2020 Elections - Trump FIRED

The odds are excellent that you will leave this forum hating someone.
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27072
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - the Reckoning

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

HooDat wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:09 pm
youthathletics wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 12:45 pm Bingo. Why? For the reasons afan has stated before...Trump is a true democrat with an r next to his name
and they can sit back and blame the R's for anything that doesn't go right.
Boy you guys are cynical.
So now the Dems actually want to lose the Presidency so they can blame it on the R's. :roll:

Yup, no worries about that meaning how many more Supreme Court slots filled by Trump?
How many more idiots posted to lower level judge positions?

Dems just want to blame R's...hoo boy.
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 34070
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - the Reckoning

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:33 pm
HooDat wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:09 pm
youthathletics wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 12:45 pm Bingo. Why? For the reasons afan has stated before...Trump is a true democrat with an r next to his name
and they can sit back and blame the R's for anything that doesn't go right.
Boy you guys are cynical.
So now the Dems actually want to lose the Presidency so they can blame it on the R's. :roll:

Yup, no worries about that meaning how many more Supreme Court slots filled by Trump?
How many more idiots posted to lower level judge positions?

Dems just want to blame R's...hoo boy.
That is some scheme.
“I wish you would!”
User avatar
HooDat
Posts: 2373
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:26 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - the Reckoning

Post by HooDat »

Typical Lax Dad wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:57 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:33 pm
HooDat wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:09 pm
youthathletics wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 12:45 pm Bingo. Why? For the reasons afan has stated before...Trump is a true democrat with an r next to his name
and they can sit back and blame the R's for anything that doesn't go right.
Boy you guys are cynical.
So now the Dems actually want to lose the Presidency so they can blame it on the R's. :roll:

Yup, no worries about that meaning how many more Supreme Court slots filled by Trump?
How many more idiots posted to lower level judge positions?

Dems just want to blame R's...hoo boy.
That is some scheme.
3-D Chess baby!!! :lol:
STILL somewhere back in the day....

...and waiting/hoping for a tinfoil hat emoji......
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15804
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - the Reckoning

Post by youthathletics »

Typical Lax Dad wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:57 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:33 pm
HooDat wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:09 pm
youthathletics wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 12:45 pm Bingo. Why? For the reasons afan has stated before...Trump is a true democrat with an r next to his name
and they can sit back and blame the R's for anything that doesn't go right.
Boy you guys are cynical.
So now the Dems actually want to lose the Presidency so they can blame it on the R's. :roll:

Yup, no worries about that meaning how many more Supreme Court slots filled by Trump?
How many more idiots posted to lower level judge positions?

Dems just want to blame R's...hoo boy.
That is some scheme.
Go back and read my entire post, not just not that excerpt...there you will find the roadmap of the left. If you cant scare everyone into voting for you with bogeyman Russia-Russia-Russia, or entice them with free stuff, or freak everyone out over everyone is gonna die in under 12 years GW/CC debacle, sprinkle in a little bit of doom (code for hope) that we go into a recession and America is falling apart b/c of Trump, and if that didn't work, well you do the next best thing...blame the Donald.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy


“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 23812
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: 2020 Elections - the Reckoning

Post by Farfromgeneva »

HooDat wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 6:25 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:57 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:33 pm
HooDat wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:09 pm
youthathletics wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 12:45 pm Bingo. Why? For the reasons afan has stated before...Trump is a true democrat with an r next to his name
and they can sit back and blame the R's for anything that doesn't go right.
Boy you guys are cynical.
So now the Dems actually want to lose the Presidency so they can blame it on the R's. :roll:

Yup, no worries about that meaning how many more Supreme Court slots filled by Trump?
How many more idiots posted to lower level judge positions?

Dems just want to blame R's...hoo boy.
That is some scheme.
3-D Chess baby!!! :lol:
Man, it’s haaard being woke...
Now I love those cowboys, I love their gold
Love my uncle, God rest his soul
Taught me good, Lord, taught me all I know
Taught me so well, that I grabbed that gold
I left his dead ass there by the side of the road, yeah
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27072
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - the Reckoning

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

youthathletics wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 6:25 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:57 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:33 pm
HooDat wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 3:09 pm
youthathletics wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 12:45 pm Bingo. Why? For the reasons afan has stated before...Trump is a true democrat with an r next to his name
and they can sit back and blame the R's for anything that doesn't go right.
Boy you guys are cynical.
So now the Dems actually want to lose the Presidency so they can blame it on the R's. :roll:

Yup, no worries about that meaning how many more Supreme Court slots filled by Trump?
How many more idiots posted to lower level judge positions?

