From these posts, I assumed something had actually happened on this. I googled her name but found nothing new.old salt wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 2:36 pmMaybe DoJ has not released it yet, possibly waiting for the IG or Durham's reports, or we don't know where to look.foreverlax wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 2:21 pmHow come we can't read it? Not on line?old salt wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 2:09 pmThat's what she wrote to Nunes, saying she was forwarding her report to DoJ.foreverlax wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 2:04 pmNot sure how this supports your point in red.old salt wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 1:39 pmforeverlax wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 1:19 pmHow would the writer know that?old salt wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 12:49 pmPrescient indeed. Here's the plot line for the sequel :tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 5:19 am https://www.realclearpolitics.com/artic ... 40493.html
A prescient article...You want safeguards against the abuse of FISA ? Hold the abusers accountable....the real subversion of justice was committed by the Obama administration’s DoJ, FBI, and intelligence agencies, both in their investigations of Trump and in whitewashing the email case against Hillary Clinton. Attorney General William Barr is already looking into those charges, as are DoJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz and U.S. Attorneys John Durham and John Huber. The chief judge of the secret intelligence courts, Rosemary Collyer, has already delivered a report to DoJ saying that the court was not given full, truthful information in warrant applications.
These investigations could burgeon into a catastrophic scandal, involving not only leaking, lying, and illicit spying but possibly collusion by U.S. government agencies to affect the outcome of an election. We don’t know that yet, and we don’t know the role the Obama White House played, but we need to know.
...same with the leakers of classified info.https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fisa ... rveillance
President Trump allowed the release of the report in it's unredacted form
"Before 2018, the Court had never received a request from Congress for documents related to any specific FISA application. Thus, your requests — and others I have recently received from Congress — present novel and significant questions," Collyer wrote in her letter to Nunes.
Trump subsequently allowed the release of the report in it's unredacted form.
That does not make the fact that it exists, classified information.
The articles you link to are from way back, and there's nada since, far as I can tell.
If you're correct that Trump has ordered any such, including what she sent to DOJ, to be unclassified (where's that citation?), then presumably it's not been released because it doesn't actually help Trump. That's certainly my starting point, not the opposite!
But I could be all wet and something's actually happened...if so, please cite it.