Fact Check: False.laxdad1434 wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 1:54 pmYork is sitting home with the same record as Middlebury, and played a much more difficult schedule. All of York's losses,excluding Salisbury, were close, 1-3 goals. They beat 2 good OOC teams, W&L and Denison. Middlebury has "0" wins against good OOC opponents.callaxdad wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 12:59 pmyes, was pointing out how you contradicted yourself....toying with you, per usual...apparently that went over your head......choochooCharlie wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 12:13 pmYou’re right. 8 losses is just too much to make it in. Now, where have I heard that before?callaxdad wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 12:03 pm Not a freaking chance ccR! Amherst @ 10-6? Need I remind you they lost (TWICE!!) H2H v Midd. Gettysburg? Really, a team with 8 losses?!?!! They lost H2H v Amherst who, might I remind you, lost to Midd twice.....swing and a miss!!
One more year of an early exit? Its happened how many times recently? Really, one OT loss in the NESCAC quarterfinals, thats what you're going to hang your hat on. Your reports of the death of the Tufts lacrosse program are greatly exaggerated!!
Me thinks you have TDS..... Tufts Derangement Syndrome!! Roll Bos!!
I don't think either team should be in, but why Middlebury over York?
Middlebury had the 3rd strongest schedule in the country; York had the 16th.
Further: Zero good wins OOC? Beating St. Lawrence isn't a good win? Ok. Even more: wins over good teams, even in conference, count just as much. So beating Wesleyan, Bowdoin and Amherst (x2) are lesser because they are in conference? That's not how selection criteria works.
Finally: Margin of victory or loss is not a selection criteria. You can lose a game by 20 or by 1. It has no impact on the string selection criteria.