Hunter Biden Tinfoil issues

[youthathletics]

Not possible....Barr said so.

Now, give us a conspiracy theory as to why the "whistleblowers" withheld this purported "documents" 'evidence' last year.

No clue, need to find out. Maybe it's time to pull out the HRC Card "What difference, at this point, does it make".

You're usually quick to suggest a conspiracy theory to explain all sorts of things that have far more likely causes, however this certainly begs the question, right? If not a conspiracy theory involving some nefarious intention, how about an innocent explanation? Did they just find these 'documents' in a drawer? Was their laptop in the shop and they just went through their old notes after it was returned? Come on...

It's your turn....you always have the answers, so what is it?

my "turn"? I suggested a couple of 'innocent' possibilities, I'm struggling to think of others. Can you?

Or a conspiracy theory if you prefer.

The simplest (conspiracy) answer that would fit nefarious intent is that these 'documents' are recently fabricated whole cloth or changed from originals. Or knowing they are "WB's" who want to 'get Hunter', someone else 'helpfully' sent them these 'documents' recently. Or that they are being positioned as damning, but really aren't when seen in context. Tell the lying accusation again and again and again and there will be those who assume the lie is true. Just make noise.

Biden’s are an asset to the CIA, Hunter keeps tripping over his dik Fuggin chit up and it’s getting harder and harder to control everything.

You like that one?

[MDlaxfan76]

Not possible....Barr said so.

Now, give us a conspiracy theory as to why the "whistleblowers" withheld this purported "documents" 'evidence' last year.

No clue, need to find out. Maybe it's time to pull out the HRC Card "What difference, at this point, does it make".

You're usually quick to suggest a conspiracy theory to explain all sorts of things that have far more likely causes, however this certainly begs the question, right? If not a conspiracy theory involving some nefarious intention, how about an innocent explanation? Did they just find these 'documents' in a drawer? Was their laptop in the shop and they just went through their old notes after it was returned? Come on...

It's your turn....you always have the answers, so what is it?

my "turn"? I suggested a couple of 'innocent' possibilities, I'm struggling to think of others. Can you?

Or a conspiracy theory if you prefer.

The simplest (conspiracy) answer that would fit nefarious intent is that these 'documents' are recently fabricated whole cloth or changed from originals. Or knowing they are "WB's" who want to 'get Hunter', someone else 'helpfully' sent them these 'documents' recently. Or that they are being positioned as damning, but really aren't when seen in context. Tell the lying accusation again and again and again and there will be those who assume the lie is true. Just make noise.

Biden’s are an asset to the CIA, Hunter keeps tripping over his dik Fuggin chit up and it’s getting harder and harder to control everything.

You like that one?

yeah, nonsensical one.
Doesn't even attempt to explain why the WB's didn't produce this "evidence" way, way long ago.
Because, who cares where they got it, when they got it, heck whether it has a shred of proof?...the noise is all that matters.

[a fan]

Not possible....Barr said so.

Now, give us a conspiracy theory as to why the "whistleblowers" withheld this purported "documents" 'evidence' last year.

No clue, need to find out. Maybe it's time to pull out the HRC Card "What difference, at this point, does it make".

You're usually quick to suggest a conspiracy theory to explain all sorts of things that have far more likely causes, however this certainly begs the question, right? If not a conspiracy theory involving some nefarious intention, how about an innocent explanation? Did they just find these 'documents' in a drawer? Was their laptop in the shop and they just went through their old notes after it was returned? Come on...

It's your turn....you always have the answers, so what is it?

my "turn"? I suggested a couple of 'innocent' possibilities, I'm struggling to think of others. Can you?

Or a conspiracy theory if you prefer.

The simplest (conspiracy) answer that would fit nefarious intent is that these 'documents' are recently fabricated whole cloth or changed from originals. Or knowing they are "WB's" who want to 'get Hunter', someone else 'helpfully' sent them these 'documents' recently. Or that they are being positioned as damning, but really aren't when seen in context. Tell the lying accusation again and again and again and there will be those who assume the lie is true. Just make noise.

Biden’s are an asset to the CIA, Hunter keeps tripping over his dik Fuggin chit up and it’s getting harder and harder to control everything.

