jhu06 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 28, 2024 5:04 pm
51 has crushed the roster sizes for years. Big day for him. I think the 07 class of schwartzman et al had 9 or 10 members total in it.
Not a big day - Don't pretend to understand alot of it and I have to believe more litigation is to follow. The first kid told by Corrigan/Lars/Tillman/Pete etc. there's no room at the inn because of the roster limits may very well have parents that can stroke the check for college and are attorneys or know quite a few.
FInd it interesting - and I understand of course it is not a lacrosse specific issue - but none of the lacrosse sites are covering this yet. Don't see anything on IL/US Lax Magazine/Lacrosse Bucket etc.[
quote=nyjay post_id=572717 time=1722217196 user_id=1207]
Maybe this is a dumb question, but are scholarships actually "funded"? I mean the marginal cost of one additional student (room and board excepted, which themselves probably have a greater than 50% margin baked in) is basically zero, so why do we think there is some source of funds (i.e. endowment) actually paying the "tuition"?
[/quote]
I would think there has to be ny - otherwise if you could just nod you head and put forth "Wink Wink Say No More" the amount of abuse (in football) would have been rampant. I seem to recall - at the end of Petro's term when Hopkins was penalized for some minor financial aid violations - the major one was around timing and decisions of renewing schalarships but there was also this - what seemed silly at the time - "Additionally, a clerical error led to both programs exceeding the maximum team scholarship limits by a slight amount." This was tied to some figures about what was spent for textbooks IIRC. So it seems there is some accounting of funds out - so logical to think they need to see funds in.