Sotomayor's SEAL Team 6 example. Did she really put that in her opinion ?
She's a fool. She insulted some of our most courageous, selfless defenders.
She's running scared from the panicked Dem mob who want to push her out before Biden's term ends.
SCOTUS
Re: SCOTUS
Last edited by old salt on Tue Jul 02, 2024 7:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
- cradleandshoot
- Posts: 15517
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm
Re: SCOTUS
+1 Sotomayor has been a loyal and faithful liberal democrat. Her reward is now being thrown under the bus. You FLP folks should be so very proud of yourselves right now.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
Bob Ross:
Re: SCOTUS
The specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
"The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog." - Calvin, to Hobbes
Re: SCOTUS
The original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
- youthathletics
- Posts: 15930
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm
Re: SCOTUS
You guys crack me up. SO if the DC Court of Appeals rejected, why would a SCOTUS judge even broach the topic?Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:21 amThe original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
-
- Posts: 5326
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am
Re: SCOTUS
She brought it up because it was a widely used hypothetical in the course of the court hearings, both at the DC Circuit and the Supreme Court. She brought it up because it is an excellent hypothetical for limning the reach of an immunity doctrine. The activity -- tasking armed service members to remove what is, in the President's judgment, a clear and present danger to the country -- is plainly "official" in any strict sense and derives directly from the President's enumerated powers under Article II.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
Moreover, no one using the hypothetical insulted or meant to insult any of "our most courageous defenders." This was only and solely about the President's potential use/misuse of his powers through the deployment of those courageous defenders.
For such a well-educated (on our dime) person, you really are as stupid as a peach pit.
-
- Posts: 5326
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am
Re: SCOTUS
See my response to the gaslighting dog walker.youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:49 amYou guys crack me up. SO if the DC Court of Appeals rejected, why would a SCOTUS judge even broach the topic?Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:21 amThe original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
Re: SCOTUS
Orange Fatso appealed their decision to SCOTUS. What planet are you on?youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:49 amYou guys crack me up. SO if the DC Court of Appeals rejected, why would a SCOTUS judge even broach the topic?Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:21 amThe original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
-
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 10:24 pm
Re: SCOTUS
I feel sorry for whoever succeeds VADM Frank Bradley as commander of JSOC. That person may likely be the one who decides if a Trump order to deploy DEVGRU is a legal order given SCOTUS’ cowardly ruling that purposely leads to a need for interpretation.Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:59 amOrange Fatso appealed their decision to SCOTUS. What planet are you on?youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:49 amYou guys crack me up. SO if the DC Court of Appeals rejected, why would a SCOTUS judge even broach the topic?Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:21 amThe original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:35 pm
Re: SCOTUS
Biden is a pedophile who raped his own daughter among countless others with video and photographic evidence. You support rape, incest and peodphilia, like a good Democrat.NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 12:44 amHappy Biden has immunity Tuesday!LaxFan2311 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 12:05 am“End of Quote”NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 11:46 pmYou just can't cope my man! Facts don't care about your feelings seeing how the violence was coming from inside the White House on J6. Not surprised that you support the murder of Trump, Pence, Biden, Fox News Hosts and all non-"pure-bloods" who got vaxxed.LaxFan2311 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 11:36 pm Ashli Babbitt, a Trump supporter was the only one to die that day. She was murdered by a police officer. But not surprised you support the murder of Trump. You're really bad at being a troll. DMac is the most deranged, followed by white neighborhood living, a fan and then you. Seacoaster is up there as well. Oh I forgot about njbill. MDLax can’t handle the truth either. So many TDS sufferers on this forum. J6 was a museum tour compared to the BLM terrorist riots. BLM is a racist, scam organization. Did you donate to them? Maybe ask for your $ back. Your wokeness knows no bounds.
Friendly reminder that you're in love with a Dirty-Blood guy who loses all the time. And who personally calls for violence when he loses. You really gotta step up your game my man. The act has gotten stale and boring and repetitive. It's like watching a standup do the same hour 4 years later. Andy Dick's got nothing on you!
Keep the personal insults coming though, they're exciting, they really get the people going! Go Seminoles! Oooh, this is fun, keep going!
Why do you support vaxxed "dirty-blood" accused Pedophile voter fraud candidates like Trump? You're supporting the stuff we're supposed to hate!
We need new standup content! Stop with the old stuff, it's boring!
Make America End of Quote Again!
Looks like Biden is truly the real Orange Man Bad!
“End Quote”
RIP a fan (8/30/24)
Cause of death: Violent Illegal Venezuelan gangs let into this country and his home by the Democrats and Kamala Harris.
