I'll try again....seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:59 pmI gotta tell you: your post makes no sense to me at all. I think it is easy; it is plainly wrong; it is of an “impeachable” character and kind. I genuinely don’t understand how anyone doesn’t think the same. “It’s” not a sham; it’s a gross misuse of public authority and trust.youthathletics wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:48 pmIf it is so cut and dry in your eyes, then what is the problem with the left that they do not see it so clearly as you do?seacoaster wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:24 pm the fact that the President asked a foreign leader for dirt while holding up $391,000,000 in aid. They just don't care. If it upsets "Libs," good. If "Libs" want it, bad. No need for facts or discernment.
Interesting how your comments so overly simplify it all and yet the the left does not even get it. You sound like you are in the republicans corner on this (its a sham) and in the same breath you are standing alongside the left being complicit in a sham.
The entire point of my post is why are the democrats having such a hard time with this? You see and articulate it clear as day....who don't they? In your eyes its a slam dunk.....why is it so hard for the House to see it the same why you do?