You like that one?

yeah, nonsensical one.
Doesn't even attempt to explain why the WB's didn't produce this "evidence" way, way long ago.
Because, who cares where they got it, when they got it, heck whether it has a shred of proof?...the noise is all that matters.

We're about to close out year 6 of this "not politically motivated' boilerplate tax case.

This is now two full 9/11 Commissions worth of Investigations which took around 3 years to complete, folks.

How many more years of "investigating" is reasonable? Another 3? Another 10?

[youthathletics]

Not possible....Barr said so.

Now, give us a conspiracy theory as to why the "whistleblowers" withheld this purported "documents" 'evidence' last year.

No clue, need to find out. Maybe it's time to pull out the HRC Card "What difference, at this point, does it make".

You're usually quick to suggest a conspiracy theory to explain all sorts of things that have far more likely causes, however this certainly begs the question, right? If not a conspiracy theory involving some nefarious intention, how about an innocent explanation? Did they just find these 'documents' in a drawer? Was their laptop in the shop and they just went through their old notes after it was returned? Come on...

It's your turn....you always have the answers, so what is it?

my "turn"? I suggested a couple of 'innocent' possibilities, I'm struggling to think of others. Can you?

Or a conspiracy theory if you prefer.

The simplest (conspiracy) answer that would fit nefarious intent is that these 'documents' are recently fabricated whole cloth or changed from originals. Or knowing they are "WB's" who want to 'get Hunter', someone else 'helpfully' sent them these 'documents' recently. Or that they are being positioned as damning, but really aren't when seen in context. Tell the lying accusation again and again and again and there will be those who assume the lie is true. Just make noise.

Biden’s are an asset to the CIA, Hunter keeps tripping over his dik Fuggin chit up and it’s getting harder and harder to control everything.

You like that one?

yeah, nonsensical one.
Doesn't even attempt to explain why the WB's didn't produce this "evidence" way, way long ago.
Because, who cares where they got it, when they got it, heck whether it has a shred of proof?...the noise is all that matters.

We're about to close out year 6 of this "not politically motivated' boilerplate tax case.

This is now two full 9/11 Commissions worth of Investigations which took around 3 years to complete, folks.

How many more years of "investigating" is reasonable? Another 3? Another 10?

All b/c Barr did not do his diligence.....lots of lost time to make up.

[a fan]

Not possible....Barr said so.

Now, give us a conspiracy theory as to why the "whistleblowers" withheld this purported "documents" 'evidence' last year.

No clue, need to find out. Maybe it's time to pull out the HRC Card "What difference, at this point, does it make".

You're usually quick to suggest a conspiracy theory to explain all sorts of things that have far more likely causes, however this certainly begs the question, right? If not a conspiracy theory involving some nefarious intention, how about an innocent explanation? Did they just find these 'documents' in a drawer? Was their laptop in the shop and they just went through their old notes after it was returned? Come on...

It's your turn....you always have the answers, so what is it?

my "turn"? I suggested a couple of 'innocent' possibilities, I'm struggling to think of others. Can you?

Or a conspiracy theory if you prefer.

The simplest (conspiracy) answer that would fit nefarious intent is that these 'documents' are recently fabricated whole cloth or changed from originals. Or knowing they are "WB's" who want to 'get Hunter', someone else 'helpfully' sent them these 'documents' recently. Or that they are being positioned as damning, but really aren't when seen in context. Tell the lying accusation again and again and again and there will be those who assume the lie is true. Just make noise.

Biden’s are an asset to the CIA, Hunter keeps tripping over his dik Fuggin chit up and it’s getting harder and harder to control everything.

You like that one?

yeah, nonsensical one.
Doesn't even attempt to explain why the WB's didn't produce this "evidence" way, way long ago.
Because, who cares where they got it, when they got it, heck whether it has a shred of proof?...the noise is all that matters.

We're about to close out year 6 of this "not politically motivated' boilerplate tax case.

This is now two full 9/11 Commissions worth of Investigations which took around 3 years to complete, folks.

How many more years of "investigating" is reasonable? Another 3? Another 10?

All b/c Barr did not do his diligence.....lots of lost time to make up.