Fondly remembered for being a troll, suffering from TDS and having keyboard diarrhea.
Cause of death: Violent Illegal Venezuelan gangs let into this country and his home by the Democrats and Kamala Harris.
Fondly remembered for being a troll, suffering from TDS and having keyboard diarrhea.
Re: SCOTUS
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:53 amShe brought it up because it was a widely used hypothetical in the course of the court hearings, both at the DC Circuit and the Supreme Court. She brought it up because it is an excellent hypothetical for limning the reach of an immunity doctrine. The activity -- tasking armed service members to remove what is, in the President's judgment, a clear and present danger to the country -- is plainly "official" in any strict sense and derives directly from the President's enumerated powers under Article II.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
Moreover, no one using the hypothetical insulted or meant to insult any of "our most courageous defenders." This was only and solely about the President's potential use/misuse of his powers through the deployment of those courageous defenders.
For such a well-educated (on our dime) person, you really are as stupid as a peach pit.
So what ? It was irrational, insulting hyperbole when first asserted in the DC Court.Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:21 amThe original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
Sotomayor made it her own words when she irresponsibly repeated it in her dissent. FTR.
She's stating that a President may now do it. She is now a joke in Supreme Court history.
No need to cast aspersions on our military, implying they would carry out such an unlawful order.
It demonstrates how sick & paranoid you hysterical Dems are.
Re: SCOTUS
...VADM Bradley will have the problem sooner than that. If anyone issues such an unlawful order, it will be from CiNC Biden -- target = candidate Trump, now that Biden's lawfare campaign has imploded. Biden has tried everything else.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:24 amI feel sorry for whoever succeeds VADM Frank Bradley as commander of JSOC. That person may likely be the one who decides if a Trump order to deploy DEVGRU is a legal order given SCOTUS’ cowardly ruling that purposely leads to a need for interpretation.Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:59 amOrange Fatso appealed their decision to SCOTUS. What planet are you on?youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:49 amYou guys crack me up. SO if the DC Court of Appeals rejected, why would a SCOTUS judge even broach the topic?Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:21 amThe original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
Re: SCOTUS
Trolling. Go to the Box.LaxFan2311 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:34 am Biden is a pedophile who raped his own daughter among countless others with video and photographic evidence. You support rape, incest and peodphilia, like a good Democrat.
Looks like Biden is truly the real Orange Man Bad!
“End Quote”
-
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 10:24 pm
Re: SCOTUS
I've been more cautious than some others in my assessment of comments you've made in the most recent years, but this one has cemented my opinion. Yep, you're full on MAGA. Your comments for being for the man's policies, but not the man, are a complete smoke screen.old salt wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:04 am...VADM Bradley will have the problem sooner than that. If anyone issues such an unlawful order, it will be from CiNC Biden -- target = candidate Trump, now that Biden's lawfare campaign has imploded. Biden has tried everything else.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:24 amI feel sorry for whoever succeeds VADM Frank Bradley as commander of JSOC. That person may likely be the one who decides if a Trump order to deploy DEVGRU is a legal order given SCOTUS’ cowardly ruling that purposely leads to a need for interpretation.Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:59 amOrange Fatso appealed their decision to SCOTUS. What planet are you on?youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:49 amYou guys crack me up. SO if the DC Court of Appeals rejected, why would a SCOTUS judge even broach the topic?Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:21 amThe original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
Re: SCOTUS
GIve me a choice better than Trump & I'll enthusiastically support him or her, whether (D) or (R). Biden is no longer a viable option.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:37 amI've been more cautious than some others in my assessment of comments you've made in the most recent years, but this one has cemented my opinion. Yep, you're full on MAGA. Your comments for being for the man's policies, but not the man, are a complete smoke screen.old salt wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:04 am...VADM Bradley will have the problem sooner than that. If anyone issues such an unlawful order, it will be from CiNC Biden -- target = candidate Trump, now that Biden's lawfare campaign has imploded. Biden has tried everything else.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:24 amI feel sorry for whoever succeeds VADM Frank Bradley as commander of JSOC. That person may likely be the one who decides if a Trump order to deploy DEVGRU is a legal order given SCOTUS’ cowardly ruling that purposely leads to a need for interpretation.Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:59 amOrange Fatso appealed their decision to SCOTUS. What planet are you on?youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:49 amYou guys crack me up. SO if the DC Court of Appeals rejected, why would a SCOTUS judge even broach the topic?Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:21 amThe original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
-
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 10:24 pm
Re: SCOTUS
