Sensible Gun Safety

[cradleandshoot]

18 year old in DC empties almost 30 rounds towards an automobile. DC judge releases him on OR. Fortunately sane minds in the DC judicial world are appealing the brain damaged decision of this sorry ass excuse for a judge.

[youthathletics]

18 year old in DC empties almost 30 rounds towards an automobile. DC judge releases him on OR. Fortunately sane minds in the DC judicial world are appealing the brain damaged decision of this sorry ass excuse for a judge.

https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crim ... c269225d51

[Typical Lax Dad]

The judge let him out because he’s black.

[NattyBohChamps04]

The judge let him out because he’s black.

The judge was apointed by a Bush Sr. Judge. Famously liberal president.

Let's not worry about anything prior to him shooting the gun or why he did it. Just how we punish him. Which obviously he should be punished for.

But more importantly, let's only focus on punishment. It will prevent the next kid from doing something similar.

[cradleandshoot]

The judge let him out because he’s black.

Sure he did. Maybe he was poppin caps at a bunch of crackers? The more rational explanation is that this judge is a freaking moron.

[cradleandshoot]

The judge let him out because he’s black.

The judge was apointed by a Bush Sr. Judge. Famously liberal president.

Let's not worry about anything prior to him shooting the gun or why he did it. Just how we punish him. Which obviously he should be punished for.

But more importantly, let's only focus on punishment. It will prevent the next kid from doing something similar.

Are you freaking out of your mind?? This case is about an individual who shot recklessly at innocent people. The first thing you spout out is it was a Bush Sr judge. So what the eff is your point here? Rhetorical question, your point is as crystal clear as it is nauseating.

[NattyBohChamps04]

The judge let him out because he’s black.

The judge was apointed by a Bush Sr. Judge. Famously liberal president.

Let's not worry about anything prior to him shooting the gun or why he did it. Just how we punish him. Which obviously he should be punished for.

But more importantly, let's only focus on punishment. It will prevent the next kid from doing something similar.

Are you freaking out of your mind?? This case is about an individual who shot recklessly at innocent people. The first thing you spout out is it was a Bush Sr judge. So what the eff is your point here? Rhetorical question, your point is as crystal clear as it is nauseating.

My point is that you think this ruling is a FLP thing.

[Typical Lax Dad]

The judge let him out because he’s black.

The judge was apointed by a Bush Sr. Judge. Famously liberal president.

Let's not worry about anything prior to him shooting the gun or why he did it. Just how we punish him. Which obviously he should be punished for.

But more importantly, let's only focus on punishment. It will prevent the next kid from doing something similar.

Are you freaking out of your mind?? This case is about an individual who shot recklessly at innocent people. The first thing you spout out is it was a Bush Sr judge. So what the eff is your point here? Rhetorical question, your point is as crystal clear as it is nauseating.

My point is that you think this ruling is a FLP thing.

[cradleandshoot]

The judge let him out because he’s black.

The judge was apointed by a Bush Sr. Judge. Famously liberal president.

Let's not worry about anything prior to him shooting the gun or why he did it. Just how we punish him. Which obviously he should be punished for.

But more importantly, let's only focus on punishment. It will prevent the next kid from doing something similar.

Are you freaking out of your mind?? This case is about an individual who shot recklessly at innocent people. The first thing you spout out is it was a Bush Sr judge. So what the eff is your point here? Rhetorical question, your point is as crystal clear as it is nauseating.

My point is that you think this ruling is a FLP thing.

My only comment was it was an idiot decision by the judge. I never brought up political ideology. Do you agree or disagree with the judges decision?

[youthathletics]

The judge let him out because he’s black.

The judge was apointed by a Bush Sr. Judge. Famously liberal president.

Let's not worry about anything prior to him shooting the gun or why he did it. Just how we punish him. Which obviously he should be punished for.

But more importantly, let's only focus on punishment. It will prevent the next kid from doing something similar.

Are you freaking out of your mind?? This case is about an individual who shot recklessly at innocent people. The first thing you spout out is it was a Bush Sr judge. So what the eff is your point here? Rhetorical question, your point is as crystal clear as it is nauseating.

My point is that you think this ruling is a FLP thing.

Where did cradle mention anything about politics, race or FLP?

[NattyBohChamps04]

The judge was apointed by a Bush Sr. Judge. Famously liberal president.

Let's not worry about anything prior to him shooting the gun or why he did it. Just how we punish him. Which obviously he should be punished for.

But more importantly, let's only focus on punishment. It will prevent the next kid from doing something similar.

Are you freaking out of your mind?? This case is about an individual who shot recklessly at innocent people. The first thing you spout out is it was a Bush Sr judge. So what the eff is your point here? Rhetorical question, your point is as crystal clear as it is nauseating.

My point is that you think this ruling is a FLP thing.

Where did cradle mention anything about politics, race or FLP?

We're in the POLITICS forum. The running commentary in the thread is that judges who don't keep people locked up pre-trial is somehow a liberal thing. He's said it before.

I'm just cutting to the chase.

But let's not worry about why this kid is shooting up the neighborhood. That's clearly not important.

[cradleandshoot]

The judge was apointed by a Bush Sr. Judge. Famously liberal president.

Let's not worry about anything prior to him shooting the gun or why he did it. Just how we punish him. Which obviously he should be punished for.

But more importantly, let's only focus on punishment. It will prevent the next kid from doing something similar.

