Just caught up with this thread. The trolling became quite ridiculous.
Syracuse is a lacrosse 'brand' but Hopkins isn't??
Taking nothing away from Syracuse, which has a storied history as well, but it ain't close.
The refs were on the take???
Idiocy.
This is intentional trolling. See it as such.
This part of the forum is intended for serious, civil discussions of lax topics.
Some humor is appreciated, but not trolling.
QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27108
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
-
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 7:38 pm
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
I'm not trolling. I'm calling for an NCAA investigation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:14 am Just caught up with this thread. The trolling became quite ridiculous.
Syracuse is a lacrosse 'brand' but Hopkins isn't??
Taking nothing away from Syracuse, which has a storied history as well, but it ain't close.
The refs were on the take???
Idiocy.
This is intentional trolling. See it as such.
This part of the forum is intended for serious, civil discussions of lax topics.
Some humor is appreciated, but not trolling.
They are supposed to respond to posts on social media.
The integrity of the sport is at stake.
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27108
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Sagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:24 amI'm not trolling. I'm calling for an NCAA investigation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:14 am Just caught up with this thread. The trolling became quite ridiculous.
Syracuse is a lacrosse 'brand' but Hopkins isn't??
Taking nothing away from Syracuse, which has a storied history as well, but it ain't close.
The refs were on the take???
Idiocy.
This is intentional trolling. See it as such.
This part of the forum is intended for serious, civil discussions of lax topics.
Some humor is appreciated, but not trolling.
They are supposed to respond to posts on social media.
The integrity of the sport is at stake.
-
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2019 7:38 pm
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Minimization won't work here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:26 amSagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:24 amI'm not trolling. I'm calling for an NCAA investigation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:14 am Just caught up with this thread. The trolling became quite ridiculous.
Syracuse is a lacrosse 'brand' but Hopkins isn't??
Taking nothing away from Syracuse, which has a storied history as well, but it ain't close.
The refs were on the take???
Idiocy.
This is intentional trolling. See it as such.
This part of the forum is intended for serious, civil discussions of lax topics.
Some humor is appreciated, but not trolling.
They are supposed to respond to posts on social media.
The integrity of the sport is at stake.
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27108
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Your satire is likely lost on those who didn't get it.Sagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:31 amMinimization won't work here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:26 amSagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:24 amI'm not trolling. I'm calling for an NCAA investigation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:14 am Just caught up with this thread. The trolling became quite ridiculous.
Syracuse is a lacrosse 'brand' but Hopkins isn't??
Taking nothing away from Syracuse, which has a storied history as well, but it ain't close.
The refs were on the take???
Idiocy.
This is intentional trolling. See it as such.
This part of the forum is intended for serious, civil discussions of lax topics.
Some humor is appreciated, but not trolling.
They are supposed to respond to posts on social media.
The integrity of the sport is at stake.
The trolling was off the hook dumb.
I suggest we move on. Those posters or perhaps single poster will likely use other aliases next time, as we'll recall them from this one.
Definitely not actual UVA fans, as Blue Angels noted.
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Agreed, I'm disappointed i wasted time in responding and have already stopped directly after I said I would in this thread. Already reported their aliases and over the line trolling attempts. I encourage others to do the same when they encounter this person.blue angels wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 7:08 amWhy do you even respond? He/she is baiting you and laughing their ass off. I am not convinced one of them is actually a Virginia fan either. Though there was lot's of sloppy play and mistakes made on both sides, this HOP/Virginia game had 2 teams leave it all on the field. Let's remember it for that and let this thread die it's natural death. Personally, I think most lacrosse fans think it's great to see HOP return to being a relevant competitor for the title again.... Denying that, is just false.norcalhop wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 12:33 am Hooz:
"LOL this is so poetic. A hopkins fan coping with his "quarter final" appearance as relevant. lol my oh my have you fallen off a freaking cliff. Can you even imagine this 20 years ago?"
blx:
"LOL. This is what Hopkins has come to? The glory days are long gone… 2024 celebrating a big 10 regular season conference title? And quarter final appearances back to back years? YIKES."
Couldn't be.
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Hopkins can't fix Baltimore's myriad problems, but let's not pretend the co-eds at Duke are attractive. Everyone knows you have to travel to Chapel Hill for those.blx9 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 12:12 am LOL. This is what Hopkins has come to? The glory days are long gone… 2024 celebrating a big 10 regular season conference title? And quarter final appearances back to back years? YIKES.
