Slow your roll there, cowboy. How many times have you told me you were a D1 coach when you criticized my opinions? Well, the shoe is on the other foot here. I'm retired now, but I practiced civil litigation for many decades. "Game of chicken"? "Rarely about the truth?" "It’s a gross world we live in (civil litigation)." Complete baloney.LaxPundit07 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:06 am Civil litigation, or the threat of a lawsuit, is almost always a game of chicken. Who is willing to take it further? It’s rarely about the truth. Which is why civil litigation rarely ends up in an actual court room. For instance, KT has this affair which is completely against the rules. But she feels discriminated against because her affair is with a woman. She threatens Syracuse for the lawsuit. Syracuse says you broke all the rules in our handbook, we had every right to fire you. KT’s lawyers say OK, but what about these text messages we have from one of your employees using a homophobic slur? Would you like that going public? Etc. etc. etc. back-and-forth until settlement is reached because it’s not good for either party for the dirty laundry to go public. And that is my point. Like Allen Iverson said, “ain’t nobody squeaky clean.” It’s a gross world we live in (civil litigation). But it doesn’t mean it’s not real.
As to this particular case, you don't know all the relevant facts. I don't know all the relevant facts. If or when all the relevant facts come out and if or when there is a lawsuit, then you can get back to me with your opinions about this case. Your speculation is just that: speculation. Basically worthless.
I agree with you there.