Yes, yes....lest we forget, he's "in on it", too., YA.

[cradleandshoot]

Not possible....Barr said so.

Now, give us a conspiracy theory as to why the "whistleblowers" withheld this purported "documents" 'evidence' last year.

No clue, need to find out. Maybe it's time to pull out the HRC Card "What difference, at this point, does it make".

You're usually quick to suggest a conspiracy theory to explain all sorts of things that have far more likely causes, however this certainly begs the question, right? If not a conspiracy theory involving some nefarious intention, how about an innocent explanation? Did they just find these 'documents' in a drawer? Was their laptop in the shop and they just went through their old notes after it was returned? Come on...

It's your turn....you always have the answers, so what is it?

my "turn"? I suggested a couple of 'innocent' possibilities, I'm struggling to think of others. Can you?

Or a conspiracy theory if you prefer.

The simplest (conspiracy) answer that would fit nefarious intent is that these 'documents' are recently fabricated whole cloth or changed from originals. Or knowing they are "WB's" who want to 'get Hunter', someone else 'helpfully' sent them these 'documents' recently. Or that they are being positioned as damning, but really aren't when seen in context. Tell the lying accusation again and again and again and there will be those who assume the lie is true. Just make noise.

Biden’s are an asset to the CIA, Hunter keeps tripping over his dik Fuggin chit up and it’s getting harder and harder to control everything.

You like that one?

yeah, nonsensical one.
Doesn't even attempt to explain why the WB's didn't produce this "evidence" way, way long ago.
Because, who cares where they got it, when they got it, heck whether it has a shred of proof?...the noise is all that matters.

We're about to close out year 6 of this "not politically motivated' boilerplate tax case.

This is now two full 9/11 Commissions worth of Investigations which took around 3 years to complete, folks.

How many more years of "investigating" is reasonable? Another 3? Another 10?

All b/c Barr did not do his diligence.....lots of lost time to make up.

Yes, yes....lest we forget, he's "in on it", too., YA.

And Garland put it on the fast tract.

[old salt]

Excerpts from a lengthy, detailed legal brief. I tried to extract the bottom line(s).
If you want to know the nitty gritty legal details, click on the link & invest a free read. :

https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/06/ ... term=first

Hunter Biden’s Only Defense Is the One the DOJ Prosecutor Gave Him

by ANDREW C. MCCARTHY, June 3, 2024

David Weiss’s strategic procrastination didn’t kill the gun case, set to begin on Monday, but it helps Hunter.

The evidence against the president’s son is extremely strong. Naturally, that’s why his lawyers tried so hard to get the prosecution diverted with an eye toward eventual dismissal, even though he should not have been eligible for diversion under Justice Department rules. That effort failed when the sweetheart plea bargain collapsed. Subsequently, Hunter was indicted and, unless there is a last-minute plea deal, the trial will begin.

The Statute of Limitations and Two-Tiered Justice

If ever there was a neon-blinking illustration of the two-tiered justice system imposed by progressive prosecutors in the Justice Department and big-city district attorneys’ offices under Democratic control, it is the statute of limitations.

In former president Trump’s Manhattan prosecution, elected Democratic district attorney Alvin Bragg waited until 2023 to indict business-records-falsification charges that should have been time-barred by 2019 under New York’s two-year statute of limitations for misdemeanors. Bragg, however, inflated the misdemeanors into felonies — 34 of them — by contending that Trump committed them to conceal his commission of another crime. In the end, it turned out that this “other crime” was . . . another misdemeanor that was also time-barred by 2019 — a conspiracy under New York election law.... ...if Bragg had tried to indict the business-records misdemeanor and the election-law misdemeanor as separate charges in the same indictment, the case would have been thrown out as a statute-of-limitations violation; but somehow, by smushing the two misdemeanors together into one charge (multiplied 34 times), the indictment Bragg talked a grand jury into approving was deemed viable.

Now, let’s compare this with Hunter Biden’s case. Biden Justice Department prosecutor and faux special counsel David Weiss dragged his feet before finally indicting the president’s son — only after the aforementioned sweetheart plea deal, by which Weiss tried to disappear all potential prosecutions of Hunter, imploded. Because Weiss did that, both Hunter and President Biden profited enormously.