Why any top recruits commit to JHU is beyond me unless they’re from the area, played top MIAA and grew up going to games at Homewood/want to stay close to home. Or if they’re legacy. That city is a sht hole and when programs/schools like Duke and UVA exist why not go there and be around attractive co-eds, actually compete for championship weekend/nat’l championships every year and get a degree from a top school on Earth
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2024 4:50 pm
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Hopkins and Cuse are in pretty much the same boat on the field. The difference is at one, you head to a respectable white collar job after, and the other, you manage a lacrosse unlimited in Elmira.Hooz123 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 8:45 amFWIW, from my vantage point, most lacrosse fans generally would like to see the full reemergence of Syracuse, for example. Cuse just feels like an iconic brand name, for so many reasons Hopkins just, isn't... Hopkins is Hopkins, but it doesn't resonate as much, especially with younger fans. For the most part, people don't really care either way. I know that is impossible for you to fathom outside of your Hopkin echo chamber, but it's true. National footprint and recognition, casuals don't care about Hopkins (and you know it).blue angels wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 7:08 amWhy do you even respond? He/she is baiting you and laughing their ass off. I am not convinced one of them is actually a Virginia fan either. Though there was lot's of sloppy play and mistakes made on both sides, this HOP/Virginia game had 2 teams leave it all on the field. Let's remember it for that and let this thread die it's natural death. Personally, I think most lacrosse fans think it's great to see HOP return to being a relevant competitor for the title again.... Denying that, is just false.norcalhop wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 12:33 am Hooz:
"LOL this is so poetic. A hopkins fan coping with his "quarter final" appearance as relevant. lol my oh my have you fallen off a freaking cliff. Can you even imagine this 20 years ago?"
blx:
"LOL. This is what Hopkins has come to? The glory days are long gone… 2024 celebrating a big 10 regular season conference title? And quarter final appearances back to back years? YIKES."
Couldn't be.
And for the record, I don't know who blx is. Hilarious actually, but no, not me.
-
- Posts: 6688
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:00 pm
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Been extremely busy with work this past week.
Did I miss anything?
DocBarrister
Did I miss anything?
DocBarrister
@DocBarrister
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Some forums have IP bans. Would be a good tool to employ here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:44 amYour satire is likely lost on those who didn't get it.Sagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:31 amMinimization won't work here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:26 amSagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:24 amI'm not trolling. I'm calling for an NCAA investigation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:14 am Just caught up with this thread. The trolling became quite ridiculous.
Syracuse is a lacrosse 'brand' but Hopkins isn't??
Taking nothing away from Syracuse, which has a storied history as well, but it ain't close.
The refs were on the take???
Idiocy.
This is intentional trolling. See it as such.
This part of the forum is intended for serious, civil discussions of lax topics.
Some humor is appreciated, but not trolling.
They are supposed to respond to posts on social media.
The integrity of the sport is at stake.
The trolling was off the hook dumb.
I suggest we move on. Those posters or perhaps single poster will likely use other aliases next time, as we'll recall them from this one.
Definitely not actual UVA fans, as Blue Angels noted.
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Seriously, when is the last time a Hopkins team had six failed clears in a half? It’s possibly a first! D1 teams clear at a rate of 85% or better .DocBarrister wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 7:57 pm Been extremely busy with work this past week.
Did I miss anything?
DocBarrister
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Seriously, when is the last time a Hopkins team had six failed clears in a half? It’s possibly a first! D1 teams clear at a rate of 85% or better .DocBarrister wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 7:57 pm Been extremely busy with work this past week.
Did I miss anything?
DocBarrister
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Did you miss the 1st round where UVa cleared 65% for the game? Any team can have a down game. It can just happen more frequently in the tournament when it's one and done with nerves on the line.Mr3Putt wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 4:15 amSeriously, when is the last time a Hopkins team had six failed clears in a half? It’s possibly a first! D1 teams clear at a rate of 85% or better .DocBarrister wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 7:57 pm Been extremely busy with work this past week.
Did I miss anything?
DocBarrister
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
The difference in the two games is Hopkins had 25 turnovers plus the 6 failed clears vs Denver . Difficult to overcome, even if the field is painted light blue.norcalhop wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 4:50 amDid you miss the 1st round where UVa cleared 65% for the game? Any team can have a down game. It can just happen more frequently in the tournament when it's one and done with nerves on the line.Mr3Putt wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 4:15 amSeriously, when is the last time a Hopkins team had six failed clears in a half? It’s possibly a first! D1 teams clear at a rate of 85% or better .DocBarrister wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 7:57 pm Been extremely busy with work this past week.
Did I miss anything?
DocBarrister
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Only problem...the so-called moderator on here may have several aliasesnorcalhop wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 11:10 pmSome forums have IP bans. Would be a good tool to employ here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:44 amYour satire is likely lost on those who didn't get it.Sagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:31 amMinimization won't work here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:26 amSagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:24 amI'm not trolling. I'm calling for an NCAA investigation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:14 am Just caught up with this thread. The trolling became quite ridiculous.
