for public office. “The mistakes I made that brought me to this moment will haunt me for the rest of my life,” she said this afternoon in her final speech on the House floor. Members of Congress are no stranger to bad behavior. But in a time when Americans are remapping the difficult landscape of sex and power in the workplace, it would be willfully naive to shove aside the uncomfortable dynamics of Hill’s relationship with a staffer who was almost a decade her junior, and a recent college graduate.
It’s comical to watch the ‘Party of Women’ twist themselves to excuse grossly unethical power dynamic violations. This defense of Party at all cost is what I thought some said Republicans are guilty of.
I mean, would a little consistency hurt?