First, in the tax investigation that focuses on Hunter’s monetizing of his father’s political influence, Weiss willfully allowed the statute of limitations to expire on tax years that would have been most humiliating for the elder Biden — those when he was vice president and Hunter was raking in millions from Burisma, the corrupt Ukrainian energy company with whose top execs Joe Biden met and spoke by telephone, and on whose behalf he appears to have pressured the Ukrainian government to fire a prosecutor. Weiss has also gone the extra mile to keep the president’s name out of the Hunter tax indictment, even though Joe Biden is a central player in the facts of the case. (The tax case is scheduled to be tried in September in Los Angeles federal court.)

Second, in the gun case set to begin on Monday, Weiss’s strategic procrastination, though it didn’t quite attain the objective of killing the case, gave Hunter his best — perhaps his only — defense.

Hunter’s defense attorneys may try to create ambiguity — and, hence, reasonable doubt — regarding the meaning of the statutory terms unlawful user and addicted to. But Weiss (if he’s going to play it straight and actually prosecute the case energetically) should have little difficulty proving the charges. ...images from Hunter’s infamous laptop, taken during the same 2018 time frame as the events in the indictment, depict him naked, cavorting with a prostitute, and brandishing a second handgun (it appears to be a Glock) during what appears to be a binge. Moreover, with respect to the revolver that is charged in the indictment, Hunter’s then-girlfriend Hallie Biden (who was also his widowed sister-in-law) evidently took the gun from him and tried to discard it, near a school, out of fear that he’d hurt himself or someone else in his drug-addled condition.

Weiss’s Politically Motivated Delay Yields a Defense for the President’s Son

So how did Weiss give Hunter a defense?

Since the evidence against Hunter is daunting, he should have been indicted within a few weeks of the October 2018 attempt to discard the gun. The incident was reported to state and federal law enforcement immediately. Yet, not only was no effort made by state or federal authorities to arrest Hunter, the Secret Service reportedly tried to erase the paper trail.

To be clear, this was not a “lie and try” case — one in which an ineligible person lies on the 4473 form, is discovered before the sale is consummated, and doesn’t get the gun. Hunter got the gun and, being Hunter, handled it recklessly — which, of course, is exactly why the law bans gun possession by drug addicts. Those cases get prosecuted.

Then as now, though, Weiss was the U.S. attorney for Delaware, where former–vice president Biden — then preparing a 2020 presidential run — had been a U.S. senator for decades and where Weiss (a Trump appointee) would not have been appointed absent the support of the two Biden-allied Democratic senators. You’ll no doubt be shocked to learn that, despite having proof that would have led to a swift prosecution against a non-connected offender, Weiss did not lift a finger to indict Hunter Biden for nearly five years.

...when Hunter purchased the revolver in October 2018, there was no reason to doubt the viability of §922(g)(3). Drug addiction had long been analogized to mental illness. The prohibition of gun possession by addicts and other “unlawful users” of drugs had thus been enacted as part of the Gun Control Act of 1968. By 2018, it had been a fixture in federal law for a half century. If he had been indicted in a timely fashion in late 2018 or early 2019, Hunter would have had little choice but to plead guilty. That is the course usually taken by first offenders with no real defense — it enables them to take advantage of the federal sentencing guidelines’ provisions that reduce penalties against defendants who plead guilty and accept responsibility for their crimes.

But Weiss dragged his feet. The only explanation is politics. The Justice Department’s unwritten rule discouraging public-enforcement actions when elections are imminent applies only to candidates, and only within 60 days of an election — it does not apply to a candidate’s son, let alone two years before an election. An indictment of Hunter would have been very unpopular among Delaware Democrats, however, so Weiss had to figure that filing one would cost him his coveted U.S.-attorney slot if Biden or another Democrat won in 2020. What a surprise, then: Weiss did nothing. And then Biden won, so Weiss continued doing nothing.

If Weiss had prosecuted Hunter more than four years ago, as he should have, Hunter would have no Second Amendment defense....

Finally, though Hunter would have no Second Amendment defense without Weiss’s dithering, what he has isn’t much. ...even if the government shouldn’t have been able to restrict Hunter’s gun possession, he had no Second Amendment right to lie on Form 4473 and to the licensed firearms dealer.