Dems just want to blame R's...hoo boy.
That is some scheme.
Go back and read my entire post, not just not that excerpt...there you will find the roadmap of the left. If you cant scare everyone into voting for you with bogeyman Russia-Russia-Russia, or entice them with free stuff, or freak everyone out over everyone is gonna die in under 12 years GW/CC debacle, sprinkle in a little bit of doom (code for hope) that we go into a recession and America is falling apart b/c of Trump, and if that didn't work, well you do the next best thing...blame the Donald.
Well, that too is quite the "scheme".

As I said, you guys are really, really cynical.

Elements of truth to be sure, but then grossly exaggerated into the super cynical.
a fan
Posts: 19540
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:05 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - the Reckoning

Post by a fan »

youthathletics wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 6:25 pm or entice them with free stuff,
Right. The trick, as the R's have learned, is to not tell people they're getting free stuff----you just give it to them, and make them think they "earned" it.

A nation of infants. "It's not socialism if I hold my breath and stomp my feet after you give me the handout", right?
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15804
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - the Reckoning

Post by youthathletics »

a fan wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:32 pm
youthathletics wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 6:25 pm or entice them with free stuff,
Right. The trick, as the R's have learned, is to not tell people they're getting free stuff----you just give it to them, and make them think they "earned" it.

A nation of infants. "It's not socialism if I hold my breath and stomp my feet after you give me the handout", right?
Kinda like that. the difference and its a big one, the ones that continue(d) to work instead of waiting and fighting for the piece of free pie, have more financial stability and are cognizant of the BS okie-doke going on. The left is just expanding outwards from their typical metropolis-inner city style of politicking now that so many have been indoctrinated by progressive liberal college educators.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy


“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
HooDat
Posts: 2373
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:26 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by HooDat »

a fan wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:32 pm The trick, as the R's have learned, is to not tell people they're getting free stuff----you just give it to them, and make them think they "earned" it.
that is indeed the trick. the dems just use a slightly different tack, which it to tell them they are owed it.

Either way, politicians prey upon the baser instincts of your average voter. and they do so successfully.... :roll: :x :(
STILL somewhere back in the day....

...and waiting/hoping for a tinfoil hat emoji......
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 15359
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by cradleandshoot »

HooDat wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:50 am
a fan wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:32 pm The trick, as the R's have learned, is to not tell people they're getting free stuff----you just give it to them, and make them think they "earned" it.
that is indeed the trick. the dems just use a slightly different tack, which it to tell them they are owed it.

Either way, politicians prey upon the baser instincts of your average voter. and they do so successfully.... :roll: :x :(
A different variation of the trick is when congressman/women pleads for reelection so they can go back and fix what is broken. They never mention why they not fix what was broken the previous 2 years. 8-)
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
CU88
Posts: 4431
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by CU88 »

cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:16 pm
HooDat wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:50 am
a fan wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:32 pm The trick, as the R's have learned, is to not tell people they're getting free stuff----you just give it to them, and make them think they "earned" it.
that is indeed the trick. the dems just use a slightly different tack, which it to tell them they are owed it.

Either way, politicians prey upon the baser instincts of your average voter. and they do so successfully.... :roll: :x :(
A different variation of the trick is when congressman/women pleads for reelection so they can go back and fix what is broken. They never mention why they not fix what was broken the previous 2 years. 8-)
RIGHT!

Imagine if o d had 2 years of a fully r controlled Congress. They would pass all of the bills they wanted and he would sign them all.

BUILD THAT WALL!

oh wait...
by cradleandshoot » Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:57 am
Mr moderator, deactivate my account.
You have heck this forum up to making it nothing more than a joke. I hope you are happy.
This is cradle and shoot signing out.
:roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 15359
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by cradleandshoot »

CU88 wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:55 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:16 pm
HooDat wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:50 am
a fan wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:32 pm The trick, as the R's have learned, is to not tell people they're getting free stuff----you just give it to them, and make them think they "earned" it.
that is indeed the trick. the dems just use a slightly different tack, which it to tell them they are owed it.

