You are so full of it. So both the NDI and the IG write gushing letters/give flowery speeches about how pleased they are with the WB, and how they find his complaint fully credible.old salt wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2019 4:29 amThe WB law is not there to provide a forum for disgruntled civil servants to subvert the policies of the elected CinC which they do not agree with..a fan wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2019 2:47 am Oh totally. The rank and file men and women who work for our government should shut up, look the other way, and serve a man who we all know is unfit for office. They have to follow their oath, and Trump doesn't. Because Old Salt sez so. It's in some book, or something.
No, no, I got it----they should blow the whistle on Trump. Yeah, that works great.
What was it you said? Oh, right. The whistleblower law is stronger then ever.
And by stronger, you mean that the DNI will take any complaints about Trump to Trump's people in 24 hours instead of 48.
If they can't fullfill their duties in good faith, they should go home, find another job & write a book. Phil Mudd was right.
The more this WB's claims fall apart, the more we see how this was an abuse of the WB process.
Then the WB complaint---the salient point----is confirmed by both Trump and his lawyer on live TV to be true. Trump did indeed ask him to look into Biden.
And you come back with "this is a disgruntled employee".
Congratulations, you are now the biggest partisan on the board, surpassing both Bandito and DocB.
Take a bow.
If he's so corrupt, why did he ask him to investigate Biden?old salt wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:57 pm You claim you don't approve of any US military aid to Ukraine ? Then you should be grateful to Trump for not funding the war there, until he knows he can trust the stand up comic who just became their latest President, to actually go after the rampant corruption which has made Ukraine little better than Russia
Take your time coming up with your spin on this one. The stand up comic comes back with fabricated "evidence" of Biden's wrongdoing, fulfilling Trump's request. Now what?
You're not this stupid. Trump thinks you are, though.
So you give me evidence that I'm right that we shouldn't arm foreign countries?
Nice job. This is your idea of refuting my point?
I had the EXACT same position the entire time we've been at the Water Cooler.
YOU are the guy who thinks we need to "arm the right guys" overseas, no matter how many times I've pointed out how stupid that practice is.
Remember when you and McCain wanted to arm the Syrian Rebels? All the way until we figured out that "whoops, that's ISIS"??