old salt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:35 pm
Trump & his family had their business dealings before he was a candidate. They did not expect to win.
Had Trump opened any new businesses after he was elected, I'd want them examined too.
So what? Dude. Will you please stop arranging the goalposts and then stand back and act like it's a coincidence that your
newly placed goalposts make Trump ok, but anyone with a D by their name not ok.
How dumb do you think I am? Maybe turn down the transparent partisanship three or four notches and try again.
Oh, these are "old businesses", "therefore" under old salt's new made up rules on ethics in government don't apply.
Where do you come up with this stuff?
old salt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:35 pm
The MSM should report the facts & let the voters decide if it's a conflict & if it matters.
Sigh. So now you have a new rule for ethics in governance. Private media has to cover conflicts of interest, and if voters care, they're supposed to do.....what, exactly?
Man. Nixon would LOVE your new rules. So would Blagojevich, for that matter. That dude must be watching this nonsense and wondering why he's in jail.
old salt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:35 pm
Hunter got his business opportunities
after his Dad was in office. They merit the same scrutiny that Trump & family dealings continue to receive. FNC not covering it ? How many times have they run Joe's sob clip ? Hannity's been all over it.
Great. So the MSM IS covering it. What's the problem?
And I thought you said you didn't watch FoxNews? I'm lost.