I really believed Hunter would plead guilty. But, just as Donald Trump has employed a strategy of delay hoping he can make the federal cases against him go away if he wins the election before they can be tried, Hunter has tried his own dilatory tactics. He and his counsel know that the politics of a pardon get easier after the 2024 election, even if the Biden White House keeps insisting there will be no pardon. But those tactics, like David Weiss’s delay tactics, have failed. Time is up.

[Kismet]

A shame Saltime does not apply this same logic/opinion to Orange Fatso and all of his cronies - Colin Cowherd gave a list of convicted felons associated with him as well.

Proves the point that you are just another partisan hack

[old salt]

If Trump wins, he can ask his AG to replace Jack Smith with Weiss, who will let all the s.o.l.'s run & delay the trials until his term has ended.

[Typical Lax Dad]

If Trump wins, he can ask his AG to replace Jack Smith with Weiss, who will let all the s.o.l.'s run & delay the trials until his term has ended.

Let's hope so!

[ggait]

If Garland and Weiss are in the tank for Hunter Biden, they are the world's worst "weaponizers" and conspirators.

Hard to see how Hunter would feel like he is getting special/favorable treatment.

Special but unfavorable seems pretty much how this thing has been going.

[old salt]

Weiss (through his minion Wolf) delayed the tax case until the SOL ran on the year Hunter received the Burisma money. Politically, the most difficult revenue to defend.

Weiss offered a diversion on the gun charge & misdemeanor plea deal for the remaining tax years.
Hunter wanted immunity from any possible future charges that might arise from the money he earned in those years (e.g. FARA, money laundering). The deal was so ambiguous that both sides thought they could slip it through. When the Judge asked who would enforce the immunity agreement, the deal fell apart. The Judge also pointed out that the Probation Office had not signed off on the diversion deal. She urged both sides to modify the deal, but they could not agree on the scope of future immunity. Hunter must have something to hide since the SOL on any other charges will likely run before a possible future Trump DoJ can investigate.

No pity for Hunter. He did everything he's been charged with & he was offered a generous deal to resolve it. That all happened before Weiss was elevated to SC, so Garland had to ok whatever Weiss offered before he was elevated to SC status.

DE pity party for Hunter => jury nullification.

[MDlaxfan76]

But pity poor Donald.

[ggait]

DE pity party for Hunter => jury nullification.

I have no particular interest in what happens to HB. He was/is a messed up guy with a lot of misdeeds and sleazy deeds in his past that he has to deal with. And he seems to have plenty of resources to defend himself.

My only point/interest is what a preposterous crock of shirt the MAGA narrative and hypocrisy on this is. Which maintains that somehow Sleepy Joe, Garland and Weiss all corruptly conspired to give HB a ridiculous sweetheart deal.

Even though HB has been under investigation for many many years by a Republican appointed and assigned by a Republican; which Republican was elevated to SC counsel by Garland; where HB is currently standing trial in federal court, and still has other issues remaining unresolved.

So basically the worst conspiracy and sweetheart deal in the history of the world.

[a fan]

DE pity party for Hunter => jury nullification.

I have no particular interest in what happens to HB. He was/is a messed up guy with a lot of misdeeds and sleazy deeds in his past that he has to deal with. And he seems to have plenty of resources to defend himself.

My only point/interest is what a preposterous crock of shirt the MAGA narrative and hypocrisy on this is. Which maintains that somehow Sleepy Joe, Garland and Weiss all corruptly conspired to give HB a ridiculous sweetheart deal.

Even though HB has been under investigation for many many years by a Republican appointed and assigned by a Republican; which Republican was elevated to SC counsel by Garland; where HB is currently standing trial in federal court, and still has other issues remaining unresolved.

So basically the worst conspiracy and sweetheart deal in the history of the world.

And completely skips over the fact that the Trump-led FBI started the investigation in 2018, and could have EASILY put this to bed before the 2020 election....or if you're talking to TeamTinFoilHat and their idiotic conspiracies....indict Hunter in November of 2020, after the election.