Syracuse is a lacrosse 'brand' but Hopkins isn't??
Taking nothing away from Syracuse, which has a storied history as well, but it ain't close.
The refs were on the take???
Idiocy.
This is intentional trolling. See it as such.
This part of the forum is intended for serious, civil discussions of lax topics.
Some humor is appreciated, but not trolling.
They are supposed to respond to posts on social media.
The integrity of the sport is at stake.
The trolling was off the hook dumb.
I suggest we move on. Those posters or perhaps single poster will likely use other aliases next time, as we'll recall them from this one.
Definitely not actual UVA fans, as Blue Angels noted.
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
I don’t get the obsession here. I’m not a “fake” UVa fan. Do you realize how insane you sound? Screw hop. Put Morris between the pipes, Nunes hasn’t earned anything. Go hoos wahoowa.tech37 wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 7:15 amOnly problem...the so-called moderator on here may have several aliasesnorcalhop wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 11:10 pmSome forums have IP bans. Would be a good tool to employ here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:44 amYour satire is likely lost on those who didn't get it.Sagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:31 amMinimization won't work here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:26 amSagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:24 amI'm not trolling. I'm calling for an NCAA investigation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:14 am Just caught up with this thread. The trolling became quite ridiculous.
Syracuse is a lacrosse 'brand' but Hopkins isn't??
Taking nothing away from Syracuse, which has a storied history as well, but it ain't close.
The refs were on the take???
Idiocy.
This is intentional trolling. See it as such.
This part of the forum is intended for serious, civil discussions of lax topics.
Some humor is appreciated, but not trolling.
They are supposed to respond to posts on social media.
The integrity of the sport is at stake.
The trolling was off the hook dumb.
I suggest we move on. Those posters or perhaps single poster will likely use other aliases next time, as we'll recall them from this one.
Definitely not actual UVA fans, as Blue Angels noted.
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27108
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
There is absolutely nothing in your behavior that suggests that you actually root for UVA.Hooz123 wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 9:00 amI don’t get the obsession here. I’m not a “fake” UVa fan. Do you realize how insane you sound? Screw hop. Put Morris between the pipes, Nunes hasn’t earned anything. Go hoos wahoowa.tech37 wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 7:15 amOnly problem...the so-called moderator on here may have several aliasesnorcalhop wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 11:10 pmSome forums have IP bans. Would be a good tool to employ here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:44 amYour satire is likely lost on those who didn't get it.Sagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:31 amMinimization won't work here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:26 amSagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:24 amI'm not trolling. I'm calling for an NCAA investigation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:14 am Just caught up with this thread. The trolling became quite ridiculous.
Syracuse is a lacrosse 'brand' but Hopkins isn't??
Taking nothing away from Syracuse, which has a storied history as well, but it ain't close.
The refs were on the take???
Idiocy.
This is intentional trolling. See it as such.
This part of the forum is intended for serious, civil discussions of lax topics.
Some humor is appreciated, but not trolling.
They are supposed to respond to posts on social media.
The integrity of the sport is at stake.
The trolling was off the hook dumb.
I suggest we move on. Those posters or perhaps single poster will likely use other aliases next time, as we'll recall them from this one.
Definitely not actual UVA fans, as Blue Angels noted.
Re: QF #3 Hopkins vs #6 Virginia Sunday @2:30
Clown post. Git gud go hoosMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 10:39 amThere is absolutely nothing in your behavior that suggests that you actually root for UVA.Hooz123 wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 9:00 amI don’t get the obsession here. I’m not a “fake” UVa fan. Do you realize how insane you sound? Screw hop. Put Morris between the pipes, Nunes hasn’t earned anything. Go hoos wahoowa.tech37 wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 7:15 amOnly problem...the so-called moderator on here may have several aliasesnorcalhop wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 11:10 pmSome forums have IP bans. Would be a good tool to employ here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:44 amYour satire is likely lost on those who didn't get it.Sagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:31 amMinimization won't work here.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:26 amSagittarius A* wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:24 amI'm not trolling. I'm calling for an NCAA investigation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 10:14 am Just caught up with this thread. The trolling became quite ridiculous.
Syracuse is a lacrosse 'brand' but Hopkins isn't??
Taking nothing away from Syracuse, which has a storied history as well, but it ain't close.
The refs were on the take???
Idiocy.
This is intentional trolling. See it as such.
This part of the forum is intended for serious, civil discussions of lax topics.
Some humor is appreciated, but not trolling.
They are supposed to respond to posts on social media.
The integrity of the sport is at stake.
The trolling was off the hook dumb.
I suggest we move on. Those posters or perhaps single poster will likely use other aliases next time, as we'll recall them from this one.
Definitely not actual UVA fans, as Blue Angels noted.