I'm really tired of this so I'll get right to the point: it's disingenuous to post that link as if it's non-partisan and something other than what it actually is. The first thing that comes to mind just like this was Vance's response to if he was for a national abortion law, to which he responded he wouldn't be for that, but would be for a national law that would put limits on state laws. For those of you easily gaslighted, that's the same as a national abortion bill.NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2024 3:48 pmYou didn't think a video titled "JUST IN: Josh Hawley Explodes At Mayorkas Over App He Says Helps Illegal Immigrants Enter US" would be seen as partisan?youthathletics wrote: ↑Wed Oct 02, 2024 3:13 pmI did not perceive or even consider that video would be seen as partisan, at all, when the goal is document an APP existed. I went to youtube, typed "Border APP", and inserted the first thing that showed up, When I saw it had Mayorkas talking about it, I knew there would be no ambiguity that the APP was a real thing, rather than using a cite from elsewhere that could have been seen as trash or leaning a certain way.
Go to your Youtube, and in the search bar, type "Border App".
I should have known...only you, would insert a partisan response.
People that hide behind "I'm not for Trump but I agree with his policies" are as opaque as ultraclear glass. I'm not buying what they're selling.