At least you're acknowledging your opinion that legal is higher in your order of importance than moral. I just wish the CinC could be charged under UCMJ. Trump would have been court martialed in year one. Heck, never would have made it into the position.old salt wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:41 amGIve me a choice better than Trump & I'll enthusiastically support him or her, whether (D) or (R). Biden is no longer a viable option.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:37 amthe position.I've been more cautious than some others in my assessment of comments you've made in the most recent years, but this one has cemented my opinion. Yep, you're full on MAGA. Your comments for being for the man's policies, but not the man, are a complete smoke screen.old salt wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:04 am...VADM Bradley will have the problem sooner than that. If anyone issues such an unlawful order, it will be from CiNC Biden -- target = candidate Trump, now that Biden's lawfare campaign has imploded. Biden has tried everything else.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:24 amI feel sorry for whoever succeeds VADM Frank Bradley as commander of JSOC. That person may likely be the one who decides if a Trump order to deploy DEVGRU is a legal order given SCOTUS’ cowardly ruling that purposely leads to a need for interpretation.Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:59 amOrange Fatso appealed their decision to SCOTUS. What planet are you on?youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:49 amYou guys crack me up. SO if the DC Court of Appeals rejected, why would a SCOTUS judge even broach the topic?Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:21 amThe original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
-
- Posts: 6384
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm
Re: SCOTUS
It's not likely to come from the Democrats.old salt wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:41 amGIve me a choice better than Trump & I'll enthusiastically support him or her, whether (D) or (R). Biden is no longer a viable option.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:37 amI've been more cautious than some others in my assessment of comments you've made in the most recent years, but this one has cemented my opinion. Yep, you're full on MAGA. Your comments for being for the man's policies, but not the man, are a complete smoke screen.old salt wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:04 am...VADM Bradley will have the problem sooner than that. If anyone issues such an unlawful order, it will be from CiNC Biden -- target = candidate Trump, now that Biden's lawfare campaign has imploded. Biden has tried everything else.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:24 amI feel sorry for whoever succeeds VADM Frank Bradley as commander of JSOC. That person may likely be the one who decides if a Trump order to deploy DEVGRU is a legal order given SCOTUS’ cowardly ruling that purposely leads to a need for interpretation.Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:59 amOrange Fatso appealed their decision to SCOTUS. What planet are you on?youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:49 amYou guys crack me up. SO if the DC Court of Appeals rejected, why would a SCOTUS judge even broach the topic?Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:21 amThe original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-j ... in-1919531
Re: SCOTUS
On that we agree, but I'm not sure we want a military junta in charge.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:49 amAt least you're acknowledging your opinion that legal is higher in your order of importance than moral. I just wish the CinC could be charged under UCMJ. Trump would have been court martialed in year one. Heck, never would have made it into the position.old salt wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:41 amGIve me a choice better than Trump & I'll enthusiastically support him or her, whether (D) or (R). Biden is no longer a viable option.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:37 amthe position.I've been more cautious than some others in my assessment of comments you've made in the most recent years, but this one has cemented my opinion. Yep, you're full on MAGA. Your comments for being for the man's policies, but not the man, are a complete smoke screen.old salt wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 10:04 am...VADM Bradley will have the problem sooner than that. If anyone issues such an unlawful order, it will be from CiNC Biden -- target = candidate Trump, now that Biden's lawfare campaign has imploded. Biden has tried everything else.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:24 amI feel sorry for whoever succeeds VADM Frank Bradley as commander of JSOC. That person may likely be the one who decides if a Trump order to deploy DEVGRU is a legal order given SCOTUS’ cowardly ruling that purposely leads to a need for interpretation.Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:59 amOrange Fatso appealed their decision to SCOTUS. What planet are you on?youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:49 amYou guys crack me up. SO if the DC Court of Appeals rejected, why would a SCOTUS judge even broach the topic?Kismet wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:21 amThe original question was posed by the DC Court of Appeals....and they REJECTED IT OUTRIGHT as criminal activity and no immunity.dislaxxic wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:08 amThe specific example WAS BROUGHT UP IN ORAL ARGUEMENT BEFORE THE SCOTUS as you well know. Donald Trump is a despicable human being who mused in meetings about "why can't we shoot illegals in the legs" as they try to cross the border. Moronic support of him and his notions of governing are SERIOUSLY gonna start a civil war at this point...
Numbnuts
..
If I recall correctly, there were CRICKETS at the time from Salty Gaslight .
Troll on Saltine.
Having been inside, I take great comfort from, & have great confidence in, the Hatch Act.
Down through history, a lot of people have died defending what they believe to be moral causes.
I joined a defense force, not the Knights Templar.