Wheels wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:19 pm
jrn19 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2024 6:07 pm
He feels more like Shack to me; but agreed a Stanwick is the comparison
My post even bringing them up was in response to someone saying that the guys coming in next year will push for starting attack roles.
With everyone lamenting the lack of dodging, the comments about Ford and Gardiner don't seem to support them displacing upperclassmen.
Well, the attack right now is Erksa, Malever, and Maltz/Kelly. One of those spots could be up for grabs as Maltz will be graduating and I’m p certain Kelly is out of eligibility as well (he played in four games in 2021; this stuff is weird now, but that usually is a year used up.) That could open a spot on the wing for a guy like Gardiner. Maybe they choose to portal it. But you’ll need a shooter in that spot.
Erksa and Malever are both not producing anywhere near what’s needed for this team to compete for championships. Erksa’s turnovers are crippling and Malever unfortunately just does not have any burst after the injury. I think, as others have touched on, consideration should be made to bumping Erksa down to midfield and running him out of the box. You’re losing Siracusa and Koras from the midfield, so you will need production there. Attack right now is not working for him. That could absolutely open up a spot for Ford, who has what Erksa lacks in passing, vision, lacrosse IQ, etc. Erksa might be a better dodger, but it doesn’t manifest itself against good teams, so right now it’s not a massive add to the team.
Malever is the wild card. The way he looks now, it looks Joey Epstein-ish. But it’s been 12 games. He could come back looking much better next year and he’s an easy starter. I imagine he stays in one of the spots to start because if he does find the burst and confidence again, he adds so much.
So you’re not necessarily asking them to displace upperclassmen as you are filling a hole you’ll have at attack and then reallocating personnel by position.