Either way, politicians prey upon the baser instincts of your average voter. and they do so successfully.... :roll: :x :(
A different variation of the trick is when congressman/women pleads for reelection so they can go back and fix what is broken. They never mention why they not fix what was broken the previous 2 years. 8-)
RIGHT!

Imagine if o d had 2 years of a fully r controlled Congress. They would pass all of the bills they wanted and he would sign them all.

BUILD THAT WALL!

oh wait...
The late Louise Slaughter... congresswoman from my district in upstate served 16 terms in Congress. The ongoing theme in ever campaign had her proclaiming she had to be re-elected to fix DC. She never did so in 32 years. Damned if she wasn't always on the cusp of getting it fixed. Pour Louise... she cashed in her chips just before the winning hand.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27072
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 2:18 pm
CU88 wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:55 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:16 pm
HooDat wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:50 am
a fan wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:32 pm The trick, as the R's have learned, is to not tell people they're getting free stuff----you just give it to them, and make them think they "earned" it.
that is indeed the trick. the dems just use a slightly different tack, which it to tell them they are owed it.

Either way, politicians prey upon the baser instincts of your average voter. and they do so successfully.... :roll: :x :(
A different variation of the trick is when congressman/women pleads for reelection so they can go back and fix what is broken. They never mention why they not fix what was broken the previous 2 years. 8-)
RIGHT!

Imagine if o d had 2 years of a fully r controlled Congress. They would pass all of the bills they wanted and he would sign them all.

BUILD THAT WALL!

oh wait...
The late Louise Slaughter... congresswoman from my district in upstate served 16 terms in Congress. The ongoing theme in ever campaign had her proclaiming she had to be re-elected to fix DC. She never did so in 32 years. Damned if she wasn't always on the cusp of getting it fixed. Pour Louise... she cashed in her chips just before the winning hand.
I have zero opinion on your Congresswoman. Just don't know enough.
From the Tenure section of her wikipedia page I did find the following:

During the 112th Congress, the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act, or STOCK Act, which Slaughter first authored and introduced into Congress in 2006[37] – was passed into law.[38] The law prohibits the use of non-public information for private profit, including insider trading by members of Congress and other government employees, and requires many financial transactions by members of Congress to be reported within 45 days.[39]

Gotta like that one right?

Considerable other legislative accomplishments plus some bringing home some pork to Rochester, but the above was what I saw re cleaning up DC.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Slaughter
tech37
Posts: 4370
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:02 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by tech37 »

https://news.yahoo.com/dr-robert-epstei ... 11657.html

Perhaps the Russians are the least of our worries?

Before any of you resistance warriors roll your eyes and disregard, Epstein is a Clinton-supporting liberal, and not politically motivated.
SCLaxAttack
Posts: 1717
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 10:24 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by SCLaxAttack »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:16 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 2:18 pm
CU88 wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:55 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:16 pm
HooDat wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:50 am
a fan wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:32 pm The trick, as the R's have learned, is to not tell people they're getting free stuff----you just give it to them, and make them think they "earned" it.
that is indeed the trick. the dems just use a slightly different tack, which it to tell them they are owed it.

Either way, politicians prey upon the baser instincts of your average voter. and they do so successfully.... :roll: :x :(
A different variation of the trick is when congressman/women pleads for reelection so they can go back and fix what is broken. They never mention why they not fix what was broken the previous 2 years. 8-)
RIGHT!

Imagine if o d had 2 years of a fully r controlled Congress. They would pass all of the bills they wanted and he would sign them all.

BUILD THAT WALL!

oh wait...
The late Louise Slaughter... congresswoman from my district in upstate served 16 terms in Congress. The ongoing theme in ever campaign had her proclaiming she had to be re-elected to fix DC. She never did so in 32 years. Damned if she wasn't always on the cusp of getting it fixed. Pour Louise... she cashed in her chips just before the winning hand.
I have zero opinion on your Congresswoman. Just don't know enough.
From the Tenure section of her wikipedia page I did find the following:

During the 112th Congress, the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act, or STOCK Act, which Slaughter first authored and introduced into Congress in 2006[37] – was passed into law.[38] The law prohibits the use of non-public information for private profit, including insider trading by members of Congress and other government employees, and requires many financial transactions by members of Congress to be reported within 45 days.[39]

Gotta like that one right?

