.. ...I knew nothing about Acosta until he became the scapegoat in this sordid affair.foreverlax wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 8:35 amWhen did you become a defender of Acosta?old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 10:13 pmDetermining how much damage was done after the plea deal is not casting doubt on how much of a slime Epstein is.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 9:56 pm Seems to me we reach a new low when we try to cast doubt on just how much of a slime a guy like Epstein is.
And I’m puzzled as to why.
Is it simply that because Acosta was appointed by Trump that he needs to be defended from criticism?
Really? No on here in the least bit thinks that Acosta is the lone bad actor in this sorry affair. We want them all to be held accountable.
But will Acosta flip on those who leaned on him back then, or is he still scared to buck the powerful or enticed by the rewards of ‘loyalty ‘.
If he doesn’t flip, Epstein or his employees may well go first.
It's determining how much actual damage, if any, Acosta enabled.
Why is there more media attention on Acosta than on Epstein & his powerful enablers ?
What makes Acosta a "bad actor"? Did he do something illegal or just go along to get along ?
Was it before or after the trial?
Did you like him more or less after the trial?
So many questions...
I heard of Epstein back when the Lolita Express flight manifests hit the internet, but were ignored by the MSM,
That's why I'm amused at the % of MSM attention focused on Acosta as opposed to Epstein.
Anybody seen George & Katie's reportage on this story ?