Recall that the entire reason TeamTinFoil wanted this case dragged out, was to give Giuliani, Trump, and Barr time to dig up dirt that showed Joe was involved. It didn't work, and now here we are in 2024, still talking about a pointless tax case of a non-politician.

Keeps Republican voters attention away from the fact that the R's are doing nothing whatsoever in DC. Which is the goal, obviously.

[youthathletics]

DE pity party for Hunter => jury nullification.

I have no particular interest in what happens to HB. He was/is a messed up guy with a lot of misdeeds and sleazy deeds in his past that he has to deal with. And he seems to have plenty of resources to defend himself.

My only point/interest is what a preposterous crock of shirt the MAGA narrative and hypocrisy on this is. Which maintains that somehow Sleepy Joe, Garland and Weiss all corruptly conspired to give HB a ridiculous sweetheart deal.

Even though HB has been under investigation for many many years by a Republican appointed and assigned by a Republican; which Republican was elevated to SC counsel by Garland; where HB is currently standing trial in federal court, and still has other issues remaining unresolved.

So basically the worst conspiracy and sweetheart deal in the history of the world.

And completely skips over the fact that the Trump-led FBI started the investigation in 2018, and could have EASILY put this to bed before the 2020 election....or if you're talking to TeamTinFoilHat and their idiotic conspiracies....indict Hunter in November of 2020, after the election.

Recall that the entire reason TeamTinFoil wanted this case dragged out, was to give Giuliani, Trump, and Barr time to dig up dirt that showed Joe was involved. It didn't work, and now here we are in 2024, still talking about a pointless tax case of a non-politician.

Keeps Republican voters attention away from the fact that the R's are doing nothing whatsoever in DC. Which is the goal, obviously.

I like your subtle qualifier that the FBI was Trumps, that's slicker than two eels in a bucket.

I suppose that means you DO believe in a deep state if you think the FBI is partisan.

[a fan]

DE pity party for Hunter => jury nullification.

I have no particular interest in what happens to HB. He was/is a messed up guy with a lot of misdeeds and sleazy deeds in his past that he has to deal with. And he seems to have plenty of resources to defend himself.

My only point/interest is what a preposterous crock of shirt the MAGA narrative and hypocrisy on this is. Which maintains that somehow Sleepy Joe, Garland and Weiss all corruptly conspired to give HB a ridiculous sweetheart deal.

Even though HB has been under investigation for many many years by a Republican appointed and assigned by a Republican; which Republican was elevated to SC counsel by Garland; where HB is currently standing trial in federal court, and still has other issues remaining unresolved.

So basically the worst conspiracy and sweetheart deal in the history of the world.

And completely skips over the fact that the Trump-led FBI started the investigation in 2018, and could have EASILY put this to bed before the 2020 election....or if you're talking to TeamTinFoilHat and their idiotic conspiracies....indict Hunter in November of 2020, after the election.

Recall that the entire reason TeamTinFoil wanted this case dragged out, was to give Giuliani, Trump, and Barr time to dig up dirt that showed Joe was involved. It didn't work, and now here we are in 2024, still talking about a pointless tax case of a non-politician.

Keeps Republican voters attention away from the fact that the R's are doing nothing whatsoever in DC. Which is the goal, obviously.

I like your subtle qualifier that the FBI was Trumps, that's slicker than two eels in a bucket.

It ain't subtle. It's direct. The sales pitch from TeamTinFoil is that it's a Dem plot to keep America from finding out that Hunter and Joe were getting bribes from Ukraine.

You know this, of course. And I've ripped apart this stupidity any number of times....every appointee involved was a Trump appointee-------FBI, DoJ, and IRS. All Trump. So if there's a cover up.....it's a Trump cover up.

This entire Hunter thing is just about the dumbest thing TrumpNation has come up with....and that's sayin' something.

[old salt]

This case could not be put to bed until the laptop popped up & it was verified as authentic.
Look at the efforts to discredit it.
See what a big part it is playing in both the gun & tax cases.

[youthathletics]

nonsense OS, it's Trumps fault. He even hired the IT guy at the laptop store.

[old salt]

...& Hunter could have pleaded these cases out before the laptop surfaced. No IRS whistleblowers.