Considerable other legislative accomplishments plus some bringing home some pork to Rochester, but the above was what I saw re cleaning up DC.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Slaughter
MD strikes again. Telling us he has no opinion of the congresswoman, and then proceeding to tell us in 700 - 800 characters what the opinion he doesn’t have is. :lol:

Question for ya, MD: Were all your tests at Dartmouth T/F and/or multiple choice? I can’t imagine you EVER finished an essay based test in the allotted time. You must’ve done great with papers, though. I bet you never saw a twenty page paper minimum you didn’t like.
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27072
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

SCLaxAttack wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:14 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:16 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 2:18 pm
CU88 wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 1:55 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:16 pm
HooDat wrote: Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:50 am
a fan wrote: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:32 pm The trick, as the R's have learned, is to not tell people they're getting free stuff----you just give it to them, and make them think they "earned" it.
that is indeed the trick. the dems just use a slightly different tack, which it to tell them they are owed it.

Either way, politicians prey upon the baser instincts of your average voter. and they do so successfully.... :roll: :x :(
A different variation of the trick is when congressman/women pleads for reelection so they can go back and fix what is broken. They never mention why they not fix what was broken the previous 2 years. 8-)
RIGHT!

Imagine if o d had 2 years of a fully r controlled Congress. They would pass all of the bills they wanted and he would sign them all.

BUILD THAT WALL!

oh wait...
The late Louise Slaughter... congresswoman from my district in upstate served 16 terms in Congress. The ongoing theme in ever campaign had her proclaiming she had to be re-elected to fix DC. She never did so in 32 years. Damned if she wasn't always on the cusp of getting it fixed. Pour Louise... she cashed in her chips just before the winning hand.
I have zero opinion on your Congresswoman. Just don't know enough.
From the Tenure section of her wikipedia page I did find the following:

During the 112th Congress, the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act, or STOCK Act, which Slaughter first authored and introduced into Congress in 2006[37] – was passed into law.[38] The law prohibits the use of non-public information for private profit, including insider trading by members of Congress and other government employees, and requires many financial transactions by members of Congress to be reported within 45 days.[39]

Gotta like that one right?

Considerable other legislative accomplishments plus some bringing home some pork to Rochester, but the above was what I saw re cleaning up DC.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Slaughter
MD strikes again. Telling us he has no opinion of the congresswoman, and then proceeding to tell us in 700 - 800 characters what the opinion he doesn’t have is. :lol:

Question for ya, MD: Were all your tests at Dartmouth T/F and/or multiple choice? I can’t imagine you EVER finished an essay based test in the allotted time. You must’ve done great on with papers, though. I bet you never saw a twenty page paper minimum you didn’t like.
:lol:

Funny. I do write quickly, and a lot, never was scared of long papers, much less timed essays.
I hated multiple choice as it rewards memorization rather than thought.

Best course, though, was when I qualified to do a Senior Honors Thesis in Government; the fall semester course for that forced complex, long form assignments to be rewritten again and again from 10+ pages to 5 pages to 1 page. All about synthesis. Much harder than long form.

On the above, I simply don't know enough of the Congresswoman to have a well informed opinion. "zero opinion" was a bit of an overstatement, but I'd certainly not want to suggest I knew enough to be "well informed". I was simply responding to Cradle's specific comment about her, based solely on a quick look at her wikipedia page that was on point. One quote, with a total of 52 words of my own.

Cradle was pretty caustic about her, as I assume she was his Congresswoman and he had a much longer informed view. I bothered to take a look to see if she'd ever done anything to 'clean up DC'. Very little, far as I could tell in 5 quick mins, but at least this one act.

I'll let you know when I have a better informed opinion on a topic.
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27072
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

tech37 wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:05 am https://news.yahoo.com/dr-robert-epstei ... 11657.html

Perhaps the Russians are the least of our worries?

Before any of you resistance warriors roll your eyes and disregard, Epstein is a Clinton-supporting liberal, and not politically motivated.
tech, we've had this discussion before.
Epstein has a personal beef with Google, and his critique is way outside of his own expertise.
His beef showed how ignorant he really is on technology. Discredited.

