ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:37 am
Didn't trump just bargain for you to sell your product in Japan, along with other US foodstuffs?
Yep. And here's what I wrote about that:
From Sep 25th
a fan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 25, 2019 2:09 pm
I support some of the Trump administration polices, too. For example? I need more details, but I'm optimistic about what I heard of the trade tweaks with Japan.
There you go. I don't have TDS. And it's tiring that you keep posting as if I do. I've also praised that he hasn't invaded a new country....I'm over the moon happy about that. And I even said that had Hillary been elected, odds are I wouldn't be making the same claim. Ask me what I think about the Japan deal next time! Ask my opinion, and I'll give it.
ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:37 am
Your tone has changed here on fanlax, insulting even. Especially to part timers like me.
There's the problem. You're here "part time". As we see above, you read about 1/4 of what goes on here, and then jump to conclusions, and do things like hammer me on Japan. Only it turns out, I did indeed praise that.
Have you considered that the problem here is that you're not reading all the posts? That's fine, of course, but you can't assume I like Joe Biden and wave his shenanigans through simply because you read a post or two, and figure I haven't commenting on Biden. Either read all the posts here, or stop attacking me. You can pick either one, and the problem will disappear. Or better still, ask what I think instead of assuming what I think. Sound fair?
ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:37 am
This place can't function, for fun, without lots of people. Yet, you are bothered by folks that just "can't keep up" Why?
I'm bothered when you tell us that we don't hammer libs or praise Trump....when the actual problem is that you're not reading all the posts, and you're being unfair. So as I said, pick one. Either stop attacking other posters for your nonstop whataboutisms where you assume everyone here is a Joe Biden fan, or read all the posts. Believe it or not, when you use English, I enjoy our banter.
As for tone, I return fire, and match tone. Your tone has changed, too. But I'll give you the same promise I gave old salt.....nothing would make me happier than if our discourse here was more polite. But that also means, you have to do the same. This ain't a one way street. Deal? Great.
ABV 8.3% wrote: ↑Sun Sep 29, 2019 7:37 am
Or, maybe, you can't handle mental orgies, you need your one on one time with randy rad. Or, the same 5-6 people could ignore Hunter Bidens ethics, conflicts of interest and Joes' own words
Yet another case of simply not reading my posts, and lashing out, when I've criticized Biden plenty. I don't want him to be President, and I think he's almost as corrupt as Hillary, and that's saying something. I don't know how many more times you need to hear that from me. What more do you want?
Here's a post from last week. Bolded the key concept.
a fan wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2019 1:39 pm
By the way....this is circulating among my liberal friends on Facebook.
It's almost as if right is right, and wrong is wrong, not matter what we're talking about. What a concept.
Headline:
Hunter Biden’s Perfectly Legal, Socially Acceptable Corruption
subtitled: Donald Trump committed an impeachable offense, but prominent Americans also shouldn’t be leveraging their names for payoffs from shady clients abroad.
Text:
But the egregiousness of these acts must not blind us to the culture of influence-peddling that surrounds and enables them. That culture is fundamental to the cynical state we are in, and it needs examining. All too often, the scandal isn’t that the conduct in question is forbidden by federal law, but rather, how much scandalous conduct is perfectly legal—and broadly accepted.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... T8JZG4xqHc