WP giving auto industry cover. They are bailing on EV…(I personally prefer plug in hybrid but not taking a stupid short position against EV like you obviously have)old salt wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 5:56 pmLook at the total content of the WP Opinion section & tell me which way it's slanted & who it advantages.a fan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 5:15 pmRight. No matter what, you're all set with your claims. Neat. If outlets don't do exactly what you want, well obviously they're biased and corrupt. Btw.....folks read the Times online by and large. There is no such thing as "a back page".old salt wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 4:05 pmThat means it's tucked on 1/2 of a back page. It's not in the News section & it's just one piece in the Opinion section.a fan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 3:59 pmRight. That means that it's not criticism.old salt wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 3:48 pmThat's an editorial.a fan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2024 11:06 am Here's that rotten ol' WaPo, giving Kamala a pass today, Old Salt.
Want help with your excuses as to how this "doesn't count" as criticism of Kamala?
The times demand serious economic ideas. Harris supplies gimmicks.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... -gimmicks/
Why Isn't Kamala Harris Giving Interviews
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/08/busi ... views.html
I can do this all day. You're simply wrong. Always have been with your claims. Stories everywhere about Kamala dodging interviews.
Now what? They're doing as you ask.
It's their obligatory complaint, as supposedly unbiased journalists. It does not impact their overall favorable & supportive coverage & slant on Harris & the Dems.
You know: I can play this same game with your claims that Fox is asking Biden to resign, right?
"Oh, that's just one one host, and it's not in the news cycle"
You're smart enough to know this is a stupid line of thinking.
Or am I to assume that it's yet another coincidence that you're parroting yet another FoxNation talking point: "Media is biased for Dems; Hunter's laptop is SO serious; election fraud; Deep State" etc. etc.
Should I just add this to the pile of FoxNonsense that you don't REALLY believe, and are trying to sell as a original thought from Old Salt?
Even when talking about EV setbacks, they claim it's just a temporary retrenchment & that they will prevail.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/columns/
https://www.spglobal.com/mobility/en/to ... 3.5%20tons).