But it's not as if we shouldn't be concerned about the power these systems could have if manipulated, whether internally or by external forces.
tech37
Posts: 4370
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:02 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by tech37 »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:08 am
tech37 wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:05 am https://news.yahoo.com/dr-robert-epstei ... 11657.html

Perhaps the Russians are the least of our worries?

Before any of you resistance warriors roll your eyes and disregard, Epstein is a Clinton-supporting liberal, and not politically motivated.
tech, we've had this discussion before.
Epstein has a personal beef with Google, and his critique is way outside of his own expertise.
His beef showed how ignorant he really is on technology. Discredited.

But it's not as if we shouldn't be concerned about the power these systems could have if manipulated, whether internally or by external forces.
:roll: Sure, discredited by you and other political hacks. These days they're a dime a dozen.
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 23812
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by Farfromgeneva »

Cradle what about Jack kemp? Spent 9 terms representing WNY, I met numerous times and liked a lot, my father got to know him a bit randomly over the years up there. Is he the same as louise Slaughter?
Now I love those cowboys, I love their gold
Love my uncle, God rest his soul
Taught me good, Lord, taught me all I know
Taught me so well, that I grabbed that gold
I left his dead ass there by the side of the road, yeah
seacoaster
Posts: 8866
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 4:36 pm

Re: 2020 Elections - The Don in Trouble

Post by seacoaster »

Klobuchar in New Hampshire this weekend:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... uld-do-it/

If former vice president Joe Biden is grave in denouncing Trump’s character, Klobuchar is lively and funny. “Donald Trump’s idea of diplomacy is waking up before the sun comes up and sending out a tweet in his bathrobe, extolling the virtues of Kim Jong Un and then before the sun goes down, going after Denmark and Greenland,” she said. “As I said a few weeks ago, what’s the difference between Donald Trump and Greenland? Greenland is not for sale.” She threw in for good measure: “And as your president, Democrats, I will pledge that I will never have my vice president stay in a resort I own. Oh, that’s right. I don’t own a resort.”

And Klobuchar would make it easy for many disgusted Republicans to cross party lines and vote for her.

“As one America, we believe that instead of engaging in vanity trade wars, and adding debt, and giving tax breaks to Big Oil, and alienating our allies, and coddling dictators, we should be a country that makes things and invent things and exports to the world,” she argued. “A country that promotes and unleashes both ideas that lead to shared economic prosperity and ideals as the world’s beacon of democracy that other countries can look up to.”

In an interview after her speech, Klobuchar was certainly upbeat, and why not? She happily pointed to the Concord Monitor front-page headline: “Klobuchar at center stage: Senator defends moderate stance in a year of progressive energy.” She was every bit the no-nonsense senator we saw dismantle Brett M. Kavanaugh at his Supreme Court confirmation hearing.

I asked Klobuchar about reports that a U.S. Air Force crew stayed at Trump’s Scottish resort during a refueling stop at a nearby airport. “It’s wrong, it’s not legal,” she said bluntly. His desire to “make money off people” in the presidency is the basis of the ongoing litigation over Trump’s alleged violation of the emoluments clause of the Constitution, she pointed out.

On the trade issue, Klobuchar said, “I see this president as using these farmers like a bunch of poker chips in one of his bankrupt casinos.” Some of these farmers voted for Trump, but also for her in 2016, she noted. She went on, lambasting him for going “way big” and “way broad” instead of working with allies. She also slammed his incredible inconsistency — threatening sanctions one day, lifting them the next, promising tax cuts and then pulling them off the table. President Xi Jinping of China must be looking at this, she said, and wondering, “What is wrong with this country?” She added that “it really hurts us in our negotiating and in the fact he does not work well with others, with our allies.”

If you squinted just a tad, you really can see a plausible path to the nomination for her. Biden, who is testing whether enthusiasm is a necessity in a presidential primary, is beloved but compares poorly at times to more dynamic speakers, and that includes Klobuchar. If voters drift off, or if he finishes poorly in Iowa and New Hampshire, the moderate contingent of the party will look around. She may be the only one meeting that description and still standing at that point. If so, Democrats would find out the benefits of occupying the segment of the electorate from center-left to center-right."
Post Reply

Return to “POLITICS”