cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 10:07 am
runrussellrun wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 9:55 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 9:50 am
runrussellrun wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 9:44 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 01, 2019 9:25 am
And you ascribe to
some science denial stuff, finding common cause with the whacko right.
Seems like a pattern to me, but go ahead and hold onto your sense that only you are a true liberal on here and everyone else is a hypocrite.
Please explain, give examples. What science am I denying? That they are giving out the wrong flu vaccines this fall?
Climate thread, RRR/ABV.
Not otherwise relevant here.
This is yet another example of it....just stop with the passive aggressive spit balls.....and throw arms up in protest as if you are always innocent.
YOU brought the issue up.......and called me a whacko. You did, you called me a whacko, or at least common cause with whacko's . Why? Why is labeling people even relevant. Humans have such a strong need to label each other. They, Them...........yankees, redsox.
You have to be patient with MD. Triple R you must be forgetting you are trying to have a discussion with a lifelong republican.
Indeed cradle.
RRR/ABV, I try not to call my fellow posters names, but I
will describe more generally 'wimps' those who go after McCain as if he was actually a dishonorable person, in common cause with the hard right/Trumpists who hate McCain because he stood up to Trump. Gets one's attention, doesn't it?
Likewise, I'm perfectly comfortable using the term "whacko" or "wing nut" to describe what I think of the science denial, conspiracy mongering, industry and their 'believers'.
It's up to you whether you place yourself in either of those camps.
But to be further clear, I'm quite comfortable using those words about liberal 'wimps', 'whackos', 'wing nuts' when applicable, to a general group.
Just as I'm comfortable calling out gross corruption or bias etc on the hard left.
However, I do try to not direct those words at specific fellow posters.
But I understand how you read that differently.