Are you freaking out of your mind?? This case is about an individual who shot recklessly at innocent people. The first thing you spout out is it was a Bush Sr judge. So what the eff is your point here? Rhetorical question, your point is as crystal clear as it is nauseating.

My point is that you think this ruling is a FLP thing.

Where did cradle mention anything about politics, race or FLP?

We're in the POLITICS forum. The running commentary in the thread is that judges who don't keep people locked up pre-trial is somehow a liberal thing. He's said it before.

I'm just cutting to the chase.

But let's not worry about why this kid is shooting up the neighborhood. That's clearly not important.

What is relevant is that you chose to employ an incorrect preconceived notion. When you realized you were wrong you chose to try and wiggle your way out of your miscue. It never will kill you to admit when your wrong. What the young man did was so careless, reckless and showing a disturbing disregard for human life that he should be in a jail cell. He probably needs a thorough mental evaluation. He sure as hell should not have been released OR. What you have not answered and keep dancing around is do you agree with the judges decision?

[NattyBohChamps04]

What is relevant is that you chose to employ an incorrect preconceived notion. When you realized you were wrong you chose to try and wiggle your way out of your miscue. It never will kill you to admit when your wrong. What the young man did was so careless, reckless and showing a disturbing disregard for human life that he should be in a jail cell. He probably needs a thorough mental evaluation. He sure as hell should not have been released OR. What you have not answered and keep dancing around is do you agree with the judges decision?

I don't know the details of the case, but I'm fine with holding attempted murderers in lockup pre-trial.

It's funny seeing you of all people talking about people not admitting when they're wrong.

[Typical Lax Dad]

https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crim ... 231e388112

[youthathletics]

The video on social media is just horrific: https://www.msn.com/en-us/music/news/va ... r-BB1mA1IJ

[youthathletics]

Legal question: Does anyone think that the Hunter Biden gun conviction trial and verdict, is really a national advertisement of what we can do to all the 2A gun owners? Not entirely intentionally, but a secondary repercussions?

[Seacoaster(1)]

Legal question: Does anyone think that the Hunter Biden gun conviction trial and verdict, is really a national advertisement of what we can do to all the 2A gun owners? Not entirely intentionally, but a secondary repercussions?

No. The word I am focusing on in your inquiry is "really;" is it "really a national advertisement on...." No, I think it was a prosecution of a prominent guy who made enormously bad decisions on account of his addiction, who did the crime, and will have to now live with the consequences of having committed the crime.

Stephen Miller is saying that the Hunter Biden prosecution is just a set-up by the White House to make DOJ look good and the Trump conviction in NYS look legitimate. Sacrificed Hunter for the "regime."

Are you saying Hunter is the fall guy to set up the people who want to punish gun owners, and find a way to remove guns from their hands?

[youthathletics]

Legal question: Does anyone think that the Hunter Biden gun conviction trial and verdict, is really a national advertisement of what we can do to all the 2A gun owners? Not entirely intentionally, but a secondary repercussions?

No. The word I am focusing on in your inquiry is "really;" is it "really a national advertisement on...." No, I think it was a prosecution of a prominent guy who made enormously bad decisions on account of his addiction, who did the crime, and will have to now live with the consequences of having committed the crime.

Stephen Miller is saying that the Hunter Biden prosecution is just a set-up by the White House to make DOJ look good and the Trump conviction in NYS look legitimate. Sacrificed Hunter for the "regime."

Are you saying Hunter is the fall guy to set up the people who want to punish gun owners, and find a way to remove guns from their hands?

In short, yes. But that was not the intention....remember, never let a good crisis go to waste.

[Seacoaster(1)]

Legal question: Does anyone think that the Hunter Biden gun conviction trial and verdict, is really a national advertisement of what we can do to all the 2A gun owners? Not entirely intentionally, but a secondary repercussions?

No. The word I am focusing on in your inquiry is "really;" is it "really a national advertisement on...." No, I think it was a prosecution of a prominent guy who made enormously bad decisions on account of his addiction, who did the crime, and will have to now live with the consequences of having committed the crime.

Stephen Miller is saying that the Hunter Biden prosecution is just a set-up by the White House to make DOJ look good and the Trump conviction in NYS look legitimate. Sacrificed Hunter for the "regime."

Are you saying Hunter is the fall guy to set up the people who want to punish gun owners, and find a way to remove guns from their hands?

In short, yes. But that was not the intention....remember, never let a good crisis go to waste.

Respectfully, and even in the spirit of amity, you are f@cking crazy.

[runrussellrun]

Legal question: Does anyone think that the Hunter Biden gun conviction trial and verdict, is really a national advertisement of what we can do to all the 2A gun owners? Not entirely intentionally, but a secondary repercussions?

Origin of knowledge.

at our most recent Qunon meeting, drugs (legal) and gun ownership was an issue.

Regarding Hunter Biden......how did our legal system arrive at developing his case, in the first place. Suck honestly doesn't know how he proceedings, and charges, originated.

For example. I own firerams. For all and any, legal purposes.

How, would anyone in law enforcement know that suck also uses mary jane ? Or, for that matter, crack cocaine? (we don't)

Maybe, perhaps, if we write a book and sell some "spit" art.....telling everyone all.........some law enforcement wheels can get moving ?

HUH .........

What "militia" did Hunter belong too ?

Also, would really, really, like to know, what kind of "discharge" Lt. JG, US Navy, Hunter Biden got when seperated from the military for failing a drug test (crack cocaine)