How do you not understand this?youthathletics wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 7:20 pmWhat does a private citizen supporting a candidate have to do with the argument you were originally making, that X is now the same as Twitter under Dorsey, just different party?a fan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 6:50 pmYou're not refuting my point: do you care about the owner of twitter working to directly install Trump into power?youthathletics wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 5:03 pm I was originally responding to the single line item that what Musk is doing is different than what Dorsey, Zuck, and Google were doing.
When twitter was owned by Dorsey, you LOST IT when you thought the government was involved in influencing their operations.
Now that Musk owns it, YouthA no longer cares that the government (Trump in a few months) is involved in influencing their operations.
You're being a hypocrite, and you know it. Want me to pull up your past posts? Remember when you claimed twitter was " a town square"?
Now you don't care.
Same company, different owner, yet you demand that the old owner, Dorsey have nothing to do with the government....yet now here in 2024, you've forgotten your past outrage, and no longer care if twitter and the government are in bed together.
Pretty simple stuff, YA. You telling us that you wouldn't have flipped out if Dorsey and Zuck had shown up on stage with Biden?? Come on.
----------------
The part you are confused by, I think........ is that I'm fine with both Dorsey and Musk doing whatever the F they want with their company. Listen to the .gov.......don't listen to the .gov.....take your pick, I don't care. They can do whatever the F they want, this is America.
Dude. Zuck CHOSE to do that. It's HIS CHOICE, no matter how much you whine about it.youthathletics wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 5:03 pmAnd to add insult to injury, when people were making those claims "that the the So now you are defining tinfoilhatnonsense as proven email correspondence from Federal employees to Social Media owners, and Zuck openly admitting he followed their requests. Cmon man.
The government can ask you to slap your wife. Are you telling me that you don't understand that you don't, in fact, have to slap your wife if government asks you to slap her?
Why is this SO hard for you and, in this case, FoxNation to understand? The .gov can ask you to do ANYTHING. in what f'ing world do you think this is the same thing as FORCING you????? Come on. You're WAY too smart for this.
The .gov warned about Russian interference for the 2016 election. One result? The WaPo refused-----refused-----to run the Steele Dossier because, like Giuliani's nonsense laptop claim, they couldn't confirm the facts in the Dossier.
Did you and your buds get mad at the Obama Admin. for warning the press about Russian disinformation, and then seeing the WaPo refuse to print the contents of the Steele Dossier?
F no!!! Not only did you not complain about the government asking the press to pay the F attention to unverifiable stories, you didn't even freaking notice? Now why is that?
For the same reason you always "forget to complain".....it was because Hillary wasn't your guy. So you didn't complain when the WaPo killed a story that could have helped her win the election.